Recent evidence for oncogenesis by insertion mutagenesis and gene activation FAROLD E. VARMUS Francisco, California 94 143 Depaflment of Microbiology and Immunology, University of California, San I Introduction 309 11 Identifying potential cellular genetic contributions to oncogenic mechanisms 31 0 1 Cellular homologues of viral oncogenes 31 0 2 Cellular genes that transform cultured cells 31 2 In Oncogenesis by viruses lacking onc genes 313 Keywords: Retroviruses, Proviruses, Viral oncogenesis, Oncogenes, Inser- tion mutagenesis, Transformation, Avian leukosis, Enhancement of transcription - [Summary ative cellular oncogenes have recently been identified by their homology h known viral oncogenes and by their capacity to transform the behaviour cultured cells. Retroviruses lacking oncogenes may induce tumobrs by or activating such cellular oncogenes. Analysis of such tumours novel mechanisms for modulating expression of eukaryotic genes, es new candidate oncogenes, and suggests possible mechanisms for nesis by non-viral agents. Introduction r many years, tumour virologists paid lip service to the possibility that the soma1 sites at which viral DNA integrates might have a determining ce upon the neoplastic process. Until recently, this notion has had few nts, for several good reasons. (i) Insertion of viral genomes into host eemed most likely to affect host genes by disrupting them; it is difficult envisage a cancer arising from the inactivation of one gene in a diploid . (ii) Although more promising consequences of viral insertions were e (e.g., gene activation, creation of a hybrid gene, or inactivation of a a locus for which the host was heterozygous), such speculations were pported by experimental observations. (iii) The integrated (proviral) ms of DNA and RNA tumour viruses appeared to be inserted randomly in Cancer Surveys Vol. 1 No. 2 I982 310 Harold E. Varrnus the host genome, reducing the likelihood of introducing viral DNA at the presumably rare positions conducive to oncogenesis. (iv) Mounting evidence' for transforming genes (oncogenes) carried by many DNA and RNA tumour viruses seemed to obviate the need for more complicated and unsubstantiated mechanisms of viral oncogenesis. Events of the past couple of years have refocused attention upon her- tional mechanisms for viral oncogenesis and have provided some specific experimental reagents with which to pursue the idea that many types of cancer of unknown cause-not only certain virus-induced cancers-might have their roots in the disordered expression of host genes. My aim in this brief review is to provide the nonspecialist with an understanding of the experimental findings that have contributed to the current viewpoint. Two overlapping areas of study are central to the ensuing discussion: (i) efforts to define cellular genes whose altered expression might contribute to tumour formation and (ii) efforts to decipher the mechanisms by which tumours are caused by RNA tumour viruses (retroviruses) lacking their own oncogenes. II Identifying potential cellular genetic contributions to oncogenic mechanisms At least two classes of host genes can now be considered candidates for some role in oncogenesis-a group of genes identified by their homology with retroviral oncogenes and another group identified by their capacity to induce transformation of a cultured mouse fibroblast cell line. 1 The first of these groups came into view during a search for the origins of the genetically defined transforming gene (src) of Rous sarcoma virus (RSV). Molecular hybridization reagents specific for src annealed to normal cellular DNA from the natural host for RSV (chickens) and to DNA from all other vertebrates, suggesting that the homologous cellular sequences had been rela- tively well conserved throughout evolution (Stehelin et al., 1976; Spector et aI., 1978a). Tests for RNA and protein products of the src-related sequences demonstrated that they constituted a competent coding domain normally expressed at a low level (Spector et al., 1978b; Collet et al., 1978; Opper- mann et al., 1979). Additional tests for genetic linkages and polymorphisms, and for the structure of the domain, indicated that the src-related domain was a structurally conventional cellular gene (now called c-src), with multiple introns, little or no variation among members of a species, and no apparent linkage or resemblance to the endogenous proviruses that inhabit the germ lines of many animals (Hughes et a1 ., 1979a, b; Parker et al., 1981; Shalloway et al., 1981). Subsequent studies of a large number of other RNA tumour viruses cap- able of transforming cultured cells and inducing tumours rapidly in animals have unearthed over fifteen distinct viral oncogenes, each of which is closely Cellular homologues of viral oncogenes Oncogenesis by insertion mutagenesis and gene activation 31 1 [elated to (and presumably derived from) a cellular gene (Bishop, 1981; /Bishop and Varmus, 1982). For convenient communication, these genes have n generically labelled `v-onc's', the viral oncogenes, and `c-onc's', their ular counterparts (Coffin et al., 1981). Each member of these classes has n assigned a trivial name (e.g., src, myc, mos; see Table 1) according to cently published rules. We may be approaching the limit of the number of c's that will ultimately be identified, since two related sets of oncogenes andfps, bm and rus) have been isolated in viruses arising in different host ecies (Shibuya et al., 1980; Andersen et al., 1981); moreover, some enes have appeared repeatedly in independent virus isolates within the pecies (Table 1). Nevertheless, there may be additional cellular genes lar potential that, for one reason or another, are not susceptible to sduction by retroviruses. Other means will be required to identify those account of the functions and products of the several c-om's is beyond view of this short essay (see Bishop and Varmus, 1982). For our ses, it is sufficient only to outline the evidence supporting the simple nce that at least some cellular homologues of v-onc's do themselves ncogenic potential. Such potential could be achieved in two ways: by ations that alter the nature of the gene products or by modulations of expression that raise the level above a threshold required for neoplastic cts. For at least two c-onc's (c-mos and c-rus), the latter possibility has found sufficient by using a strong promoter of transcription to enhance ssion of the cellular genes (Oskarsson et al., 1980; Blair et al., 1981; able 1. Cellular sequences identified as probable oncogenic sequences in the genomes of nc Number of quence virus isolates Example Animal origin Rous sarcoma virus (Prague strain) Chicken Fujinimi sarcoma virus Chicken Y73 sarcoma virus Chicken UR-2 virus Chicken Avian myelocytomatosis virus-29 Chicken Avian erythroblastosis virus Chicken (v-onc's) have been found in the genomes mologous to host sequences (c-om's) with been assigned to the onc sequences (Coffin virus isolates containing each onc sequence, m which the onc sequences have apparently 312 Harold E. Varmus DeFeo et al., 1981). These experiments required the molecular cloning and subsequent joining in vitro of two components: a cellular oncogene and a region of retroviral DNA, the long terminal repeat unit (LTR), Which encodes a strong promoter. When reintroduced into cultured cells, the `acti- vated' c-onc's are capable of transforming them to a neoplastic phenotype. Earlier experiments indicated that c-src could contribute at least partially to the production of an onhgenic protein, since competent transforming viruses could be isolated from tumours induced in chickens with deletion mutants of RSV lacking part of v-src (Hanafusa et ai., 1977). Biochemical studies of the recovered viruses suggested they were generated by recombination between c-src and the defective v-src (Wang et al., 1979; Vigne ef al., 1980; for a dissenting view, see Lee et al., 1981). It should be emphasized, however, that for most c-om's there is as yet no direct evidence for their oncogenic potential; in these cases, the structural differences between v-om's and c-om's may prove to be critical determinants of function. Even in the provocative situations considered below, in which c-onc's are activated in tumours induced by retroviruses that lack V-om's, it is premature to conclude that the enhanced expression of a c-onc is directly responsible for tumour growth. 2 Cellular genes that transform cultured cells The second class of putative cellular tumour genes has been defined by using mouse NIH/3T3 fibroblasts to assay the transforming potential of naked DNA from a variety of sources, including chemically induced tumours, tumours induced by viruses lacking om genes, spontaneous tumours, and normal tissues (Shih et al., 1979, 1981; Cooper et al., 1980; Cooper and Neiman, 1980; Lane et al., 1981). Although the efficiency of transformation is quite low, DNA from the transformed cells can be used, in turn, to trans- form fresh cells; the transforming elements can be classified with respect to their susceptibility to restriction endonucleases or their linkage to highly repeated cellular sequences (Shihet al., 1981; Murray et al., 1981; Perucho et al., 1981); and, in a few cases, the transforming components have been molecularly cloned in prokaryotic host-vector systems (Goldfarp et a1 ., 1982, G. Cooper, R. Weinberg, personal communications). Although little is pres- ently known about the structures, products, and normal functions of these putative oncogenes, they are likely to be genetically altered in the tumour cells from which they are derived, since DNA similarly prepared from normal cells is inactive in the transformation assay. As in the case of c-om's and v-om's, it is for the dost part uncertain whether the important differences reside in structural or in regulatory domains. The observation that the shear- ing of DNA from normal cells may confer transforming potential upon it suggests that regulatory changes may be more important, since the shearing might remove the restraining influence of cis-dominant controlling elements and allow potential transforming genes to be inserted within highly active transcriptional units (Cooper et al., 1980). However, the experiments with normal cell DNA may be misleading: it is not known whether the transform- OncoRenesis by insertion mutagenesis and gene activation 3 13 g activity of DNA from tumour cells is derived from the same set of genetic ci as the activity in sheared DNA from normal cells. It is possible that transforming genes defined by the NIH/3T3 cell assay are -overlapping with c-om's; however, there is reason (described below) for osing that c-om's and transforming genes may play different roles in at certain types of neoplasia. The number of potential transforming genes still elusive, but it is striking that DNA from certain classes of tumour cells mary tumours [Lane et al., 19811, neural tumours and carcinomas . , 19811, chemically transformed cell lines [Shilo and Weinberg or T cell leukaemias [Lane et al., 19821 and human lung and r carcinomas [Perucho et al., 1981; R. Weinberg, personal communi- ]) exhibit class-specific patterns using restriction endonucleases. ver, the transforming element from two human colon and two human arcinomas appears to be the same (Perucho et al., 1981; Murray el al., Such observations suggest that a common gene is affected in each type and that the number of potential transforming genes may be less number of distinguishable types of cancers. Oncogenesis by viruses lacking om genes the late 1970s, amidst the proliferation of viral oncogenes and their pro- s, increasing attention was also given to the previously elusive question of some retroviruses can cause tumours despite the apparent absence of forming genes from the viral genomes. There were several reasons for rekindled interest. First, the long latency between infection and the arance of tumours suggested that viruses lacking v-onc's might be more vealing than v-one' viruses about the pathogenesis of human tumours eichetal., 1982). Second, the application of restriction mapping to proviruses tumours induced by v-om- viruses indicated that these tumours were clonal r at least dominated by clones), so that the sites of proviral insertion could onveniently studied (Steffen and Weinberg, 1978; Cohen et al., 1979). the newly perceived structure of proviral DNA-with