pmc logo imageJournal ListSearchpmc logo image
Logo of aemFormerly Appl MicrobiolAppl Environ Microbiol SubscriptionsAppl Environ Microbiol Web Site
Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000 May; 66(5): 2224–2226.
PMCID: PMC101478
Design and Evaluation of a Lactobacillus manihotivorans Species-Specific rRNA-Targeted Hybridization Probe and Its Application to the Study of Sour Cassava Fermentation
Frédéric Ampe*
Institut de Recherche pour le Développement (IRD), Laboratoire de Biotechnologie Microbienne Tropicale, 34032 Montpellier, France
*Mailing address: LBMRPM, CNRS-INRA BP 27, 31326 Castanet-Tolosan Cedex, France. Phone: 33 5 61 28 50 54. Fax: 33 5 61 28 50 61. E-mail: Frederic.Ampe/at/mpl.ird.fr.
Received November 15, 1999; Accepted February 23, 2000.
Abstract
Based on 16S rRNA sequence comparison, we have designed a 20-mer oligonucleotide that targets a region specific to the species Lactobacillus manihotivorans recently isolated from sour cassava fermentation. The probe recognized the rRNA obtained from all the L. manihotivorans strains tested but did not recognize 56 strains of microorganisms from culture collections or directly isolated from sour cassava, including 29 species of lactic acid bacteria. This probe was then successfully used in quantitative RNA blots and demonstrated the importance of L. manihotivorans in the fermentation of sour cassava starch, which could represent up to 20% of total lactic acid bacteria.
 
Cassava plays an important role in tropical agriculture; it is a staple food for many countries and is a source of raw material for agroindustrial development (9, 10). However, once the roots have been harvested, they are quickly oxidized and their storage is difficult. To solve this problem, a large part of the cassava roots destinated for human consumption is transformed by spontaneous lactic acid fermentations (6, 15). In Colombia and Brazil, the roots are washed, peeled, and grated, and the starch suspended in water is separated, by sieving, from the pulp or bran. The wet starch is passed through a series of tanks, where a natural lactic microflora develops, and, finally, the fermented starch is sun dried (11, 19). Interestingly, this process yields a cassava sour starch capable of going through a bread making process, whereas cassava starch that was not fermented and sun dried is not suitable for making bread. Recently, two strains of a new amylolytic species, Lactobacillus manihotivorans, have been isolated from this fermented food (14). Random amplified polymorphic DNA analysis was capable of discriminating strains isolated from sour cassava, including L. manihotivorans (N. ben Omar, F. Ampe, M. Raimbault, J.-P. Guyot, and P. Taillez, submitted for publication). However, such fingerprints cannot yield quantitative information on the ecological importance of this species, especially because (i) the isolation procedure is selective and only a fraction of the strains are isolated, and (ii) the study of a great number of samples would require the isolation and characterization of thousands of strains (4). So far, it is not known whether L. manihotivorans plays a significant role in this fermentation. Molecular tools such as hybridization probes based on rRNA sequences are well suited to overcome these limitations (8, 18). Therefore, we designed and validated a hybridization probe specific for L. manihotivorans to monitor this species in cassava fermentations.

Probe design. The 16S rDNA sequences of L. manihotivorans and closely related lactic acid bacteria were aligned as described by Morlon-Guyot et al. (14), and the target region used for probe design is presented in Fig. 1. The four sequences available for L. manihotivorans strains had identical target sequences (region bp 207 to 227 in Escherichia coli consensus numbering). In that region, at least three mismatches and gaps were found for all the sequences of the closely related lactobacilli. On the basis of these observations, we developed an L. manihotivorans species-specific probe (5′-CAAAAGCGACAGCTCGAAAG-3′), named S-S-Lbma-0207-a-A-20 according to the Oligonucleotide Probe Database nomenclature (1). A computer-assisted specificity control of the S-S-Lbma-0207-a-A-20 probe was then performed (the last control was in September 1999) by using the probe match facility function available with the Ribosomal Database Project facilities (13). The probe sequence excludes by at least three mismatches all nontarget rRNA sequences available in the database.

