Home
BEMR
Contents
U.S.
Map
Introduction Section
Nuclear Material and Facility Stabilization Section
Environmental Restoration Section
Landlord Section
WASTE MANAGEMENT
Hanford Site has every type of waste found in the complex. Managing the
existing and future waste is the largest life-cycle cost at the site. Hanford
Site waste management programs have undergone major redirection during the past
Fiscal Year. Because of this major redirection the resulting changes may not
have been fully integrated into the overall waste management strategy. Cost
estimates have been prepared as part of multiyear program plans. Information
for the next three years is budget-quality, but the estimates for the outyears
(FY 1999 and after) are a combination of modeled costs, professional judgment,
and projections of current costs. Because outyear activities have not been
firmly identified, plausible assumptions have been made in the following
discussion about the types of facilities needed, the dates on which facilities
will be operational, facility processing rates, and completion dates of
facility operation. It has also been necessary to make best-judgment
assumptions about dates for shipping high-level waste, defense spent nuclear
fuel, and transuranic waste to the Yucca Mountain repository and the Waste
Isolation Pilot Plant.
WASTE MANAGEMENT MAP
Since the Waste Management program receives waste from other generators as well
as from its own activities, its costs reflect treatment, storage and disposal,
as applicable, to all waste it receives. The cost for treatment and disposal of
offsite waste is born by the generators. Waste generators are responsible for
characterizing, packaging, and transporting waste to Hanford's aste Management
program facilities.
Major Waste Management Project Cost Estimate
(Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
|
FY 1996-2000
|
2005
|
2010
|
2015
|
2020
|
2025
|
2030
|
200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility
|
11,994
|
12,543
|
13,884
|
14,341
|
14,341
|
14,341
|
14,624
|
200 Area Treated Effluent Disposal Facility
|
4,503
|
4,389
|
6,115
|
4,389
|
4,389
|
4,389
|
4,389
|
2706 T
|
2,398
|
1,592
|
1,627
|
1,616
|
1,600
|
1,592
|
1,614
|
300 Area Treated Effluent Disposal Facility
|
4,194
|
4,479
|
4,479
|
4,479
|
4,479
|
4,479
|
|
324 Building - Waste Technology
|
10,646
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
340 Facility (300 A Liquid Waste)
|
4,023
|
6,543
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canister Storage Building
|
20,473
|
1,809
|
1,675
|
1,675
|
1,675
|
1,675
|
1,675
|
Central Waste Complex
|
8,323
|
8,302
|
14,289
|
13,719
|
9,557
|
8,316
|
8,557
|
Commercial Stabilization Treatment
|
|
7,600
|
9,500
|
9,500
|
9,500
|
9,500
|
9,500
|
Cs & Sr Capsule Storage
|
517 |
7,444
|
27,832 |
4,568
|
286 |
|
|
High Level & Low Level Vitrification
|
381,802
|
417,836
|
546,124
|
711,734
|
601,452
|
300,402
|
117,620
|
HLW Canister Interim Storage Facility
|
8,102
|
5,574
|
5,991
|
6,429
|
5,028
|
5,103
|
3,656
|
Interim Storage Area
|
353 |
941
|
665
|
123
|
|
|
|
K-Basins
|
60,403
|
981 |
|
|
|
|
|
LLW Burial Grounds
|
4,468
|
4,245
|
4,360
|
4,329
|
3,430
|
3,388
|
3,393
|
Non-Radioactive Hazardous Waste Storage
|
439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
PNL Facilities
|
12,189
|
18,773
|
18,774
|
18,774
|
18,774
|
18,774
|
18,774
|
PUREX
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,101
|
|
Radioactive Mixed Waste Trench Ops.
|
437 |
2,690
|
2,051 |
2,036
|
2,017 |
2,007
|
2,034 |
Single and Double Shell Tanks
|
292,542
|
269,471
|
63,656
|
39,618
|
30,446
|
25,085
|
7,398
|
SNF Other Hanford Fuels
|
1,189
|
1,642
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
Spent Fuel Conditioning Facility
|
15,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T Plant
|
15,588
|
14,151
|
30,582
|
29,497
|
29,211
|
29,066
|
29,603
|
Transuranic Waste Stor. and Assay Facil.
|
2,639
|
2,621
|
1,078
|
|
|
|
|
Vitrified LLW Disposal Facility
|
9,973
|
17,288
|
19,568
|
19,491
|
19,504
|
5,483
|
4,003
|
Waste Receiving And Processing Facility
|
9,380
|
9,593
|
12,478
|
12,394
|
12,270
|
12,212
|
12,337
|
...continuted
|
200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility
|
18,075
|
9,818
|
|
|
|
|
|
200 Area Treated Effluent Disposal Facility
|
3,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2706 T
|
1,604
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
300 Area Treated Effluent Disposal Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
324 Building - Waste Technology
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
340 Facility (300 A Liquid Waste)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canister Storage Building
|
1,675
|
3,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
Central Waste Complex
|
6,425
|
466
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Stabilization Treatment
|
9,608
|
540
|
540 |
540
|
40 |
540
|
540
|
s & Sr Capsule Storage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
High Level & Low Level Vitrification
|
14,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HLW Canister Interim Storage Facility
|
6,747
|
23,781
|
5,029
|
|
|
|
|
Interim Storage Area
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
K-Basins
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LLW Burial Grounds
|
3,303
|
3,477
|
3,477
|
3,477
|
3,477
|
3,477
|
3,477
|
Non-Radioactive Hazardous Waste Storage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PNL Facilities
|
18,773
|
18,773
|
18,773
|
18,773
|
18,773
|
18,773
|
18,773
|
PUREX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Radioactive Mixed Waste Trench Ops.
|
2,021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Single and Double Shell Tanks
|
1,361
|
310
|
258 |
|
|
|
|
SNF Other Hanford Fuels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spent Fuel Conditioning Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
T Plant
|
29,420
|
23,505
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transuranic Waste Stor. and Assay Facil.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vitrified LLW Disposal Facility
|
387
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Waste Receiving And Processing Facility
|
2,459
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Major Waste Management Projects Cost Estimate table continued on next page.)
(Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
|
2075
|
2080
|
2085
|
2090
|
2095
|
2100
|
200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
619,800
|
200 Area Treated Effluent Disposal Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,165
|
2706 T
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
68,218
|
300 Area Treated Effluent Disposal Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,940
|
324 Building - Waste Technology
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
53,232
|
340 Facility (300 A Liquid Waste)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
52,831
|
Canister Storage Building
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
177,006
|
Central Waste Complex
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
389,773
|
Commercial Stabilization Treatment
|
540 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
342,440
|
Cs & Sr Capsule Storage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
203,237
|
High Level & Low Level Vitrification
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,458,472
|
HLW Canister Interim Storage Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
377,198
|
Interim Storage Area
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,407
|
K-Basins
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
306,922
|
LLW Burial Grounds
|
3,477
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
276,274
|
Non-Radioactive Hazardous Waste Storage
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,197
|
PNL Facilities
|
18,773
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,375,082
|
PUREX
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,505
|
Radioactive Mixed Waste Trench Ops.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
76,465
|
Single and Double Shell Tanks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,650,720
|
SNF Other Hanford Fuels
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,524
|
Spent Fuel Conditioning Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,261
|
T Plant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,153,119
|
Transuranic Waste Stor. and Assay Facil.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
31,689
|
Vitrified LLW Disposal Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
478,480
|
Waste Receiving And Processing Facility
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
415,614
|
* Project costs represent a subset of total Waste
Management costs.
|
** Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
High-Level Waste
The Hanford Site has stored high-level radioactive waste in large underground
storage tanks since 1944. The first single-shell tank was constructed with a
10- to 20-year design life. Approximately 210 million liters (55 million
gallons) of waste have accumulated in 149 single-shell tanks and
28 double-shell tanks. This radioactive waste consists of different
chemicals and is in the form of liquids, slurries, salt cakes, and sludges. The
high-level waste typically contains over 99 percent of the radioactivity
generated from the reactor and processing activities. This waste is, therefore,
the most difficult and costly to manage.
Sixty-seven of the older single-shell tanks have or are assumed to have leaked
approximately 3.8 million liters (1 million gallons) into the surrounding
soil. No waste has been added to the single-shell tanks since 1980. None of the
28 newer, double-shell tanks (the first of which was placed into service in
1971) have leaked to date. These tanks have a 25- to 50-year design life and
will be used to store waste and sluice water prior to vitrification processing
of the waste. The tanks have a current inventory of approximately 209,000 cubic
meters (273,000 cubic yards) of high-level waste.
GENERATION AND HANDLING
The fuel processing methods generated acidic waste streams. To neutralize the
acid and minimizing tank corrosion, sodium hydroxide was added to the waste
before it was transferred to the tanks. As a result, the tanks currently
contain strongly alkaline solutions. Post-processing of some of the waste to
recover uranium or to recover fission products has resulted in the addition of
ferrocyanide and some organic compounds listed as hazardous by the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act. However, tank waste is mostly inorganic salts of
sodium hydroxide and sodium salts of nitrate, nitrite, carbonate, aluminate,
and phosphate, and hydrous oxides of aluminum, iron, and manganese. The
radioactive components consist primarily of mixed fission products, such as
strontium-90, cesium-137, and isotopes of plutonium, uranium, and americium.
Major Waste Management Baseline Activity Milestones
High-Level Waste
|
Tank Characterization Reports
|
1999
|
Single-Shell Tank Interim Stabilization
|
2000
|
Single-Shell Tank Waste Retrieval
|
2018
|
Closure of Single-Shell Tanks
|
2024
|
Tank Waste Vitrification
|
2028
|
Closure of Double-Shell Tanks
|
2032
|
Spent Nuclear Fuel
|
Removal of Basin Fuel
|
1999
|
Placement in Dry Storage
|
2000
|
K-Basin Project Transfer to Decommissioning
|
2001
|
Removal of 800 Area & FFTF Fuels
|
1997
|
Transuranic Waste
|
WRAP I Construction Phase I
|
1996
|
Low-Level Mixed Waste
|
Award Contract for Commercial Stabilization
|
1996
|
Phase V Storage Construction
|
1997
|
Low-Level Waste
|
Burial Ground Operations
|
2070
|
Hazardous Waste
|
Nondangerous Waste Storage Facility (place in cold standby)
|
1996
|
Sanitary Waste
|
Close Hanford Landfill
|
1996
|
C Plant and other miscellaneous sources have also added to the tank waste
inventory. Although the amount of waste generated is relatively small (3
million liters [803,000 gallons]), the waste typically has a high strontium
content. Other sources of waste include operations in the 300 Area, 100 Area
production reactors, various laboratories, and catch tanks. To absorb residual
supernatant liquors, diatomaceous earth was added to six tanks, and type 2
Portland cement was added to a seventh. Miscellaneous waste streams include
Hanford residual liquor, waste from Hanford laboratory operations, filtered
Hanford site water, and phosphate decontamination waste from the N Reactor.
The double-shell tanks continue to receive waste generated by decommissioning
and cleanup operations in the 100, 200, 300, and 400 Areas. Waste directed to
the double-shell tanks includes effluents from routine maintenance and
deactivation of the Plutonium-Uranium Extraction Plant, waste from B Plant
Waste Encapsulation Storage Facility maintenance activities and condensate,
waste from T Plant operations, laboratory waste from the 222-S Laboratory in
the 200West Area and the 300 Area laboratories, miscellaneous waste from
ion exchange resin regeneration, and equipment flush water. Additional liquid
waste is being added to the double-shell tanks as the remaining liquids are
pumped from single-shell tanks for interim-stabilization. Operation of an
evaporator facility removes water from this waste, thereby recovering
additional tank capacity. The Effluent Treatment Facility in the 200 Area
provides final treatment for the water from this waste.
To store, handle, treat, and immobilize tank waste safely, cleanup personnel
must know the chemical and physical properties of the tank waste. This waste
characterization requires taking samples to analyze the contents of the tanks.
The current baseline calls for the issuance of tank characterization reports
for all 177 Hanford waste tanks by FY 1999.
In addition, there are about 1,900 double-walled stainless steel capsules
containing either cesium chloride or strontium fluoride. The cesium and
strontium were recovered from the tank waste and contain approximately 40
percent of the radioactivity (as measured in curies) in the tank waste. The
Waste Encapsulation and Storage Facility currently stores these capsules. While
no definite plans are in place, this report assumes the capsules would be
transferred to a new facility for interim storage in 2011, until they are sent
to Yucca Mountain for disposal in FY 2043.
LASER ABLATION/MASS SPECTROSCOPY
Laser Ablation/Mass Spectroscopy is being developed to eliminate sample
preparation, generation of secondary waste, and personnel exposure to
radiation. This technology can determine the amount of most elements and
isotopes in a waste tank sample using a more efficient method than currently
exists. After a sample is taken from a tank, a pulsed laser beam is used to
remove very small amounts of materialBa process called ablation. A carrier gas
transports the ablated particles through a sample line to an inductively
coupled plasma/mass spectrometer that determines the elemental composition of
the particles. Used in a laboratory, this method will provide rapid analysis of
tank waste samples that will speed the decisionmaking process and reduce the
need for subsample analysis in laboratories. This technology has been
successfully used in the laboratory, will be demonstrated in FY 1996 on
radioactive waste.
|
TREATMENT
Treatment activities include retrieval, pre-treatment, and waste
immobilization. All waste will be retrieved from double-shell and single-shell
tanks. A substantial amount of secondary waste will be generated as retrieval
equipment is contaminated and obstructions are removed from the tanks. Some
equipment, such as sluicers, valves, and pumps, may be left in the tanks;
removed equipment must be stored, transported, and treated as waste. Retrieval
activities and costs also include tank farm closure (stabilization) and
long-term monitoring. Four retrieval systems (for four double-shell tanks) are
planned before 2002 to allow room for short-term storage of single-shell tank
waste and sluice water. Retrieval of waste from the single-shell tanks will
begin in FY 1997 and is planned for completion by 2018. Sluicing (using
low-pressure, high-volume streams of water to mobilize waste) will be one of
the methods used to retrieve waste from the single-shell tanks. Other retrieval
methods may also be needed to remove the hard sludge heels and other
difficult-to-remove waste.
Tank Waste Treatment Process
Commercial firms, who will design, construct, operate, decontaminate, and
decommission their own equipment and facilities to treat tank waste, will bear
primary responsibility for treating high-level tank waste at Hanford Site. They
will be paid per unit of vitrified (solidified) waste that meets Department of
Energy specifications. The first contract will be awarded in FY 1996; operation
will continue through FY 2005, with six to 13 percent of the tank waste
vitrified. After this demonstration phase, the remainder of tank waste will be
treated under the final contract awarded in FY 2005, with operations completed
by FY 2028.
The retrieved tank waste will require pre-treatment (separation of the waste
into smaller high-level waste and larger low-level mixed waste fractions) to
reduce the volume of high-level waste for disposal in the Yucca Mountain
repository. Pre-treatment consists of both physical separation into a liquid
and sludge and chemical processing of each fraction. Pre-treatment of the
liquid waste fraction will chemically separate such radionuclides as cesium,
strontium, and technetium. These radionuclides will be added to the high-level
waste fraction. High-level waste sludges will be washed with a caustic solution
to dissolve such elements as aluminum, chromium, and zirconium. The dissolved
material will be added to the low-level mixed waste fraction. The remaining
high-level waste sludges and separated radionuclides from the pre-treatment
activities will be combined with glass-forming materials and melted in a
high-temperature melter. The resulting glass will be put into stainless steel
canisters, cooled, seal-welded, and leak-tested. This report expects that
approximately 7,200 canisters of high-level waste will be produced.
Several technical issues must be resolved before the tank farms can be closed,
including remediation approaches for residual tank waste and ancillary
equipment, the disposal strategy for single-shell and double-shell tanks, a
subsidence prevention approach for waste left in place, and a decision about
using surface barriers. Under the current schedule, a tank closure plan will be
submitted by December 2004; closure of the first operable unit or tank farm
will begin by March FY 2012; all single-shell tank farms will close by
September 2024; and all double-shell tank farms will close by FY 2032. The tank
closure plan will determine the levels and methods of long-term monitoring that
will be required for the tank farm areas after FY 2032. For the purposes of
this report, the cost estimate assumes the empty tanks will be filled with
gravel and capped.
STORAGE AND DISPOSAL
After it is solidified, high-level waste sealed in canisters will be
transported to an interim storage facility at Hanford until the Yucca Mountain
repository is ready to accept them. Shipments to the repository are currently
estimated to begin in FY 2035. When all of the waste has been shipped, the
interim storage facility will be decontaminated and closed. Cost estimates
include these activities.
The low-level mixed waste resulting from the pre-treatment processes described
above will be vitrified and disposed of in near-surface vaults at Hanford as it
is generated. The waste will be placed in large containers prior to disposal
and will be disposed of in a retrievable form, as required by the State.
Spent Nuclear Fuel
Several types of spent fuel are present at Hanford. The largest volume of
material is the spent N Reactor fuel currently stored in K Basins. The first
priority in the Spent Nuclear Fuel Project is to expeditiously remove, to a
location away from the Columbia River, the spent fuel from two fuel storage
basins in the 100-K Area. Almost 7,500 canisters containing 2,100 metric tons
of uranium fuel are stored in basins: approximately 3,800 in the KWest
Basin and approximately 3,600 in the K-East Basin. Several other types of spent
fuel are also stored onsite at different locations. Spent nuclear fuel contains
the fission products produced in nuclear reactors. It is, therefore, highly
radioactive, and management procedures similar to those for high-level waste
are necessary. This report assumes that Spent Nuclear Fuel project activities
will generate 2,100 metric tons heavy metal of spent nuclear fuel.
GENERATION AND HANDLING
Uranium metal fuel with zirconium cladding was used in the N Reactor. The 2,100
metric tons (Uranium) spent nuclear fuel remaining in storage was generated by
the operation of the N Reactor from 1970 to 1986. Beginning in 1975, spent fuel
from N Reactor was transferred to the two 100-K Area storage basins. The
100-K Area fuel storage basins, east and west, constructed in the early 1950s
with a 20-year design life, are unlined concrete pools located approximately
0.4 kilometers (0.25 mile) from the banks of the Columbia River. The K-East
Basin has a history of leaking.
Some of the spent fuel cladding was damaged during reactor discharge and
handling. The fuel was not intended for long-term wet storage and, because of
the clad damage, continues to degrade slowly. Corrosion products from the
damaged fuel have contaminated the K-East Basin water and have generated a
large volume (approximately 50 cubic meters [65 cubic yards]) of sludge.
Cleanup of the basin water will result in the generation of spent ion exchanger
material, which must be disposed of at the low-level waste burial ground.
TREATMENT
Fuel conditioning is required to stop fuel corrosion and deterioration and is
expected to be a two-step process. First the fuel will be vacuum dried in the
100-K Area (near the K Basins), then it will be further conditioned in the
Canister Storage Building. During FY 1996, the process parameters to support
the design of the drying and conditioning facilities will be defined, the
design contract will be awarded, and the design activities will begin.
According to the current schedule, fuel conditioning will require two years,
beginning late in FY 1999. Fuel conditioning facilities will be deactivated
when fuel-conditioning operations are completed. Following deactivation, the
Environmental Restoration program will take over the conditioning facilities
for decontamination and decommissioning.
Characterizing the fuel is an integral part of this plan. In the late spring of
1995, hot lab testing in the 327 Building in the 300 Area was begun on
three fuel elements from the K-West Basin. Characterization of both the stored
fuel and basin sludge will continue. After the fuel, sludge, and debris are
removed from the K Basins, preparations will begin for turnover to
Environmental Restoration.
STORAGE
The Canister Storage Building will be located in the 200-East Area of Hanford.
During FY 1996, the design of the Canister Storage Building will be completed
and construction will start after the Environmental Impact Statement Record of
Decision is issued. Current estimates for the interim storage period are
approximately 40 years. (The Richland Operations Office has taken action to
allow a 35-year extension.) Once all of the fuel has been removed from K Basins
and stored in the Canister Storage Building, the Waste Management program will
assume management and operations. After this interim storage period, the
Canister Storage Building will be closed and turned over to the Environmental
Restoration program for decontamination and decommissioning.
The following additional spent fuels are also in storage at Hanford: fuel
materials associated with operation of the Fast Flux Test Facility, which are
currently stored in the 308 Building and at the Fast Flux Test Facility;
Core 2 fuel from the Shippingport Pressurized Water Reactor, currently stored
at T Plant; spent fuel from the Los Alamos Molten Plutonium Reactor Experiment
and the University of Washington, currently stored at the Plutonium Finishing
Plant; fuel assemblies, fuel pins, and fuel pieces associated with hot cell
work, currently stored in the 300 Area; and spent nuclear fuel from Oregon
State University, currently stored in drums in the 200-West Area Low-Level
Waste Burial Ground.
Fuel from the 308 Building and the Fast Flux Test Facility will be consolidated
in the 400 Area Interim Storage Area outside the Fast Flux Test Facility. This
fuel consolidation is a part of the deactivation of facilities in the
300 and 400 Areas and will reduce potential risks in current storage
areas. Remaining fuel from the Plutonium-Uranium Extraction Plant has been
transferred to the K basins; any fuel recovered during the N Basin cleanout
conducted by the Environmental Restoration program will also be transferred
into the K Basins.
Once the Canister Storage Building in the 200-East Area has been completed, a
200 Area Interim Storage Area will be constructed adjacent to it. Most of the
other spent fuels will be consolidated there. Once the fuels are moved, the
Operations Office anticipates they will be managed with the N Reactor spent
fuel. For security reasons, some materials will be stored at the Plutonium
Finishing Plant. Stored fuel will be managed according to the Record of
Decision for the Department of Energy Programmatic Spent Nuclear Fuel
Management and the Idaho National Engineering Laboratory Environmental
Restoration and Waste Management programs Final Environmental Impact Statement.
DISPOSAL
This report assumes the conditioned spent N Reactor fuel will be shipped
without further treatment to a geologic repository. This is projected to occur
no later than FY 2038 and will require the procurement of an acceptable
transportation cask and transport system.
Transuranic Mixed and Transuranic Waste
Transuranic waste has been packaged in containers, segregated from low-level
waste, and retrievably stored since May 1, 1970. Before then, the transuranic
waste was commingled and buried with the lowlevel waste. Current plans are
to retrieve waste stored as retrievable transuranic waste since 1970 and ship
it to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant for disposal. Transuranic waste is
classified both by the way it is stored and by its handling requirements.
Transuranic waste is similar to low-level waste in that it is material used in
processing operations contaminated from handling spent fuel plutonium or
high-level waste. The toxicity of the transuranic elements require they be
handled with care and disposed of in a deep underground repository.
Nonretrievable waste will be left in place and capped over. This report assumes
this site will dispose of a total of 42,191 cubic meters (55,270 cubic yards)
of transuranic and transuranic mixed waste at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant.
Of this total, 15,982 cubic meters (20,674 cubic yards) are transuranic mixed
waste and 26,409 cubic meters (34,596 cubic yards) are transuranic waste.
Because the management procedures at Richland for these waste types are
similar, they are discussed together. However, the cost estimate has been
developed by separating them; therefore, the cost estimates exhibit them
separately.
GENERATION AND HANDLING
A variety of facilities throughout the Hanford Site will generate transuranic
waste. The Plutonium Finishing Plant will continue to be a significant
waste-generator. Retrieval of the waste from the single-shell tanks and from
high-level waste vitrification are projected to generate the largest volume of
remote-handled waste in the Department of Energy complex. In addition, nuclear
facilities that handled spent fuel and transuranic materials are now being
deactivated, and deactivation activities are expected to generate
contact-handled and remote-handled transuranic waste.
Transuranic waste containers have been retrievably stored in 25 trenches in
four burial grounds in the 200-East and 200-West Areas since 1970. Retrievable
transuranic waste is predominantly contact-handled but also includes some
remote-handled materials.
TREATMENT
The Waste Receiving and Processing Module 1 is a 4,800-square meter
(51,736-square foot) structure being constructed in the 200-West Area for
contact-handled transuranic waste. Radioactive solid waste will be
characterized, treated, and repackaged in this facility. Construction began in
1994 and will be completed in FY 1996. Limited operation is scheduled for FY
1997, with shipment to the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant beginning in FY 2007. As
waste is sorted and segregated, some material will be reclassified as low-level
or low-level mixed waste.
Currently, Hanford does not have the capability to process newly generated
remote-handled transuranic waste. However, negotiations under the Tri-Party
Agreement between the Department of Energy, the Washington State Department of
Ecology, and the Environmental Protection Agency are under way to plan for this
capability and set milestone dates. The Richland Operations Office is not
planning any land-disposal-restricted treatment of transuranic waste.
Since no facility has yet been selected for this activity, cost estimates
assume an existing Department facility (T Plant) will be converted to process
remote-handled transuranic waste. Design activities for converting T Plant
would be initiated in FY 2003 and would last three years. After the design
phase, construction would begin in FY 2006 and would be completed in FY 2008.
Processing would begin in FY 2009 and continue through FY 2035.
Retrieval of stored transuranic waste will be split into three phases: 1) Phase
1, retrieving the portion of the stored waste expected to be intact and stored
in a single burial ground trench; 2) Phase 2, handling the remainder of
retrievably stored waste in trenches; and 3) Phase 3, removing remote-handled
waste from burial ground caissons. Phases 1 and 2 will remove mainly
contact-handled transuranic waste. Design work is complete for Phase 1, but no
construction funding is currently planned for FY 1996. No design work has begun
for Phases 2 or 3. Retrievably stored transuranic waste will also be repackaged
at the Waste Receiving and Processing Module 1. During retrieval, a large
volume increase is expected from repackaging and contamination for materials
and soils.
STORAGE
The Transuranic Waste Storage and Assay Facility (224-T), located in the 200
Area, provides approximately 1,070 square meters (11,500 square feet) of
storage space for transuranic waste. The Transuranic Waste Storage and Assay
Facility was originally designed and built in the mid-1940s as a chemical
processing unit for plutonium purification. The Army Corps of Engineers
authorized the facility as part of the Manhattan Project. In 1984, the
Department of Energy designated the facility for storing and assaying newly
generated transuranic waste. After plutonium contamination had been cleaned
out, the facility began storage and assay operations in 1985. In addition, the
Central Waste Complex, which consists of 20 storage buildings, also stores
transuranic waste.
Currently, Hanford does not have a facility for storing newly generated
remote-handled waste packages. The only method now available is to shield the
waste so the package surface meets contact-handled limits. Properly shielded
packages may be stored at the Transuranic Waste Storage and Assay Facility
(224-T), at the Central Waste Complex, or in the 200 Area burial grounds.
DISPOSAL
The Waste Receiving and Processing Module 1 will process contact-handled and
retrievable buried waste for disposal at the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant. When
completed, the remote-handled transuranic waste processing facility will
prepare remote-handled transuranic waste for shipment to the Waste Isolation
Pilot Plant. This report assumes T Plant to be the facility for processing
remote-handled waste. The report also assumes the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant
program will develop and provide a transportation system at no additional cost
to the Hanford programs.
All disposal costs for transuranic and transuranic mixed waste are included in
the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant program estimate. The costs included in this
estimate are for managing transuranic and transuranic mixed waste and include
retrieval, characterization, treatment, and packaging to meet the Waste
Isolation Pilot Plant waste acceptance criteria.
Low-Level Mixed Waste
Hanford Facilities began generating both solid and liquid low-level mixed waste
in the 1940s. Solid low-level mixed waste has been generated both onsite and
offsite. Since 1987, Hanford has stored low-level mixed waste separately from
other waste. Liquid radioactive and mixed wastewater are generated at several
facilities on the site and are managed at two major facilities. Because both
radioactive and mixed wastewaters are combined, all liquid waste is considered
to be mixed waste for management purposes. Low-level mixed waste was material
used in processing operations contaminated with both hazardous and radioactive
materials. They generally have a much lower hazard than high-level, spent
nuclear fuel, or transuranic waste. This report assumes Waste Management
program activities will generate about 90,000 cubic meters (118,000 cubic
yards) of low-level mixed waste.
The Tri-Party Agreement contains provisions pertaining to the treatment of
mixed waste, including treatment conducted under land disposal restrictions of
the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act. Under the agreement, the Hanford
Site annually submits an updated Land Disposal Restrictions Plan for mixed
waste. The most recent update was issued in April 1995. Because the Hanford
Site has a Federal Facility Agreement and Consent Order, and the Land Disposal
Restrictions Plan is a part of these agreements, the Washington Department of
Ecology and the Environmental Protection Agency have formally concurred that a
Federal Facility Compliance Act Site Treatment Plan is not required.
The Hanford Site could receive approximately 62 cubic meters (81 cubic yards)
of low-level mixed waste for treatment over the next five years from eight
other Department of Energy and Naval Reactor sites. Discussions with the
shipping sites' regulators and the Washington Department of Ecology have been
held as part of the approval process for the shipping sites's Site Treatment
Plans before their Site Treatment Plans were issued. The generators, start date
of delivery, and volume projections are provided in the table below.
The data presented in the table are based upon data received from generating
sites concerning the amount of waste they assumed they were shipping. These
data do no necessarily reflect the expectations of the Richland Field Office
and they have not been reviewed or approved by the State, the Environmental
Protection Agency, or other local stakeholder organizations.
Low-Level Mixed Waste Generators
Battelle Columbus Laboratory
|
1996
|
12
|
General Atomics |
1999
|
4
|
Knolls - Kesselring
|
2001
|
5
|
Knolls - Schenectady
|
2001
|
4
|
Knolls - Windsor |
2001
|
4
|
Pearl Harbor Naval Station
|
2001
|
5
|
Portsmouth Naval Station
|
2001
|
1
|
Puget Sound Naval Station
|
2001
|
27
|
Total |
|
62
|
Hanford manages three additional solid low-level mixed waste streams. Vitrified
low-level mixed waste will be generated by the high-level waste vitrification
process and is costed in the high-level waste section of the report. The
Environmental Restoration program will also generate some low-level mixed waste
which is costed in that section of the report. Submarine reactor compartments
are also received at the site and disposed in unlined trenches. However, they
are not included as a part of the Environmental Management program and are not
included within the scope of this report.
GENERATION AND HANDLING
A variety of sources generate contact-handled low-level mixed waste. They
include laboratories, construction sites, reactor facilities, fuel and waste
processing facilities and maintenance and remediation activities. Remediation
of the 183H Basin generated the largest volume of this waste. These basins were
used for solar evaporation of certain liquids from the N Reactor fuel
fabrication activities and include solidified liquids, crystalline solids, and
sludge containing salts and some heavy metals. Future retrieval, processing,
and other waste management activities will produce larger volumes of waste.
Remote-handled solid low-level mixed waste is mainly generated from
deactivation and decontamination of facilities and from high-level waste tank
retrieval. Much of this material is currently stored in tanks, and some of the
material has not been declared waste, but it is assumed it will become waste.
TREATMENT
The primary options for treating low-level mixed waste will be waste
stabilization, to incorporate the waste into a stable form, and thermal
destruction. The Department expects to use other techniques such as compaction
for volume reduction. Stabilization will allow the waste to be disposed of in
accordance with land disposal restrictions. The Department will use thermal
destruction for radioactive polychlorinated biphenyl waste. Following thermal
treatment, the Department will immobilize the waste in a grout or glass/slag
final waste form.
The Richland Operations Office plans to commercialize waste treatment to
stabilize low-level mixed waste; the Request for Proposal closed in October
1995. The Richland Operations Office also awarded a commercial thermal waste
treatment contract for alpha-contaminated waste regulated under the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act and the Toxic Substances Control Act. Commercial
thermal treatment will begin in FY 2001. Commercial Stabilization treatment is
expected to begin in FY 1999.
Currently, there is no capability for processing newly generated remote-handled
waste. Negotiations are under way with the State of Washington on how and when
to provide this capability. The cost estimate assumes T Plant will be used to
process this waste.
The 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility treats liquid waste from the
242A-Evaporator, the K basins, the N basins, and tank waste remediation
activities, and purge water from ground-water monitoring activities and
secondary waste from solid waste treatment and disposal facilities. 300 Area
liquid waste is collected at the 340 Facility and it is then shipped to the
tank farms.
STORAGE
Hanford will store contact-handled solid low-level mixed waste in the Central
Waste Complex until it can be treated. There are no capabilities to store newly
generated remote-handled mixed waste other than to provide proper shielding.
However, the estimates assume properly shielded waste packages will be stored
in the Central Waste Complex or in the Transuranic Waste Storage and Assay
Facility.
Liquid waste from the 300 Area is stored in the 340 Facility in two
57-kiloliter (15,000-gallon) tank cars and then shipped to the double-shell
tanks in the 200 Area. The Department has developed a plan to replace this
facility, and the baseline report assumes the existing facility in the 340
Facility will close in FY 2002 and future waste from this area will be packaged
at the 325 laboratory facility, loaded on a tanker truck, and shipped to the
double-shell tanks.
DISPOSAL
Contact-handled solid waste will be disposed of in two Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act-approved trenches completed in 1994 and 1995. Remote-handled
waste can be disposed of in the same trenches, provided the level of
radioactivity does not exceed the design limit of the trench liners. All waste
will be properly certified and treated prior to disposition in the trenches. In
addition, an unlined trench for the disposal of submarine reactor compartments
is operational but is not within the scope of the Environmental Management
program, and, therefore, its costs are not included in the estimate. This
trench receives approximately 10,000 tons of contact-handled low-level mixed
waste per year.
Treated effluent from the 200 Area Effluent Treatment Facility will be
discharged to a State-approved land disposal site for disposal at a site
located north of the 200-West Area. This disposal site consists of an
underground drainage field. Discharge limits have been specified by the State
of Washington in a discharge permit and by the Environmental Protection Agency
in a Delisting Petition which limits the treated effluent discharge to 72
million liters per year (19 million gallons per year). Tritium cannot be
removed from the treated effluent but will not be discharged above current
limits. The location of the disposal site maximizes the time for migration to
the Columbia River to allow for radioactive decay of the tritium.
Low-Level Waste
GENERATION AND HANDLING
Solid low-level radioactive waste has been received from both onsite and
offsite waste generators since the mid-1940s. Early waste streams included
laboratory and/or construction waste. As reactors and processing facilities
came on-line, failed equipment and process waste were added as waste streams.
Now, the waste streams consist of materials generated by maintenance and
cleanup of the facilities. The waste forms typically are paper, plastic,
rubber, wood, glass, dirt, and metal. Approximately 450,000 cubic meters
(590,000 cubic yards) of waste from onsite and offsite sources is expected by
the end of the life cycle. Liquid low-level waste generated onsite is combined
with the low-level mixed waste liquid streams and is treated as mixed waste.
TREATMENT
Most of the solid low-level waste is sent directly to disposal with no
treatment required or planned. Facilities at the Hanford Site that generate
low-level waste may either compact the waste at their facility or use
commercial contractors.
The 2706-T and T Plant (221-T) Facilities provide low-level radioactive
decontamination services for the Hanford Site. Among items that are
decontaminated are railroad equipment, buses, trucks, automobiles,
road-building equipment, tank farm equipment, and plant process equipment.
Items are decontaminated either to release them for reuse or to reduce the
amount of radioactive materials before disposal.
STORAGE AND DISPOSAL
The solid low-level waste is disposed of in facilities in the 200-East and
200-West Areas. Low-level waste is generally packaged in metal drums and metal
and wooden boxes. Sometimes concrete burial vaults and other accepted burial
containers are also used. This report assumes the 200 Area disposal facilities
will operate indefinitely to dispose of onsite and offsite low-level waste. It
also assumes the permitted storage capacity of the facilities will meet the
future needs for low-level waste disposal for continuing Waste Management
program activities and offsite generators out to FY 2070. This estimate
includes costs to FY 2070.
The results of this Baseline Report indicate that approximately 12 sources
assume that they will ship low-level waste in the Hanford Site.
The data presented in the following table are based upon data received from
generating sites concerning the amount of waste they assumed they were
shipping. These data do not necessarily reflect the expectations of the
Richland Field Office and they have not been reviewed or approved by the State,
Environmental Protection Agency, or other local stakeholder organizations.
State of Washington regulations require environmental monitoring of closed
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act disposal sites for 30 years.
Environmental monitoring consists of a ground-water monitoring system of 16
wells in the 200-East Area and 19 wells in the 200-West Area. These wells,
which were installed in 1987, provide information about background-water
quality and the properties of the uppermost aquifer beneath the burial grounds.
After 30 years, monitoring requirements will be reassessed.
Hazardous Waste
Hazardous waste is nonradioactive, regulated chemical waste. More than 40
facilities and/or programs generate such waste throughout Hanford. The current
estimate for total volume of hazardous waste to FY 2070 is 29,000 cubic meters
(38,000 cubic yards). State of Washington Administrative Code Section 173-303
defines dangerous waste. This dangerous waste regulation is more stringent than
that required by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and imposes
increased compliance requirements.
Low-Level Waste Generators
Idaho National Engineering Laboratory
|
1999-2048
|
207,533
|
Argonne National Laboratory - East
|
1996-2070
|
21,545
|
Brookhaven National Laboratory
|
1996-2070
|
15,716
|
Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory
|
1996-2070
|
12,481
|
Commercial Offsite
|
2000-2048
|
9,264
|
Princeton Plasma Physics Laboratory
|
1996-2070
|
8,037
|
Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
|
1996-2070
|
3,498
|
Stanford Linear Accelerator Center
|
1996-2070
|
1,482.5
|
Ames Laboratory |
1996-2070
|
533
|
Knolls - Schenectady
|
2001-2004
|
238
|
University of Utah
|
1996-2070
|
20
|
Laboratory for Energy Related Health Research
|
1996-1997
|
12
|
Total |
|
280,359
|
GENERATION AND HANDLING
A wide range of activities, including construction, laboratory research,
facility operation and maintenance, facility cleanup, and site services (such
as vehicle maintenance or painting), generate waste. Waste accumulates at
various locations and is shipped to interim storage facilities to comply with
regulatory guidelines.
STORAGE
The Nonradioactive Dangerous Waste Storage Facility (616) has accumulated and
stored some of the nonradioactive dangerous waste generated on the Hanford
Site. From this facility, hazardous waste can be shipped to offsite treatment,
storage, or disposal facilities with appropriate permits. This facility will be
placed in cold standby in 1996 and made available for reuse. Waste generators
will then ship directly to commercial treatment facilities. The estimates
include fees for these services.
TREATMENT AND DISPOSAL
Offsite commercial treatment facilities will treat and dispose of all hazardous
waste from Hanford.
Sanitary Waste
GENERATION AND HANDLING
Most of the liquid sanitary waste regulated by the Clean Water Act results from
one-pass heating or cooling of buildings or processes and is essentially clean
water. However, some streams contain chemical contaminants or resulted from
coolant and condensate from compressed air production, or came from rainwater,
boiler discharge, strainer backwash, laboratory wash waters, or
airmonitoring systems. These waste streams may contain organics, heavy
metals or cyanide. The volume of wastewater is approximately 1.4 million cubic
meters/year (approximately 1.8 million cubic yards/year) and is much larger in
volume than the solid waste streams, which will be contracted to a commercial
garbage hauler. Sanitary waste contains neither radioactive nor hazardous
components.
TREATMENT
The 300 Area Treated Effluent Disposal Facility provides treatment for the 300
Area industrial wastewater. After the facility became operational in December
1994, discharge to the process trenches ceased. The treatment process removes
heavy metals and mercury and destroys organics and cyanide. Sludge and spent
ion exchange resin are generated during the treatment process. The 300 Area
Treated Effluent Disposal Facility has a 30year design life and is
scheduled for transition to private operation by FY 2025.
DISPOSAL
The 200 Area Treated Effluent Disposal Facility is a piping network for
collecting and disposing of liquid effluents that have been treated at the
generation facility to meet discharge requirements. Facilities using the
disposal network include the Plutonium Finishing Plant, 222-S Laboratory
Complex, T Plant and associated laboratory, the power plant, the
Plutonium-Uranium Extraction Plant, and B Plant Waste Encapsulation Storage
Facility. The 200 Area Treated Effluent Disposal Facility began operation in
1995 and has a 30year design life. The treated effluent is disposed of in
two two-hectare (5-acre) ponds in the 200-East Area.
The treated liquid effluent from the 300 Area Treated Effluent Disposal
Facility is monitored and discharged at up to 1,135 liters/minute (300
gallons/minute) through an outfall to the Columbia River under a National
Pollutant Discharge Elimination System permit. Solid waste generated from the
300 Area Treated Effluent Disposal Facility process is bulk-shipped to the 200
Area low-level waste burial grounds.
The site generated about 31,000 cubic meters (40,610 cubic yards) of solid
sanitary waste during 1994. The largest fractions of materials are paper and
construction waste. Smaller volumes of wood, asbestos waste, metals, grounds
maintenance waste, plastic, textiles, rubber, medical waste, glass, and food
have also been collected and disposed. The volume of waste has historically
been related to the site population and construction activities; with the
reduction in Hanford site staff, some decreases in waste volumes are expected
in the future.
The Hanford Landfill has operated for the life of the site but is expected to
close during FY 1996, as directed by the Washington State Department of
Ecology. The City of Richland Landfill will receive most of the nonradioactive,
nonhazardous waste. A site for the disposal of asbestos, medical, and drummed
waste has yet to be chosen. The cost estimate for this report does not include
the costs for operational management of sanitary solid waste as part of Waste
Management costs; instead, these are part of the facility's landlord budget,
which is discussed later.
Special Case Waste
Special case waste is waste without a readily identified disposal path. A
variety of activities, including research and development, operations of
various reactors, processing of spent fuel, and storage of high-level and
transuranic waste, have generated special case waste. Site cleanup activities
are expected to generate approximately 1,000 cubic meters (1,950 cubic yards)
of material. The current projection is that most of the material will be
greater-than-class C low-level waste, as well as some transuranic materials
whose activity level exceeds the Waste Isolation Pilot Plant acceptance
criteria. The waste includes sludges, failed equipment, debris, and
particulates. Some of the material is mixed waste and about half of the
material requires remote handling. This analysis assumes the waste will be
treated in T Plant (along with the other remote-handled material) and then
stored in T Plant until FY 2039, when the materials will be shipped to Yucca
Mountain for disposal.
Other Materials
Radioactive sodium is the primary nonwaste material at Hanford. Sodium metal
has been used as a coolant in the Fast Flux Test Facility and other reactors.
It is a pyrophoric material and requires treatment to convert it to a
non-pyrophoric material if disposal becomes necessary. However, elemental
sodium has multiple uses and has not been determined to be a waste, but is
managed as a material.
The Hanford Site radioactive sodium inventory is located in three buildings
containing very low levels of radiological contamination. The Sodium Storage
Building (2727-W) and the South Alkali Metal Storage Modules near the Central
Waste Complex store sodium. The Sodium Storage Building (2727-W) stores five
56,780-liter (15,000-gallon) tanks, and the South Alkali Metal Storage Modules
store 158 drums. Commercial processing is planned for the radioactive sodium
stored in these locations. A Request for Expression of Interest has been issued
to identify potential vendors, but no funding is currently available. Costs for
treatment are not a part of Waste Management program activities. The 984, 000
liters (260,000 gallons) of sodium currently in the Fast Flux Test Facility
will be stored in the Sodium Storage Facility in the 400 Area. This report
assumes, after the treated material is converted to sodium hydroxide, it will
be used with commercially procured sodium hydroxide in the high-level waste
program to treat the tank waste as a product to adjust the pH and that it will
end up in the vitrified low-level waste from the high-level waste program.
324 BUILDING TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT
The engineering development and chemical laboratories in the 324 Building house
the nonradioactive prototypes of the proposed vitrification systems that will
treat liquid tank waste. In addition, these laboratories will develop new
environmental restoration technologies for cleanup efforts at multiple federal
and industrial sites whose soil and ground water are contaminated by solvents,
heavy metals, and mixed waste. Processes currently under development include
Electrical Remediation at Contaminated Environments (ERACE) technologies (in
situ heating and corona), bioremediation systems for chlorinated solvents, and
electrochemical separation and oxidation for metals and organics.
|
Direct Program Management/Support
The primary support programs for waste management include a range of activities
needed for regulatory compliance, integration of site activities to eliminate
duplications, and planning waste management strategies. These activities
include facility surveillance and maintenance; analytical services;
environmental monitoring; pollution prevention, and program planning.
PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY
The overall objective of the program is for Pacific Northwest National
Laboratory to provide facility surveillance and maintenance activities; reduce
safety and environmental risks remaining from past Laboratory research
operations; conduct routine operational activities to comply with statutory and
regulatory requirements; and conduct cleanup operations to dispose of waste
materials.
The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory will continue to support the
technology development needs of the Hanford Site through the site's cleanup
life cycle and the national need beyond that time. This will require the
identified support missions operate through FY 2070. This report assumes the
cost of the related support operations will continue at levels similar to those
in FY 1996.
The Hanford Mission program provides sitewide environmental monitoring
necessary for developing hazard assessments. The program also supports
implementation of the Site Ground Water Protection Management Plan. It includes
meteorology and climatological services, ecosystem management, and cultural
resource management services to carry out the Hanford mission in compliance
with regulations. It involves stakeholders and regulators to incorporate public
values into the decisionmaking processes.
Waste Management Activities Cost Estimate
(Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
|
|
High Level Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment
|
381,802
|
417,836
|
546,124
|
711,734
|
601,452
|
300,402
|
117,620
|
|
Storage and Handling
|
296,908
|
273,660
|
86,292
|
30,296
|
17,845
|
15,464
|
9,315
|
|
Disposal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spent Nuclear Fuel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment
|
15,052
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Storage and Handling
|
96,432
|
16,035
|
2,413
|
1,798
|
1,675
|
1,675
|
1,675
|
|
Disposal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transuranic Mixed Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment
|
|
461
|
4,033
|
6,916
|
6,582
|
13,332
|
8,451
|
|
Storage and Handling
|
172 |
924
|
2,436
|
4,789
|
4,312
|
3,382
|
257 |
|
Transuranic Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment
|
1,195
|
3,482
|
24,479
|
21,514
|
21,570
|
14,680
|
20,045
|
|
Storage and Handling
|
3,034
|
10,031
|
25,474
|
8,025
|
6,653
|
779
|
300 |
|
Low-Level Mixed Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment
|
11,994
|
20,901
|
31,062
|
29,475
|
29,420
|
29,393
|
29,751
|
|
Storage and Handling
|
16,131
|
22,146
|
21,048
|
25,985
|
20,008
|
16,559
|
9,599
|
|
Disposal
|
4,930
|
17,777
|
20,817
|
20,703
|
20,719
|
6,645
|
5,512
|
|
Low-Level Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment
|
11,479
|
9,948
|
7,866
|
7,812
|
7,735
|
7,698
|
7,802
|
|
Storage and Handling
|
77
|
77
|
77
|
77
|
77
|
77
|
77
|
|
Disposal
|
7,748
|
7,240
|
8,871
|
9,806
|
8,794
|
8,662
|
5,972
|
|
Hazardous Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Storage and Handling
|
439 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposal
|
655
|
653 |
663
|
668 |
668
|
668
|
603
|
|
Sanitary Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment
|
4,194
|
4,479
|
4,479
|
4,479
|
4,479
|
4,479
|
|
|
Disposal
|
4,503
|
4,389
|
6,115
|
4,389
|
4,389
|
4,389
|
4,389
|
|
Other Waste and Materials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment
|
|
|
630
|
1,631
|
1,615
|
1,607
|
1,629
|
|
Storage and Handling
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct Program Management/Support
|
226,224
|
147,723
|
132,986
|
121,363
|
142,985
|
107,052
|
115,561
|
|
Total
|
1,082,970
|
957,763
|
925,960
|
1,011,461
|
900,978
|
536,944
|
338,560
|
|
|
|
High Level Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment
|
14,722
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Storage and Handling
|
7,719
|
23,702
|
4,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposal
|
71,681
|
359,841
|
223,357
|
|
|
|
|
|
Spent Nuclear Fuel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Storage and Handling
|
1,675
|
3,070
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposal
|
|
50,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transuranic Mixed Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment
|
4,780
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Storage and Handling
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transuranic Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment
|
18,659
|
18,863
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Storage and Handling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Low-Level Mixed Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment
|
33,275
|
11,409
|
540
|
540 |
540
|
540 |
540
|
|
Storage and Handling
|
6,857
|
842
|
376 |
373
|
376 |
376
|
373
|
|
Disposal
|
2,277
|
1,360
|
868
|
868 |
868
|
868 |
868
|
|
Low-Level Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment
|
2,834
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Storage and Handling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposal
|
5,015
|
5,189
|
5,189
|
5,189
|
5,189
|
5,189
|
5,189
|
|
Hazardous Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Storage and Handling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposal
|
603
|
603 |
603
|
603 |
603
|
603
|
603
|
|
Sanitary Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposal
|
3,471
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Waste and Materials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment
|
1,619
|
304 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Storage and Handling
|
|
3,200
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disposal
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct Program Management/Support
|
73,800
|
71,164
|
54,916
|
51,518
|
44,292
|
44,292
|
44,292
|
|
Total
|
248,988
|
569,634
|
290,744
|
59,091
|
51,868
|
51,868
|
51,865
|
|
(Waste Management Activities Cost Estimate table continued on next page.)
(Five-Year Averages, Thousands of Constant 1996
Dollars)
|
|
2075
|
2080
|
2085
|
2090
|
2095
|
2100
|
Treatment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15,458,472
|
High Level Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Storage and Handling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,830,483
|
Disposal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,274,396
|
Spent Nuclear Fuel
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
75,261
|
Storage and Handling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
632,241
|
Disposal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
250,000
|
Transuranic Mixed Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
223,213
|
Storage and Handling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
81,367
|
Transuranic Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
722,442
|
Storage and Handling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
271,482
|
Low-Level Mixed Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment
|
540
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,149,594
|
Storage and Handling
|
376 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
707,115
|
Disposal
|
868
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
529,740
|
Low-Level Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
315,871
|
Storage and Handling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,695
|
Disposal
|
5,189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
492,154
|
Hazardous Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Storage and Handling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2,197
|
Disposal
|
603
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47,013
|
Sanitary Waste
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
132,940
|
Disposal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
180,165
|
Other Waste and Materials
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Treatment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
45,174
|
Storage and Handling
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16,475
|
Disposal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100,000
|
Direct Program Management/Support
|
47,005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,125,868
|
Total
|
54,581
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35,666,358
|
* Total Life Cycle is the sum of the annual costs in
constant FY 1996 dollars.
|
ANALYTICAL SERVICES PROGRAM
Analytical Services are guided by the overall mission as outlined in the
Hanford Mission Plan and by requirements outlined in the Tri-Part Agreement.
Hanford Site programs will define analytical services requirements. Analytical
Services works directly with program clients to estimate the needed analytical
support and to coordinate the use of laboratory services within the Analytical
Services program. This includes participation in the data quality objectives
process and joint development of the statements of work. Laboratory services
include consulting on sampling, field screening, and recommendations on
appropriate analyses; conduct of analyses to strict procedure control; data and
report preparation; follow-up client assistance; and adherence to strict
quality control. Construction of new laboratories, enhancements to existing
laboratories, and multiple commercial laboratory contracts are crucial elements
of the Analytical Services program, which will provide cost-effective and
high-quality analyses to support the needs of each of the Hanford programs now
and in the future.
The 222-S Laboratory is the largest laboratory, housed in a 1951 vintage
building, with 6,500 square meters (70,000 square feet) containing 11
analytical hot cells and 157 laboratory hoods. It is the primary laboratory
used in the analysis of radiological and mixed waste samples on the Hanford
Site. The 222-S Laboratory has recently received heating, ventilation, air
conditioning, and electrical upgrades to support a 30-year mission.
The Waste Sampling and Characterization Facility is a newly constructed
1,280-square-meter (13,800-square-foot) environmental and industrial hygiene
analytical laboratory with 27 individual laboratories. Its primary mission is
to support the Effluent Treatment Facility effluent monitoring, industrial
hygiene, and radioanalytical chemistry for the Environmental Monitoring
Program.
The commercial laboratories augment the laboratory capacity on the Hanford Site
to provide support for waste classification and ground-water monitoring. This
support will vary as the site sample loads change but is expected to be
continually used in the future.
The 1706-KE (Water Studies Semiworks Facility) and 1706-KER (Water Studies
Recirculation Building) were constructed beginning in 1954 as a part of the
100-K production reactor complex. The original mission of the facility complex
was reactor fuel element, material corrosion, coolant chemistry, and
irradiation studies. This facility is expected to begin the transition toward
deactivation in FY 1996.
RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY ACT AND OPERATIONAL MONITORING PROGRAM
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and Operational Monitoring program
is responsible for monitoring and reporting on ground water, air emissions, and
surface areas surrounding the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act treatment,
storage, and disposal facilities and operating facilities regulated by the
Department under the Atomic Energy Act.
HANFORD ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
The Hanford Environmental Management program identifies and resolves site-wide
environmental issues, provides guidance to facilities on regulatory compliance,
coordinates site-wide report preparation, and integrates Tri-Party Agreement
activities. This report assumes activities will continue through 2070.
WASTE MINIMIZATION/POLLUTION PREVENTION PROGRAM
The objectives of the Hanford Site waste minimization/pollution prevention
program are to reduce the quantity and toxicity of hazardous, radioactive,
mixed, and sanitary waste; to conserve resources; and to prevent or minimize
pollutant releases to the environment. Staff seek, identify, screen, and
recommend new options for preventing pollution and reducing waste generation.
The program saved $75.4 million in FY 1995 by reducing waste loads and
associated treatment, storage, and disposal costs. This baseline estimate
assumes the program will continue until the end of most waste management
activities in FY 2030.
PLANNING AND INTEGRATION PROGRAM
The Planning and Integration program oversees the Hanford Strategic Plan, the
Mission Direction document, program baselines, and an integrated site baseline.
This report assumes the program will continue at reduced levels until 2070.
WASTE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND SUPPORT
Waste Management Program Management and Support oversees the management and
operating contractors and subcontractors; all federal salaries, benefits,
office supplies, and travel; and general services support contractors. While
these activities may vary slightly between programs depending on mission,
elements typically include program direction and oversight; tasks necessary to
plan, control, analyze, and report program performance; preparation of safety
analyses, environmental reports, and permits; implementation and maintenance of
management systems; and oversight to ensure compliance with requirements.
Future program management activities are expected to remain consistent with
current practices. This report does not anticipate changes will significantly
impact the present program management approach. This report assumes activities
will continue at levels consistent with other site activities to FY 2070.
Landlord Section
|
|