identical ory domains (long terminal repeats or LTRs) present at both ends oked hypotheses in which proviruses exerted regulatory influences anking host DNA (Coffin, 1979; Quintrell et al., 1980; Robinson et al., most tumours induced by viruses lacking oncogenes, pathogenetic are still far from understood. However, in one case, the induction mphomas in the bursa of Fabricius by avian leukosis viruses re is strong evidence for insertion mutagenesis and gene activa- ogenic process. The experimental findings that dominate the ows: (i) all tumours are clonal and carry at least a portion of an provirus (Neiman et al., 1980; Payne et al,, 1981; Neel et al., 1981; g et al., 1981); (ii) in several instances the provirus is structurally defec- and no viral genes are expressed, implying that viral gene products are necessary to maintain the tumour state (Payne et al., 1981); (iii) virtually umours bear proviruses within the same cellular genetic domain (Neel et 314 Harold E. Varmus al., 1981; Payne et al., 198l), a region first identified by Hayward and his colleagues (1981) as the c-onc called c-myc; (iv) all the tumours bearing insertions in the c-myc region exhibit levels of expression of c-myc RNA 10- to 100-fold above levels in normal B cells (Hayward et al., 1981; Payne et a[., 1982); and (v) DNA from the tumours contains activated transforming genes, as determined by assay in NIH/3T3 cells, with the transforming DNA free of ALV or c-myc sequences (Cooper and Neiman, 1980, 1981). How should these findings be viewed in relation to the pathogenesis of the disease? It is likely that ALV spreads efficiently through the bursal cell poPu. lation in a newly infected susceptible animal, inserting proviral DNA more or less at random in the genomes of large numbers of cells. In the rare cell (about 1 in lo6) that acquires a provirus in the c-myc domain, the neoplastic process can presumably be initiated by overproduction of c-myc RNA and protein. (The c-myc protein has not been identified, and there is no proof that it is inherently oncogenic; furthermore, the v-myc domain is usually expressed in virally transformed cells as a hybrid protein also containing peptides encoded by viral structural genes [Bister et al., 19771.) It is probable that additional mutations or rearrangements of cellular genes occur subsequent to activation of c-myc, including one change that activates a gene capable of transforming NIH/3T3 cells. As the tumour nodule enlarges and the genetically evolving cellular population competes for dominance of the tumour mass, advantage belongs to tumour cells in which all proviruses, including the inciting provirus in the c-myc domain, are inactivated (e.g., by partial deletions), since any immune response against viral antigens will no longer operate against such cells. However, retention of at least a single LTR near c-myc may be necessary to maintain the tumour state, even though viral gene products are not required (Payne et al. ,1981). An immediate question raised by the study of chicken lymphomas is rele- vant to understanding gene regulation in eukaryotes, as well as tumorigenesis: how does an insertion of ALV proviral DNA amplify the expression of c-myc? The initial premise, and the simplest, was that in each case an ALV LTR would be positioned `upstream' from the genetic target, in an orienta- tion that would permit it to act as a promoter for transcription (Nee1 et al., 1981; Payne et al., 1981). Although the majority of tumours do contain this arrangement of c-myc and an ALV LTR, with RNA transcripts that appear to have been initiated within the LTR and extended into c-myc (Hayward et al., 198l), there is also a substantial number of tumours in which other arrangements are observed (Payne et al., 1982). In several tumours, the ALV provirus is upstream from c-myc, but in the transcriptional orientation opposite that of c-myc; in at least one tumour the provirus is downstream from c-myc. With these two unexpected arrangements, the ALV LTR cannot act simply as a promoter to enhance the expression of c-myc. The most obvious possibility is that the ALV LTRs indirectly potentiate the transcriptional activity of the chromosomal domain in which they have been inserted, affecting the strength of promoters normally used or recruiting promoters normally inactive. Although the biochemical bases for such phenomena are not understood, Oncogenesis by insertion mutagenesis and gene activntion 315 [potentially related findings in more malleable contexts suggest that the [phenomena are experimentally accessible. Thus, regions near the origin of keplication in SV40 DNA and the LTR of RSV (but not the LTR of the Lon-tumorigenic chicken virus, RAV-0) markedly increase the frequency of \ransformation of thymidine kinase-deficient (tk-) mouse cells to a tk+ bhenotype when present in a micro-injected plasmid containing the complete herpes simplex tk gene in either orientation (Capecchi, 1980; P. Luciw and M. pecchi, unpublished). Enhancing properties of SV40 DNA upon the ression of linked promoters have been mapped within a 72 bp repeat mally positioned upstream from the promoter for the early genes; this equence has a strong influence upon transcription of the early genes (Gruss &I al., 1981; Benoist and Chambon, 1981); it can stimulate expression of linked heterologous genes using their natural promoters or adjacent bromoter-like sequences (Banerji et a[., 1981; M. Fromn and P. Berg, per- bnal communication; M. Botchan, personal communication); and it can be eeplaced during SV40 replication by a functionally homologous domain of the burine sarcoma virus LTR (Levinson et al., 1982). The findings with ALV-induced lymphomas raise a host of additional ques- ions the most approachable being whether similar events occur in tumours by other viruses without onc genes. Several pieces of evidence ge belief that they do. (i) In avian B cell lymphomas induced by a etrovirus unrelated to ALV (the reticuloendotheliosis virus called chicken virus) and by a virus differing only modestly from ALV (the stosis-associated virus, MAV), proviral insertions near c-myc have tified, sometimes accompanied by deletions within and amplification interrupted domain (Noori-Daloii et al., 1981; D. Westaway and C. vici, unpublished). However, the level of c-myc expression has yet to rmined in these cases and tumour DNA has not been tested for trans- ming activity in NIH/3T3 cells. (ii) Preliminary evidence implicates pro- lira1 insertion near another cellular oncogene (c-erb), the progenitor of the fransforming gene of avian erythroblastosis virus, in the rare induction of &rythroblastosis by ALV (T. Fung and H. J. Kung, personal communication). fiii) A significant proportion (about 50%) of mammary carcinomas induced by the mouse mammary tumour virus (MMTV) in C3H mice contain pro- viruses in the same 20 kb region of the host genome (R. Nusse, unpublished). owever, this region has been defined only by the presence of proviral DNA: ' nit has not been found. The analogy with ALV-induced lymphomas is streng- hened by the observation that DNA from MMTV-induced mammary umours transforms NIH/3T3 cells; the pattern of inactivation of the trans- orming principle by restriction endonucleases suggests that the same ne may be involved in each of five cases and in a chemically induced mary tumour and a spontaneous human mammary carcinoma ., 1981). As in the case of ALV-induced lymphomas, the trans- orming sequences seem to be unlinked to proviral DNA. It would be premature to conclude from these provisional data that all Retroviruses without oncogenes induce tumours in similar ways. On the one P no known cellular oncogenes reside within it, and an activated transcriptional 316 Harold E. Varmus hand, we are far from understanding how oncogenic transformation occurs in the most successfully explored example, ALV-induced lymphoma; on the other hand, some of the most important viruses in this category-including murine, bovine, and feline leukaemia viruses, as well as the newly described human isolates associated with T cell lymphomas and leukaemias (Poiesz et al., 1980; Hinuma et al., 1981)-have yet to be adequately assessed from these new perspectives. Some insight into the significance and function of putative oncogenes affected in