FIG. 1FIG. 1
Definition of the L. manihotivorans species-specific probe S-S-Lbma-0207-a-A-20 based on the 5′-to-3′ 16S rRNA sequence alignment (region bp 198 to 234 in E. coli consensus numbering). Nucleotides identical to those of L. manihotivorans (more ...)

Probe validation with rRNA from pure cultures. Probe specificity was assessed by using total RNA extracted from pure cultures of 64 microbial strains, including reference strains and strains isolated during sour cassava fermentation. All strains were grown in appropriate rich media, and total RNA was extracted as previously described (2). RNA (100 ng) was blotted on two identical nylon membranes and was hybridized with two oligonucleotide probes: probe S-S-Lbma-0207-a-A-20 and probe S-*-Univ-1390-a-A-18 (5′-GACGGGCGGTGTGTACAA-3′), targeting all organisms (20). Synthetic high-pressure liquid chromatography-purified oligonucleotides (Eurogentec, Seraing, Belgium) were 3′ end labeled with digoxigenin by following the instructions of the manufacturer (Boehringer Mannheim). After hybridization, two stringent washes with 1× SSC (0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate) and 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate (washing temperature [Tw] = 44°C for both probes) were performed as described elsewhere (18), and chemiluminescence was detected according to the manufacturer's instructions (Boehringer Mannheim).

Without exception, the probe S-S-Lbma-0207-a-A-20 was specific for L. manihotivorans in the experimentally determined stringent washing conditions (Tw = 44°C) in comparison with similar hybridizations with the universal probe (Table 1). This was true for strains from culture collections, but also for strains isolated from sour cassava fermentation. Probe S-S-Lbma-0207-a-A-20 hybridized with the eight strains identified as L. manihotivorans and with none of the other 56 strains that included members of the genera Enterococcus, Lactobacillus, Lactococcus, Leuconostoc, Pediococcus, Oenococcus, Streptococcus, and Weissella, as well as some non-lactic-acid bacterium microorganisms. Nontarget Lactobacillus species were L. amylophilus, L. amylovorus, L. brevis, L. buchneri, L. casei, L. cellobiosus, L. curvatus, L. delbrueckii, L. fermentum, L. hilgardii, L. paracasei, L. plantarum, L. reuteri, L. rhamnosus, L. sakei, L. salivarius, and L. sharpeae.

TABLE 1

Membrane-based analysis of S-S-Lbma-0207-a-A-20 probe specificity with RNA from reference strains and strains isolated from sour cassava starch fermentationa

SpeciesStrainProbe
UnivLbma
Lactobacillus amylophilusCNCM102988+
Lactobacillus amylovorusCIP102989+
Lactobacillus brevisDSM1268+
Lactobacillus buchneriOnd10*+
Lactobacillus caseiATCC 393+
Lactobacillus caseiOnd18*+
Lactobacillus caseiOnd22*+
Lactobacillus cellobiosusATCC 9846+
Lactobacillus curvatusATCC 25601+
Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricusATCC 1184+
Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. delbrueckiiATCC 9649+
Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactisATCC 12315+
Lactobacillus fermentumATCC 14931+
Lactobacillus fermentumMW+
Lactobacillus fermentumOGI+
Lactobacillus hilgardiiOnd12*+
Lactobacillus hilgardiiOnd20*+
Lactobacillus hilgardiiOnd21*+
Lactobacillus manihotivoransLMG18010*++
Lactobacillus manihotivoransLMG18011*++
Lactobacillus manihotivoransOlb7*++
Lactobacillus manihotivoransOnd29*++
Lactobacillus manihotivoransOnd30*++
Lactobacillus manihotivoransOnd31*++
Lactobacillus manihotivoransOnd33*++
Lactobacillus manihotivoransYAMI2*++
Lactobacillus paracaseiATCC 25302+
Lactobacillus plantarumDSM20174+
Lactobacillus plantarumLMG18053+
Lactobacillus plantarumOlb15*+
Lactobacillus plantarumOnd28*+
Lactobacillus plantarumOnd5*+
Lactobacillus plantarumOnd7*+
Lactobacillus plantarumOnd9*+
Lactobacillus plantarumR10101/1*+
Lactobacillus plantarumR10101/2*+
Lactobacillus plantarumR10102/2*+
Lactobacillus plantarumR10107/1*+
Lactobacillus plantarumR10402*+
Lactobacillus reuteriATCC 23272+
Lactobacillus rhamnosusATCC 7469+
Lactobacillus sakeiATCC 15521+
Lactobacillus salivariusATCC 11741+
Lactobacillus sharpeaeLMG9214+
Pediococcus acidilactiL+
Pediococcus damnosusDSM20331+
Pediococcus pentosaceusR10602*+
Leuconostoc dextranicumINRA18G+
Leuconostoc mesenteroidesATCC 10832+
Leuconostoc mesenteroidesR10608/1*+
Leuconostoc mesenteroidesR10705*+
Oenococcus oeniATCC 23277+
Weissella confusaATCC 10881+
Weissella paramesenteroidesATCC 33313+
Lactococcus lactis subsp. cremorisATCC 14365+
Lactococcus lactis subsp. lactisATCC 11454+
Streptococcus salivarius subsp. thermophilusCNCM10303+
Enterococcus duransNCDO596+
Enterococcus faecalisCIP103015+
Xanthomonas campestris pv. malvacearumORSTIA+
Clostridium acetobutylicumATCC 824+
Corynebacterium glutamicumATCC 17965+
Saccharomyces cerevisiaeFL100+
Escherichia coliJM109+
Escherichia colipurified RNA+
aUniv, probe S-*-Univ-1390-a-A-18; Lbma, probe S-S-Lbma-0207-a-A-20; +, hybridization signal; −, no signal; *, strains isolated from sour cassava fermentation.

Application of the probe to quantify L. manihotivorans in sour cassava fermentation. The designed probe was then used to quantify L. manihotivorans in samples taken at different times in four independent fermentations of cassava. Samples were taken from traditional sour starch fermentation tanks in Marilopez, Colombia, with four different varieties of cassava (Mper 183, CM 6740-7, Mbra 383, and Venenosa). The strategy first developed by Stahl et al. (18) and successfully applied to the fermentation of maize (3) was used to quantify L. manihotivorans rRNA. Total RNA was extracted from sour cassava starch by using a previously optimized method (2). As cassava RNA may be present in the sample, we could not use a universal probe to quantify total microbial RNA. Also, the very high majority of microorganisms responsible for the fermentation of cassava sour starch are lactic acid bacteria (5). Therefore, we reported the hybridization signals obtained with probe S-S-Lbma-0207-a-A-20 to those given by a probe targeting all lactic acid bacteria (probe S-*-Lab-0722-a-A-25 [5′-YCACCGCTACACATGRAGTTCCACT-3′], Tw = 54°C) (17). Pure RNA samples from L. manihotivorans and L. plantarum were used as standards. The RNA content of these standards was estimated by hybridization with the universal probe S-*-Univ-1390-a-A-18 (20) with E. coli RNA (Boehringer Mannheim) as absolute standard. Serial twofold dilutions of the standards and the sample RNAs were blotted on two identical membranes and were hybridized with probes S-S-Lbma-0207-a-A-20 and S-*-Lab-0722-a-A-25. The lower limit for detecting a unique small-subunit (SSU) rRNA in the 2-μg sample of nucleic acid spotted on the membrane was approximately 5 ng of SSU-like rRNA (i.e., a threshold of 0.25%), and the quantification of the chemiluminescence signals was linear on a 2-log scale. Results demonstrate that L. manihotivorans was present in the four independent fermentations performed (Table 2). This species could account for up to 20% of the total lactic acid bacterium population (in terms of RNA index). The initially low number of L. manihotivorans apparently increased during the first week to reach maximum values after 6 to 15 days of fermentation.

TABLE 2

Importance of L. manihotivorans in cassava sour starch from four independent fermentations using quantitative dot blot measurements of 16S rRNAa

Days fermentedCassava variety
Mper 183CM 6740-7Mbra 383Venenosa
12.2 ± 0.502.6 ± 1.3ND
6ND8.2 ± 3.016.2 ± 9.216.0 ± 3.9
1513.1 ± 2.3ND2.6 ± 0.719.7 ± 9.9
300ND00
aThe probes used (S-S-Lbma-0207-a-A-20 and S-*-Lab-0722-a-A-25) were digoxigenin-labeled for hybridization, and the control RNA used for standardization was from strains L. manihotivorans Ond32 and L. plantarum Ond5. Results are given as the relative percentage (± standard deviation) in comparison with total lactic acid bacteria (five repetitions of the quantification procedure were performed on single RNA extractions). The detection limit was 0.25% of total lactic acid bacteria RNA. ND, not determined.

The high RNA indexes recovered are the first evidence of the ecological importance of L. manihotivorans in the fermentation of sour cassava starch. This new species, first isolated in the area of Cali, Colombia (14), was found here to represent up to one-fifth of total lactic acid bacteria in four fermentations independently run in another region of Colombia. So far, most of the isolated strains of this species were shown to be amylolytic (Morlon-Guyot, personal communication). This feature may be of primary importance, as the washing of starch prior to fermentation eliminates almost all of the available free sugar, and starch becomes one of the only carbon and energy sources available for lactic acid bacteria (data not shown). This statement is supported by the demonstration of amylolysis in situ (7). In addition, amylolysis by L. manihotivorans contributes to the modification of the structure of starch granules (5), a modification which may be of primary importance for the use of sour cassava starch in bread making.

Quantitative rRNA hybridization is a very powerful approach to monitor microbial taxons responsible for traditional fermentations: it does not depend on the biased and time-consuming isolation of microorganisms and may be applied to complex environments such as solid-state cultures. So far, only a limited number of environments have been investigated with this approach, namely gastrointestinal tracts (8, 12, 18) and pozol, another fermented food (3, 4). Nonetheless, the use of rRNA as a target may introduce bias as well. It has been shown that hybridization signals are related to cellular activity (16). During the time course of a cassava lactic acid fermentation where cells are developing, it is likely that a rather comparable physiological status for the various components of the microflora exists. The remaining bias would be due to differential extraction of RNA from various microbial types. A previous work was performed to optimize the extraction procedure of total RNA from lactic-acid-fermented starchy foods (2), and the resulting protocol was found to yield RNA from all the species so far isolated from sour cassava starch, thus minimizing the bias due to the extraction procedure. Therefore, we believe that quantitative rRNA hybridization is a method of primary importance to describe the structure of the microbial communities responsible for the fermentation of food products and that more phylogenetic probes should be developed and extensively tested in this way.

Acknowledgments

I thank Nabil ben Omar and Audrey Sirvent for technical assistance, Nadine Zakhia for providing the sour cassava starch samples, Edouard Miambi for critical reading of the manuscript, and Juliette Morlon-Guyot for help with sequence alignments.

REFERENCES
1.
Alm, E W; Oerther, D B; Larsen, N; Stahl, D A; Raskin, L. The oligonucleotide probe database. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996;62:299–306.
2.
Ampe, F; ben Omar, N; Guyot, J-P. Recovery of total microbial RNA from lactic acid fermented foods with a high starch content. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1998;27:270–274. [PubMed]
3.
Ampe, F; ben Omar, N; Guyot, J-P. Culture-independent quantification of physiologically active microbial groups in mexican pozol, a lactic acid fermented dough, using rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probes. J Appl Microbiol. 1999;87:131–140. [PubMed]
4.
Ampe, F; ben Omar, N; Moizan, C; Wacher, C; Guyot, J-P. Polyphasic study of the spatial distribution of microorganisms in Mexican pozol, a maize-fermented dough, demonstrates the need for cultivation-independent methods to investigate traditional fermentations. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65:5464–5473. [PubMed]
5.
Brabet, C. Etude des mécanismes physico-chimiques et biologiques responsables du pouvoir de panification del'amidon fermenté de manioc. Ph.D. dissertation. Montpellier, France: Université de Montpellier II; 1994.
6.
Brauman, A; Kéléké, S; Malonga, M; Miambi, E; Ampe, F. Microbiological characterization of cassava retting, a traditional lactic acid fermentation for foo-foo (cassava flour) production. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996;62:2854–2858.
7.
Cardenas, O S; Debuckle, T S. Sour cassava starch production: a preliminary study. J Food Sci. 1980;45:1509–1528.
8.
Doré, J; Sghir, A; Hannequart-Gramet, G; Corthier, G; Pochart, P. Design and evaluation of a 16S rRNA-targeted oligonucleotide probe for specific detection and quantitation of human faecal Bacteroides populations. Syst Appl Microbiol. 1998;21:65–71. [PubMed]
9.
George, M; Moorthy, S N; Padmaja, G. Biochemical changes in cassava tuber during fermentation and its effect on extracted starch and residue. J Sci Food Agric. 1995;69:367–371.
10.
Lancaster, P A; Ingram, J S; Lim, M Y; Coursey, D G. Traditional cassava-based food: survey of processing techniques. Econ Bot. 1982;36:12–45.
11.
Liliana Mosquera, P; Chacon, M P P; Henry, G; Chuzel, G. Cassava starch in northern Cauca, Colombia: socioeconomic evaluation of its production and commerce. In: Dufour D, O'Brien G M, Best R. , editors; Dufour D, O'Brien G M, Best R. , editors. Cassava flour and starch: progress in research and development. Cali, Colombia: CIAT/CIRAD Publication; 1996. pp. 30–42.
12.
Lin, C; Stahl, D A. Taxon-specific probes for the cellulolytic genus Fibrobacter reveal abundant and novel equine-associated populations. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995;61:1348–1351. [PubMed]
13.
Maidak, B L; Cole, J R; Parker, C T, Jr; Garrity, G M; Larsen, N; Li, B; Lilburn, T G; McCaughey, M J; Olsen, G J; Overbeek, R; Pramanik, S; Schmidt, T M; Tiedje, J M; Woese, C R. A new version of the RDP (Ribosomal Database Project). Nucleic Acids Res. 1999;27:171–173. [PubMed]
14.
Morlon-Guyot, J; Guyot, J-P; Pot, B; Jacobe de Haut, I; Raimbault, M. Lactobacillus manihotivorans sp. nov., a new starch hydrolyzing lactic acid bacterium isolated from cassava sour starch fermentation. Int J Syst Bacteriol. 1998;48:1101–1109. [PubMed]
15.
Ngaba, P R; Lee, J S. Fermentation of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). J Food Sci. 1979;44:1570–1571.
16.
Poulsen, L K; Ballard, G; Stahl, D A. Use of rRNA fluorescence in situ hybridization for measuring the activity of single cells in young and established biofilms. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1993;59:1354–1360. [PubMed]
17.
Sghir, A; Antonopoulos, D; Mackie, R I. Design and evaluation of a Lactobacillus group-specific ribosomal RNA-targeted hybridization probe and its application to the study of intestinal microecology in pigs. Syst Appl Microbiol. 1998;21:291–296. [PubMed]
18.
Stahl, D A; Flescher, B; Mansfield, H R; Montgomery, L. Use of phylogenetically based hybridization probes for studies of ruminal microbial ecology. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1988;54:1079–1084. [PubMed]
19.
Westby, A; Cereda, M P. Production of fermented cassava starch (polvilho azedo) in Brazil. Trop Sci. 1994;34:203–210.
20.
Zheng, D; Alm, E W; Stahl, D A; Raskin, L. Characterization of universal small-subunit rRNA hybridization probes for quantitative molecular microbial ecology studies. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996;62:4504–4513. [PubMed]