QUESTION: [NOTE: This question contains two stated facts followed by one question, which in all three the expert has answered. The questions are within his answers.] ANSWER from Jack Farmer on September 18, 1998: Question: The Viking project collected samples of the Martian surface in wich they found radioactive nutrients. Answer: Viking collected only soil samples. These were analyzed for signs of life by adding water and nutrients to see if any metabolic products were given off that might indicate the presence of organisms. Theere were products given off and some mimicked life processes, but were ultimately shown to be due to inorganic reactions. Viking could not analyze for radioactive compounds in the soils, except for radioactive carbon which was added to the soils and later recovered in carbn dioxide liberated by chemical reactions in the soils. Question: If life really exists on the surface, the radioactive nutrients could be used to their reproduction. Answer: There is no compelling evidence for life on Mars based on the Viking results. All the Viking Life Detection experiments were ultimately explained by inorganic processes. Also, when the soils were analyzed for organic compounds, not a single molecule was discovered, even through they could have been detected at a concentration of one in a billion! There are in fact good reasons life was not found in the surface environments sampled by Viking. First, there is no liquid water. Water is essential for organisms on earth and is needed to carry out the basic biochemistry of their metabolism. No water means no life, at least as we understand it. Second, the surface of Mars gets a heavy dose of ultraviolet radiation that is very harmful to organisms. We can imagine ways around this if organisms could "hide" in areas shaded from heavy radiation, or if they produced pigments or external coverings that could absorb harmful wavelengths. But the UV dose on Mars is 3-4 times that at the surface on Earth, and most organisms would probably not survive. Third, the soils of Mars are loaded with harsh, oxidizing chemicals (peroxides) that are very destructive to organic compounds that organisms use and are made up of. Together, all these things make the surface of Mars a very inhospitable place for life. But life may exist in the deep subsurface of Mars where liquid water could be present. These environments were not sampled by Viking, and unfortunately, it may be some time before we can drill down to explore those depths. Question: Explain how the experiment proves scientifically the prescence of life in Mars. Answer: We presently have no proof for Martian life, past or present. The sugestion of fossil life in a Martian meteorite is not well founded and has largely been disputed by scientists since the announcement a couple of years ago. The goal of the next decade of Mars missions is to search for that evidence.