various tumours may be provided by asking whether viruses, such as ALV, that induce several kinds of neoplasm do so by activating the same or different oncogenes in each target cell. Conversely, it will be of interest to determine whether the same oncogene is affected by different viruses in a single target cell, as may be the case for c-myc in B cell lymphomas (see above). It is possible that the answers to these questions will depend upon the normal functions of the various cellular oncogenes (e.g., whether they are general regulators of growth or determinants of differentiation); in any case, the answers may serve as guides for exploring the involvement of such genes in spontaneous tumours and in tumours induced by non-viral agents. A profound understanding of neoplastic mechanisms involving putative cellular oncogenes will doubtless demand detailed descriptions of the pro- ducts of these genes. There is reason to be optimistic about achieving these immediate goals, judging from recent successes with viral oncogenes (reviewed in Tooze, 1980 and Bishop and Varmus, 1982). It will be a more difficult task to assign functional attributes to the genes and their products. The demanding question that now dominates the study of viral oncogenes will ultimately need to be addressed with cellular oncogenes as well: What biochemical properties of their products are responsible for the various mani- festations of the neoplastic phenotype? References Andersen, P. R., Devare S. G., Tronick, S. R., Ellis, R. W., Aaronson, S. A. and Scolnick, E. M. (1981) Generation of BALB-MuSV and Ha-MuSV by type C virus transduction of homologous transforming genes from different species. Cell 26, Banerji, J., Rusconi, S. and Schaffner, W. (1981) Expression of a P-globin gene is enhanced by remote SV40 DNA sequences. Cell 27, 299-308 Benoist, C. and Chambon, P. (1981) In vivo sequence requirements of the SV40 early promoter region. Nature 290, 304-310 Bishop, J. M. and Varmus, H. E. (1982) Functions and origins of retroviral transform- ing genes. In: R. Weiss, N. Teich, H. E. Varmus and J. Coffin (eds.), Molecular Biology of Tumor Viruses. Part 111. RNA Tumor Viruses, Ch. 9. Cold Spring Harbor Press, New York 129-134 Bishop, J. M. (1981) Enemies within: The genesis of retrovirus oncogenes. Cell 23, 546 Bistir, K., Hayman, M. J. and Vogt, P. K. (1977) Defectiveness of avian myelocytomatosis virus MC29: Isolation of long-term nonproducer cultures and analysis of virus-specific polypeptide synthesis. Virology 82, 431-448 Oncogenesis by insertion mutagenesis and gene activation 3 17 Blair, D. G., Oskarrsson, M., Wood, T. G., McClements, W. L., Fischinger, P. J. and Vande Woude, G. G. (1981) Activation of the transforming potential of a normal cell sequence: A molecular model for oncogenesis. Science 212, 941-943 Capecchi, M. R. (1980) High efficiency transformation by direct microinjection into cultured mammalian cells. Cell 22, 479-488 Coffin, J. M., Varmus, H. E., Bishop, J. M., Essex, M., Hardy, W. D., Martin, G. S., Rosenberg, N. E., Scolnick, E. M., Weinberg, R. A. and Vogt, P. K. (19S1) A proposal for naming host cell-derived inserts in retrovirus genomes. Journal of Virology 40, 953-957 Coffin (1979) Structure, replication, and recombination of retroviral genomes: some unifying hypotheses. Journal of General Virology, 42, 1-26 Cohen, J. C., Shank, P., Morris, V. L., Cardiff, R. and Varmus, H. E. (1979) Integra- tion of the DNA of mouse mammary tumour virus in virus-infected normal and neoplastic tissue of the mouse. Cell 16, 333-345 Collett, M. S., Brugge, J. S. and Erikson, R. L. (1978) Characterization of a normal avian cell protein related to the avian sarcoma virus transforming gene product. Cell Cooper, G. M. and Neiman, P. E. (1980) Transforming genes of neoplasms induced by avian lymphoid leukosis viruses. Nature 287, 659-660 Cooper, G. M. and Neiman, P. E. (1981) Two distinct candidate transforming genes of lymphoid leukosis virus-induced neoplasms. Nature 292, 857-858 Cooper, G. M., Okenquist, S. and Silverman, L. (1980) Transforming activity of DNA of chemically transformed and normal cells. Nature 284, 418-421 DeFeo, D., Gonda, M. A., Young, H. A., Chang, E. H., Lowy, D. R., Scolnick, E. M. and Ellis, R. W. (1981) Analysis of two divergent rat genomic clones homologous to the transforming gene of Harvey murine sarcoma virus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 78, 3328-3332 Eung, Y-K. T., Fadly, A. M., Crittenden, L. B. and Kung, H-J. (1981) On the mechan- ism of retrovirus-induced avian lymphoid leukosis: Deletion and integration of the proviruses. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 18, 341 8-3422 Goldfarb, M., Shirnizu, K., Perucho, M. and Wigler, M. (1982) Isolation and preliminary characterization of a human transforming gene from T24 bladder carcinoma cells. Nature 296, 409 Gruss, P., Dhar, R. and Khoury, G. (1981) Simian virus 40 tandem repeated sequ- ences as an element of the early promoter. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 78, 943-947 Hanafusa, H., Halpern, C. C., Buchagen, D. L. and Kawai, S. (1977) Recovery of avain sarcoma virus from tumors induced by transformation-defective mutants. Journal of Experimental Medicine 146, 1735-1747 'Hayward, W. S., Neel, B. G. and Astrin, S. M. (1981) Activation of a cellularonc gene by promoter insertion in ALV-induced lymphoid leukosis. Nature 290, 475-480 Hinuma, Y., Nagata, K., Hanaoka, M., Nakai, M., Matsumoto, T., Kinoshita, K. I., Shiradawa, S. and Miyoshi, I. (1981) Adult T-cell leukemia: Antigen in an ATL cell line and detection of antibodies to the antigen in human sera. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 18, 6476-6480 Hughes, S. H., Payvar, F., Spector, D., Schimke, R. T., Robinson, H. L., Payne, G. S., Bishop, J. M. and Varmus, H. E. (1979a) Heterogeneity of genetic loci in chickens: Analysis of endogenous viral and nonviral genes by cleavage of DNA with restric- tion endonucleases. Cell 18, 347-359 Hughes, S. H., Stubblefield, E., Payvr, F., Engel, J. D., Dodgson, J. B., Spector, D., Cordell, B., Schimke, R. T. and Varmus, H. E. (1979b) Gene localization by chromosome fractionation: Globin genes are on at least two chromosomes and three 15, 1363-1369 318 Harold E. Varmus estrogen-inducible genes are on three chromosomes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 76, 1348-1352 Lane, M. A., Sainten, A. and Cooper, G. M. (1981) Activation of related transforming genes in mouse and human mammary carcinomas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 18, 5185-5189 Lane, M.-A., Sainten, A. and Cooper, G. M. (1982) Stage-specific transforming genes of human and mouse B- and T-lymphocyte neoplasms. Cell, 28, 873-880 Lee, W. H., Nunn, M. and Duesberg, P. H. (1981)src genes of ten Rous sarcoma virus strains, including two reportedly transduced from the cell, are completely allelis; putative markers of transduction are not detected. Journal of Virology 39,758-766 Levinson, B., Khoury, G. V., Woude, G. and Gruss, P. (1982) Activation of SV40 genome by 72-base pair tandem repeats of Maloney sarcoma' virus. Nature 295, Murray, M. J., Shilo, B-Z., Shih, C., Cowing, D., Hsu, H. W. and Weinberg, R. A. (1981) Three different human tumor cell lines contain different oncogenes. Cell 25, Neel, B. G., Hayward, W. S., Robinson, H. L., Fang, J. and Astrin, S. M. (1981) Avian leukosis virus-induced tumors have common proviral integration sites and synthes- ize discrete new RNAs: Oncogenesis by promoter insertion. Cell 23, 323-334 Neiman, P. E., Jordan, L., Weiss, R. A. and Payne, L. N. (1980a) Malignant lym- phoma of the bursa of Fabricius: Analysis of early transformation. In M. Essex et a/. (ed.) Viruses in naturally occurring cancers, pp. 519-528. Cold Spring Harbor Press, New York Noori-Daloii, M. R., Seift, R. A., Kung, H. J., Crittenden, L. B. and Witter, R. L. (1981) Specific integration of REV proviruses in avian bursal lymphomas. Nature Oppermann, H., Levinson, A. D., Varmus, H. E., Levintow, L. and Bishop, J. M. (1979) Uninfected vertebrate cells contain a protein that is closely related to the product of the avian sarcoma virus transforming gene (src). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 76, 1804-1 808 Oskarsson, M., McClements, W. L., Blair, D. G., Maizel, J. V. and Vande Woude, G. F. (1980) Properties of a normal mouse cell DNA sequence (sarc) homologous to the src sequence of Moloney sarcoma virus. Science 207, 1222-1224 Parker, R. C., Varmus, H. E. and Bishop, J. M. (1981) The cellular homologue (c-src) of the transforming gene of Rous sarcoma virus: Isolation, mapping, and transcrip- tional analysis of c-src and flanking regions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 78, 5842-5846 Payne, G. S., Bishop, J. M. and Varmus, H. E. (1982) Multiple arrangements of viral DNA and an activated host oncogene (c-myc) in bursal lymphomas. Nature 295, Payne, G. S., Courtneidge, S. A., Crittenden, L. B., Fadly, A. M., Bishop, J. M. and Varmus, H. E. (1981) Analyses of avian leukosis virus DNA and RNA in bursal tumors suggest a novel mechanism for retroviral oncogenesis. Cell 23, 311-322 Perucho, M., Goldfarb, M., Shimizu, M., Lama, C., Fogh, J. and Wigler, M. (1981) Human-tumor-derived cell lines contain common and different transforming genes. Cell 21, 461-416 Poiesz, B. J., Ruscetti, F. W., Gazdar, A. F., Bunn, P. A., Minna, J. D. and Gallo, R. C. (1980) Detection and isolation of type C retrovirus particles from fresh and cultured lymphocytes of a patient with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 77, 7415-7419 Quintrell, N., Hughes, S. H., Varmus, H. E. and Bishop, J. M. (1980) Structure of viral DNA and RNA in mammalian cells infected with avian sarcoma virus. Journal of Molecular Biology, 143, 363-393 568-572 355-361 294, 574-576 209-213 Oncogenesis by insertion mutagenesis and gene activation 31 9 Robinson, H. L., Pearson, M;N., DeSimone, D. W., Tsichlis, P. N. and Coffin, J. M. (1980) Subgroup-E avian-leukosis-virus-associated disease in chickens. Cold Spring Harbor Symposium on Quantitative Biology 44, 1133-1142 Shalloway, D., Zelenetz, A. D. and Cooper, G. M. (1981) Molecular cloning and characterization of the chicken gene homologous to the transforming gene of Rous sarcoma virus. Cell 24, 531-541 Shibuya, M., Hanafusa, T., Hanafusa, H. and Stephenson, J. R. (1980) Homology exists among the transforming sequences of avian and feline sarcoma viruses. Pro- ceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 77, 6536-6540 Shih, C., Padhy, L. D., Murray, M. and Weinberg, R. A. (1981) Transforming genes of carcinomas and neuroblastomas introduced into mouse fibroblasts. Nature 290 Shilo, B. 2. and Weinberg, R. A. (1981) Unique transforming gene in carcinogen- transformed mouse cells. Nature 289, 607-609 Spector, D. H., Varmus, H. E. and Bishop, J. M. (1978a) Nucleotide sequences related to the transforming gene of an avian sarcoma virus are present in the DNA of uninfected vertebrates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 75, Spector, D. H., Smith, K., Padgett, T., McCombe, P., Roulland-Dussoix, D., Moscovici, C., Varmus, H. E. and Bishop, J. M. (1978b) Uninfected avian cells contain RNA related to the transforming gene of avian sarcoma viruses. Cell 13, Steffen, D. and Weinberg, R. A. (1978) The integrated genome of murine leukemia virus. Cell 15, 1003-1010 Stehelin, D., Varmus, H. E., Bishop, J. M. and Vogt, P. K. (1976) DNA related to the transforming gene(s) of avian sarcoma viruses is present in normal avian DNA. Nature 260, 170-173 Teich, N., Wyke, J., Mak, T., Bernstein, A. and Hardy, W. (1982) Retroviral pathogenesis, In: R. Weiss, N. Teich, H. Varmus and J. Coffin (eds.), Molecular Biology of Tumor Viruses. Part 111. RNA Tumor Viruses, Ch. 8, Cold Spring Harbor Press, New York Tooze, J. (ed.) (1980) The Molecular Biology of Tumor Viruses. Part 2. DNA Tumor Viruses. Cold Spring Harbor Press, New York Vigne, R., Neil, J. C., Breitman, M. L. and Vogt, P. K. (1980) Recoveredsrc genes are polymorphic and contain host markers. Virology 105, 71-85 Wang, L-H., Moscovici, C., Karess, R. E. and Hanafusa, H. (1979) Analysis of thesrc gene of sarcoma viruses generated by recombination between transformation- defective mutants and quail cellular sequences. Journal of Virology 32, 546-556 261-263. 4102-4106 371-379 [The author is responsible for the accuracy of the references.]