%images;]> LCRBMRP-T0E16Simple thoughts on the Sabbath day ; and, Proper division of God's laws to man : by M.F. Womack, minister of Constitution Street Church of Christ, Lexington, Kentucky, 1899.: a machine-readable transcription. Collection: African-American Pamphlets from the Daniel A. P. Murray Collection, 1820-1920; American Memory, Library of Congress. Selected and converted. American Memory, Library of Congress.

Washington, 1994.

Preceding element provides place and date of transcription only.

This transcription intended to be 99.95% accurate.

For more information about this text and this American Memory collection, refer to accompanying matter.

91-898127Daniel Murray Pamphlet Collection, 1860-1920, Rare Book and Special Collections Division, Library of Congress. Copyright status not determined.
0001

Simple ThoughtsON THESabbath Day,ANDProper Division ofGod's Laws to Man.BYM.F. WOMACK,Minister of Constitution Street Church of Christ,LEXINGTON, KENTUCKY,1899.STANDARD PRINT,60 West Main

0002

M.F. WOMACK,Author of: What Is the Church of Christ--A Light on the Way to the Church of Christ--The Design and Action of Baptism.

0003

SIMPLE THOUGHTS ON THE SABBATH DAY.

To Whom Was the Seventh Day Sabbath given of Which We Read in Exodus xx, 8, and Genesis ii, 2?

God created the heavens and the earth and all things which they contain in six days and rested from all His work on the seventh. Man, who was in this creation, was not required to observe the Sabbath when first created, and we may account for this fact when we remember that God did not require toil at the hands of man before he had fallen by disobedience. [Genesis iii, 19.] Then it was said to him that he he should live by the sweat of his face.

If Adam, Cain, Abel, or any other man, before the day in which God delivered the Jewish nation from Egyptian bondage, was commanded to keep the seventh or Sabbath day, the Bible is as silent on it as it is as to which railroad Cain rode on out to the Land of Nod. [Genesis iv, 16.] God, in that age, had no written ten-commandment law, as He afterward gave to Moses at Horeb. [Deuteronomy iv, 12, 13.] If God had such a covenant, then Cain could not have taken the L. & N. Railway to the Land of Nod, for the reason that the undertakers would have had him in a glass wagon before the railroad could have been founded. It is true God has always commanded man to keep a moral law, but not after the manner of Moses' ten-commandment law, which required the death of all who violated it.

Cain killed Abel in violation of the moral law, which was not then written, but neither man nor the devil killed Cain; how, then, could he have been under the law of Moses? The fact that Cain was not killed at the hands of anyone shows clearly to all thinking 00044men that God has the right to change his laws and covenants as he wills to suit changing conditions of the children of men.

The law governing Noah was not the law controlling Abram nor Jacob. God gave Moses a ten-commandment law with a different relation to the Jewish nation than any other law ever given by Him, before or since, to any other man or nation. [Ex.xx; Deut. iv, 12, 13.] This law is called by Paul [II Corinthians iii] the ministration of death written and engraven in stone, and was the letter which killed those who violated it. Cain, not being under this law, was permitted to live after killing his own dear brother without a just cause. Cain could not violate the Sabbath for the simple reason it was not given to him. [Deuteronomy v, 3, 4.]

Since we take the position that the Sabbath was not given to Cain, nor any other man or nation before Moses led the Jews to Horeb, it is our duty to say when and to whom God gave the Sabbath, or ministration of death written and engraven on tables of stone. The reader will please turn to Deuteronomy v, 1; we read that Moses called Israel and said unto them: "Hear, O Israel, the statues and judgments which I speak in your ears this day that ye may learn and keep and do them!" The Lord made a a covenant with us at Horeb. Us who; Abram and Jacob? No, it was the Jewish nation under Moses.

We know that we are right in our position, for Deuteronomy v, 3, tells us that God made not this covenant with our fathers, but with us, even us who are all of us here alive this day. All of the fathers were dead at the time of the making of the covenant of the Sabbath, hence it was not binding on them. In Deuteronomy v, 15, we are informed why God gave this Sabbath to the Jews. The Sabbath was a sign between God and the children of Israel, not a sign between us of this age and God, for the law was given by Moses, but grace and truth came by Jesus Christ. [John i, 17.] If the Sabbath was a sign between God and the children of Israel throughout their generation, it can not be a sign between God and any other nation, since God gave the Sabbath to no other nation. [Exodus xxxi, 12, 13, 16, 17.] The Sabbath became a part of God's law with the penalties of death at Horeb, not before. The Sabbath and the relation which the law of Moses held to the 00055Jews was abrogated and removed when the first covenant was taken out of the way. [Jeremiah xxxi, 31, 35; Hebrews viii, 7, 10.] If the earthly penalties of death for violating the Sabbath have been removed, the given at the same time, has been removed also. The Sabbath never was a moral statute, but a positive command like circumcision. [Genesis xvii, 12, 14.] Under the Sabbath law no man was permitted to kindle a fire in his own habitation on the Sabbath. [Exodus xxxv, 3.] Abide ye every man his place on the Sabbath. Let no man go out of his place. [Exodus xvi, 16, 29.]

Bear no burden on the Sabbath, nor bring it in by the gates of Jerusalem on the Sabbath; neither carry forth a burden out of your houses on the Sabbath. [Jeremiah xvii, 21, 22.] From even unto even shall ye celebrate your Sabbath. [Leviticus xxiii, 32.] Whoever doeth any work on the Sabbath shall surely be put to death. [Exodus xxxi, 14, 15.] The man found picking up sticks on the Sabbath is stoned to death. [Numbers xv, 32, 36.] The idea of having no fire kindled on the Sabbath ought to be enough to close the mouths of all Sabbath keepers wherever we have a cold climate like Kentucky. The man who thinks that he is keeping the Sabbath law deceiveth himself.

Christ was Lord even of the Sabbath Day, and after he became the greatest teacher earth ever had the disciples were commanded to hear him, not Moses. [Matthew xvii,5.] Christ is the prophet that Moses said God would raise up and we must hear him. Christ never did say while on earth to any of his disciples, "Remember the Sabbath day and keep it holy," in a Mosaic sense. He being Lord of the Sabbath day did not remain inside of city, or in the house of any disciple, but went through the cornfields and healed the sick on that day regardless of what the Sabbath day keepers said or taught.

His disciples plucked the ears of corn under the rebuke of the Sabbath keepers but not rebuked by the Lord of the Sabbath day. Christ was greater than Moses or the Sabbath day and had the right to do as he did, and gave his disciples the right to do what they did, for they went with him through the cornfields which Moses forbid anyone doing before Christ became the great teacher with 00066higher laws of mercy and truth. [John i, 7; Matthew xii, 1, 14; Mark ii, 23.]

Christ knew his business and in his teaching he let the woman found in the act of adultery go free on the condition of her repentance and with the command, "Go and sin no more." [John viii, 11.] The would-be keepers of Moses law would have her stoned, which was right when Moses' law held its deathly relations to the Jews, but since Jesus is come with grace and truth the poor woman was allowed to repent and live on. Christ fulfilled the law and took it out of the way in his death. [II Corinthians iii, 1, 11, 15.]

Now, Paul says let no man judge you in regard to a Sabbath day, etc. [Colossians ii, 14, 17.] As to days, Paul says let every man be persuaded in his own mind; for some men, he said, regarded every day alike and there is no rebuke on account thereof. Some men regard one day above another and he did not find fault with the man that did so. [Romans xiv, 5, 8.]

Many of Christ's disciples observed the Sabbath day before and after his resurrection but not because of any special command from him. They were Jews, and as such many of them worshipped and offered sacrifices as required by the law of Moses and not by the law of Christ. [Acts xxi, 26, 30.] Paul often met with the Jews on the Sabbath in order to reach them with grace and truth, but his meeting with them was simply an opportunity to preach the gospel to them and not a command to keep the Sabbath day. [Acts xiii, xiv xv, xvi.]

