skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 166769  
Title: Athlete, the School, and the Supreme Court
Journal: Children's Legal Rights Journal  Volume:16  Issue:4  Dated:(Fall 1996)  Pages:7-13
Author(s): C O Donaldson
Publication Date: 1996
Pages: 7
Type: Legislation/policy analysis
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: The recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in Vernonia School District v. Acton has given school officials the power to conduct warrantless random searches without violating the Fourth Amendment; the Court held that public school districts could randomly test student athletes for drugs without violating these students' constitutional rights.
Abstract: This decision came 10 years after the landmark decision in New Jersey v. T.L.O., which gave school officials great leeway to conduct searches on school grounds. The Vernonia case related to a school district's decision to establish random urinalysis testing of students taking part in interscholastic athletes. The testing resulted from allegations of widespread rebellion and chaos resulting from drug use. Athletes testing positive received a light punishment consisting of sitting out a few games. The Vernonia decision relied on the communal nature of the public school experience as an excuse for school authorities to ignore children's privacy interests in favor of discipline. The reasoning could be interpreted to permit random testing of all students. The reasoning is flawed in crucial areas. In addition, although random blanket searches are an efficient way to detect students' drug use, the light punishment sends the wrong message to children by indicating a relatively high tolerance for drug use. Reference notes
Main Term(s): Juvenile delinquency preventn prgs
Index Term(s): Rights of minors ; Drug testing ; School delinquency programs ; US Supreme Court decisions ; School discipline
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=166769

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder