\relax 
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Executive Summary}{1}}
\citation{bnlloi}
\citation{homestk}
\citation{wipp}
\citation{sk}
\citation{sno}
\citation{lsnd}
\citation{boon}
\citation{k2k}
\citation{j2k}
\citation{numi-off}
\citation{minos}
\citation{cngs}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}Introduction}{5}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}Neutrino Oscillations}{5}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}Very Long Baseline Experiment}{6}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces BNL wide band neutrino beam spectrum}}{7}}
\newlabel{wspec}{{1}{7}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Expected event rates}}{8}}
\newlabel{evcount}{{1}{8}}
\@input{disap.aux}
\citation{arafune}
\citation{marciano}
\citation{irina}
\citation{irina2}
\citation{marciano}
\citation{irina}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.2}$\nu _\mu \to \nu _e$ appearance}{20}}
\newlabel{eq:one}{{1}{20}}
\newlabel{eq9}{{1}{20}}
\newlabel{eq:blah}{{2}{20}}
\newlabel{eq6}{{2}{20}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {9}{\ignorespaces P($\nu _\mu \to \nu _e$), $\delta _{CP} = 45^\circ $.}}{21}}
\newlabel{cpasym}{{9}{21}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {10}{\ignorespaces P($\nu _\mu \to \nu _e$), $\delta _{CP} = 0,45^\circ $, matter effects.}}{22}}
\newlabel{pnumunuea}{{10}{22}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {11}{\ignorespaces P($\nu _\mu \to \nu _e$) and P($\mathaccent "7016\relax \nu _\mu \to \mathaccent "7016\relax \nu _e$), $\delta _{CP} = 45^\circ $, matter effects.}}{23}}
\newlabel{pnumunueb}{{11}{23}}
\citation{wolfenstein}
\citation{e889}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.3}Backgrounds}{24}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {12}{\ignorespaces The $q^2$ distribution for NC($\nu $N$\pi ^0$) events}}{26}}
\newlabel{ncq2}{{12}{26}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {13}{\ignorespaces NC($\pi ^0$) energy spectrum}}{27}}
\newlabel{pi0e}{{13}{27}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {14}{\ignorespaces $\pi ^0$ misidentification probability and electron efficiency.}}{28}}
\newlabel{pirej}{{14}{28}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {15}{\ignorespaces $\nu _\mu \to \nu _e$ background reconstructed energy spectrum.}}{29}}
\newlabel{allbck}{{15}{29}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.4}Sensitivity to $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators sin}\nolimits ^2 2 \theta _{13}$ }{30}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {16}{\ignorespaces $\nu _\mu \to \nu _e$ appearance spectrum $\Delta m^2_{32} = 0.0025$}}{31}}
\newlabel{nuenodesa}{{16}{31}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {17}{\ignorespaces $\nu _\mu \to \nu _e$ appearance spectrum $\Delta m^2_{32} = 0.0015$}}{32}}
\newlabel{nuenodesb}{{17}{32}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.5}Sensitivity to the CP violation parameter}{33}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {18}{\ignorespaces Sensitivity to $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators sin}\nolimits ^2 2 \theta _{13}$ and $\Delta m^2_{31}$}}{34}}
\newlabel{limit1}{{18}{34}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {19}{\ignorespaces Sensitivity to $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators sin}\nolimits ^2 2 \theta _{13}$ and $\Delta m^2_{31}$ with $\times $2 NC background.}}{35}}
\newlabel{limit2}{{19}{35}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {20}{\ignorespaces Expected $\nu _e$ appearance at various $\delta _{CP}$}}{36}}
\newlabel{3cp}{{20}{36}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {21}{\ignorespaces Event rate as function of $\delta _{CP}$ for various energies.}}{37}}
\newlabel{cp3bn}{{21}{37}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {22}{\ignorespaces Sensitivity to $\delta _{CP}$ and $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators sin}\nolimits ^2 2 \theta _{13}$}}{38}}
\newlabel{cpth1390}{{22}{38}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.6}Sensitivity to mass hierarchy }{39}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {23}{\ignorespaces Expected statistical uncertainties at test point of $\delta _{CP} = 45^\circ $ and $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators sin}\nolimits ^22\theta _{13} = 0.06$}}{40}}
\newlabel{cpth1345st}{{23}{40}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {24}{\ignorespaces Expected statistical + systematic uncertainties at test point of $\delta _{CP} = 45^\circ $ and $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators sin}\nolimits ^22\theta _{13} = 0.06$}}{41}}
\newlabel{cpth1345sy}{{24}{41}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {25}{\ignorespaces Expected statistical + systematic uncertainties at test point of $\delta _{CP} = 135^\circ $ and $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators sin}\nolimits ^22\theta _{13} = 0.04$}}{42}}
\newlabel{cpvsth13-3}{{25}{42}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {26}{\ignorespaces Expected statistical + systematic uncertainties at test point of $\delta _{CP} = -90^\circ $ and $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators sin}\nolimits ^22\theta _{13} = 0.06$}}{43}}
\newlabel{cpvsth13-4}{{26}{43}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {27}{\ignorespaces P($\nu _\mu \to \nu _e$) with natural and unnatural mass hierarchy at $\delta _{CP} = 0,180^\circ $}}{44}}
\newlabel{nurevm}{{27}{44}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {28}{\ignorespaces Sensitivity to $\Delta m^2_31$ and $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators sin}\nolimits ^22\theta _{13}$ for natural and unnatural mass hierarchy at $\delta _{CP} = 0,180^\circ $}}{45}}
\newlabel{sin13revm}{{28}{45}}
\citation{e734d}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.7}Sensitivity to $\Delta m^2_{21}$ }{46}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {29}{\ignorespaces P($\mathaccent "7016\relax \nu _\mu \to \mathaccent "7016\relax \nu _e$), unnatural hierarchy, $\delta _{CP} = 0,180^\circ $}}{47}}
\newlabel{anurevm}{{29}{47}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {30}{\ignorespaces  Cross section for quasielastic events. $\nu _e + n \to e^- + p$ for neutrinos and $\mathaccent "7016\relax \nu _e + p \to e^+ + n$ for anti-neutrinos. }}{48}}
\newlabel{qecrs}{{30}{48}}
\citation{kamland}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.8}The Experimental Strategy and Program}{49}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {31}{\ignorespaces  Spectrum of electron-like events for $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators sin}\nolimits ^2 2 \theta _{13}=0$. The other important parameters are $\Delta m^2_{21} = 6\times 10^{-5} eV^2$ and $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators sin}\nolimits ^2 2 \theta _{12} =0.8$. }}{50}}
\newlabel{sol1}{{31}{50}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {32}{\ignorespaces  Spectrum of electron-like events for $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators sin}\nolimits ^2 2 \theta _{13}=0$. The other important parameters are $\Delta m^2_{21} = 6\times 10^{-5} eV^2$ and $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators sin}\nolimits ^2 2 \theta _{12} =0.8$. }}{51}}
\newlabel{sol2}{{32}{51}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {33}{\ignorespaces 68, 90, and 99 percent confidence level contours for a measurement at the LMA best fit point.}}{52}}
\newlabel{sol3}{{33}{52}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {34}{\ignorespaces Expected 90\% confidence level limit on $\Delta m^2_{21}$ versus $\mathop {\mathgroup \symoperators sin}\nolimits ^2 2 \theta _{12}$ if there is no excess of electron-like events.}}{53}}
\newlabel{sol4}{{34}{53}}
\citation{3m}
\citation{study2}
\citation{uno}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.9}Detectors for the very long baseline experiment}{54}}
\citation{muonflux}
\citation{muonflux}
\citation{uno}
\citation{uno}
\citation{ICARUS}
\citation{lannddp}
\citation{franco1}
\citation{skahn}
\citation{argonprop}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {35}{\ignorespaces Cosmic ray muon intensity as a function of depth in meters water equivalent (m.w.e) (from ref \cite  {muonflux}).}}{56}}
\newlabel{muon_depth}{{35}{56}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {36}{\ignorespaces Conceptual design of baseline UNO detector (from ref \cite  {uno}).}}{57}}
\newlabel{uno_detector}{{36}{57}}
\citation{study2}
\citation{Proton:ref1}
\citation{acc:ref2}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5}AGS Upgrade}{58}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.1}Superconducting LINAC{}}{58}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces AGS Proton Driver Parameters.}}{59}}
\newlabel{tab:tab1}{{2}{59}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {37}{\ignorespaces AGS Proton Driver Layout.}}{59}}
\newlabel{fig1}{{37}{59}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.2}Upgrade to 4 MW}{59}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces General Parameters of the SCL.}}{60}}
\newlabel{tab:tab2}{{3}{60}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.3}Cost of the AGS upgrade}{60}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {6}Neutrino Beam Design}{60}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces Preliminary direct costs of upgrading the AGS to 1 MW. These costs do not include EDIA, contingency, and overheads.}}{61}}
\newlabel{agscost}{{4}{61}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {38}{\ignorespaces BNL-Homestake and BNL-WIPP baselines}}{62}}
\newlabel{blines}{{38}{62}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {39}{\ignorespaces Beam line layout on BNL site}}{63}}
\newlabel{planview}{{39}{63}}
\citation{e889}
\citation{e734}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {40}{\ignorespaces Schematic diagram of neutrino beamline hill}}{64}}
\newlabel{eleview}{{40}{64}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {6.1}Optimization of the wide band spectrum}{64}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {41}{\ignorespaces The design of the horn focusing system used for the E734 experiment adapted from the E889 proposal.}}{65}}
\newlabel{horns}{{41}{65}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {42}{\ignorespaces Neutrino energy spectrum with copper or Super-Invar target}}{66}}
\newlabel{bnlspec}{{42}{66}}
\citation{mars}
\citation{harp}
\citation{e910}
\citation{numihose}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {6.2}Target Station}{67}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {43}{\ignorespaces Geometry of the focusing horns}}{68}}
\newlabel{horns2}{{43}{68}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {44}{\ignorespaces Optimized $\nu _\mu $ neutrino energy spectrum with graphite target.}}{69}}
\newlabel{ctarg1}{{44}{69}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {45}{\ignorespaces Optimized $\nu _e$ neutrino energy spectrum with graphite target.}}{70}}
\newlabel{ctarg2}{{45}{70}}
\citation{study2}
\citation{e951}
\citation{e951}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {46}{\ignorespaces Details of first horn and target positioning.}}{72}}
\newlabel{Horn}{{46}{72}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {47}{\ignorespaces $\pi ^+$ production in various targets}}{74}}
\newlabel{hkirk2}{{47}{74}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {48}{\ignorespaces $\pi ^-$ production in various targets}}{75}}
\newlabel{hkirk3}{{48}{75}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {6.3}Cost of the neutrino beam}{76}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {49}{\ignorespaces Secondary/Primary ratio {\it  vs.} production radius.}}{77}}
\newlabel{hkirk4}{{49}{77}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {50}{\ignorespaces Secondary/Primary ratio {\it  vs.} target length.}}{78}}
\newlabel{hkirk5}{{50}{78}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {51}{\ignorespaces The energy deposition is shown as a function of target axial position for a 28 GeV 100 TP beam.}}{79}}
\newlabel{hkirk6}{{51}{79}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces Preliminary direct cost (FY02\$M) of building the neutrino beam with 200 meter decay tunnel. These costs do not include EDIA contingency, and overhead.}}{80}}
\newlabel{bcost}{{5}{80}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {7} Conclusion}{80}}
\citation{roser01}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {8}Appendix I Working Group Charge and Assignments}{82}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {9}Appendix II Underground Detector Construction at Homestake}{86}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {9.1}Determination of Excavation Stability}{86}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {9.2}Construction of Multiple 100 kiloton Modules in the Homestake Mine}{86}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {9.3}Construction Timetable and Cost}{87}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {9.4}Rock Removal}{88}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {9.5}Equipment Cost}{88}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {9.6}Choice of Depth and Depth Dependent Cost}{88}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {9.7}What Lessons About Depth Can be Learned from Previous Experience?}{89}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {9.8}Comparison of Costs at 4850 ft versus 6950 ft}{90}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {}{List of Figures}}{92}}
\citation{muonflux}
\citation{uno}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {}{List of Tables}}{95}}
\@input{bib.aux}