After Christ rose from the dead, so far as we know, he did not command his followers to keep any day holy. He did not sanctify any day as God did the Sabbath. But as Christ was resurrected on the first day of the week it is but natural that the day of his resurrection to life would he regarded by his followers as greater, so far as they were concerned, than any other day. In Acts xx, 7, we have the example of Paul and the disciples at Troas for worship and celebrating the Lord's Supper on the first day of the week; also the church at Corinth was required in their worship on first day of the week to lay by in store as God had prospered them for the help of the poor. [I Corinthians xvi, 1, 3.] This shows that the Lord's day, or first day of the week was the day of their worship and not 00077the seventh or Sabbath day. It can not be shown after the resurrection of Christ from the dead where a body of disciples or church of Christ alone met for worship on the Sabbath day.

In none of the epistles to the churches of Christ do we find such a command as keeping the Sabbath day. Paul informed the Collosian brethren that no man should judge them in matters of eating, drinking, new moons, holy days, or a Sabbath day, which things were done away with in Christ. [Colossians ii, 14, 18, and Ephesians ii, 14, 21.] Under the law of liberty, which is the law of Christ not Moses, we are not commanded to keep any day holy, as under Moses; and we do not know of any body of Christians, who believe in Christ, that are keeping any day holy as the Jews kept the Sabbath day. I know of persons who make such claims but they are witnesses against their own teaching. We may obey the laws of our country if they do not conflict with God's laws, and in this way we may not work on Sunday as other days. But the holy days are not found in the new and better covenant of grace.

The question may be asked by the reader, if man may not steal, kill, and do any immoral act, since the law of Moses has passed away. No, it was wrong to do any immoral act before Moses lived and it is still wrong for man not to obey moral precepts; but these precepts are found in the new covenant, but not after the manner of the law of Moses. [Acts xiii, 38, 39; Galatians iii, 24, 25; Galatians v, 19.]

We have some of the principles of the laws of England and France in the United States Government, but this is neither an English nor a French government. By the law of Christ having some of the principles of the law of Moses in it does not give us the law of Moses any more than having some of the English principles in our laws gives us an English government.

Christ came not to destroy the law or the prophets but to fulfill them, and it is always understood when any prophecy concerning him was fulfilled it was completed or finished. Matthew xxvii, 35; John xix, 28, writings relative to him were fulfilled, or completed, and of course were no longer in force; only as they serve us as examples to encourage us to suffer for his sake as he 00088suffered for us. [I Peter, iv, 1.] Christ is the end or purpose of the law unto righteousness to everyone that believeth. [Romans x.] When the law had served its end or purpose in leading this world to a Redeemer it was then its mission began to close, so that the perfect means of grace and truth might be written on the minds and hearts of the people as foretold by Jeremiah and all of the old prophets. [Jeremiah xxxi, 31, 35; Hebrews viii.]

God took away the first covenant that he might establish the second and better covenant. In the first covenant given at Horeb God commanded the Jews to keep ten commandments which were written not in their hearts, but upon tables of stone. [Deuteronomy iv, 12, 13.] It was death to the man who failed to keep this covenant. Christ has no such covenant after grace and truth is established in the hearts of men. [John i, 17.] This ten-commandment covenant given to Moses at Horeb is the covenant which required the keeping of the Sabbath day on pain of death, and this is the covenant which Jeremiah and Paul declare was removed so that a better one might take its place. [Hebrews viii, 7, 13.] It was being removed by Jesus so soon as he became a teacher on earth and was fully taken out of the way in his death. [Colossians ii, 14, 18; II Corinthians iii, 7, 10, 14; Ephesians ii, 14, 17.] Why then should we serve the law? It was added because of transgression till the seed should came to whom the promise was made. Christ is the seed, and the law served as schoolmaster to bring us to him that we might be saved [Galatians iii, 19, 24]--the law of the Spirit of Life in Christ, not the law of Moses which was weak and not able to save or redeem the trangressors under it.

The Holy Spirit was sent to the apostles to guide them into all truth under the new and better covenant of grace, and as the Spirit did not guide them to keep the Jewish Sabbath day we may know that the Sabbath is not a part of the truth. The Spirit came to the apostles to bring afresh into their minds the teachings of their Master during three and a half years of his personal ministry, if in his personal ministry he enjoined the Sabbath as one, his saying the Spirit must bring that afresh into their minds. [John xvi, 12, 13B.] Now since being delivered from the law by the death 00099of Christ we are at liberty to get a new husband. [Romans vii.] This new covenant in its state of preparation began with John the Baptist. The law and the old prophets were until John. Since that time the Kingdom of Heaven has been preached.

