Stephen L.
Tober, Esq.
Chairman
American Bar Association
Standing Committee on
the
Federal Judiciary
Portsmouth, NH |
Tom Hayward,
Esq.
Past-Chairman
American Bar Association
Standing Committee on
the
Federal Judiciary
Chicago, IL |
Pamela A.
Bresnahan, Esq.
DC Circuit Representative
American Bar Association
Washington, DC |
The
Honorable Dick Thornburgh
Former Attorney
General of the United States
Former Governor of Pennsylvania
Counsel
Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Nicholson Graham
Washington, DC
The Honorable John Lewis
United States House of Representatives
[D-GA-5th District] |
Jennifer
Cabranes Braceras, Esq.
Commissioner
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights
and Visiting Fellow at the Independent Women’s Forum
Boston, MA
Wade Henderson
Executive Director
Leadership Conference on Civil Rights
Washington, DC |
Peter
Kirsanow, Esq.
Partner
Benesch, Friedlander,
Coplay & Aronoff
and Commissioner
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights
Cleveland, OH
The Honorable Nathaniel Jones
Retired Judge
U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals
to the Sixth Circuit
Of Counsel
Blank Rome LLP
Cincinnati, OH |
Maureen E.
Mahoney, Esq.
Partner
Latham & Watkins
Washington, DC
Carol M. Browner
Former Administrator
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Principal
The Albright Group
Washington, DC |
Kathryn Webb
Bradley, Esq.
Senior Lecturing Fellow
Duke Law School
Durham, NC
Anne Marie Tallman
President and General Counsel
Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund
Los Angeles, CA |
The Honorable Denise
Posse-Blanco Lindberg
Judge
Third Judicial District Court
State of Utah
Salt Lake City, UT
Reginald M. Turner, Jr.
President
National Bar Association
Detroit, MI |
Catherine E.
Stetson, Esq.
Partner
Hogan & Hartson
Washington, DC
Marcia Greenberger
Co-President
National Women’s Law Center
Washington, DC |
The
Honorable Bruce Botelho
Former Attorney General
State of Alaska
Mayor of Juneau
Juneau, AK
Roderick Jackson
Coach
Ensley High School
Birmingham, AL |
Henrietta
Wright, Esq.
Of Counsel
Goldberg, Godles, Wiener and Wright
and Chairman of the Board
Dallas Children’s Advocacy Center
Dallas Texas
Beverly Jones
Lafayette, TN |
The
Honorable Charles Fried
Former Solicitor
General of the United States
Beneficial Professor of Law
Harvard Law School
Cambridge, MA
Peter B. Edelman
Professor of Law; Co-Director
Joint Degree in Law and Public Policy
Georgetown University Law Center
Washington, DC |
Patricia L.
Bellia
Professor of Law
Notre Dame Law School
South Bend, IN
Judith Resnik
Arthur Liman Professor of Law
Yale Law School
New Haven, CT |
Christopher
S. Yoo
Professor of Law
Vanderbilt University Law School
Nashville, TN
David Strauss
Harry N. Wyatt Professor of Law
University of Chicago Law School
Chicago, IL |
Diana
Furchtgott-Roth
Senior Fellow
Hudson Institute
Washington, DC
Robert Reich
University Professor and Maurice B. Hexter
Professor of Social and Economic Policy
Brandeis University
Waltham, MA |
Rabbi Dale
Polakoff
President
Rabbinical Council of America
Great Neck, NY
Susan Thistlethwaite
President
Chicago Theological Seminary
Chicago, IL |
The
Honorable John Engler
Former Governor of Michigan
President
National Association of Manufacturers
Washington, DC
Karen Pearl
Interim President
Planned Parenthood Federation of America
New York, NY |
11:07 a.m. Senator
Specter closes the question and answer session.
Sen. Specter is now instructing that
questions to be submitted to Judge Roberts are due. The
Committee will now move to a closed session, under Senate Rule
26. At which time the committee will consider the FBI
report about the nominee. Under Sen. Biden's tenure, this
session was made mandatory, regardless of the content of the
investigative FBI report. The Committee will hear from the
first panel of witnesses at the conclusion of the closed
session.
11:05 a.m. Senator Graham is discussing
the content on which a nominee should be judged.
Sen. Graham says that he would not like to be
judged by the people he has represented. Sen. Graham sys
that no one can question Judge Roberts' intellect. He is
discussing that it comes down to what Judge Roberts' heart says.
Sen. Graham says that if the Committee goes down the road where
it is the quality of someone's "heart" that determines if they
should be confirmed, the Committee will be doing a disservice.
11:01 a.m. Senator Durbin questions
Judge Roberts about
Sen. Durbin is now asking Judge Roberts about the
memo concerning the EEOC which Sen. Kennedy addressed.
Sen. Durbin is now returning to a case discussed yesterday about
an HMO and the insurance coverage of thousands of families.
Judge Roberts has said that he takes the cases that come to him,
and if an opposing side had come to him, he would have taken
their case. Sen. Durbin is asking if Judge Roberts would
have taken a case that would have overturned rights for
minorities or specific groups, if he would accept the case.
Judge Roberts says that he does not sit in judgment of clients
when they come to him; he believes that the Court is responsible
for those decisions. Sen. Durbin is asking Judge Roberts
where he would draw the line where his personal views would
prevent him from taking a
particular case. Judge Roberts says that people become
lawyers for various reasons, and he became a lawyer because he
believes in the point of the law. Judge Roberts says that
he became a lawyer to promote the rule of law.
10:47 a.m. Senator Cornyn is asking
Judge Roberts about documents that have been released.
Sen. Cornyn is now asking Judge Roberts to
discuss why documents may not have been released. Judge
Roberts is discussing why several documents may not have been
released due to attorney-client privilege. Judge Roberts
says that that privilege pertains to a company or to the
President of the United States. Sen. Cornyn is now
submitting for the record letters indicating that it is
appropriate for the documents that have been withheld to be
withheld.
10:42 a.m. Senator Schumer is
questioning Judge Roberts about the appropriateness of questions
that have been asked of him.
Sen. Schumer is asking Judge Roberts if he would
personally object to the Administration releasing requested
memos. Judge Roberts says that he does not think it
appropriate for him to take a position on that matter.
Sen. Schumer is talking about Judge Roberts
refusal to answer certain questions. Sen. Schumer is
asking Judge Roberts what questions he would pose to a nominee
if he were in the position to do so, and how Judge Roberts would
answer the question eh would ask himself. Judge Roberts
says that he would ask a lot of the same questions he has been
asked, including what his view of the proper role of a judge in
our legal system. Judge Roberts says that he would
ask how a nominee would approach
cases. Sen. Schumer would like to know what question Judge
Roberts would ask that hasn't been asked. Judge Roberts
says that he would ask what a person's personal views are.
Judge Roberts says that he would answer that question by saying
that he sets aside his personal views, and so they are not an
issue when deciding cases.
Sen. Schumer is returning to the Commerce Clause. He is
asking Judge Roberts if he believes that Congress has the
authority to regulate local activities if they are commercial in
nature. Judge Roberts says that the question comes to
whether an activity is in fact commercial. Sen. Schumer is
now asking if under the Commerce Clause, Congress could pass a
law banning cloning for commercial activity. Judge Roberts
says that he does believe that Congress would have that
authority.
Sen. Schumer is now concluding by thanking Judge Roberts for his
three days of testimony. Sen. Schumer is expressing his
concerns about the seriousness of this nomination on the future
of the Court. He is highlighting Judge Roberts brilliance,
familiarity with the law, that he believes Judge Roberts is a
lawyer above all, and Judge Roberts' judicial philosophy of
modesty and humility. Sen. Schumer is also discussing his
hesitations in Judge Roberts' nomination, including the question
of compassion and humanity, the refusal of the Administration to
release documents from Judge Roberts' tenure on the Solicitor
General's office, and Judge Roberts refusal to answer several
questions from the Judiciary Committee.
Judge Roberts is now responding to the question of what kind of
justice Judge Roberts would be. Judge Roberts says that he
has been as fully responsive as he could be during the hearings.
He says that his opinions demonstrate that he is not an
ideologue.
10:23 a.m. Senator Sessions is asking Judge
Roberts to clarify his position on educating immigrant children.
Sen. Sessions is asking Judge Roberts about a
case decided in Texas where education would not be provided to
immigrant children. Sen. Sessions is asking Judge Roberts
if he is judging the constitutionality of the right of the state
of Texas to legislate on this issue. Typically, governance
of education is handled by the states. Judge Roberts says
this is why he attempted to separate the legal question and his
personal views on education.
10:21 a.m. Senator Feingold is asking
Judge Roberts about ethics on the court.
Sen. Feingold is asking Judge Roberts if he would
curb the lobbying of federal judges should he be confirmed.
Judge Roberts says that he does not know how the funding rules
regulate this practice, he finds it inappropriate for judges to
be lobbied, and he would review these practices. Judge
Roberts says that he does think that it is important for judges
to get out of Washington to visit law schools and discuss issues
with other people.
Sen. Feingold is now asking Judge Roberts about
honoraria. He is asking Judge Roberts if he thinks it is
appropriate that judges are banned from accepting honoraria.
Judge Roberts says that he is unfamiliar with the area.
Sen. Feingold is asking Judge Roberts
about the death penalty. He is asking Judge Roberts about
the right of death row inmates to habeas corpus, or the
right to have a case heard in court. Sen. Feingold is
asking Judge Roberts if his thoughts about habeas corpus
have changed. Judge Roberts says that he was referring to
a time when there was no limit to the number of petitions that
individuals could file. Judge Roberts says that Congress
has since passed laws that restrict and limit the number of
repetitive and successive petitions individuals could file.
10:00 a.m. Senator Feinstein is
questioning Judge Roberts about educating immigrant children.
Sen. Feinstein is stating that she is now not
sure how she is going to vote for Judge Roberts. She is
commenting that his long tenure on the Court would raise several
additional concerns in voting to confirm him. She has
asked Judge Roberts if he believes that he was wrong in drafting
a memorandum suggesting that some children should not be
educated based on their immigration status. Judge Roberts
is stating that he has respect for the ruling of the Court in
this particular case, and that he believes that there is a legal
issue at play, and his opinions on this particular case comes
from a legal perspective.
Sen. Feinstein is now highlight a review
conducted by a Duke professor in which Judge Roberts was
considered to be a consistent vote against worker's rights.
Judge Roberts says that according to another study, he was
labeled as having voted more than any other Judge on the D.C.
Circuit Court in favor of workers rights and against
corporations.
Sen. Feinstein is now questioning Judge Roberts
about executive power.
9:41 a.m. Senator Kennedy is asking
Judge Roberts about discrimination issues.
Sen. Kennedy is asking Judge Roberts if he
believes that the Congress has the authority and ability to
legislate to free the country from discrimination based on sex,
race, and disabilities. Judge Roberts has responded that
he does believe that Congress has that authority. Sen.
Kennedy says that it has been decided that states should be
given the authority to legislate about disabilities. Judge
Roberts says that the issue is whether Congress has the
authority to act on this issue without violating the individual
rights of states to legislate.
Sen. Kennedy is now asking Judge
Roberts about affirmative action. Sen. Kennedy is saying
that several memos from Judge Roberts