Southern Research Station Headquarters - Asheville, NC
Main Logo of Southern Research Station, Stating: Southern Research Station - Asheville, NC, with a saying of 'Science you can use!'
[Images] Five photos of different landscape

Publication Information

Mail this page   Give us your feedback on this publication

Title: Mixotrophy and Nitrogen Uptake by Pfiesteria Piscicida (Dinophyceae)
Author(s): Lewitus, Alan J.; Willis, Bonnie M.; Hayes, Kenneth C.; Burkholder, JoAnn M.; Gasgow, Howard B., Jr.; Gilbert, Patricia M.; Burke, Marianne K.
Date: 1999
Source: J. Phycol. 35, 1430-1437 (1999)
Description: The nutritional versatility of dinoflagellates is a complicating factor in identifying potential links between nutrient eurichment and the proliferation of harmful algal bloom. For exmaple, although dinoflagellates associated with hamful algal blooms (e.g. red tides) are generally considered to be phototrophic and we inorganic nutrients such as nitrate or phosphate, many of these species also have pronounced heterotrophic capabilities either as osmorophs or phagotrophs. Recently, the widespread occurence of the heterotmpbic toxic dinoflagellate Pfiesteria piscidia Steidinger et Burkholder, has been documented in turbid estuarine waters. Pfiesteria piscidia has a relatively proficient gmziug ability, but also has an ability to function as a phototroph by acquiring chloroplasts from algal prey, a process termed kleptoplastidy. We tested the abilily df kleptoplastidic P. piscicida to take up 15N-labled NH+4, NO-3, urea, or glutamate. The photosynthetic activity of these cultures was verified,inpart by use of the fluorochrome, primulin which indicated a positive relationship between photosynthetic starch production and growth irradiance. All four N substrates were taken up by P. piscicido, and the highest uptake rates were in the range cited for phytoplankton aad were similar, to N uptake estimate for phototrophic P. piscicido. The demonstration of direct nutrient acquisition by kleptoplastidic P. piscicido suggests that the response of the dinoflagellate to nutrient enrichment complex, and that the specified pathway of nutrient stimulation (e.g. indirect stimulation through enhancement of phytoplankton prey abundance vs. direct stimulation by saprotrophic nutrient uptake) may depend on P. piscicida's nutrient state (phagotrophy vs. phototrophy).
View and Print this Publication (805 KB)
Pristine Version: An uncaptured or "pristine" version of this publication is available. It has not been subjected to OCR (Optical Character Recognition) and therefore does not have any errors in the text. However it is a larger file size and some people may experience long download times. The "pristine" version of this publication is available here:

View and Print the PRISTINE copy of this Publication (1.7 MB)
Publication Notes:
  • We recommend that you also print this page and attach it to the printout of the article, to retain the full citation information.
  • This article was written and prepared by U.S. Government employees on official time, and is therefore in the public domain.
  • Our on-line publications are scanned and captured using Adobe Acrobat. During the capture process some typographical errors may occur. Please contact the SRS Webmaster, srswebmaster@fs.fed.us if you notice any errors which make this publication unuseable.
[ Get Acrobat ] Get the latest version of the Adobe Acrobat reader or Acrobat Reader for Windows with Search and Accessibility




Publication Links:

FIA Resource Bulletins

Publications Search


Search for on-line publications
containing the following:

 


(Uncheck this box to search all R&D Publications.)

Small logo of the USDASmall logo of the Forest Service