FDA Logo links to FDA home pageCenter for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug AdministrationHHS Logo links to Department of Health and Human Services website

FDA Home Page | CDRH Home Page | Search | CDRH A-Z Index | Contact CDRH U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health [Skip navigation]
horizonal rule

Super Search
510(k) | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | PMA | Classification | CLIA
CFR Title 21 | Advisory Committees | Assembler | Recalls | Guidance | Standards
 

 

Adverse Event Report

COCHLEAR LTD. NUCLEUS 24 CHANNEL COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM   back to search results
Model Number CI24M
Device Problem Electrode(s), failure of
Event Date 11/20/2002
Event Type  Malfunction  
Event Description

There has been a progressive loss of electrode function. Explantation/reimplantation surgery is yet to be scheduled. The healthcare professional has been informed that the explanted device should be returned to cochlear ltd.

 
Manufacturer Narrative

Clinical summary: at switch-on, all electrodes were reported as operational. However within 4 months an electrode was detected as an open circuit. Over the next three months the number of electrodes detected as open circuits increased, until 10 electrodes were found to be non-functional. An integrity test conducted by coclear staff on the 28th may 2002 confirmed 10 electrodes non-functional. The patient was re-implanted with a nucleus 24k. Result of analysis: bends and kinks consistent with explantation were observed along the electrode lead and array. Kinks, cuts and exposed wires consistent with explantation were observed along the ball electrode lead. The electrode lead was severed near the beginning of the electrode array, and was returned with the device. Broken electrode wires were observed along the electrode lad at the middle of the electrode lead (where the helix ends and the straight part of the lead starts). Coninuity between electrodes was checked on the sererved electrode array. Continuity was observed on all electrodes. Continuity of the electrode lead was checked at the location of the broken electrode wires. Continuity was confirmed along the electrode lead stimulator body and the location of the broken electrode wires. X-rays of the device showed no anomalies aside from those described above. The device passed all electrical testing conducted to confirm operation of the stimulator. Conclusion: the device has multiple broken wires at the midpoint of the electrode lead. Open circuits were detected at the location of the break. It cannot be ruled out that additional electrode damage occurred during explantation. The device passed all tests conducted to verify the proper operation of the stimulator.

 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  new search  |  submit an adverse event report

Brand NameNUCLEUS 24 CHANNEL COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM
Type of Device24 CHANNEL COCHLEAR IMPLANT
Baseline Brand NameNUCLEUS 24 COCHLEAR IMPLANT SYSTEM
Baseline Generic NameCOCHLEAR IMPLANT
Baseline Model NumberCI24M
Baseline Device FamilyCOCHLEAR IMPLANT
Baseline Device 510(K) Number
Baseline Device PMA NumberP840024
Baseline Shelf Life Information Yes
Baseline Preamendment? No
Transitional? No
510(K) Exempt? No
Shelf Life(Months)24
Date First Marketed06/25/1998
Manufacturer (Section F)
COCHLEAR LTD.
14 mars road
lane cove, nsw
AUSTRALIA 2066
Manufacturer (Section D)
COCHLEAR LTD.
14 mars road
lane cove, nsw
AUSTRALIA 2066
Manufacturer Contact
marilyn nelson, r.n.
400 inverness drive south
suite 400
englewood , CO 80112
(303) 790 -9010
Device Event Key424546
MDR Report Key435629
Event Key412249
Report Number6000034-2002-00219
Device Sequence Number1
Product CodeMCM
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Company Representative
Reporter Occupation Other
Type of Report Initial,Followup
Report Date 12/10/2002
1 Device Was Involved in the Event
1 Patient Was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received12/10/2002
Is This An Adverse Event Report? No
Is This A Product Problem Report? Yes
Device Operator Lay User/Patient
Device MODEL NumberCI24M
Was Device Available For Evaluation? Device Returned To Manufacturer
Date Returned to Manufacturer12/30/2002
Is The Reporter A Health Professional? No
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Device Agena
Date Manufacturer Received11/20/2002
Was Device Evaluated By Manufacturer? Yes
Date Device Manufactured07/01/2000
Is The Device Single Use? Yes
Is the Device an Implant? Yes
Is this an Explanted Device?
Type of Device Usage Initial

Database last updated on January 30, 2009

horizonal rule

CDRH Home Page | CDRH A-Z Index | Contact CDRH | Accessibility | Disclaimer
FDA Home Page | Search FDA Site | FDA A-Z Index | Contact FDA | HHS Home Page

Center for Devices and Radiological Health / CDRH