Jesus came unto those prepared by John for him. [Acts i, 20, 22.; John i, 10, 13.] Out of these persons prepared for him he made choice of his apostles and teachers, with whom he begins the work of making, and arranging for the making, a new covenant. [Matthew iii, iv, v, vi, vii, x.] After completing his life's work he is put to death on the cross to fulfill the law and the prophets [Luke xxiv, 44] and to redeem mankind from sin and the curse of the broken law. When Jesus died all laws of the past ages lost their former relations to mankind and must be held only as principles, if held at all, until enacted into law by the King who is Jesus Christ.

Sound and good timber taken from an old building which has been thrown down may be so shaped that it may become a part of the new building which is to be erected, but any timber which the housebuilder may leave out of the new building is no part of the new house by reason of the fact it was in the old building.

All persons who believed in Christ became dead to law by the body of Christ; therefore, my brethren, ye became dead to the law through the body of Christ that ye should be joined to another even him who was raised from the dead, that we might bring forth fruit unto God. [Romans vii, 4.] For when we were in the flesh the sinful passions which were by the law worked in our members to bring forth fruit unto death; but now, being discharged from the law, having died to that wherein we were held, so that we serve in the newness of the Spirit and not in the oldness of the Letter. [Romans vii, 5, 6.]

The above is a clear statement of Paul relative to the law of the decalogue, for in it adultery is forbidden as well as covetousness, and mankind was held bound by that in all of its forms until discharged by the death and body of Christ, to whom they were married, since becoming dead to the former husband, which was the law whereby they were held before being released. This is so plain that it needs no comment. The law was good and holy but man 001010being lustful and failing to obey the law that pointed out sins he found an occasion to sin through disobedience to the law. Man having trangressed the moral laws of covetousness and adultery was condemned by those laws before God; and the offering of the blood of bulls and goats could not discharge nor release man from that state of sins and condemnation into which he had fallen.

Therefore, Christ died for man, and he alone with his own blood has redeemed us from the sins against the law, and from the law also; that we might be married to him who is the head of the church, the first-born from the dead. For it is impossible that the blood of bulls and goats should take away sins. Wherefore, when he cometh into the world he saith, sacrifice and offering thou wouldst not, but a body thou didst prepare for me. In whole burnt offerings and sacrifice for sins thou hast no pleasure. Then said: I, lo, I come! In the roll of the Book it is written of me to do thy will, O God! He taketh away the first that he may establish the may establish the second, by which will we have been sanctified through the offering of the body of Christ for all. [Hebrews x, 49.]

In the above statement of Paul we find that something which existed first was taken away. What was it? Also, we find that something which came second was established. What was it? Also, we find that something which came second was established. What was it? We read Hebrews viii, v, and find that that which was taken away was covenant, and we also find that that that which was established secondly to it was covenant. This being true, no part of the first covenant is left binding as a covenant so far as as God was concerned. At the time referred to He had no covenant that was binding on the children of men. There could be no established covenant or law by which man was covenanted to God until another was given. That one was in a state of preparation is not denied. That man could be saved by faith in God's promises to complete the covenant is also not denied.

But what we do deny is that any part of the first covenant remained binding as a covenant after it was taken out of the way, or when the second covenant was established. That some principles which of themselves were necessary and must exist were enacted into the new covenant from the old is not denied. Such principles are not binding as perpetuity of the old law, or covenant, but as a 001111re-enactment; and, therefore, a part of the new covenant and binding on us because of the authority of Christ and not Moses. These principles hold a new relation to us other than that which they held to the Jewish nation, for we are now under grace and truth.

Sabbath day keepers make a big fuss about keeping the commandments, and with them the Sabbath is always one of the commandments which Jesus said keep. They forget the fact that Jesus told the young man who came to him which of the commandments he enjoined upon him. [Matthew xix, 16, 27.] Jesus told the young man which ones he enjoined upon him, and some other things in addition to them without which the young man could not be saved. [Mark xii, 28, 34.]

The bed is too short and the covering too narrow. You cannot prove your Sabbath, therefore, let us all come and worship the King in Zion on the day of his resurrection from the dead, which is the first day after the Sabbath is past. [Luke xxiii, 1; Mark xvi, 1; Matthew xxviii, 1.] We should worship on this day, since the day after which Christ slept in the tomb on which he restores mankind from death is greater than the day on which God rested after He had created the material world. To restore mankind in redemption and in the resurrection is much greater work than creating a material world.

On the first day of the week the Holy Spirit descended from a high and came even to the apostles to guide and give them the best laws for the better covenant of grace and truth. [Acts ii.] On this day all history of the Apostolic Church tells us that the disciples of Christ met on the first day of the week to celebrate the Lord's death. On this day Paul commanded all the churches of Galatia and Corinth to lay by in store, as God had prospered them, for help of the poor saints. [1 Corinthians xvi, 1 2.] On this day Paul met with the disciples to break bread at Traos. [Acts xx, 7.] On this day John, while on the lonely island of Patmos, was in the Spirit. [Revelations i, 10.] We should all be in the Spirit on day and worship God in spirit and in truth.

0012
GOD MADE THE NEGRO.

Written by a White Man and Addressed to His Own Race.

God made the Negro like unto thee,With heart, and brain, and form divine,And into his dark breast He breathedA soul as pure and white as thine.

God made the Negro; for him he badeThe flowers bloom, the birds to sing;For him the changing seasons glowFrom summer's gold to flowering spring.

God made the Negro, made him free;He hath heaven-born rights, same as thou;For his redemption Christ did wearThe crown of thorns upon His brow.

God made the Negro, placed him hereTo live with thee life's troubled span;Be just, be true, be kind to him,He is thy neighbor, fellow-man!

ARTHUR W. ATKINSON.Lynn, Massachusetts.

0013
PROPER DIVISION OF GOD'S LAWS TO MAN.

Three Ages In Which God Covenanted Himself to Man--Alexander Campbell on the Law--Facts of History.

There were three ages in which God covenanted himself to to man: First--Patriarchic Dispensation, continued about 2,500 years. Second--The Mosaic Dispensation, continued about 1,500 years. Third--The Dispensation of Christ. No principle of the first dispensation became a law of the second because it was in the first dispensation. Neither did any law of the second become a law of the third dispensation because it was a law in the second dispensation. All laws of the law giver become such by the power and enactment of the law maker under the time of his reign. Moses did not make laws for Abraham or Jacob; neither did Abraham make laws for Moses; yet some of the principles in the first dispensation was in the second, but they were binding because of the second and not because of the first.

Moses was over his own house, and under God he gave laws to his house only. He did not enact laws for the new covenant. If so, why did God take away the old covenant? [Jeremiah, xxxi, 31.] Moses said to the Jews that God would raise them up a prophet and would put words in his mouth and he should speak unto the people all things which God would require of them. [Deuteronomy xviii.] Why did Moses then obtain a law from God to continue through the Christian dispensation, since God would furnish another prophet, with all laws necessary to reach the whole people?

God spake directly from the high court of heaven to Peter and James and John, saying: This is my beloved son in whom I am well pleased; hear ye him. [Matthew xviii, 5, 6.] They were to 001414teach all things which Christ commanded them to do, not Moses. [Matthew xxviii, 20.] Moses commanded the Sabbath day to be kept; Christ did not. Some of the principles of the second dispensation are found in the third, but they are there by Christ's enactment, not Moses. If Christ put the Sabbath day in the new covenant, it was enacted into it by him under the direction of his Father, through him alone, not by Moses. [Matthew xxviii, 18.] Now since we have found that the old was taken out of the way by Christ, when did he enact a new law or covenant?

We have already said that John the Baptist prepared the material for this covenant out of which Christ must finish or complete the covenant. Christ enters into the work of making this covenant with the people whom John prepared. [Acts i, 21, 22; John i, 10, 12.] Christ, like Moses, confirmed his mission by signs and miracles and leads his people--the church--in its preparatory state, teaching and training them for the completion of his kingdom or covenant. [Matthew v, vii, xvi and xviii.] Many disciples were made both by him and those who were prepared for him by John the Baptist. [John iv, 1, 6.] Hence he gives them his laws and precepts which is to govern them for all time to come, and they agree to keep them and teach them to others. [Acts i.] This forms the basis of a covenant.

He dies to save or redeem them from the curse of a broken law and to discharge or release them from the law so they might be married to him. [Roman vii, 4; Ephesians v, 26, 28; John x, 11, 12.] On the cross he sheds his blood to redeem all mankind and all of the law passes away, since it has served its purpose in bringing man to Christ. [Galatians iii, 24.] From this time forward the old scriptures became our examples as and they can comfort the believer and the unbeliever by admonishing the one and pointing out Christ to the other, by prophecies, types, shadows, etc. [Acts xvii, 11.] Christ, being buried in the tomb but rises on the third day to fully complete the scripture of the Old Testament and to fully complete his covenants or laws, meets with his disciples during forty-days; but immediately after rising from the dead he gives them the laws and conditions upon which they are to carry his covenant into complete organization and receive men and women 001515into his church, or kingdom, by the direction of the Holy Spirit. He commanded them to go forth into all the world preaching the gospel to every nation or creature. He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved, and he that believeth not shall be condemned. [Mark xvi, 16.]

All power in heaven and in earth is given unto me. Go ye, therefore, teach all nations; baptizing them into the name of the Father and of the Son and of the Holy Spirit; teaching them to observe all things whatsoever I command you (not what Moses commanded the Jews at Hereb). [Exodus xx.] Lo, I am with you alway, even unto the end of the world.

Repentance and the remission of sins was to be preached in Christ's name among all nations beginning at Jerusalem. [Luke xxiv, 45, 47.] The apostles were to tarry at the city of Jerusalem until they were clothed with power from on high. And we may add here that this covenant was incomplete until it was clothed with the power of the Holy Spirit from on high [Acts 1, 8]; according to Micah and Isaiah, for they say that the law is to go forth out of Zion, and the word of the law from Jerusalem. [Micah iv, 1; Isaiah 1, 2. What law is this that these prophets speak of that is to go forth from Zion? The ten-commandment law of Moses? No, for that law had gone forth from Mount Horeb 700 years before this statement of the prophets. This law is for all nations, the other only for the Jewish nation. [Exodus xx.]

About fifty days after his resurrection the Holy Spirit comes, according to promise, after Jesus takes his seat on the throne as king over his kingdom. All things are now completed and the apostles begin the work of preaching for the first time under a new covenant of grace, and not of the works of the law of Moses, nor of Man's own works, which can not save a soul from death. [Ephesians ii.] It was written that repentance and remission of sins should be preached in his name beginning at Jerusalem. [Luke xxiv, 45.] Now, since the Holy Spirit has come to guide the apostles in the missionary work of the new covenant in the name of Christ, we must receive the words which the Spirit gives since he gives the same law and teaching that Jesus had given. For he shall take of mine and shall declare it unto you. All things 001616whatsoever the Father hath are mine. Now, if the Father had a Sabbath day to go into the covenant of grace, he would have given the same to his Son and the Son would given the same Sabbath day to Spirit, and the Holy Spirit would have given this day to the Apostles, and the Apostles would have given this day to the Church and all who believe and on the Father and Son through their teachings.

But where do we read of such a charge? We do not read it in Matthew, Mark, Luke or John. We do not read it in the Acts of the Apostles nor nay of the Epistles to the Churches. But it is claimed that Jesus enjoined it in Matthew xxiv, 20. We will now see whether he did or not. Here is what he said in unto them concerning the overthrow of the city of Jerusalem. Pray ye that your flight be not in winter weather, neither on the Sabbath day, for then there shall be great tribulation such as has not been known from the beginning of the world until now; no, nor never shall be. Does the above enjoin the Sabbath on the disciples? Jesus knew that the Jews, who rejected him, would still keep the Sabbath day, and forty years after this expression would make it very painful on those who might want to flee from or through the gates of the city of Jerusalem on that day. If this expression enjoins the Sabbath it also enjoins the winter season, for they were commanded to pray that their flight be not in winter also. The same reason is assigned for one that is to be assigned for the other, and inconvenience is to be assigned for both. It would not be an easy thing to flee on the Sabbath or in winter.

