| How to Obtain
Documents |
| |
| NCJ Number:
|
NCJ 117161
|
| Title:
|
Self-Defense in Kentucky: A Need for Clarification or Revision
|
| Journal:
|
Kentucky Law Journal Volume:76 Issue:1 Dated:(1987-88) Pages:167-199
|
| Author(s):
|
W S Cooper ; R G Lawson
|
| Publication Date:
|
1988 |
| Pages:
|
33 |
| Type:
|
Legislation/policy analysis |
| Origin:
|
United States |
| Language:
|
English |
| Annotation:
|
This article reviews Kentucky's current statute regarding homicide in self-defense and proposes a revision that would address an unreasonable perception of risk of harm as the basis for a self-defense homicide. |
| Abstract:
|
The only provision in Kentucky's Code that gives an accused a basis for claiming self-defense is Kentucky Revised Statutes section 503.050. The defense defined by this statute is absolute, entitling an accused to exoneration on the sole basis of a subjective belief in the need for self-protection. Section 503.120(1) purports to qualify this absolute defense by declaring the defense unavailable when the defendant's subjective belief is wantonly or recklessly mistaken. According to the Kentucky Supreme Court, however, the Kentucky General Assembly did not define the lesser degrees of homicide (those committed through wantonness or recklessness) to include killings with a wanton or a reckless belief in the need for self-protection, thereby leaving the qualifying section unimplemented and the absolute defense fully intact. The law should be revised to indicate that a killing under a belief in the need for self-protection would be manslaughter in the second degree upon a showing that the defendant acted in the face of a substantial and unjustifiable risk of mistaken belief in the need for self-protection; that the defendant was aware of and consciously disregarded the risk that he was mistaken in his belief; and in acting, he grossly deviated from the standard of conduct that a reasonable person would have observed in the same situation. Reckless homicide would be the offense upon a showing that the previous conditions existed, with the exception that before acting, the defendant failed to perceive the risk that he was mistaken in his belief regarding the need for self-protection. 109 footnotes. |
| Main Term(s):
|
Self defense |
| Index Term(s):
|
State laws ; Kentucky |
| |
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=117161
|
* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents
not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.
|
|
Help | Contact Us | Home
