FDA Logo links to FDA home pageCenter for Devices and Radiological Health, U.S. Food and Drug AdministrationHHS Logo links to Department of Health and Human Services website

FDA Home Page | CDRH Home Page | Search | CDRH A-Z Index | Contact CDRH U.S. Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health [Skip navigation]
horizonal rule

Super Search
510(k) | Registration & Listing | Adverse Events | PMA | Classification | CLIA
CFR Title 21 | Advisory Committees | Assembler | Recalls | Guidance | Standards
 

 

Adverse Event Report

CIRCON SURGITEK SEITZINGER TRIPOLAR CUTTING FORCEPS BIPOLAR CUTTING FORCEPS   back to search results
Catalog Number 006689-901
Event Date 05/26/1997
Event Type  Injury   Patient Outcome  Hospitalization;
Event Description

One week after a laparoscopic hysterectomy the pt experienced very severe pain. The pt was admitted to the hosp where it was discovered that there was a leak from one of her ureters. A stent was placed to drain the kidney and allow the ureter time to heal. The surgeon believes there was no direct injury at the time of the hysterectomy, but there was lateral thermal injury as a result of the bipolar cautery tripolar cutter that was used for the procedure.

 
Manufacturer Narrative

Number of persons - 1 the info for this report was received from a distributor by way of a fax, not a distributor report. According to the surgeon involved in the case, the hysterectomy was completed uneventfully. He feels that the lateral diathermy burn caused a small area of necrosis in the uretic wall. He stated that the pt will experience a complete recovery without any loss of kidney function or other function. A review of the mdr database shows that there were 4 reportable events associated with the seitzinger tripolar cutting forceps since product introduction in august 1994 (a less that 0. 01% incident rate). There were three incidents where a pt injury was reported and one incident where the physician chose to complete the operation via laparotomy. In one of the three pt injuries the ureter was burned. The physician involved in this incident reported there was no malfunction of the instrument and the burn was related to technique. The physician stated that the ureter was burned due to proximity of the tissue to the tongs of the instrument when current was applied. In the other two pt injuries the umbilicus and thigh, respecively were inadvertently burned. The burns to the umbilicus and thigh were associated with plugging the cables into the monopolar output of the generator, rather than the bipolar output.

 
Search Alerts/Recalls

  new search  |  submit an adverse event report

Brand NameSEITZINGER TRIPOLAR CUTTING FORCEPS
Type of DeviceBIPOLAR CUTTING FORCEPS
Baseline Brand NameTRIPOLAR CUTTING FORCEPS 10MM FOR OPEN PROCEDURES
Baseline Generic NameBIPOLAR CUTTING FORCEPS
Baseline Catalogue Number008140-901
Baseline Device FamilyTRIPOLAR CUTTING FORCEPS
Baseline Device 510(K) NumberK932293
Baseline Device PMA Number
Baseline Shelf Life Information Yes
Baseline Preamendment? No
Transitional? No
510(K) Exempt? No
Shelf Life(Months)60
Date First Marketed08/01/1994
Manufacturer (Section F)
CIRCON SURGITEK
3037 mt. pleasant st.
racine WI 53404
Manufacturer (Section D)
CIRCON SURGITEK
3037 mt. pleasant st.
racine WI 53404
Manufacturer (Section G)
GYRUS ACMI, INC.
3037 mt. pleasant st.
racine WI 53404
Manufacturer Contact
beth frederickson
3037 mt pleasant
racine , WI 53404
(262) 639 -7205
Device Event Key114556
MDR Report Key116766
Event Key109826
Report Number2124979-1997-00009
Device Sequence Number1
Product CodeKNS
Report Source Manufacturer
Source Type Other
Reporter Occupation Physician
Type of Report Initial
Report Date 07/30/1997
1 Device Was Involved in the Event
1 Patient Was Involved in the Event
Date FDA Received08/27/1997
Is This An Adverse Event Report? Yes
Is This A Product Problem Report? No
Device Operator Health Professional
Device Catalogue Number006689-901
Was Device Available For Evaluation? No
Is The Reporter A Health Professional? Yes
Was the Report Sent to FDA? No
Date Manufacturer Received07/30/1997
Was Device Evaluated By Manufacturer? Device Not Returned To Manufacturer
Is The Device Single Use? Yes
Is the Device an Implant? No
Is this an Explanted Device?
Type of Device Usage Initial

Database last updated on January 30, 2009

horizonal rule

CDRH Home Page | CDRH A-Z Index | Contact CDRH | Accessibility | Disclaimer
FDA Home Page | Search FDA Site | FDA A-Z Index | Contact FDA | HHS Home Page

Center for Devices and Radiological Health / CDRH