skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 108418  
Title: Legal Issues in Private Security: The 'Moonlighting' Police Officer
Journal: Journal of Security Administration  Volume:10  Issue:1  Dated:(July 1987)  Pages:29-37
Author(s): J J Sullivan
Publication Date: 1987
Pages: 9
Type: Legislation/policy descriptions
Origin: United States
Language: English
Note: Paper presented at the 1986 Annual Meeting of the Academy of Criminal Justice Sciences, March 17-21, 1986, Orlando, Fla.
Annotation: This paper reviews some of the legal problems that coexist in the criminal justice system and the private security industry, with the focus on the authority or lack of authority of private security officers compared with that of 'moonlighting' police officers in the areas of arrest, search and seizure, interrogation, and the use of force.
Abstract: Although a few States allow security officers to be deputized or have special arrest powers while performing their special duties, most States do not give private officers special arrest powers beyond those granted private citizens. The same is true of the authority to use force. Generally, the rules of search and seizure do not apply to private police, including 'moonlighting' public officers acting as private police. This is because the fourth amendment protects against only unlawful governmental intrusions and does not pertain to the acts of private persons. Although the Miranda decision pertaining to suspect interrogation does not apply to questioning by private security officers, private security officers should not be coercive in their questioning, since due process of law may require the suppression of evidence obtained under coercive interrogation. Although the courts have not ruled on all aspects of a 'moonlighting' public officer's powers and responsibilities as a private security officer, it would seem that the same laws and constitutional safeguards that regulate the on-duty officer's conduct should also apply off-duty. 34 footnotes.
Main Term(s): Private police
Index Term(s): Search and seizure ; Arrest and apprehension ; Off-duty employment ; Lawful use of force ; Suspect interrogation
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=108418

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder