Maskless Ion Beam Lithography
The manufacture of CMOS integrated circuits will eventually require
techniques for patterning sub-10 nm features, with sub-25 nm half-pitch. Mask
costs for deep-UV (eventually EUV) lithography will continue to escalate
with each new generation of technology, and will even become prohibitive for
low-volume IC products. Maskless patterning techniques are desirable in
order to circumvent these issues. In this section, we report on two maskless
ion-beam lithography schemes that were highlights of the past year’s
accomplishment in the Plasma and Ion Source Technology Group.
Maskless Micro-Ion Beam Reduction Lithography Project
We have been investigating a novel ion beam projection lithography (IPL)
system called Maskless Micro-Ion Beam Reduction Lithography (MMRL) System
(Figure 1), which completely eliminates the first stage of the conventional
IPL system, i.e. the ion beam illumination columns before the stencil mask
and the mask itself. Ions drift out from a multicusp ion source through a
beam-forming electrode (the pattern generator) and are then directly
projected to the wafer. Due to its low energy at the beam-forming electrode,
ion beamlets can be switched on and off at the universal pattern generator
with a high speed. Using the proper writing strategy, the MMRL system can
directly write patterns on wafer without employing complicated and expensive
masks.
|
|
|
|
Figure 1. Maskless Micro-Ion Beam Reduction
Lithography System uses a universal pattern generator (beam-forming
electrode) to form lithographic patterns on wafers. |
|
In order to obtain sub-100 nm resolution, the numerical aperture (NA) of the
MMRL needs to be smaller than 10-3. This can be accomplished by installing a
limiting aperture (<200 mm in diameter) at the beam crossover position
(Figure 2). Preliminary resist exposure results with the limiting aperture
show feature sizes as small as 120 nm (Fig. 3), limited only by the size of
the aperture on the IBM mask presently being used. By employing a mask with
smaller apertures, e.g. 500 nm in diameter, 50 nm feature size can be
achieved after 10x reduction.
|
|
|
|
Figure 2. MMRL ion optical column with limiting
aperture. |
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 3. Resist (PMMA) exposure result using a
pattern generator of 1 mm apertures. Features size as small as 120 nm
achieved on the wafer. |
|
Beamlet switching in the past is achieved by using a pattern generator which
consists of three layers of electrodes - that is two metallic with an
insulating electrode in between. By biasing the third electrode more
positive than the first electrode, the ion current of the individual beamlet
can be turned off. However, such pattern generator with 1 micron aperture
and with total thickness >20 microns is very difficult to fabricate. In
order to overcome this technical problem, it has been demonstrated that ion
beams can be switching on and off using a single layer pattern generator
(Figure 4). It has been demonstrated (Figure 5) that less than 5-volt bias
is needed to turn the beamlet current off.
|
|
|
|
Figure 4. Schematic diagram of a one-layer switching
pattern generator. |
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 5. Preliminary experimental results of ion
beam switching using a one-layer pattern generator. Less five volts of
bias is enough to turn the beam off. |
|
Maskless and Resistless MOSFET Fabrication using Ion Beam Lithography
Besides tremendous challenges associated with mask technology, new resists
must continually be developed to provide optimal resolution with adequate
line-width control and throughput, as ever shorter wavelengths of light are
used. Maskless and resistless patterning techniques can greatly simplify
the manufacture of nanoscale integrated circuits in the future. We have
demonstrated that it is possible to fabricate a MOSFET entirely without any
masks or resist, by using ion beam lithography.
As shown in Figure 6a, silicon can be selectively oxidized by low-energy
oxygen ions. O2+ ions are selectively implanted with energy 3 keV, to form a
thin silicon dioxide layer on the surface, which serves as a hard mask in a
subsequent reactive-ion etch process used to pattern the poly-Si film.
Figure 6b and 6c show a patterned poly-Si line (140 nm thick) and its
profile, respectively.
|
|
|
|
Figure 6. a) Process for direct patterning of
poly-Si. b) Micrograph of poly-Si line patterned with a focused O2+ beam at
a dose of 10^15 cm-2. c) Profile map of the poly-Si line. |
|
SOI MOSFET can be fabricated using a process as shown in Figure 7 without
any mask or resist involved. A completed MOSFET is shown in Figure 8.
