******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect or Word to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of Southwestern Bell Telephone Company's Permanent Cost Allocation Manual for the Separation of Regulated and Nonregulated Costs ) ) ) ) ) ) ASD 99-25 ORDER Adopted: July 27, 2000 Released: July 28, 2000 By the Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division: I.INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 1.On March 29, 1999, SBC Communications, Inc. ("SBC") filed revisions to Southwestern Bell Telephone Company's ("SWBT's") cost allocation manual ("CAM") to reflect proposed changes in its time reporting procedures for installation and maintenance technicians. On July 10, 2000, SWBT filed additional modifications to its revised CAM. We hereby approve SWBT's proposed CAM revisions, subject to certain conditions as described below. 2.In the Joint Cost Order the Commission established a mechanism for separating the costs of regulated telephone services from the costs of nonregulated services. The purpose of the Joint Cost Order was to ensure that a carrier's regulated operations do not improperly subsidize its nonregulated activities. The Commission established two separate but complementary sets of rules, one which governs how carriers allocate their costs between regulated and nonregulated activities and the other which governs transactions between carriers and their affiliates. The Commission required that carriers file CAMs setting out in detail the manner in which they propose to implement both the cost allocation and affiliate transaction rules. 3.For carrier activities that are labor intensive, such as the installation and maintenance activities, an accurate time reporting system is essential to ensure that a carrier's costs are recorded in the proper accounts and cost pools and, therefore, are allocated properly between a carrier's regulated and nonregulated activities. Most carrier employees prepare activity reports for all of their work. In recent years, however, carriers have developed procedures in which only a sample of their installation and maintenance technicians prepare activity reports. These carriers have proposed such procedures primarily to reduce their administrative costs. Generally, we have approved the use of such streamlined procedures when a carrier has demonstrated that they provide adequate accuracy for accounts and cost pools. IV.DISCUSSION 5.On March 29, 1999, SWBT submitted CAM revisions in which it proposed sample-based time reporting procedures for its installation and maintenance technicians. These procedures, which SWBT refers to as its technician activity statistical sampling ("TASS") process, relied on both regression analysis and statistical sampling techniques to determine account and cost pool amounts. Both Commission staff and an independent auditor reviewed this proposal. The independent auditor and the Commission staff made various recommendations for improvements to the TASS process. 6.On July 10, 2000, SWBT filed additional CAM revisions. In this filing SWBT proposed to implement most of the recommendations of the independent auditor and Commission staff. Our review finds that SWBT's July 10, 2000 CAM revisions are appropriate; however, in order to ensure that its CAM will provide reliable accounting results, we will require that SWBT make two additional revisions to both its TASS process and CAM. First, SWBT must select at least 1,000 valid sample jobs per state per month on which to base its statistical testing. Second, as recommended by Deloitte and Touche, SWBT must improve its controls regarding TASS software changes and must amend its System Administration Binder accordingly. 7.Therefore, we approve SWBT's proposed CAM revisions and permit SWBT to implement its TASS process effective August 1, 2000, subject to these conditions. Our approval of SWBT's CAM revision is limited to the use of the statistical sampling method described in SWBT's submissions and SWBT must not make any changes to its TASS process without prior written approval. Furthermore, as part of its CAM audit or attestation review under Part 64.904 of the commission's rules, we require SWBT to direct its independent auditor to conduct additional procedures to test and review the TASS process. VIII. ORDERING CLAUSE 9.Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED, pursuant to Sections 4(i), 4(j), 201, 202, and 220 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.  154(i), 154(j), 201, 202, and 220, and Sections 0.91 and 0.291 of the Commission's rules, 47 C.F.R.  0.91 and 0.291, that Southwestern Bell Telephone Company's July 10, 2000, cost allocation manual revisions pertaining to Section VII, Time Reporting ARE APPROVED and effective August 1, 2000, subject to the conditions in paragraphs 5 and 6 above. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Kenneth P. Moran Chief, Accounting Safeguards Division