> next up previous
Next: Logical Operations and Computation Up: Theory of Molecular Machines. Previous: Derivation of from the

Derivation of ${\cal E}_{min}$ from the Capacity of Molecular Machines

The capacity of a molecular machine is given by:

 \begin{displaymath}C_y = d_{space}\log_{2}{ \left( \frac{P_y}{N_y} + 1 \right) }
\;\;\;\;\; \mbox{(bits per operation)} .
\end{displaymath} (17)

[Schneider, 1991]. The symbols have the following meanings:

By dividing the power by the machine capacity at that power we obtain the number of joules that must be dissipated to gain a bit of information [Raisbeck, 1963]:

 \begin{displaymath}{\cal E}\equiv \frac{P_y}{C_y}
\;\;\;\;\; \mbox{(joules per bit)}.
\end{displaymath} (18)

Although decreasing Py decreases ${\cal E}$, the capacity Cy also decreases according to equation (17), so we might incorrectly anticipate that at Py = 0we would discover that ${\cal E}$ would be undefined or zero. However, ${\cal E}$ does approach a distinct limit (Fig. 1) [Raisbeck, 1963] which we can find by substituting (17) into (18):

 \begin{displaymath}{\cal E}= \frac{P_y}{ d_{space}\log_{2}{ \left( \frac{P_y}{N_y} + 1 \right) }}
\;\;\;\;\; \mbox{(joules per bit)} ,
\end{displaymath} (19)

and defining ${\cal E}_{min}$ as the limit as $P_y \rightarrow 0$(using l'Hôpital's rule [Thomas, 1968]):

 \begin{displaymath}{\cal E}_{min}\equiv
\lim_{P_y \rightarrow 0} {\cal E}= \frac{N_y \ln(2)}{d_{space}}
\;\;\;\;\; \mbox{(joules per bit)} .
\end{displaymath} (20)


  
Figure: The lower bound on ${\cal E}$ is ${\cal E}_{min}$.
\vspace{13cm}
\makebox{
\special{psfile=''fig/emin.ps''
hoffset=-100 voffset=-370
hscale=100 vscale=100
angle=0}
}


The thermal noise disturbing a molecular machine is:

 \begin{displaymath}N_y = d_{space}k_{\mbox{\scriptsize B}}T
\;\;\;\;\;\;\mbox{(joules)}
\end{displaymath} (21)

[Schneider, 1991] so substituting (21) into (20) gives us

 \begin{displaymath}{\cal E}_{min}= k_{\mbox{\scriptsize B}}T \ln(2)
\;\;\;\;\;
\mbox{(joules per bit)}
\end{displaymath} (22)

which is equation (16) again. The value of dspace, which is not easy to determine, conveniently drops out of the equation.

This derivation was first recognized by Pierce and Cutler [Pierce & Cutler, 1959,Raisbeck, 1963]. Because it produces the same result as equation (16), the derivation shows that the machine capacity (equation (17)) is closely related to the Second Law of Thermodynamics under isothermal conditions.

Although the present paper was written using the equations for a simple molecular machine, one also obtains equation (22) for both the Shannon receiver [Pierce & Cutler, 1959,Raisbeck, 1963] and for the general molecular receiver [Schneider, 1991] because the factors of dspace and W cancel between the capacity and noise formulas in each case. (See Table 1 in [Schneider, 1991].) So Shannon's channel capacity is, surprisingly, also related to the ``isothermal'' Second Law of Thermodynamics.


next up previous
Next: Logical Operations and Computation Up: Theory of Molecular Machines. Previous: Derivation of from the
Tom Schneider
1999-12-24