skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 110297  
Title: Philosophy, Jurisprudence, and Jurispredential Temperament of Federal Judges
Journal: Indiana Law Review  Volume:20  Issue:2  Dated:(Spring 1987)  Pages:453-515
Author(s): R J Aldisert
Publication Date: 1987
Pages: 63
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: This article examines manifestations of legal philosophy, jurisprudence, and jurisprudential temperament as factors that influence the decisions of Federal judges.
Abstract: There is a distinction between philosophy of law and 'a' philosophy of law. Legal philosophy inquires into the problems of terminology, legal methods, the role of precedent, statutory interpretation, underlying rationale, the use of different types of authority, the efficacy of various controls, and their operation in diverse factual scenarios, and the basic issues concerning the values implemented. 'A' legal philosophy refers to the specific answers to the aforementioned basic inquiries by respectable thinkers on the bench and in academia. Jurisprudence is a body of law that has formal features, and jurisprudential temperament determines whether the case result is found in the jurisprudence; requires a choice between two competing precepts, also in the jurisprudence; or requires recourse to first principles. Based on the aforementioned factors this article examines the meanings of the judge as 'lawmaker' and as 'declarer of public policy.' Other variables in Federal judicial decisionmaking examined are constitutional law interpretation and statutory construction. The necessity for 'reasoned elaboration,' regardless of legal philosophy, is discussed as an important factor in judicial decisionmaking. 293 footnotes.
Main Term(s): Judicial attitudes
Index Term(s): Judicial discretion ; Federal courts ; Jurisprudence ; Judicial activism
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=110297

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder