skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 059851  
Title: COMPLAINANT'S CONDITION IN RAPE CASES
Journal: MEDICINE, SCIENCE AND THE LAW  Volume:19  Issue:1  Dated:(JANUARY 1979)  Pages:25-28
Author(s): A M SMITH
Corporate Author: John Wright and Sons, Ltd
United Kingdom
Publication Date: 1979
Pages: 4
Origin: United Kingdom
Language: English
Annotation: BY EXAMINING ENGLISH CASE LAW, THOSE ASPECTS OF THE COMPLAINANT'S CONDITION WHICH SERVE AS CORROBORATIVE EVIDENCE IN RAPE CASES ARE IDENTIFIED.
Abstract: JUDICIAL DECISIONS SHOW THAT CORROBORATIVE EVIDENCE OF RAPE MAY BE OBTAINED FROM THE VICTIM'S CONDITION ONLY IN LIMITED CIRCUMSTANCES. EVIDENCE OF VIOLENCE IS NOT SUFFICIENT TO ESTABLISH RAPE, SINCE INJURY COULD HAVE RESULTED FROM OTHER MEANS THAN THE ACT OF RAPE. HOWEVER, EXTREME INJURIES TO THE GENITALS ARE MOST LIKELY TO BE ACCEPTED AS CORROBORATIVE EVIDENCE THAT RAPE HAS OCCURRED. THE GENERAL APPEARANCE, DEMEANOR, AND EMOTIONAL STATE OF THE COMPLAINANT ARE OTHER FACTORS SOMETIMES USED BY THE PROSECUTION AS CORROBORATIVE EVIDENCE. DECISIONS IN WHICH APPEARANCE HAS BEEN CONSIDERED SUGGEST THAT VARYING WEIGHT MAY BE GIVEN TO SUCH EVIDENCE. A COMPLAINANT'S 'DISHEVELLED CONDITION' IS CONSIDERED EQUIVOCAL IN RELEVANT CASES, AS IT MAY HAVE BEEN CAUSED BY ROUGH HANDLING DURING A SUCCESSION OF ACTS OF INTERCOURSE TO WHICH SHE CONSENTED. IN A NUMBER OF CASES, THE COMPLAINANT'S DISTRAUGHT MANNER MAY HAVE PROVIDED CORROBORATION OF HER STORY. HOWEVER, THE COURTS HAVE BEEN EXTREMELY CAUTIOUS ABOUT THE VALIDITY OF SUCH EVIDENCE. THE COURTS HAVE ALSO REPEATEDLY STRESSED THAT A DISTRAUGHT CONDITION MAY BE FEIGNED AND SHOULD THEREFORE BE TREATED WITH CONSIDERABLE SUSPICION. HOWEVER, IT WOULD NOT BE CORRECT TO SAY THAT EVIDENCE OF A DISTRESSED CONDITION IS OF NO CORROBORATIVE VALUE. IN ONE CASE, IT WAS DECIDED THAT THE WEIGHT GIVEN TO THE DISTRESSED CONDITION OF THE COMPLAINANT SHOULD DEPEND UPON SUCH FACTORS AS THE AGE OF THE COMPLAINANT, THE TIME INTERVAL BETWEEN THE ALLEGED ASSAULT AND WHEN SHE WAS OBSERVED IN DISTRESS, HER CONDUCT AND APPEARANCE IN THE INTERIM, AND THE CIRCUMSTANCES EXISTING WHEN SHE WAS OBSERVED IN THE DISTRESSED CONDITION. REFERENCES ARE PROVIDED. (RCB)
Index Term(s): Rape ; Evidence ; Judicial decisions/ ; Great Britain
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=59851

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder