 |  |
| ||||
Copyright © 2001, American Society of Plant Physiologists Comparison of Gas Exchange and Bioassay Determinations of the
Ammonia Compensation Point in Luzula sylvatica (Huds.)
Gaud.1 2Present address: Institute of Environmental
Science, University of Wales, Bangon, Robinson Building, Deiniol Road,
Bangon, Gwynedd LL57 2UW, UK. *Corresponding author; e-mail pwhill/at/ceh.ac.uk; fax
44–01314453943. Received May 3, 2000; Revised July 13, 2000; Accepted September 9, 2000.  This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. | |||||||||||||||||
Abstract Determinations of the NH3 compensation point
for the understory plant of semi-natural woodlands Luzula
sylvatica (Huds.) Gaud. were carried out by measurements of gas
exchange and by calculation from the NH4+
concentration and pH of extracts of the foliar apoplast. Compensation
points determined by gas exchange measurements were among the lowest
yet reported (0.51–1.10 μg NH3 m−3) and
those calculated from apoplast extracts were lower than any yet
reported (0.017–0.54 μg NH3 m−3). Those
determined by gas exchange were consistently found to be between 2 and
30 times higher than those determined from apoplast extracts.
Consideration of possible causes of this discrepancy, which is not
confined to this investigation, showed that all likely errors would
result in an increase in the discrepancy, or were insufficient to
account for observed differences. It is suggested that spatial
variability of pH and NH4+ concentration within
the foliar apoplast represents the most promising line for further
investigation. It is also shown that the foliar apoplast of L.
sylvatica is sufficiently buffered to eliminate the need for
correction of H+ concentration for dilution during
extraction, but that it is necessary to correct the
NH4+ concentration of apoplast extracts for
dilution. | |||||||||||||||||
After
N2 and N2O,
NH3 is the most abundant nitrogen species in the
atmosphere (Raven et al., 1992) with
NH4+ being the dominant cation
in precipitation in Europe and North America for the last four decades
(Flechard, 1998). There is increasing evidence to suggest that where
the atmosphere becomes artificially enriched with
NH3 there may be detrimental effects on sensitive
(low nitrogen) ecosystems due to eutrophication. The best documented
instances of eutrophication due to nitrogen deposition have been the
replacement of ericaceous species, such as Calluna vulgaris
and Erica tetralix, by grass species such as Molinia
caerulea and Deschampsia flexuosa (e.g. Heil and
Diemont, 1983; Roelofs, 1986; Leith et al., 1999). Furthermore,
although NH3 rapidly protonates to
NH4+ in solution, metabolism of
NH4+ by plants and microbes can
lead to the acidification of poorly buffered ecosystems (van Breemen et
al., 1982, 1983). Raven (1988) calculated that the uptake and
assimilation of NH3 by the aerial parts of plants
leads to the generation of 0.22 H+
N−1, whereas uptake and assimilation of
NH4+ leads to the generation of
1.22 H+ N−1. Nitrification
of NH4+ by soil microbiota leads
to the generation of 2 H+
N−1 (van Breemen et al., 1983), whereas there is
a net generation of 1 H+
N−1 if deposition is as
NH3. It was demonstrated as early as 1850 that plants can take up and utilize gaseous NH3 (Ville, 1850; cited in Sutton et al., 1993). It has since become accepted that a stomatal NH3 compensation point exists that determines, at a given atmospheric NH3 concentration, whether NH3 will be taken up by, or released from stomata (e.g. Farquhar et al., 1980; Lemon and Van Houtte, 1980). The NH3 compensation point is thought to be determined by the pH and the NH4+ concentration of gas exchange sites in the foliar apoplast (e.g. Farquhar et al., 1980; Husted and Schjoerring, 1995). As a consequence, there has recently been interest in measuring the pH and NH4+ concentration of the foliar apoplast as a simpler method of determining the NH3 compensation point than carrying out accurate measurements of gas exchange with foliage, which are considerably more time consuming. Apoplast pH has been measured by a variety of methods including the use of pH sensitive microelectrodes (Bowling and Edwards, 1984; Okazaki et al., 1995; Hanstein and Felle, 1999), equilibration with solutions (e.g. Raven and Farquhar, 1989; Pearson et al., 1998), and pH-sensitive fluorescent dyes (Pfanz and Deitz, 1987; Mühling et al., 1995). The use of pH-sensitive dyes, although not allowing the calculation of NH3 compensation points, has provided data that suggest spatial heterogeneity of pH within the foliar apoplast. Hanstein and Felle (1999) attempted to measure apoplast NH4+ concentration in intact leaves using a microelectrode inserted through a stoma, but encountered problems of sensitivity and interference from K+. Extraction of the foliar apoplast by pressure vessel (Jachetta et al., 1986; Hartung et al., 1988) or by infiltration of leaves and extraction by centrifugation (e.g. Husted and Schjoerring, 1995; Hanstein et al., 1999) allows pH and NH4+ concentration of extracted liquids to be measured. Only the infiltration and centrifugation extraction method has been used for the prediction of NH3 compensation points to date. It is important for estimation of the magnitude and direction of NH3 fluxes that the NH3 compensation point be determined accurately. This investigation made a comparison between the determination of NH3 compensation points for a widespread plant of semi-natural habitats (Luzula sylvatica [Huds.] Gaud.) by calculation from the pH and NH4+ concentration of apoplast extracts and by direct measurement of gas exchange. For the first time an evaluation of possible causes of discrepancies between compensation points determined by the two methods (e.g. Mattsson et al., 1997; Mattsson and Schjoerring, 1999) was made. Evaluation included the important issue of apoplast buffering, which has been assumed to be zero in previous determinations of NH3 compensation points. | |||||||||||||||||
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION Cytoplasmic Contamination Comparison of the malate dehydrogenase activity of total
leaf homogenates and apoplast extracts showed a mean cytoplasmic
contamination of apoplast extracts of 0.14% with a maximum value of
0.86% when the homogenate of lowest activity was compared with the
apoplast extract of highest activity.Influence of Indigo Carmine on the pH and
NH4+ Analysis of Extracts No significant difference (P ≤ 0.05) was found
when the pH of apoplast extracts collected after infiltration with
deionized water was compared by t test (assuming unequal
variance, Microsoft Excel) with those collected after infiltration with
50 μm indigo carmine.The presence of indigo carmine in standard NH4+ solutions had no systematic effect on the analysis of the NH4+ concentration (data not shown). Osmotica The five methods for estimating the osmolality of the foliar
symplast gave widely varying estimates (Table
I). It was considered that freezing
caused the greatest cell disruption, although there was no statistical
difference between boiling and freezing determinations (t
test, P ≤ 0.05).
Estimates of the intercellular air space volume (Table II) were not significantly different when compared by single factor analysis of variance (P ≤ 0.05, Microsoft Excel). The estimate derived via infiltration with silicone fluid was the lowest. This may have been influenced by the difficulty of achieving complete infiltration of L. sylvatica leaves with the silicone fluid.
The NH4+ concentration of apoplast extracts was not significantly different (t test, P ≤ 0.05) between those infiltrated with 50 g L−1 mannitol and those infiltrated with 91 g L−1 mannitol, although the non-significant difference between the means (Table II) was in the direction that would be expected if either the 50 g L−1 solution caused a flux of water from apoplast to symplast, or the 91 g L−1 solution caused a flux of water from the symplast to the apoplast. As mentioned earlier, the uncertainty in the methods for symplastic osmolality determination and the lack of statistically significant differences in other tests made it preferable to use low osmolality solutions for infiltration. Comparison of NH3 Compensation Points
Determined by Gas Exchange and Bioassay Values for the NH3 compensation point as
determined by gas exchange measurements were among the lowest yet
reported. Values of the NH3 compensation point
calculated from the pH and NH4+
concentration of apoplast extracts were the lowest yet reported (Table
III). Other reported controlled gas
exchange compensation point measurements (25°C) range from 0.05 μg
m−3 (1 μg NH3
m−3 is approximately 1.5 nmol
NH3 mol−1 air at 1 atm and
25°C) for Arrhenatherum elatius (Hanstein et al., 1999),
which is exceptionally low as compared with other gas exchange
determinations, to >26 μg m−3 for wheat
(Morgan and Parton, 1989). Reported compensation points calculated from
apoplast extracts range from 0.04 μg m−3 for
low-nitrogen maize (Loubet et al., 1999) to 36.2 μg
m−3 for high-nitrogen barley (Mattsson et al.,
1998). In general, non-crop plants have been found to have lower
NH3 compensation points than crop plants (Morgan
and Parton, 1989; Husted and Schjoerring, 1996; Husted et al., 1997;
e.g. Hanstein et al., 1999; Mattsson and Schjoerring, 1999), although
compensation point values (25°C) such as 0.3 for μg
m−3 low-nitrogen oilseed rape (Husted and
Schjoerring, 1996; Schjoerring et al., 1998a), 5.9 μg
m−3 for Calluna vulgaris (Schjoerring
et al., 1998b), and 0.03 μg m−3 for
maize (Loubet et al., 1999) are notable exceptions. Higher
NH3 compensation points in crop plants may
reflect their adaptation to situations where nitrogen availability is
high.
A marked discrepancy was found between values of the NH3 compensation point and Γ determined by gas exchange measurements and those determined from apoplast extracts (Table III; Fig. 1). NH3 compensation points determined via gas exchange were between 2- and 30-fold higher than those calculated from apoplast extracts, with a mean difference of 5-fold. Such a discrepancy between compensation point values determined by the two methods can also be seen in the data of Mattsson et al. (1997) and Mattsson and Schjoerring (1999), with discrepancies ranging from 1.5- to 7-fold. In a similar manner, such a difference can be inferred from the data of Hermann et al. (1999), which shows sustained emission fluxes of NH3, measured by micrometeorological methods, during periods when the calculated NH3 compensation point was approximately 8-fold lower than the atmospheric NH3 concentration. Sutton et al. (1999) drew attention to apoplast extract-based (Loubet et al., 1999) and micrometeorological determinations (Milford et al., 1999) of the NH3 compensation point for a fertilized grassland in Southern Scotland that again show lower NH3 compensation points calculated from bioassays than would be predicted from gaseous flux measurements. Husted and Schjoerring (1995, 1996) reported good agreement between compensation points determined by the two methods, whereas Hanstein et al. (1999) found compensation points calculated from apoplast bioassays to be 3- to 8-fold larger than those determined from gas exchange measurements. However, Hanstein et al. (1999) suggested that the discrepancy was caused by coelution of amines with NH4+ in ion chromatograph measurements leading to an overestimation of apoplast NH4+ concentration.
Given that a discrepancy has been found between the two methods of determination in all investigations other than those of Husted and Schjoerring (1995, 1996) on oilseed rape, it appears likely that a flaw exists in the methodology or the interpretation of results. Two basic differences exist in the procedure used by Husted and Schjoerring (1995, 1996) for the calculation of NH3 compensation points and that used here, (a) the correction for dilution of H+ during the extraction procedure, and (b) the correction of the NH4+ dissociation constant (Kd) for the ionic strength of the apoplast. However, in both cases, utilization of the methods of Husted and Schjoerring (1995, 1996) leads to lower estimates of the NH3 compensation point. Furthermore, the change in pH during the dilution of apoplast extracts from L. sylvatica suggested that the apoplast was sufficiently buffered to eliminate the need for correction of H+ concentration for dilution up to a factor of at least 2.5-fold (Fig. 2). The data of Nielsen and Schjoerring (1998) suggests that the pH of the apoplast of oilseed rape is similarly regulated and/or buffered.
Correction of Kd for the ionic strength of the apoplast gives estimates of the NH3 compensation point and Γ approximately 0.9 of those presented here assuming an apoplast ionic strength of 20 mm calculated on the basis of measured ion concentrations (Table IV) and a predicted negative charge of 4.9 mm. Given that the unquantified negative charge was “added” as a monovalent species, the ionic strength of the apoplast may in reality be greater than 20 mm, and the calculated NH3 compensation points lower than 0.9 of the values presented here.
Infiltration of leaves with solutions of differing pH also suggested that the apoplast was subject to almost complete homeostasis with respect to H+ concentration within the range of perturbations carried out here (Fig. 3). The change of the H+ concentration of solutions after infiltration was almost 1:1 correlated with the departure of the infiltrated solution from the apoplast H+ determined by infiltration with unadjusted indigo carmine solution (see gradient of measured data regression line, Fig. 3). Approximate homeostasis of the apoplast with respect to pH is likely to be due to apoplast buffering and transplasmalemma fluxes. Nielsen and Schjoerring (1998), in similar infiltrations of oilseed rape leaves, found the pH of the apoplast to be regulated. They considered the regulation only in terms of transplasmalemma fluxes of H+ rather than buffering, although the data presented here (Fig. 2) clearly show that buffering occurs in the apoplast of L. sylvatica. This is consistent with the reports of apoplast buffering made by Böttger et al. (1980), Pfanz and Dietz (1987), Ikoma and Okamoto (1988), Peters and Felle (1991), and Hanstein and Felle (1999).
