All volunteers gave their informed consent whilst remaining experimentally naive regarding cardiorespiratory control. Experiments were carried out with local ethics committee approval and with permission from the Administration of Radioactive Substances Advisory Committee, London, to administer radioactivity to male subjects over 25 years of age. All experiments conformed to the Declaration of Helsinki.
Two studies were undertaken, all under hypnosis. Study 1: imagination of exercise whilst at rest. Study 2: neuroimaging during imagination of exercise whilst at rest.
Throughout this paper, ‘awake’ is used to describe the normal conscious state and ‘under hypnosis’ refers to the hypnotized state, which is clearly distinguishable from sleep.
Subject selection and familiarization
Initial assessments were performed on athletically untrained, healthy, experimentally naive subjects (
n = 27; 22 men and 5 women), who were hypnotized using a standard induction procedure (a combination of visual fixation and progressive relaxation suggestions) and assessed for their hypnotic susceptibility and trance depth by experienced medical hypnotists (D.L.P./A.R.G.). Subjects were scored according to a modified version of the Stanford hypnotic susceptibility scale form B (
Weitzenhoffer & Hilgard, 1959). Those scoring 6 or more during this assessment proceeded to the rest of the study (the scale being graded from 0 to 12, with 12 being the most susceptible). These subjects would typically show features associated with deep hypnosis, including partial amnesia, an altered perception of the passage of time and rapid responses to suggestions of visual, auditory and olfactory imagery. Seven subjects were rejected at this stage owing to low susceptibility scores and the group for study 1 then consisted of 18 men and 2 women, aged 26 ± 1 years (mean ±
s.e.m.).
In study 2, eight experimentally naive men who scored 6 or more out of 12 on the Stanford scale were familiarized with leg exercise cycle ergometry in the semi-reclined position in the awake state.
Assigning exercise levels
Subjects performed an incremental exercise test in the semi-reclined position on an electromagnetically braked cycle ergometer (Elema-Schonander, Sweden) at a pedalling frequency of 60 r.p.m. achieved with the aid of a metronome. Work rate started at 16 W and increased in 16 W increments every minute until the subject's HR was 75 % of the predicted maximum above his/her resting level (HR
max taken to be 220 beats min
−1 minus age in years). Subsequently, each subject was familiarized with a load corresponding to 50 % of his/her HR
max (‘heavy’ load). Ventilation was measured as described below. Subjects performed imagination of ‘heavy exercise’ in the awake state and separately under hypnosis.
Cardiorespiratory measurements
Except during the assessment of hypnotic susceptibility, subjects breathed via a facemask (one-way valves, separate nose compartment giving mouth-only breathing, total dead space ≈100 ml, resistance at 50 l min
−1 was 0.8 cmH
2O; 7920, 7930, 7940, Hans Rudolph, USA). A pneumotachometer (Fleisch size 4, unheated) was fixed to the inspired side of the facemask; the pressure across it was measured with a differential pressure transducer (Anodyne), the signal was then amplified and integrated (transducer, amplifier and integrator, P. K. Morgan, UK) for analysis of tidal volume (
VT) and breathing frequency (
f). Calibration of the flow signal was performed prior to each experimental session using a 3 l syringe (Hans Rudolph). Valve imperfections resulted in a slight backflow through the pneumotachometer with each expiration; these were of negligible volume. Where indicated, CO
2 was added to the inspired air to prevent hypocapnia developing with hyperventilation. The amount of CO
2 added was manually controlled using a rotameter (0–1100 ml min
−1, Platon). Expired gases were analysed for O
2 and CO
2 (Servomex 570A, Servomex 1400) and minute averages of O
2 uptake (
O2) were obtained. End-tidal
PCO2 (
PET,CO2) was recorded (Datex Normocap 200) from a sampling line attached to the facemask. The Servomex gas analysers were calibrated daily using a cylinder of 20 % O
2, 5 % CO
2. HR was measured from lead II of the ECG (Minimon 7136, Kontron Instruments, UK). In five subjects (study 1) electromyograms (EMGs) were obtained during study 1 (protocol 1) from left and right quadriceps and hamstrings (Neurolog System, NL820, 135, 824, Digitimer, UK).
Positron emission tomography
A cannula was inserted into an antecubital vein for the infusion of the positron-emitting
15O in the form of 5 mCi of H
215O. Subjects were then hypnotized on the scanning table, after which the head was positioned to minimize movement under laser beam alignment. The immobility of the subjects under hypnosis and their automatic response to instructions, together with the vividness of their descriptions of the experience, e.g. the altered state of consciousness, the sense of deep relaxation and the altered perception of the passage of time, made the medical hypnotists confident that the subjects were in a deep hypnotic state.
A transmission scan was performed using an external 137Cs positron source to permit compensation for the field distortion occurring due to the subject's head. Scans occurred at 6 min intervals. Each consisted of a 30 s background scan (to allow correction for background activity), followed after a 15 s delay by a 20 s infusion of radiotracer. An activation scan of 90 s was then taken to coincide with the steady-state cardiorespiratory response. Suggestion of the required imagination was made just before the infusion of radiotracer commenced. The integrated counts for the activation scan, corrected for background activity, gave an estimate of regional cerebral blood flow. All subjects studied with PET had a structural MRI scan on a different date.
