Tyco Electronics Corporation, Jacobus, PA; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration [Notices] [07/18/2002]
Tyco Electronics Corporation, Jacobus, PA; Notice of Negative Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration [07/18/2002]
Volume 67, Number 138, Page 47407
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Employment and Training Administration
[NAFTA-05836]
Tyco Electronics Corporation, Jacobus, PA; Notice of Negative
Determination Regarding Application for Reconsideration
By application postmarked March 22, 2002, an employee requested
administrative reconsideration of the Department's negative
determination regarding eligibility to apply for North American Free
Trade Agreement-Transitional Adjustment Assistance (NAFTA-TAA),
applicable to workers and former workers of the subject firm. The
denial notice was signed on February 28, 2002, and was published in the
Federal Register on March 20, 2002 (67 FR 13011).
Pursuant to 29 CFR 90.18(c) reconsideration may be granted under
the following circumstances:
(1) If it appears on the basis of facts not previously considered
that the determination complained of was erroneous;
(2) if it appears that the determination complained of was based on
a mistake in the determination of facts not previously considered; or
(3) if in the opinion of the Certifying Officer, a mis-
interpretation of facts or of the law justified reconsideration of the
decision.
The denial of NAFTA-TAA for workers engaged in activities related
to the production of electrical connectors at Tyco Electronics
Corporation, Jacobus, Pennsylvania including an offsite warehouse at
Shrewsbury, Pennsylvania was based on the finding that criteria (3) and
(4) of the group eligibility requirements of paragraph (a)(1) of
section 250 of the Trade Act, as amended, were not met. The company did
not shift production of electrical connectors to Canada or Mexico and
did not import electrical connectors from Canada or Mexico. The
predominant cause of worker separations at the subject plant is due to
a domestic shift of production to other affiliated domestic locations.
The petitioner appears to be alleging that the company shifted a
portion of subject plant production to Mexico. The petitioner further
believes that the subject firm imports electrical connectors to the
United States. The petitioner attached shipping invoices to depict
various imports by the company.
Based on information provided during the initial investigation and
recent contact with the company, no shifts in plant production occurred
during the relevant period. All subject plant production was shifted to
other domestic sources. The information supplied by the company further
indicates that they did not import any products like or directly
competitive with what the subject plant produced.
The petitioner attached three shipping invoices to illustrate the
various products imported by the company. Two of the three shipping
invoices consisted of products imported from countries other than
Canada or Mexico to the subject plant. The third invoice shows that the
company imports some type of product from Mexico. The company was
contacted concerning the invoices and indicated that the imported
products were component parts used to produce the finished electrical
connectors. The imported products, must be like or directly competitive
with what the subject plant produces to meet the eligibility
requirements for NAFTA-TAA under section 250 of the Trade Act of 1974.
Conclusion
After review of the application for reconsideration and
investigative findings, I conclude that there has been no error or
misinterpretation of the law or of the facts which would justify
reconsideration of the Department of Labor's prior decisions.
Accordingly, the application is denied.
Signed at Washington, DC, this 5th day of July 2002.
Edward A. Tomchick,
Director, Division of Trade Adjustment Assistance.
[FR Doc. 02-18078 Filed 7-17-02; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4510-30-P
|