Buffering would also be expected from the presence in the foliar apoplast of organic acids undergoing dissociation or protonation at physiological values of apoplast pH e.g. citrate, and malate (Table IV; Speer and Kaiser, 1991; Lohaus et al., 1995; Mühling and Sattelmacher, 1995; Gabriel and Kesselmeier, 1999). Homeostasis of the Apoplast with Respect to
NH4+ Concentration Infiltration of leaves with solutions of differing
NH4+ concentration,
although suggesting that NH4+ is
transported from the foliar apoplast to the symplast, did not show
complete homeostasis of the apoplast with respect to
NH4+ concentration in L.
sylvatica within the approximate 4 min between infiltration and
centrifugation (Fig. 4). However,
Nielsen and Schjoerring (1998) reported that the
NH4+ concentration of the
apoplast of oilseed rape was upwardly regulated to a value of 0.8
mm within 1.5 min after infiltration with an
NH4+-free solution. Such a rapid
upward regulation was not taking place in leaves of L.
sylvatica. Figure 4 shows that infiltration with a solution
approximately equal to the NH4+
concentration of the apoplast extract collected after infiltration with
NH4+-free indigo carmine
solution caused an increase in the
NH4+ concentration of the
resulting extract. It therefore appears that, despite the evidence for
uptake of NH4+ from the
apoplast, a correction for the dilution of
NH4+ in the apoplast of L.
sylvatica during the extraction procedure is necessary when
calculating NH3 compensation points.
Errors in the Determination of NH3 Compensation Points
by Gas-Exchange Measurements Gas-exchange measurements, being the more empirical method of
compensation point determination, should theoretically give the most
reliable estimates. No obvious sources of error existed in these
measurements other than possible NH3 exchange
between the plant growing medium and the atmosphere. In control
experiments with artificial plants measurable exchange of
NH3 did not appear to be taking place with the
growing medium of experimental plants.Cytoplasmic Contamination of Extracts Cytoplasmic contamination of extracts is not a likely explanation
for the observed discrepancy in the determinations of the
NH3 compensation points since such contamination
would be likely to increase the pH and the
NH4+ concentration of apoplast
extracts. Thus, calculated NH3 compensation
points would probably be overestimated.Use of Osmotica in Infiltration Solutions Assuming that infiltration of leaves with low osmolality solutions
caused a flux of water from the apoplast to the symplast, it would be
likely that indigo carmine concentrations would be higher than in the
absence of such fluxes. Correction for dilution would therefore
underestimate the proportion of the extract that was apoplastic in
origin, and increase the factor by which
NH4+ concentrations were
multiplied during correction for dilution. Again this would lead to an
overestimation of the apoplast
NH4+ concentration and the
NH3 compensation point.Loss of Indigo Carmine within the Leaf If indigo carmine were adsorbed by surfaces within the leaf, there
would be a tendency to overestimate the proportion of extracts that
were of apoplastic origin. This could lead to an underestimate of the
factor by which extract NH4+
concentrations were multiplied to correct for dilution during
extraction, and thus underestimation of the NH3
compensation point. The use of indigo carmine in infiltrations to
determine apoplast liquid volumes has precedent in the literature
(Cosgrove and Cleland, 1983; Husted and Schjoerring, 1995, 1996; Husted
et al., 1997; Mattsson et al., 1997; Mattsson et al., 1998; Nielsen and
Schjoerring, 1998; Hanstein et al., 1999; Mattsson and Schjoerring,
1999). Furthermore, results have been validated by Husted and
Schjoerring (1995) who compared results from indigo carmine
infiltrations with [14C]sorbitol infiltrations
and found good agreement between the two approaches. They did, however,
find 2% of the indigo carmine in a 6-μm solution thereof
adsorbed to isolated cell walls of oilseed rape. Such an adsorption
would be insufficient to account for the discrepancy between
NH3 compensation points determined by gas
exchange and those calculated from apoplast extractions. Cosgrove and
Cleland (1983) also found good agreement between apoplast liquid volume
determined by indigo carmine and [14C]mannitol
in stems of pea and soybean, but suspected that some indigo carmine
might be lost during infiltrations of cucumber. It should be noted that
Cosgrove and Cleland (1983) reported averages of only two
determinations with no indication of variation and that there is, as
they point out, no guarantee that the
[14C]mannitol determination was not responsible
for the observed discrepancy.It is possible that there may have been significant loss of indigo carmine during the infiltration and extraction process, although assuming apoplast pH was correct, the magnitude of the indigo carmine loss would have needed to be great to account for such large discrepancies in compensation points determined by the two methods used here. For instance, in a hypothetical extraction a 50-μm solution of indigo carmine was infiltrated into leaves and resulted in an extract indigo carmine concentration of 15 μm. If the concentration of indigo carmine in the extract without any loss should have been 25 μm, the correct calculated compensation point would only be 1.4 times higher than that calculated from the extract where dye loss had occurred. Therefore, although such loss of indigo carmine during the extraction process would lead to an underestimation of calculated NH3 compensation points, it does not seem possible that it could have made more than a contribution to observed discrepancies. Error in the Determination of Apoplast pH Small errors in the determination of apoplast pH could potentially
lead to much larger errors in calculated NH3
compensation points due to the logarithmic relationship between pH and
H+ concentration. However, it is clear that a
large margin of error in the measurement of apoplast pH (e.g. 0.3–1.5
pH units) would be necessary to account for the magnitude of the
discrepancies between the two methods of compensation point
determination.Rust Infection of Experimental Plants Rust infection of experimental plants may have had an influence on
the magnitude of the NH3 compensation point.
However, documented effects of rust infection suggest that the
NH3 compensation points of infected plants would
be higher than those of uninfected plants. Tetlow and Farrar (1993)
reported an alkalization of the apoplast of rust-infected barley plants
as compared with controls, and Fukuda (1996) noted a similar
extracellular alkalization from cultured cells in response to a fungal
elicitor. Fungal infection has been linked to an increase in
phenylalanine ammonia-lyase activity (Habereder et al., 1989; Hahlbrock
and Scheel, 1989; Walter, 1989), which is one of the principal
NH3-generating enzymes in plants (Raven et
al., 1992). Higher NH4+
generation rates are consistent with reports of increased foliar
NH4+ concentrations (Farkas and
Király, 1961) and increased volatilization of
NH3 (Jenkyn and Finney, 1984), which also suggest
an increase in the NH3 compensation point in
response to biotrophic infection.Within Leaf Spatial Variability of Apoplast pH and
NH4+ Concentration Apoplast extractions have a number of sources of error. The
principal ones have been dealt with above and appear to be
quantitatively too small or liable to result in calculated
NH3 compensation points becoming lower. However,
it is not possible to ever be completely sure what the origin of the
“apoplast” extract really is. The extraction technique has been
widely used with a range of validation techniques (Cosgrove and
Cleland, 1983; Husted and Schjoerring, 1995) and available data
indicate that extracted liquid is apoplastic in origin. A major
consideration in the application of this technique to the calculation
of NH3 compensation points is whether or
not extracted liquid is representative of liquid in the apoplast at
leaf gas exchange sites. Hoffmann and Kosegarten (1995) found
spatial differences in the apoplast of leaf cells of sunflower to be up
to 1 pH unit. Bowling and Edwards (1984) report differences in apoplast
pH of Tradescantia virginiana between guard cell and
epidermal cell of 1.4 pH units in the dark, although in the light,
gradients were much smaller. However, even these large reported pH
gradients are insufficient to account for the largest discrepancies
found between NH3 compensation points determined
by the two different approaches (i.e. a ratio of 30). A difference in
pH of 0.7 unit is, however, sufficient to account for the mean 5-fold
discrepancy. However, the pH of bulk foliar apoplast extracts is
unlikely to represent one extreme of spatial apoplast pH variability,
but rather some intermediate value.It is possible that there may be gradients of pH radially through the cell wall due to solute transport and volatilization. The existence of such gradients in plant cell walls is yet to be demonstrated, but such a possibility merits further investigation if a suitable measurement technique could be developed. NH4+ concentration in the foliar apoplast is unlikely to be spatially uniform, but no investigation of its variation has been carried out to date. Indeed it is doubtful whether a suitable technique for its investigation is currently available. However, reports and speculation on the evaporative concentration of solutes at the end of the transpiration stream such as Canny (1995), would suggest that the apoplast at transpiration sites could be enriched in NH4+ relative to the bulk of the foliar apoplast. Furthermore, such an accumulation of solutes may not be uniform over the leaf but is thought to be greater at leaf margins (Wilson et al., 1991). Consequently extracts of the foliar apoplast would be likely to underestimate the NH4+ concentration at transpiration sites, and thus the NH3 compensation point. | |||||||||||||||||
CONCLUSION NH3 compensation points for L. sylvatica are low compared with values in the literature when determined by either gas exchange measurements or the pH and NH4+ concentration of apoplast extracts. This is consistent with other measurements that suggest that wild species generally have lower NH3 compensation points than crop plants. The marked discrepancy between compensation point values determined by the two discussed methods is not readily explained, since most conceivable errors are liable to result in overestimates of compensation points, or are of insufficient magnitude. In the absence of other data, spatial variability of pH and/or NH4+ concentration within the foliar apoplast appears the most promising area for further investigation. | |||||||||||||||||
MATERIALS AND METHODS Experimental Plants Wild-growing Luzula sylvatica (Huds.) Gaud.
plants were collected from Carlops (Scottish Borders, UK; UK Ordnance
Survey grid reference NT179567) and potted singly in a 4:1
vermiculite:perlite mix. Plants were grown in a greenhouse at a minimum
temperature of 10°C under ambient light supplemented with mercury
vapor lamps during winter months to increase the photoperiod to 16
h day−1. Artificial light intensity was approximately 400
μmol photons m−2 s−1 at canopy height.
Plants received Long-Ashton nutrient solution (Hewitt and Smith, 1974)
concentrations of 0.214, 2.14, 5.35, 10.7, or 21.4 mm N as
NH4Cl or NH4NO3 at a rate of 20 mL
pot−1 week−1 for approximately 8 months prior
to use in experiments. This rate of nitrogen addition was equivalent to
2, 20, 50, 100, and 200 kg N ha−1 y−1 based
on a growing medium surface area of 156 cm2.During growth, plants were found to be infected with the rust Puccinia luzulae Libert., which is widespread in wild-growing L. sylvatica. Typical leaf areas ranged from 300 to 1,250 cm2 pot−1 depending upon nitrogen treatment. Gas-Exchange Measurements Measurements of the exchange of NH3, water vapor,
and carbon dioxide with plants were carried out in a purpose-built
dynamic cuvette facility (Fig. 5)
contained within a controlled temperature room.
Experimental plants were placed inside a 0.216-m3 Perspex cuvette. Pots were placed in polythene bags secured tightly around the base of the foliage with cable ties. Light was supplied with a 250 W discharge lamp at a rate of approximately 400 μmol photons m−2 s−1 at canopy height after passing through a glass water bath to reduce heating effects. A control experiment was performed, replacing experimental plants with artificial Chlorophytum sp. (Philip Display, Edinburgh) of similar morphology to quantify any gaseous exchange between the growth medium and the cuvette atmosphere. Experiments using artificial plants or an empty cuvette also showed there to be no line loss of ammonia once stable conditions had been reached. During experiments plants were fed and watered as necessary with a syringe through a 1.6-mm outside diameter Teflon tube sealed inside the plastic bags covering pots. Air entering (30 L min−1) and leaving the cuvette was continually sampled for NH3 content with an AMANDA NH3 analysis system (Wyers et al., 1993; ECN, Petten, The Netherlands) and was sampled for water vapor and carbon dioxide content on a 10-min cycle. Water vapor and carbon dioxide were measured with a temperature and humidity probe (Rotronic Instruments, Horley, Surrey, UK) and an infrared gas analyzer (type 255 mk3, ADC, Hoddesdon, Hertsfordshire, UK), respectively. Air temperature and humidity within the cuvette were continuously monitored using a probe (Vaisala, Cambridge, UK) and leaf temperature was measured using six type-T thermocouples attached to the underside of leaves with paper clips in such a way as to hold the junction against the leaf surface. Prior to entering the cuvette, the air stream was dried by passing through copper coils submerged in a water bath at 4°C with condensed liquid being captured in a flask. Adjustment of humidity was carried out by bubbling a portion of the air stream through deionized water. Relative humidity was maintained at 50% ± 10%. NOx was removed by passing air through Purafil and activated charcoal, and NH3 was removed by passing air through oxalic acid suspended on rockwool. Particles were captured on a depth filter (Pall Biomedical, Portsmouth, Hampshire, UK). Generation of NH3 was achieved by introducing, with a peristaltic pump, small volumes of dilute NH3 solution into a heated flask through which the air stream passed. Determination of NH3 Compensation Points NH3 compensation points were determined from the
linear regression equation of NH3 flux against ambient
NH3 concentration where the ambient NH3
concentration was considered to be that of air entering the cuvette.
Figure 6 shows a typical plot.
Apoplast Extraction To prepare apoplast extracts, leaves were detached from plants,
washed in deionized water, dried with tissues (Kimberly Clark,
Aylesford, Kent, UK), and infiltrated with 50 μm indigo
carmine solution (4°C) under alternate vacuum and pressure in a 50-mL
syringe. Leaves were again dried and rolled perpendicular to the long
axis before they were placed in a 15-mL syringe-type serial pipettor
tip barrel (Boeringer-Mannheim, Lewes, East Sussex, UK). Pipettor tip
and leaves were then placed in a 50-mL centrifuge tube with a 1.5-mL
microcentrifuge tube at the bottom to collect liquid expelled from the
leaf. The assembly was centrifuged at 2,000g for 4 min
at 4°C.NH4+ and pH Measurement The pH of extracts collected during centrifugation was measured
with an InLab 423 semi-micro electrode (Mettler Toledo, Udorf,
Switzerland) inserted in the microcentrifuge tube. Calibration was only
with low ionic strength standards (Russell pH, Auchtermuchty, Fife,
UK). NH4+ concentration was assessed in an
AMFIA NH4+ flow injection analyzer (ECN).
Extracts of less than 100 μL were diluted to the minimum analyzable
volume of 100 μL with deionized water prior to
NH4+ analysis.Cytoplasmic Contamination Cytoplasmic contamination of apoplast extracts was
assessed by comparison of malate dehydrogenase activity (EC 1.1.1.37)
in apoplast extracts and leaf homogenates. Apoplast extracts for assay
were prepared as above excepting that a buffer (0.1 m
N-tris[hydroxymethyl]methyl-2-aminoethanesulphonic
acid, 2 mm dithiothreitol, and 0.2 mm EDTA) was
substituted for indigo carmine solution and leaves were weighed before
and after infiltration. Leaf homogenates were prepared by grinding
tissue in liquid nitrogen before diluting a weighed portion with the
aforementioned buffer. Malate dehydrogenase activity was assessed by
adding 30 μL of extract to 1 mL of a solution composed of 0.05
m Tris, 0.1 mm NADH, and 0.4 mm
oxalacetate, and measuring absorbance decrease at 340 nm (20°C) in a
Shimadzu UV-160A spectrophotometer (Shimadzu, Kyoto).Assessment of Apoplast Dilution Dilution of the apoplast liquid during the extraction procedure
was assessed by measuring the concentration of indigo carmine in
extracts spectrophotometrically at 610 nm. Since dilution was somewhat
variable, indigo carmine was utilized in all extracts (excepting those
used to assess cytoplasmic contamination) to eliminate errors due to
the use of a mean dilution correction, as has been the case in previous
studies (e.g. Husted and Schjoerring, 1995). Furthermore, the
assessment of apoplast dilution in each sample eliminates
interpretation problems resulting from the incomplete infiltration of
leaves.The influence of indigo carmine on pH analysis was tested by twice comparing 10 extracts from leaves infiltrated with deionized water and 10 of those infiltrated with 50 μm indigo carmine. Standard NH4+ solutions with 0 to 200 μm indigo carmine were analyzed to test for any influence of indigo carmine on NH4+ analysis. Osmotica An estimate of the osmolality of the symplast of L.
sylvatica was made by using several different methods to
produce extracts for analysis in an osmometer (model 5100C vapor
pressure osmometer, Wescor, Logan, UT). (a) Leaves were frozen in
liquid nitrogen and ground in a pestle and mortar. A weighed portion of
the ground leaves was allowed to equilibrate with deionized water
overnight in a sealed microcentrifuge tube at 4°C. Following
equilibration the sample was centrifuged at 10,000g for
6 min before measuring the osmolality of the supernatant. (b) The above
technique was modified by equilibrating ground tissue in deionized
water with 1 drop of Triton X-100 50 mL−1 to further
disrupt cell membranes. Correction was made for the influence of the
Triton X-100 on the osmolality of the extract. (c) A tight roll of
leaves was squeezed in a vise and the osmolality of the expelled liquid
measured. (d) A roll of leaves was placed in a 5-mL syringe that was
sealed with a blocked needle hub. The syringe was placed in liquid
nitrogen and liquid was expelled with the syringe plunger after
thawing. (d) A variation of the above technique was carried out in
which cells were disrupted by boiling rather than freezing. Sealed
syringes were immersed in boiling water for 3 min and cooled before
expelling liquid from leaves with the syringe plunger.As a consequence of the widely varying estimates of osmolality resulting from the above methods (see “Results”), osmotica were not used in this study during infiltration. It was considered that because the osmolality of the symplast could not be accurately measured, the effect of infiltrating with osmotica was less predictable than that of infiltrating a well-hydrated leaf with a low osmolality solution, relying on cell turgor to prevent significant transplasmalemma water fluxes. To test the potential for water to move from the apoplast to the symplast during infiltration with low osmolality solutions, a comparison was made between determinations of the foliar intercellular air space volume when infiltrating with different solutions. Leaves were weighed before and after infiltration with deionized water, high-viscosity silicone fluid (5 cs, Dow-Corning, Poole, Dorset, UK), which theoretically cannot cross the plasmalemma (Cosgrove and Cleland, 1983), and 91 g L−1 d-mannitol solution that was theoretically isoosmotic (see “Results”) with the symplast. Account was taken of the density of the infiltrated solutions. A further comparison was made of the NH4+ concentration of apoplast extracts after infiltration with either 50 or 91 g L−1 d-mannitol solution. Apoplast Buffering and pH Regulation To assess the necessity for correction of apoplast hydrogen ion
