Shrader Asset Management Co., et al. v. Conbraco Industries, Inc., et al., Case No. 02-30312, Adv. Proc. 02-3052 (Bankr. W.D.N.C. May 22, 2002)(Whitley) - State Court Meiselman type action brought by minority shareholders of a North Carolina closely held corporation against the majority shareholder/directors, including the Debtor. The court denied the Plaintiffs' motions to remand an action to North Carolina state courts and for voluntary dismissal against Carl L. Mosack. The Court held that it had subject matter jurisdiction over the causes of action, some of which were "core" and the remainder of which were "related to" causes of action. The Plaintiffs' attempt to dismiss their claims against the Debtor to defeat jurisdiction were ineffective. Remanding the action to state court could lead to inconsistent results, the possibility of double liability, and a waste of resources. Finally, the Court denied the Plaintiffs' motion to dismiss the Debtor, Carl L. Mosack, because he occupied the central role in the litigation and absent his presence, complete relief could not be accorded to the other parties under Fed. R. Civ. P. 19.