With Charged Words, Democrats Get Tough with Petraeus
and Crocker
April 09, 2008
ABC News' Matthew Jaffe Reports:
If the first round of Senate and
House questioning left something to be desired, this afternoon's House Foreign
Affairs Committee hearing managed to make up for it, bringing to an end, with
sharp words, the combined fifteen hours of Congressional testimony given by the
U.S. commander in Iraq General David Petraeus and U.S. Ambassador Ryan Crocker.
Foreign Affairs Chairman Howard
Berman, Democrat of
And his Democratic colleague Rep.
Gary Ackerman, of
"With the surge, you've gotten a re-do," he said.
"You know, we haven't had one
of those since we played in the playground, but you get a
re-do. Four thousand Americans who died don't get a
re-do; 20,000, 30,000 whose lives have been dismembered don't get a
re-do. Tens of thousands, scores of thousands of families who have been
destroyed don't get a re-do."
Ackerman continued, "The only
thing we know for sure is there will be a lot more people who don't get re-dos.
How do you know we've won? Because at the end of this thing, unless we decide
it's the end, nobody's going to hand you a revolver; nobody's going to hand you
the sword and say, 'We quit. We stopped.' How do we know the Iraqis can stand
up for themselves? Nobody seems to be able to answer that question."
Crocker acknowledged that he and
Petraeus deal with Ackerman's question all the time. "It’s a question that
we both ask ourselves constantly", while warning that "it’s going to
be not one grand sweeping moment in which we can say "it’s all fixed"
but it’s going to be area-by-area, circumstance-by-circumstance. It’s
complicated, but I think it’s do-able."
"When we're asked why the
troops are there, well, we sent the troops over there and now we have to
support them because they're there," Ackerman said. "Well, why are
the troops there? Because we sent them. And what do we
have to do? We have to support them because they're there. So, we're there
because we're there, because we're there, because we're there, and it never
ends. How do you get out of this mess, is the real question. How do you fix
it?"
At one point, the conversation
abruptly turned to '08er politics.
"What would happen if we, with
a new president, said we're going to jerk everybody out of there in six months?", asked Rep. Dan Burton R-Indiana.
Crocker responded, "My judgment
is that where conditions are at this time, that you would see a spiral
down," he responded. "And that would lead to expanded sectarian
conflict at levels we probably have not seen before. It would bring the
neighbors, especially
"The ambassador has captured my
sentiment on that as well," Petraeus agreed, adding "it's about risk,
and it's about the consequences that the ambassador talked about with respect
to Al Qaeda, sectarian conflict, regional stability, the humanitarian situation
and so forth."
Across the aisle from a satisfied
"I can only serve one boss at a
time, and I can only execute one policy at a time," Petraeus fired back.
"I'm actually very uncomfortable, candidly, with where the conversation is
going as a military man, again, who subscribes to civilian control."