concentration for dilution during the extraction procedure, dilutions
with 50 μm indigo carmine were carried out on apoplast
extracts while monitoring pH changes.Further investigation of apoplast pH regulation was carried out by infiltrating leaves from plants receiving 200 kg N ha−1 year−1 as NH4Cl with 50 μm indigo carmine solution adjusted to pH 3, 4, 7, or 10 with HCl or NaOH. The pH of resulting extracts was compared with the theoretical values based on simple mixing of infiltrated solution and apoplast liquid. To calculate the expected pH of extracts based on simple mixing, it was assumed that the extracts obtained after infiltration with unadjusted indigo carmine solution (pH 7) gave a reasonable estimate of apoplast pH, i.e. that apoplast buffering was sufficient to prevent significant perturbation of apoplast pH during infiltration with a neutral, unbuffered solution. Regulation of Apoplast NH4+
Concentration As for the investigation of apoplast pH regulation, leaves from
plants receiving the 21.4 mm N NH4Cl nutrient
solution were infiltrated with 50 μm indigo carmine
solution adjusted to 0, 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mg
NH4+ L−1 with
(NH4)2SO4. Again the
NH4+ concentrations of extracts were compared
with those predicted from simple mixing, assuming that the extracts
obtained following infiltration with unadjusted indigo carmine
solution, and correction for dilution, gave a reasonable estimate of
apoplast NH4+ concentration.Calculation of NH3 Compensation Points NH3 compensation points were calculated from
apoplast pH and NH4+ concentration according to
the equilibria applied by Sutton et al. (1994) using the simplified
numerical fit of Nemitz (1998):
The temperature-independent analog for the NH3 compensation point, Γ (the ratio of apoplast NH4+ concentration to apoplast H+ concentration; Sutton et al.,1996) was also used as a method of comparison. Ionic Composition of the Apoplast Apoplast extracts prepared as above were analyzed for inorganic
ion content on an Alltech Odyssey high performance ion chromatography
system (Alltech, Deerfield, IL) with either an Alltech Universal Cation
column (3 mm methane sulfonic acid eluent) or an Alltech
Universal anion column (A-15; 0.86 mm
Na2CO3/0.34 mm NaHCO3
with 5% [w/v] methanol, eluent). Na+ in extracts
due to the presence of indigo carmine was subtracted from measured
values.Similar extracts were prepared for organic ion analysis. Extracts were dried in a Heto CT 110 centrifugal drier (Heto-Holten A/S, Allerod, Denmark), dissolved in pyridine, and derivatized in N-tert-butyldimethylsilyl-N-methyltrifluoroacetamide at 70°C for 30 min. Derivatized samples were then analyzed in a VG Organic MD800 gas chromatograph-mass spectrometer (Fisons, Manchester, UK). Quantification of chemical species was carried out by comparison with standards. A simple computer model based on measured ionic concentrations and organic ion dissociation constants was used to predict the concentration of unquantified negative charge needed to predict a physiologically realistic apoplast pH and the dissociation state of organic ions and NH4+ (Hill, 1999). In the model, changes in pH with increasing dilution were modeled from the concentrations of pH-active species and their dissociation constants at 20°C or 25°C (Weast, 1987; Budavari, 1989) and concentration of inorganic ions. The calculations were derived on the principle of charge balance and the function was solved numerically by iteration using the Newton-Raphson approximation (Burden and Faires, 1993). Concentrations of charged forms of dissociating species were calculated from their dissociation constants, total concentrations, and H+ concentrations. The function was of the form:
| |||||||||||||||||
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Thanks to Dr. John Beardall for inorganic ion analysis, Robert Hardy for allowing experimental plants to be gathered from his land, Frank Harvey and Colin McBeath for gathering experimental plants, Anna-Laure Corriol for indigo carmine tests, Dr. Richard Parsons and Ewan Kier for assistance with GCMS analysis, and Professor Graham Farquhar for suggestions on the accumulation of NH4+ at transpiration termini. | |||||||||||||||||
Footnotes 1This work was supported by a Cooperative Awards
in Sciences of the Environment Studentship (no. GT4/95/64/T) from the
Natural Environment Research Council and funds from the UK Department
of Environment Transport and Regions (UMBRELLA project). | |||||||||||||||||
LITERATURE CITED
| |||||||||||||||||
