skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 181094  
Title: Penal Communities
Journal: Punishment & Society  Volume:1  Issue:1  Dated:July 1999  Pages:27 to 43
Author(s): R. A. Duff
Publisher Url*: http://www.sagepub.co.uk/journal.aspx?pid=105749 
Publication Date: 1999
Pages: 17
Origin: United Kingdom
Language: English
Annotation: This article describes a political community structured by the liberal values of autonomy, individual freedom and privacy, a community in which the criminal law will have an important but limited role in defining a range of “public” wrongs and providing for a formal response to such wrongs.
Abstract: The article questions whether criminal punishment can be consistent with community—-whether it can treat those who are punished as full members of the political community. The article argues that a deterrent system of punishment is not fully consistent with the values of a society in which criminal law has a limited role in defining public wrongs and providing formal responses to such wrongs. A communicative system of penitential punishment, which aims to persuade wrongdoers to repent and to reform, is consistent with those values and can be defended against the liberal charge that it violates offenders’ autonomy and privacy. Notes, references
Main Term(s): Courts/
Index Term(s): Criminal codes ; Punishment ; Theory/ ; Deterrence ; Reform/ ; Criminal law ; Corrections policies ; Social control ; Criminology theory evaluation
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=181094

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder