ERIC: Education Resources Information Center Skip main navigation

EJ769623 - Generalizations of Ptolemy and Brahmagupta Theorems

Help Tutorial Help | Tutorial Help | Tutorial Help With This Page Help With This Page
Record Details

Full-Text Availability Options:

More Info:
Help | Tutorial
Help Finding Full Text
More Info:
Help
Find in a Library
Publisher's Web Site

Click on any of the links below to perform a new search
ERIC #:EJ769623
Title:Generalizations of Ptolemy and Brahmagupta Theorems
Authors:Ayoub, Ayoub B.
Descriptors:Geometric Concepts; Mathematics Instruction; Theories; Mathematics; Mathematical Logic; Validity; Mathematical Formulas; Mathematics Education; History
Source:Mathematics and Computer Education, v41 n1 p30-36 Win 2007
More Info:
Help
Peer-Reviewed:
Yes
Publisher:MATYC Journal Inc. Mathematics and Computer Education, P.O. Box 158, Old Bethpage, NY 11804. Tel: 516-822-5475; Web site: http://www.macejournal.org
Publication Date:2007-00-00
Pages:7
Pub Types:Journal Articles; Reports - Descriptive
Abstract:The Greek astronomer Ptolemy of Alexandria (second century) and the Indian mathematician Brahmagupta (sixth century) each have a significant theorem named after them. Both theorems have to do with cyclic quadrilaterals. Ptolemy's theorem states that: In a cyclic quadrilateral, the product of the diagonals is equal to the sum of the products of two pairs of opposite sides. If the lengths of the sides of a cyclic quadrilateral are a, b, c, d in this order and the lengths of the diagonals are l and k, then Ptolemy's theorem would be expressed as lk = ac + bd. On the other hand, Brahmagupta came up with a remarkable formula for the area E of the cyclic quadrilateral, that is E = [square root](s-a)(s-b)(s-c)(s-d), where s stands for the semiperimeter 1/2(a+b+c+d). Around the middle of the 19th century, there appeared generalizations for both theorems that apply to any convex quadrilateral. The German mathematicians C. A. Bretschneider and F. Strehlke each published their own proofs of the generalizations. Since then, more proofs have shown up in the literature. This paper presents new proofs, which could be used in the classroom or as projects outside the classroom. In addition, it looks into some implications of the two generalizations, and shows that they are not independent of each other. (Contains 1 figure.)
Abstractor:ERIC
Reference Count:8

Note:N/A
Identifiers:Alexandria; Egypt (Alexandria)
Record Type:Journal
Level:N/A
Institutions:N/A
Sponsors:N/A
ISBN:N/A
ISSN:ISSN-0730-8639
Audiences:Teachers
Languages:English
Education Level:N/A
 

ERIC Home