Electrical characterization of the fabricated transistors is still in
progress.
|
|
|
|
Figure 7. SOI MOSFET fabrication process. a) SOI
starting substrate (100 nm Si on 400 nm buried oxide); b) thin the Si by
thermal oxidation, then pattern the active regions using a focused O2+ beam
followed by reactive ion etching; c) grow the gate oxide and deposit
in-situ doped poly-Si; d) pattern the poly-Si using a focused O2+ beam
followed by RIE; e) selectively dope the source and drain regions using a
focused P+ beam, then activate the dopants with a rapid thermal anneal. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 8. Micrographs of SOI MOSFET
fabricated without any masks or resist. |
|
A combined electron and ion beam system
Sample charging is always a problem during micromachining or imaging
insulating material using positively charged particles. Conventionally,
either an electron beam can be aimed and impinge on the sample to compensate
the positive potential, or a gas cell can be inserted on the path of the
positive ions for partial neutralization. A novel idea of forming a combined
electron and positive ion beam is being developed, which can be applied to
various applications, such as circuit inspection, ion beam milling, and
secondary ion mass spectroscopy etc. As shown in Figure 9a, the new system
consists of two identical alumina plasma chambers, which are separated by a
stack of electrodes. Double layer of copper wires are wound outside the
chambers as external antenna. Gases, such as argon, are introduced into both
chambers to generate plasma by RF induction discharge. The potentials
applied on the electrodes are arranged in such a way (Figure 9b) that only
electrons are extracted from the left chamber, and positive ions are
extracted from the right one. Electrons extracted from the left chamber will
drift through the right chamber and be extracted from the column attached to
the right chamber together with the positive ion beam. A proof-of-principle
setup has been completed (Figure 10) and preliminary results have confirmed
the co-existence of both electrons and ions in the beam.
|
|
|
|
Figure 9. a) Schematic diagram of a double-chamber
source. A beam consisting of electrons and positive ions can be formed
using a single column. Larger dots represent positive ions, while smaller
dots represent electrons. b) Axial potential distribution of the setup. |
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 10. A picture of the novel combined electron
and ion beam system. |
|
A FIB/SEM Dual Beam System A FIB/SEM dual-beam
A FIB/SEM dual-beam system is being developed jointly by Harvard
University and the Plasma and Ion Source Technology Group. It employs a
mini-RF driven plasma source to generate various species of focused ion
beams, a FEI two-lens electron (2LE) column for SEM imaging (as shown in
Figure 11) and a five-axis manipulator system. The FEI 2LE column, which
utilizes Schottky emission, proprietary electrostatic focusing optics, and
stacked-disk column construction, can provide high-resolution (as small as
20 nm) imaging capability, with fairly long working distance (25 mm) at 25
keV beam voltage. The mini-RF plasma source consists of a ceramic chamber
with 1.5 cm inner diameter and a two-layer copper wires as external antenna.
Through a 50 mm diameter extraction aperture, the current density of Ar+
ions that can be extracted reaches as high as 100 mA/cm2 at only 150 W of
input RF power. An all-electrostatic two-lens system has been designed to
focus the ion beam extracted from the source. Based on the ion optics
simulation, beam spot sizes as small as 300 nm can be achieved at beam
energies from 5-35 keV if a 50 mm diameter extraction aperture is used.
Smaller beam spot sizes can be achieved with small apertures at sacrifice of
some beam current. The system is under construction and will be tested in
the next few months.
|
|
|
|
Figure 11: Schematic diagram of the FIB/SEM dual beam
system. |
|
Ion Beam Imprinter
A new concept of ion-beam imprint has been developed in the Plasma and Ion
Source Technology Group, as shown in Figure 12. A stencil mask that consists
of different shape of features, such as lines, arcs, round holes, and other
arbitrary shapes is used as a plasma electrode, which is biased at a
positive potential relative to the substrate. Ions can be extracted through
the apertures and reach the same pattern as those on the mask. With the
existence of electric field between the mask and the substrate, different
demagnification factor can be achieved, depending on the shape of the
apertures and the distance between the mask and the substrate.
|
|
|
|
Figure 12: Schematic diagram of the ion beam
imprint. |
|
The system has been applied to ion beam machining for various samples, such
as stainless steel (Figure 13) for medical stent manufacturing, glassy
carbon for NIF target topology modification (Figure 14).
|
|
|
|
Figure 13. Schematic diagram of the
ion beam imprint in stainless steel. |
|
|
|
|
|
Figure 14. Schematic diagram of the
ion beam imprint in glassy carbon. |
|
Copyright 2005 Taneli Kalvas (TVKalvas@lbl.gov)
and Qing Ji (QJi@lbl.gov)