Now, let us examine the teachings of the Holy Spirit through the Apostles and see if we can find the laws and commandments of the Father and of the Son and of the Spirit? Peter preached the gospel unto the vast multitude before him, and quite a number of them were pricked in their hearts by the Word of God through faith, and asked what to do. He commanded them to repent and be baptised in the name of Christ into the remission of sins and they should receive the gift of the Holy Spirit. [Acts ii, 37, 38.] About three thousand persons gladly received his word and were baptized the same day. Now they are in the new covenant and must keep the laws of the Spirit of Life in Christ Jesus. [Romans viii.] 001717If they do this they will never keep the Sabbath for the simple reason that it is not required by the Spirit. [Acts xiv, 8, 15; Espesians iv, 6; Revelations iv, 10, 11.] Idolatry is not permitted. First commandment. [Acts xv, 28, 29; I Thessalonians i, 9.] Second commandment.

In Matthew xix, 18, 19, we have five commandments in the following order, sixth, seventh, eighth, ninth, fifth. In Romans xiii, 9, we have five commandments in this order, seventh, sixth, eighth, ninth, tenth. This is James' royal law that is found in the New Testament which became so by enactment of Christ or the Spirit. [James ii, 8, 13.] But where is the Sabbath day? It is not found at all in the new covenant.

0018
ALEXANDER CAMPBELL ON THE LAW.

Quotations from Lectures on the Pentateuch, Pages 271 and 272--Also Pages 286 and 288--Comment.

I quote from Lectures on the Pentateuch, pages 271 and 272: "There remains another objection to this division of the law. It sets itself in opposition to the skill of an apostle, and ultimately deters us from speaking of the ten precepts, the ministration of condemnation and of death. [I Corinthians iii, 7, 13.] This we call the moral law. Whether he or we are to be esteemed the most able ministers of Christ, it remains for you, my friend, to say. Paul having called the ten precepts the ministration of death, next affirmed that it was to be done away and that it was done away. Now the calling the ten precepts the moral law, is not only a violation of the use of the word; is not only inconsistent in itself, and contradictory to truth, but greatly obscures the doctrine taught by the apostle in the third chapter of second Corinthians, and in similar passages, so as to render it almost, if not altogether, unintelligible to us."

I quote again, from page 286: "'Sin,' says the apostle, 'shall not have dominion over you; for ye are not under the law, but under grace.' In the sixth and seventh chapters of the Romans the apostle taught them that they were not under the law but under grace; that they were freed from it--'dead to it'--'delivered from it.' In the eighth chapter, first verse, he draws the above conclusion. What a pity that modern teachers should have added to and clogged the words of inspiration by such unauthorized sentences as the following: 'Ye are not under the law as a covenant of works, but as a rule of life.' Who ever read one word of 'the covenant of works' in the Bible, or of the Jewish law being a rule of life to the disciples of Christ? Of these you hear no more from the Bible than of the 'Solemn League' or of 'St. Giles' days.'"

Again, from page 288 of the Lecturers: "But query, Is the law 001919of Moses a rule of life to Christians? An advocate of the popular doctrine replies, 'Not all of it.' Query again, What part of it? 'The ten commandments.' Are these a rule of life to Christians? 'Yes.] Should not, then, Christian sanctify the seventh day? 'No.' Why so? 'Because Christ has not enjoined it.' Oh, then, the law, or ten commandments, is not a rule of life to Christians any further than it is enjoined by Christ; so that in reading the precepts in Moses' words, or hearing him utter them, does not enjoin them; it is only what Christ says we must observe. So that an advocate for the popular doctrine, when hard pressed, can not prove the law."

There is no greater mistake than to suppose that a part of the law was left, as a law, while the rest of it was taken away. Their division of it is purely fanciful. The Bible knows nothing about it. Jesus treated the ten commandments just as he did the rest of the law; it had served its purpose as a constitution of a national religion. The government which was built upon it was both political and religious. And as a whole system, the law had served its purpose in preparing the people for the higher lessons of the Great Teacher. But they sometimes ask, why would God take away the ten commandments in order to get rid of one? Why not blot out the one and leave the other nine standing? Whatever may be the impression such a question may make on the mind of a Bible evidently that it has some element of strength. Again we might ask if God removed all the law but the ten commandments? To which they are bound to answer yes. We ask again if many of the things now in the Christian institution were not in the law of Moses? Again they say yes. Then why were these things taken away? Why were they not left standing, seeing they must be in the new covenant as well as in the old. From this it will appear that they are just as much in need of showing why God has first removed and then re-enacted as we are. He has also made requirements of them as they had more light and more responsibility.

Some of our Adventist brethren say that Alexander Campbell in his lifetime believed that the Sabbath day ought to be observed, but the foregoing quotations from him take that witness forever from them.

0020
FACTS OF HISTORY REGARDING LORD'S DAY.

Testimony of Tertullian, Justin Martyr, Mosheim, John Wesley and Dr. Mason--Bishop of Lyons--Ignatius and Pliny.

Tertullian says in so many words: "The Lord's Day is the day of the Christian Church. We have nothing to do with the Sabbath. The Lord's Day is the Christian's solemnity."

Justin Martyr in his Apology to Antoninus, page 67, A.D. 140. This man had been raised in Palestine and only writes a little on this side of the Apostle John. Martyr says: "On the day called Sunday all who lived in cities, or in the country, gathered in one place and the memoirs of the apostles or the writings of the prophets were read, as long as time permits; then the president verbally instructs and exhorts to the imitation of the good things. Then we all rise together and pray; then bread and water and wine are brought, and the president offers prayers and thanksgiving according to his ability, and the people say amen. There is a distribution to each and a partaking of that over which thanks have been given and a portion is sent by the deacons to those who are absent. The wealthy among us help the needy; each gives what he thinks fit, and what is collected is laid aside by the president, who relieves the orphans and the widows and those who are sick or in want."

The above agrees somewhat with Paul's teaching in I Corinthians xvi, 1, 2, and to all of the churches in Galatia. Within a century after the death of the last apostle we find the observance of the first day of the week, under the name of the Lord's Day, established as a universal custom of the church according to the unanimous testimony of Barnabus, Ignatius, Pliny, Justin Martin and Tertullian.002121Mosheim, translated by Murdock, volume 1, page 137, says of the practice of the second century: "The Christians celebrated the Lord's Supper, which they were accustomed to do chiefly on the first day of the week." Then again in Book I, Century I, Part II, fourth chapter, fourth section: "The Christians of this century assembled for the worship of God and for the advancement of their own piety on the first day of the week, the day on which Christ reassumed his life; for that this day was set apart by the apostles themselves, and that after the manner of Church at Jerusalem."

The reader will see that the foregoing shows, beyond a doubt, that the Church of Christ observed the first day of the week, or Lord's Day, before there was a Catholic Church; and it is all fallacy to talk of that church being the origin of the Lord's Day.

John Wesley, in a letter to America in 1784, said: "I also advise the elders to administer the Supper of the Lord every Lords day."

Dr. Mason,in his lectures on Frequent Communism (Edinburg edition), says: "Communion every Lord's Day was universal and was preserved in the Greek Church till the Seventh Century; and such as neglected three weeks together were excommunicated."

Ireneus, Bishop of Lyons, A. D. 178, assert that the Sabbath was abolished.

It is certainly known to all true writers, historians and great men, who have led many multitudes from the darkness of Catholicism, that the primitive Church of Christ, as a whole, observed the first and not the seventh day of the week. Now, if the Sabbath keepers of this age will show in the New Testament where a body of Christians alone met on the Sabbath day for worship after Christ rose from the dead, we will at least agree to so teach. But why should we so teach when not one of them can find such a thing?

ERRATA.In the third line from the bottom of page 8 substitute "if" for "which" In the third line from the bottom of page 13 substitute "to" for "a"