skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 159200  
Title: Believability of Repressed Memories
Journal: Law and Human Behavior  Volume:19  Issue:6  Dated:(December 1995)  Pages:569-591
Author(s): J M Golding ; S A Sego ; R P Sanchez ; D Hasemann
Publication Date: 1995
Pages: 23
Type: Surveys
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: Two experiments examined how mock jurors react to a case involving a repressed memory of child sexual assault.
Abstract: The participants were 57 male and 66 female college students who took part in partial fulfillment of a course requirement. The participants in Experiment 1 read a fictional civil trial summary; the participants in Experiment 2 read a fictional criminal trial summary. Each summary involved the sexual assault of a 6-year-old female. The summary was presented in three different versions. In the child version, the alleged victim reported her memory of the assault in the same year that the assault occurred. In the repressed version, the alleged victim reported the assault 20 years later, after remembering it for the first time. In the no-repressed version, the alleged victim reported the assault 20 years later, but the memory of the assault had been present for the 20 years. Results revealed that although the alleged victim's testimony was believed to some extent in all versions, the alleged victim in the child version was believed at the highest level; this was associated with more decisions against the defendant. Findings represent an initial step toward understanding how jurors react to repressed memory cases. Tables, methodological information, and 35 references (Author abstract modified)
Main Term(s): Criminology
Index Term(s): Jury decisionmaking ; Child sexual abuse ; Juvenile witnesses ; Witness credibility ; Adults molested as children
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=159200

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder