skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 016034  
Title: EVALUATING EVALUATORS - THE LIAR (LINKED INDICES FOR ASSESSING RELEVANCE) MODEL
Journal: PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW  Dated:(JANUARY/FEBRUARY 1972)  Pages:49-52
Author(s): F D BALDWIN
Corporate Author: American Soc. for Public Admin
United States
Publication Date: 1972
Pages: 4
Type: Studies/research reports
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: LIAR (LINKED INDICES FOR ASSESSING RELEVANCE) IS A MATHEMATICAL MODEL TO PREDICT THE PROBABLE UTILIZATION OF EVALUATIVE RESEARCH FINDINGS IN PUBLIC PROGRAMS.
Abstract: THIS COMPUTERIZED MODEL GIVES AN OBJECTIVE OBSERVER A WAY OF PREDICTING AN EVALUATION'S PROBABLE UTILIZATION AT ANY TIME FROM THE BIRTH OF THE IDEA TO THE COMPLETION OF THE REPORT. IN ITS SIMPLEST FORM, WHICH REQUIRES THE INPUT OF ONLY SIX OBSERVATIONS, THE LIAR MODEL IS BASED ON THE FOLLOWING TYPES OF VARIABLES - INCENTIVES TO UTILIZATION, DISCENTIVES TO UTILIZATION, AND ENVIRONMENTAL CONSTRAINTS. EACH VARIABLE GIVEN A WEIGHT FROM ONE TO TEN. IT IS RECOMMENDED THAT OBSERVATIONS BE TAKEN AT LEAST TWO POINTS, PREFERABLY AT THE START OF THE EVALUATION AND JUST BEFORE THE FINAL REPORT IS CIRCULATED. AT THE START OF A STUDY, THE MODEL SERVES AS A TOOL FOR THE HEAD OF AN EVALUATION DIVISION IN DECIDING WHETHER OR NOT TO PERFORM AN EVALUATION BY PERMITTING HIM TO SELECT PROJECTS WHERE THE REPORT IS LIKELY TO ATTRACT FAVORABLE COMMENT AND PERHAPS BE ACTED UPON. AT THE LATER STAGE, IT PERMITS A CHANGED PREDICTION IN THE LIGHT OF NEW CIRCUMSTANCES AND HELPS THE EVALUATOR TO DECIDE HOW MUCH OF HIS PRESTIGE SHOULD BE COMMITTED TO PUBLICIZING THE FINAL REPORT. CRITICISMS OF THE LIAR MODEL INCLUDE A LACK OF MATHEMATICAL PURITY IN THE PROBABILITY FORMULA AND A FAILURE TO TAKE INTO ACCOUNT THE FACT THAT AN ORGANIZATION'S ENTHUSIASM FOR MAKING EVALUATIONS VARIES INVERSELY WITH ITS DISPOSITION TO TAKE ANY OTHER ACTION. (AUTHOR ABSTRACT MODIFIED)
Index Term(s): Computer aided operations ; Mathematical models ; Evaluation/ ; Modeling techniques ; Planning/ ; Evaluation techniques/ ; Prediction ; Evaluative research
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=16034

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder