skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 185092  
Title: "Condemn a Little More, Understand a Little Less": The Political Context and Rights Implications of the Domestic and European Rulings in the Venables-Thompson Case
Journal: Journal of Law and Society  Volume:27  Issue:3  Dated:September 2000  Pages:416 to 448
Author(s): Deena Haydon ; Phil Scraton
Publication Date: 09/2000
Pages: 33
Type: Issue overviews
Origin: United Kingdom
Language: English
Annotation: This article examines the political context and rights implications of the United Kingdom and European rulings in the Venables-Thompson case.
Abstract: In 1993, Jon Venables and Robert Thompson both of them children were found guilty of the abduction and murder of 2-year-old James Bulger. Aged 10 at the time of the offense, they were tried in an adult court before a judge and jury amidst a blaze of publicity. They were named by the trial judge and sentenced to detention at Her Majesty's Pleasure. The Home Secretary set a minimum tariff of 15 years imprisonment. In December 1999 the European Court of Human Rights held that, in the context of the trial and the fixing of the tariff, the United Kingdom government had violated the European Convention on Human Rights. This article discusses how the case became a watershed in youth justice procedure and practice influencing Labor proposals for reform and the 1998 Crime and Disorder Act. Examining the progression of appeals through the domestic and European courts, it explores the dichotomous philosophies separating the United Kingdom and European approaches to the age of criminal responsibility, the prosecution and punishment of children and the influence of political policy on judicial decisions. It also analyzes the backlash against "threatening children," the affirmation of adult power and knowledge and the implications of the European judgments in the context of a rights-based agenda. Notes
Main Term(s): Juveniles
Index Term(s): Juvenile corrections ; Young juvenile offenders ; Courts/ ; Juvenile murderers ; Foreign juvenile justice systems ; Juvenile offenders ; Foreign sentencing ; European Convention on Human Rights ; European Court of Human Rights ; United Kingdom
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=185092

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder