SUPPLEMENTARY
CALCULATIONS AND INFORMATION:
(Note: paragraph numbering
corresponds to that of the GSA Today response)
1. MICROSPHERULES. To compare the local ET accretion
rate for the Younger Dryas impact layer (YDB) to the global accretion rate from
Karner et al. (2003) of 2.5 x 109 g yr-1, it is necessary
to convert the YDB rate to a global value. At 14 sites tested for YDB microspherules,
the average is 389 per 100 cm2 with a range of 6 to 2144 spherules
kg-1 (Firestone et al. 2007, Table 4), which, we propose, accumulated
within one year or less. For the density of microspherules, we adopted a value
of 5.18 g cm-3, the density of magnetite. Sizes ranged from 10 to
250 microns, averaging ~100 microns in diameter. Using the above, we calculated:
Volume of one avg. YDB spherule = 5.24 x 10-13 m3
Weight of one avg. YDB spherule = 2.71 x 10-6 g
Number of YDB spherules (if global) = 1.98 x 1019 yr-1
Total weight of global YDB spherules = 5.37 x 1013 g yr-1
However,
we counted only microspherules, whereas Karner reported values for the
accretion of total ET particles, some of which are not spherules. Yada et al. (2004,
Fig. 4) found that microspherules make up an average of 38% of total ET
material extracted from Antarctic ice. To normalize the global YDB ET material
to account for 38% microspherules, we get:
Total global YDB material =
(5.37 x 1013 g yr-1)/(0.38) =
14.13 x 1013 g yr-1
Comparing
the YDB value to Karner’s value for ET accretion:
(14.13 x 1013 g yr-1)/(
2.5 x 109 g yr-1) = 56,500 times annual accretion
2. IRIDIUM. Rudnick and Gao (2003) reported
iridium concentrations of 0.022 ng g-1. Firestone et al. (2007,
Table 3) reported measurable YDB iridium values ranging from 0.04 to 3.8 ng g-1
and averaging 1.94 ng g-1. Comparing the YDB value to Rudnick’s
iridium values:
(1.94 ng g-1)/(0.022 ng g-1)
= 88
times higher
3. NANODIAMONDS. Firestone et al. (2007, Fig. 11) show
a 13C-NMR plot of nanodiamonds found in glass-like carbon. The
glass-like carbon at that site comprises 1.6% of the sediment, and in the
samples tested, the diamonds comprise ~3% by volume. None were found above or
below the YDB. Testing is underway to fully quantify the nanodiamonds, which
are a widely accepted impact marker. Preliminary results indicate that at 14
sites in 5 countries on 2 continents, they exist only in the YD impact layer in significant quantities that appear
comparable to K/T values reported.
4. STRATIGRAPHIC CONTINUITY. At Blackwater Draw, NM, the Clovis
type-site, Haynes (1995) reported 60 radiocarbon dates, of which 20 closely
span the time of the YD impact event.
Based on this sequence of dates, Haynes et al. (1999) concluded that at
the Clovis surface, which we call the YDB, any break in sedimentation lasted “no more than a decade and possibly much
less.” This duration was much too short to produce the high iridium levels
or magnetic microspherule concentrations we have reported that average 56,500
years of ET accretion.
In addition, radiocarbon dates of sufficient chronologic
resolution from other YDB sites, such as Murray Springs, AZ, support the
conclusion that at the YDB, there was either continuous deposition or only very
brief interruption in sedimentation. Given this evidence, it is implausible
that a “normal rain of ET material” would
have produced the reported large concentrations of markers.
5. IMPACT MARKERS. The following YDB markers peak at the
K/T and YD impact events (for discussion and references, see Firestone et al.,
2007):
1) Magnetic microspherules
2) Magnetic grains
3) Iridium
4) Grape-cluster soot
5) PAHs (polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons)
6) Fullerenes
7) Helium-3
8) Nanodiamonds
9) Extinctions
The
following YDB markers can be produced by intense wildfires (see discussion and
references in Firestone et al., 2007), such as are associated with the K/T impact:
10) Charcoal
11) Glass-like carbon
12) Carbon spherules
13) Black layer (containing charcoal
and wood fragments)
14) Ammonium, nitrates, nitrites, and
oxalates.
While
some of these markers exist at low levels in non-impact layers as well, due to redeposition
and normal ET accretion rates, the crucial distinction is that the
concentrations of markers rise to substantial, synchronous peaks only in impact
layers, including the YDB layer.
REFERENCES:
Carlisle, B.C. & Braman, R.B.,
1991, Nanometre-size diamonds in the
Cretaceous/Tertiary boundary clay of Alberta, Nature, v. 352, p.
708–709.
Firestone, R. B., West, A., Kennett,
J. P., Becker, L., Bunch, T. E., Revay, Z. S., Schultz, P. H., Belgya, T.,
Kennett, D. J., Erlandson, J. M., Dickenson, O. J., Goodyear, A. C., Harris, R.
S., Howard, G. A., Kloosterman, J. B., Lechler, P., Mayewski, P. A.,
Montgomery, J., Poreda, R., Darrah, T., Hee, S. S. Que, Smith, A. R., Stich,
A., Topping, W., Wittke, J. H., Wolbach, W. S., 2007, Evidence for an
extraterrestrial impact 12,900 years ago that contributed to the megafaunal
extinctions and the Younger Dryas cooling, Proceedings of the National Academy
of Sciences, v. 104, p. 16,016–16,021.
Haynes
C.V., Jr., 1995, Geochronology of paleoenvironmental change,
Clovis type site, Blackwater Draw, New Mexico, Geoarchaeology
10 (5):317–388.
Haynes, C.V., Jr., Stanford, D.J.,
Jodry, M., Dickenson, J., Montgomery, J.L., Shelley, P.H., Rovner, I, Agogino,
G.A., 1999, A Clovis well
at the type site 11,500 B.C.: The oldest prehistoric well in America,
Geoarchaeology, v. 14, no. 5, p. 455–470.
Karner, D. B., Muller, R. A., Levine,
J., Asaro, F., Ram, M., and Stolz, M. R., 2003, Extraterrestrial accretion from the GISP2 ice core, Geochimica et
Cosmochimica Acta, v. 67, no. 4, p. 751–763.
Rudnick,
R.L. & Gao, S., 2003, “Composition of the Continental Crust, “ in Holland,
H.D. & Turekian, K.K., eds., Treatise
on Geochemistry: Oxford, UK, Elsevier, v. 3, 50 p. 1–64.
Yada, T., Nakamura, T., Takaoka, N., Noguchi, T.,
Terada, K., Yano, H., Nakazawa, T., and Kojima, H., 2004, The global accretion rate of
extraterrestrial materials in the last glacial period estimated from the
abundance of micrometeorites in Antarctic glacier ice, Earth, Planets and Space, 56, 67-79.