skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 140425  
Title: Psychology of Eyewitness Testimony: A Comparison of Experts and Prospective Jurors
Journal: Journal of Applied Social Psychology  Volume:22  Dated:(1992)  Pages:1241-1249
Author(s): S M Kassin ; K A Barndollar
Publication Date: 1992
Pages: 9
Type: Surveys
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: To compare people's beliefs about eyewitness testimony with expert opinion, 79 college students and community adults filled out a questionnaire in which they reported whether they agreed or disagreed with 21 statements previously used in a survey of eyewitness experts.
Abstract: Results revealed significant inter-item correlation of agreement rates, although subjects differed from experts on 15 of the 21 items. Relatively few subjects believed eyewitness reports were influenced by exposure time, the violent nature of the event, or witness sex. Fewer subjects than experts knew about the fairness of a lineup, effects of lineup instructions, showups, exposure time, the forgetting curve, cross-race biases, hypnotic suggestibility, and color perception under monochromatic light. Conversely, more subjects than experts believed that eyewitness confidence predicted accuracy, that women were better than men at recognizing faces, and that hypnosis facilitated memory retrieval. For courts seeking to determine the extent to which juries need assistance in their evaluation of eyewitness evidence, the findings offer a tentative list of topics worthy of either expert testimony or cautionary instructions from the judge. 22 references and 2 tables
Main Term(s): Eyewitness testimony
Index Term(s): Rules of evidence ; Expert witnesses ; Line-up ; Competency to testify
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=140425

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder