\relax 
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {1}Executive Summary}{1}}
\newlabel{concl}{{1}{1}}
\citation{spy}
\citation{tpc}
\citation{selex}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {2}Introduction}{2}}
\newlabel{intro}{{2}{2}}
\citation{scale}
\citation{annih}
\citation{scale}
\citation{annih}
\citation{scale}
\citation{scale}
\citation{dpf}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {3}Physics Motivation}{4}}
\newlabel{motivation}{{3}{4}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.1}Scaling Law of Hadronic Fragmentation}{4}}
\newlabel{scaling}{{3.1}{4}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces  $M^2$ distribution for the various subsets in various $t$ ranges. Overall data, weighted by appropriate $\beta _{subset}(M^2)$ is superimposed on the subset data. Data for each $t$ range is offset from the neighboring one by a factor of 10. }}{5}}
\newlabel{sc:fig1}{{1}{5}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces  $t$ distribution for the various subsets in various $M^2$ ranges. Overall data, weighted by appropriate $\beta _{subset}(M^2)$ is superimposed on the subset data. Data for each $M^2$ range is offset from the neighboring one by a factor of 10. }}{6}}
\newlabel{sc:fig2}{{2}{6}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.2}Systematic Errors in NuMI/MINOS Measurements\\ of Neutrino Oscillation Parameters}{7}}
\newlabel{minos}{{3.2}{7}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces  The hadron production angle out of the target for NuMI. }}{8}}
\newlabel{fig:prod_angle}{{3}{8}}
\citation{MINOSTDR}
\citation{wang}
\citation{CKP}
\citation{malensek}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.3} Preliminary Study on Sensitivity of Neutrino Oscillation Parameters\\ to Spectral Variations in MINOS }{9}}
\citation{BGRW}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces  MINOS low energy beam spectra expected at the far detector for $\delta m^2_{32}=0.0$, 0.001, 0.002, 0.003, 0.004, 0.005, 0.006, 0.007 ev$^2$. The curve with the largest number of events is the one for no-oscillations, {\em  i.e.}, $\delta m^2_{32}=0.0$. The curve with the least number of events corresponds to $\delta m^2_{32}=0.007$\nobreakspace  {}ev$^2$. Panel (a)\nobreakspace  {}is for the Geant Fluka model of hadronic spectra and (b)\nobreakspace  {}for the modified spectrum. }}{11}}
\newlabel{fig:loenergy}{{4}{11}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces  MINOS medium energy beam spectra expected at the far detector for $\delta m^2_{32}=0.0$, 0.001, 0.002, 0.003, 0.004, 0.005, 0.006, 0.007 ev$^2$. The curve with the largest number of events is the one for no-oscillations, {\em  i.e.}, $\delta m^2_{32}=0.0$. The curve with the least number of events corresponds to $\delta m^2_{32}=0.007$\nobreakspace  {}ev$^2$. Panel (a)\nobreakspace  {}is for the Geant Fluka model of hadronic spectra and (b)\nobreakspace  {}for the modified spectrum. }}{12}}
\newlabel{fig:medenergy}{{5}{12}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces  MINOS low energy beam run results for a 10\nobreakspace  {}kiloton-year run. Dark rectangle denotes the generated point of sin$^2 2\theta _{23}=0.8$ and $\delta m^2_{32}=0.003$\nobreakspace  {}ev$^2$. The $\star $ denotes the fitted point. 90$\%$\nobreakspace  {}CL MINOS contour is shown for the cases (a)\nobreakspace  {}Geant Fluka spectra used for theoretical curves and experimental results, with SuperK and Kamioka results shown for comparison, (b)\nobreakspace  {}Geant Fluka spectra used for theoretical curves and modified spectra used for experimental results, (c)\nobreakspace  {}modified spectra used for theoretical curves and experimental results and (d)\nobreakspace  {}modified spectra used for theoretical curves and Geant Fluka spectra used for experimental results. }}{13}}
\newlabel{fig:locnts}{{6}{13}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces  MINOS low energy beam run results for a 10\nobreakspace  {}kiloton-year run. Events generated for sin$^2 2\theta _{23}=0.8$ and $\delta m^2_{32}=0.003$\nobreakspace  {}ev$^2$. Experimental spectra (histograms with error bars) and fitted functions (hatched histograms) for (a)\nobreakspace  {}Geant Fluka spectra used for theoretical curves and experimental results, (b)\nobreakspace  {}Geant Fluka spectra used for theoretical curves and modified spectra used for experimental results, (c)\nobreakspace  {}modified spectra used for theoretical curves and experimental results and (d)\nobreakspace  {}modified spectra used for theoretical curves and Geant Fluka spectra used for experimental results. }}{14}}
\newlabel{fig:lofits}{{7}{14}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {8}{\ignorespaces  MINOS medium energy beam run results for a 10\nobreakspace  {}kiloton-year run. Dark rectangle denotes the generated point of sin$^2 2\theta _{23}=0.8$ and $\delta m^2_{32}=0.005$\nobreakspace  {}ev$^2$. The $\star $ denotes the fitted point. 90$\%$\nobreakspace  {}CL MINOS contour is shown for the cases (a)\nobreakspace  {}Geant Fluka spectra used for theoretical curves and experimental results, with SuperK and Kamioka results shown for comparison, (b)\nobreakspace  {}Geant Fluka spectra used for theoretical curves and modified spectra used for experimental results, (c)\nobreakspace  {}modified spectra used for theoretical curves and experimental results and (d)\nobreakspace  {}modified spectra used for theoretical curves and Geant Fluka spectra used for experimental results. }}{15}}
\newlabel{fig:medcnts}{{8}{15}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {9}{\ignorespaces  MINOS medium energy beam run results for a 10\nobreakspace  {}kiloton-year run. Events generated for sin$^2 2\theta _{23}=0.8$ and $\delta m^2_{32}=0.005$\nobreakspace  {}ev$^2$. Experimental spectra (histograms with error bars) and fitted functions (hatched histograms) for (a)\nobreakspace  {}Geant Fluka spectra used for theoretical curves and experimental results, (b)\nobreakspace  {}Geant Fluka spectra used for theoretical curves and modified spectra used for experimental results, (c)\nobreakspace  {}modified spectra used for theoretical curves and experimental results and (d)\nobreakspace  {}modified spectra used for theoretical curves and Geant Fluka spectra used for experimental results. }}{16}}
\newlabel{fig:medfits}{{9}{16}}
\citation{bus75}
\citation{eli80}
\citation{bus88}
\citation{Che99:Measuring}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.4}Proton-Nucleus Physics}{17}}
\newlabel{pA}{{3.4}{17}}
\citation{Bjo83:Highly}
\citation{cern00}
\citation{Abb92:Measurement}
\citation{Bialkowska:1992kq}
\citation{Chemakin:2000ha}
\citation{yan00}
\citation{bjo92}
\citation{yan00}
\citation{ycol00}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {10}{\ignorespaces  Examples of heavy ion data showing strangeness enhancement. Top - data from AGS E866 showing the $K^+$ yield per participant {\em  vs.} \unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {$N_{\rm  part}$}in \unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {Si$A$}\ and \unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {AuAu}\ collisions; \unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {$pp$}\ data shown in solid symbols. Bottom - Data from SPS experiment WA97 showing various strange baryon yields per participant relative to \unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {$p$Be}\ collisions. }}{19}}
\newlabel{fig:enhance}{{10}{19}}
\citation{Bialkowska:1992kq}
\citation{Gazdzicki:1996pk}
\citation{yan00}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {11}{\ignorespaces  \unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {$\nu $}\ dependence of \unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {$\mit  \Lambda $}\ production in 17.5 GeV/$c$ $p$Au collisions from E910. Solid points show yield within E910 acceptance, open points show estimated total yield. Solid line shows participant scaling of \unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {$pp$}\ data, dot-dashed shows maximal ``binary-collision'' scaling. Dashed line shows empirical fit, \unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {$N_\Lambda = N_{\rm  pp}(1-e^{-0.3\nu ^{1.3}})/(1-e^{-0.3})$.} }}{20}}
\newlabel{fig:e910lam}{{11}{20}}
\citation{and98}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {12}{\ignorespaces  Top - Estimates of \unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {$\mit  \Lambda $}, \unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {$\mit  \Xi ^-$}, and \unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {$\mit  \Omega ^-$}\ production from projectile fragmentation in \unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {$pA$}\ collisions as a function of \unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {$\nu $}\ based on the constituent quark model (see text for details). Bottom - projectile fragmentation rates for \unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {$\mit  \Xi ^-$}\ and \unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {$\mit  \Omega ^-$}\ relative to \unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {$\mit  \Lambda $}'s. }}{21}}
\newlabel{fig:ratenu}{{12}{21}}
\newlabel{eq:centrates}{{4}{21}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {13}{\ignorespaces Invariant mass plot for \unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {$\mit  \Lambda $}$\pi ^-$ pairs. See text for details.}}{22}}
\newlabel{fig:e910xi}{{13}{22}}
\citation{bus84}
\citation{barton}
\citation{too87}
\citation{abe88}
\citation{bus84}
\citation{Chemakin:1999cp}
\citation{cho97}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {14}{\ignorespaces  $\delimiter "426830A \Delta y \delimiter "526930B $ for 18\nobreakspace  {}GeV/$c$ {\em  vs.} the number of recoil nucleons measured in the TPC, $N_{\rm  grey}$, and \unhbox \voidb@x \hbox {$\nu $}\ extracted from this quantity. }}{23}}
\newlabel{fig:dy_nu}{{14}{23}}
\citation{Superk1}
\citation{Kajita}
\citation{Atherton}
\citation{SPY}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.5}Measurements for Atmospheric Neutrino Physics}{24}}
\newlabel{atmos}{{3.5}{24}}
\citation{fnals}
\citation{cerns}
\citation{fnals}
\citation{cerns}
\citation{harp}
\citation{mars}
\citation{geant}
\citation{model}
\citation{barkov}
\citation{atherton}
\citation{spy}
\citation{barkov}
\citation{barkov}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {1}{\ignorespaces Sources of Error in Prediction $\Phi (\nu )$:}}{25}}
\newlabel{tab:athm_err}{{1}{25}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.6}Neutrino Factory Needs}{25}}
\newlabel{neufact}{{3.6}{25}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.7}Quality of Existing Hadroproduction Data}{25}}
\newlabel{other}{{3.7}{25}}
\citation{bozhko}
\citation{atherton}
\citation{barton}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {15}{\ignorespaces Invariant cross section of $\pi ^{-}$ production in $p$Be interactions as a function of Feynman $x$ for $p_t$=0 GeV/$c$. Symbols - experimental data; curves - model calculations.}}{26}}
\newlabel{fig:piminusx}{{15}{26}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {16}{\ignorespaces Invariant cross section of $\pi ^{+}$ production in $p$Be interactions as a function of Feynman $x$ for $p_t$=0 GeV/$c$. Symbols - experimental data; curves - model calculations.}}{27}}
\newlabel{fig:piplusx}{{16}{27}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {17}{\ignorespaces Invariant cross section of $\pi ^{+}$ production in $p$Be interactions as a function of Feynman $x$ for $p_t$=0.5 GeV/$c$. Symbols - experimental data; curves - model calculations.}}{27}}
\newlabel{fig:piplusx5}{{17}{27}}
\citation{dgh}
\citation{pdg}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {18}{\ignorespaces Invariant cross section of $\pi ^{+}$ production in $p$Be interactions as a function of the transverse mass $m_T=\sqrt  {p^2_T+m^2_{\pi }}$ of the $\pi ^{+}$. Symbols - experimental data; curves - model calculations.}}{28}}
\newlabel{fig:piplust}{{18}{28}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {3.8}Light Meson Spectroscopy}{28}}
\newlabel{glueb}{{3.8}{28}}
\citation{goul}
\citation{markianos}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {2}{\ignorespaces  Meson multiplet assignments form. }}{29}}
\newlabel{mltplts}{{2}{29}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {4}Beam and Experimental Layout}{31}}
\newlabel{layout}{{4}{31}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.1}Implementation Scheme}{31}}
\newlabel{impl}{{4.1}{31}}
\citation{malensek}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {19}{\ignorespaces  Layout of proposed Meson Center beam line in enclosure MC7. }}{32}}
\newlabel{mc7}{{19}{32}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {20}{\ignorespaces  Layout of secondary beamline proposed for Meson Center. }}{32}}
\newlabel{mc5lo}{{20}{32}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.2}Beam Requirements}{32}}
\newlabel{beam}{{4.2}{32}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {21}{\ignorespaces  Schematic of secondary beamline proposed for Meson Center with TRANSPORT calculation superimposed. }}{33}}
\newlabel{mc5sch}{{21}{33}}
\citation{Christian}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {22}{\ignorespaces Positive particle production for a 120 GeV/$c$ incident proton beam. }}{34}}
\newlabel{pos}{{22}{34}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.3}Event Rates}{34}}
\newlabel{rates}{{4.3}{34}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {23}{\ignorespaces  Negative particle production for a 120 GeV/$c$ incident proton beam. }}{35}}
\newlabel{neg}{{23}{35}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {24}{\ignorespaces  Particle velocities and threshold indices of refraction as a function of secondary beam momentum. }}{35}}
\newlabel{cerenkov1}{{24}{35}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {25}{\ignorespaces  Particle velocities and threshold indices of refraction as a function of secondary beam momentum. }}{36}}
\newlabel{cerenkov2}{{25}{36}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {26}{\ignorespaces  Beam ellipses at 115 GeV/$c$ secondary momentum with magnet apertures superimposed (dotted lines). }}{36}}
\newlabel{spot}{{26}{36}}
\citation{malensek}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {3}{\ignorespaces  Particle rates, prescale factors and event yields for a positive secondary beam. }}{37}}
\newlabel{tab:pos}{{3}{37}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.4}Primary Beam Rate Requirements}{37}}
\citation{NuMI}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {4}{\ignorespaces  Particle rates, prescale factors and event yields for a negative secondary beam. }}{38}}
\newlabel{tab:neg}{{4}{38}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {4.5}Running Time Requirements}{38}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {5}{\ignorespaces  Primary beam rates, secondary beam rates and event yields for a positive secondary beam. }}{39}}
\newlabel{tab:posbeam}{{5}{39}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {6}{\ignorespaces  Primary beam rates, secondary beam rates and event yields for a negative secondary beam. }}{39}}
\newlabel{tab:negbeam}{{6}{39}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {7}{\ignorespaces Running time requirements for various aspects of E907 running. }}{40}}
\newlabel{tab:time}{{7}{40}}
\citation{colqm97}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {5}Detector Performance}{41}}
\newlabel{performance}{{5}{41}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.1}Particle Acceptances}{41}}
\newlabel{accep}{{5.1}{41}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.2}Particle Resolutions}{41}}
\newlabel{resol}{{5.2}{41}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.3}Particle Identification}{41}}
\newlabel{pid}{{5.3}{41}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {27}{\ignorespaces  Experiment layout in MC7. }}{42}}
\newlabel{scheme}{{27}{42}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {28}{\ignorespaces  Acceptance efficiencies for 1\% interaction targets. Acceptance requirements are (a)\nobreakspace  {}10\nobreakspace  {}hits in the TPC, top left panel, (b)\nobreakspace  {}a hit in the \v {C}erenkov, top right panel, (c)\nobreakspace  {}a hit in DC\nobreakspace  {}10, the drift chamber just upstream of the RICH, bottom left panel and (d)\nobreakspace  {}passage through the mid-$z$-plane of the RICH, bottom right panel. }}{42}}
\newlabel{regacc}{{28}{42}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {29}{\ignorespaces  Acceptance efficiencies for the NuMI target. Acceptance requirements are (a)\nobreakspace  {}10\nobreakspace  {}hits in the TPC, top left panel, (b)\nobreakspace  {}a hit in the \v {C}erenkov, top right panel, (c)\nobreakspace  {}a hit in DC\nobreakspace  {}10, the drift chamber just upstream of the RICH, bottom left panel and (d)\nobreakspace  {}passage through the mid-$z$-plane of the RICH, bottom right panel. }}{43}}
\newlabel{numiacc}{{29}{43}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {30}{\ignorespaces  $dE/dx$ particle bands for tracklengths of greater than 50 pads in the TPC. The data are 18\nobreakspace  {}GeV/$c$ p+Au events from E910. }}{43}}
\newlabel{fig:dedx}{{30}{43}}
\citation{jeng}
\citation{litt}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {31}{\ignorespaces  Acceptance efficiency in the TOF for 1\% interaction targets. }}{44}}
\newlabel{fig:tofacc}{{31}{44}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {8}{\ignorespaces  Momentum thresholds (GeV/$c$) for three \v {C}erenkov gases. }}{44}}
\newlabel{tab:rich}{{8}{44}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {9}{\ignorespaces  Momentum ranges, in GeV/$c$, per particle for each PID with the addition of each detector. }}{45}}
\newlabel{tab:pid}{{9}{45}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {5.4}Data Acquisition}{45}}
\newlabel{daq}{{5.4}{45}}
\@writefile{lof}{\contentsline {figure}{\numberline {32}{\ignorespaces Particle identification acceptances for positive particles.}}{46}}
\newlabel{fig:ypt_pid}{{32}{46}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {6}Cost and Schedule}{48}}
\newlabel{costs}{{6}{48}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {6.1}Cost Estimate}{48}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {6.1.1}Scope of Estimate}{48}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {6.1.2}Estimate Methodology and Basis}{49}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {10}{\ignorespaces  Work breakdown structure (WBS) and preliminary cost estimates by task. For each task EDIA (engineering, design, inspection, and administration), Labor, M\&S (materials and supplies) are rolled up separately. Labor is further broken down into ``FNAL \& E907'', labor to be provided by Fermilab and E907, or ``FNAL $\mid $ T\&M'', labor that can be provided by Fermilab (to minimize cost) or by T\&M contracts (to minimize the use of Fermilab manpower). We have assumed that this labor is provided by Fermilab. M\&S is further broken down into ``T\&M'', contracts for heavy rigging, and ``Other M\&S'' for the remainder. The last column shows the total cost for each task. We assume that physicist effort is not charged directly to the experiment; tasks with zero direct cost are to be done by physicists, as shown in the manpower estimate, below. \vspace  \bigskipamount }}{50}}
\newlabel{tab:WBS_cost}{{10}{50}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {6.1.3}Contingency}{53}}
\citation{malensek}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsection}{\numberline {6.2}Manpower Estimate}{54}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {subsubsection}{\numberline {6.2.1}Physicist Effort for Core Analysis}{54}}
\@writefile{lot}{\contentsline {table}{\numberline {11}{\ignorespaces  Work breakdown structure (WBS) rolled up by effort for Physicists, Engineers, and Technicians, in man weeks. }}{55}}
\newlabel{tab:WBS_effort}{{11}{55}}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{\numberline {A}Schedule for 120\nobreakspace  {}GeV Beam to the Meson Lab}{56}}
\newlabel{sy120}{{A}{56}}
\bibcite{tpc}{1}
\bibcite{selex}{2}
\bibcite{minos}{3}
\bibcite{harp}{4}
\bibcite{na49}{5}
\bibcite{mars}{6}
\bibcite{geant}{7}
\bibcite{model}{8}
\bibcite{bozhko}{9}
\bibcite{atherton}{10}
\bibcite{spy}{11}
\bibcite{barkov}{12}
\bibcite{na44}{13}
\bibcite{barton}{14}
\bibcite{scale}{15}
\bibcite{annih}{16}
\bibcite{dpf}{17}
\bibcite{litt}{18}
\bibcite{dgh}{19}
\bibcite{pdg}{20}
\bibcite{goul}{21}
\bibcite{markianos}{22}
\@writefile{toc}{\contentsline {section}{References}{57}}
\bibcite{Abb92:Measurement}{23}
\bibcite{abe88}{24}
\bibcite{and98}{25}
\bibcite{Bialkowska:1992kq}{26}
\bibcite{Bjo83:Highly}{27}
\bibcite{bus75}{28}
\bibcite{bus84}{29}
\bibcite{bus88}{30}
\bibcite{Chemakin:1999cp}{31}
\bibcite{Che99:Measuring}{32}
\bibcite{Chemakin:2000ha}{33}
\bibcite{cho97}{34}
\bibcite{ycol00}{35}
\bibcite{eli80}{36}
\bibcite{cern00}{37}
\bibcite{Gazdzicki:1996pk}{38}
\bibcite{too87}{39}
\bibcite{yan00}{40}
\bibcite{bjo92}{41}
\bibcite{Superk1}{42}
\bibcite{Kajita}{43}
\bibcite{Atherton}{44}
\bibcite{SPY}{45}
\bibcite{fnals}{46}
\bibcite{cerns}{47}
\bibcite{MINOSTDR}{48}
\bibcite{wang}{49}
\bibcite{CKP}{50}
\bibcite{malensek}{51}
\bibcite{BGRW}{52}
\bibcite{Christian}{53}
\bibcite{NuMI}{54}
\bibcite{jeng}{55}
\bibcite{colqm97}{56}