Experimental protocols
Hypnotic induction was performed using the same technique as for the susceptibility assessment and was followed by manoeuvres designed to increase the depth of the hypnotic state (arm levitation, sensory imagery). These manoeuvres were repeated in-between experimental protocols if hypnotic depth was judged to have decreased (assessed by pupil dilatation, relaxation of facial muscles;
Waxman, 1989). The time taken from the beginning of the induction to starting the protocols was approximately 20 min. The order of the protocols was randomized with the exception of volitional hyperventilation being always performed last in order not to alert the subjects to our interest in breathing. Great care was taken to avoid mentioning cardiorespiratory variables at any stage during the investigations, except during instructions for volitional hyperventilation (described below). All protocols were performed without use of a metronome and the subjects breathed room air except where indicated.
Study 1
Protocol 1: imagination of exercise, awake and under hypnosis Hypnotized subjects (n = 17) imagined themselves exercising for 2 min at the ‘heavy’ work rate with which they had been familiarized. It was suggested to the subjects that they were cycling up a steep hill with a grade equivalent to the heavy work rate. In order to assess the repeatability of the response, four of these subjects performed the protocol eight times at 6 min intervals. Imagination of exercise was repeated in eight of the subjects in the awake state. In five subjects bipolar surface EMGs were obtained during imagination of exercise under hypnosis from left and right quadriceps and hamstrings.
Protocol 2: imagination of freewheeling downhill under hypnosis In order to examine the cardiorespiratory effects of cognitive effort per se, hypnotized subjects (n = 8) were asked to imagine themselves on a bicycle freewheeling down a hill, whilst applying the brakes gently. This protocol was performed for 2 min.
Protocol 3: volitional hyperventilation under hypnosis Hypnotized subjects (n = 6) were told to ‘breathe faster’ for 2 min. Feedback on the breathing frequency required was provided by the hypnotist and was set at the level achieved during imagination of exercise.
In order to examine whether the magnitude of any hyperventilation was limited by hypocapnia, seven subjects during study 1 (protocol 3) had CO2 added to the inspired air to maintain isocapnia.
Study 2
Neuroimaging imagination of exercise at rest PET scanning was used to image neuro-anatomical correlates of ‘central command’. We employed cognitive subtraction methodology to create two contrasts (A and B) in two separate protocols with different subjects (n = 4 for both; 8 scans per subject). Three cognitive conditions were used: condition I, imagination of freewheeling downhill on a safe country road; condition II, imagination of exercise, cycling uphill on the same road; condition III, volitionally driven increase in f (under instruction of the hypnotist) to match that achieved in condition II whilst imagining a safe country road. The order of the conditions was randomized in a balanced design, with the restriction that condition III was always the last to be studied. In the first protocol, freewheeling was compared with cycling uphill to produce contrast A, highlighting cerebral areas involved in the imagination of exercise. In the second protocol, freewheeling was compared with a voluntary increase in f to produce contrast B, highlighting areas activated in the direct volitional control of f as opposed to indirect activation as a consequence of imagination of exercise. Any effects of both imagination and hypnosis were therefore constant throughout all conditions. All subjects in this study had CO2 added to the inspired air to maintain isocapnia.
Data acquisition and analysis
Breathing Analog signals were sampled at 200 Hz (Biopac MP100WS) and recorded on a Power Macintosh computer using Acqknowledge software for subsequent analysis. Breath-by-breath data from each subject were divided into 15 s epochs (study 1, protocols 1 and 3; study 2) or 30 s epochs (study 1, protocol 2) and averages were calculated for each epoch. The average value from 30 to 15 s prior to the onset of the instruction to imagine was taken as the control value; this was then subtracted from each epoch average. Changes were then averaged across the group and all data were expressed as means ±s.e.m. Comparison of imagined exercise with and without inspired CO2 was evaluated by a repeated measures ANOVA and post hoc Tukey test.
Positron emission tomography Analysis of the PET data was performed using statistical parametric mapping (SPM96) (Frackowiak et al. 1997). Images were reconstructed as axial planes and realigned to remove the effects of head motion. They were spatially normalized to the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) template using the subject's own T1 MRI to guide this process and then smoothed by an isotropic 10 mm, full-width half-maximum, isotropic Gaussian kernel filter to account for individual variation in gyral anatomy and to improve the signal-to-noise ratio. The standard stereotaxic space was that of the Montreal Neurological Brain (Evans, 1993) but the coordinates presented in Table 2 have been corrected (A. Meyer-Lindenberg, unpublished data: http://www.mailbase.ac.uk/lists/spm/1998-06/0079.html) to those of Talairach space (Talairach & Tournoux, 1988) to facilitate comparison with previous studies.
| Table 2 Brain activations under hypnosis during imagination of exercise and voluntary hyperventilation |
A small volume correction factor was applied only to areas activated where a prior hypothesis existed concerning areas known to be involved in the control of breathing (Worsley et al. 1996). These regions of interest were hand-edited on a copy of the SPM canonical T1 template, using Analyze AVW software (Robb et al. 1989). Each region of interest image was entered into SPM96 and the corrected P value for peak voxels within these regions was calculated (M. Brett, unpublished data: http://www.mrc-cbu.cam.ac.uk/Imagining/vol-corr.html). SPM96 corrects for multiple comparisons using a Euler characteristic. This characteristic is dependent on the number of resolution elements (resels) with a given image, which itself depends on the number of voxels within the image and the 3-D smoothness of that image. A small volume correction reduces the number of resels in the search volume to that of the brain region of interest in question; thus the threshold for accepting a given Z score as significant (P < 0.05) is reduced (Worsley et al. 1996).