We briefly describe here the CDF detector and the type of particles
we observe (which often come from interesting physics processes that
we are studying).
Please also see
See a photo of the CDF detector
INTRO--The CDF Detector is a 100-ton complex detector which measures most
of the interesting particles that come out of the P-bar P collision. 2
Intense beams (about 10**14 to 10**15 particles each) of protons and antiprotons
meet head-on in the middle of the CDF detector, and a few collisions occur
every time 2 bunches collided (this happens every (120 nsec--or about 1/8-miilion
seconds). Most of these collision are "glancing" collisions, with almost
all the energetic particles going along the beam in both directions, and only
a few low energy particle going off at large angles (the only ones that will
be detected by the CDF detector (see COVERAGE). We call these "glancing"
collisions "Minbias", or Minimum-Bias events. A few of these collisions per
second are recorded--mostly to be used as calibration of our detector, and
other uses.
Out of the Millions of collisions per second, only a few are "Hard"
collisions--those which produce energetic particles which go off at large
angle (above 1-2 degress from the beam)--sometimes even at 90 degrees to the
incoming beam !!! What happens is that one each of the energetic constituents
of the proton and antiproton (quark or gluon) made a smashing hit!!! and
debris come off at large angles, like fireworks exploding. Sometime, these
smashing hits produces a short lived particle, such as the W or Z boson;
other times, just 2 jets; however (we hope), occasionally, something new
happens, and perhaps a new previously-unknown particle is produced (usually,
these new particles will decay rapidly--almost instantly--into other
particles that we can observe). However, it is not enough for the new particle
to be produced--we have to show that the evidence of these decays are
exceptional, and can not come from any of the more normal or known processes
(we would call these known processes "background" to the "signal" of the
new particle). Thus, we must measure these observable particles, and
"reconstruct" what happened in the event, then show that the number of such
events are way beyond what could be expected from backgrounds. This is the
process what we went through to show the discovery of the Top quark.
WHAT ARE THE OBSERVABLE PARTICLES--We measure the particles that are
produced at an angle that will make it pass through our detector (see
COVERAGE below).
Only those particles that are charged, or undergoes strong or electromagnetic
interactions will be observed. Some particles that are neutral and do no
interact in our detector will show up as MET (Missing Energy transverse),
by carrying off large Transverse Momentum which is not balanced by the
other particles in the event which we observe (these non-interacting neutral
particles includes neutrinos,
as well as possibly some new particles of similar persuasion).
WHAT ARE THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THESE PARTICLES THAT WE OBSERVE--Particles
we are able to observe can be catagorized into
DETECTOR COMPONENTS --In order to measure the observable particles, we have
several detector systems. Lets consider a particle coming off the collision
at really large angle--say, 40-90 degrees from the beam. it will meet in order
the following detector systems [need to include figures]--
COVERAGE--You may have notice that we have little or no detector in the
direction of the beam--for very good reason. Since most glancing collisions
produced lots of energetic particles along the beam direction, any detector
where would be hit with so many particles that the detector would die--
and since each bunch-crossing would have millions of particles, we would
not know which one come from the collision we are interested in. Furthermore,
there is a vacuum beam pipe for the beam to go through (so that the beam does
not get wasted by collision with air)--and it is very difficult instrument
next to vacuum (well, we do have some small detector--call Roman Pots, which
stick into the beam to make some measurement, but not for hard collisions.
So, our Coverage starts at 1-2 degree from the beam, and covers all the
"large" angle region, with progressively more sophisticated detector.
Coverage from about 30 dgree to 90 degree (Central region) is the most thorough
--described above. Between 10 and 30 degree, there is less tracking coverage
(we see the track, but do not measure the momentum well), adequate
calorimetry coverage (PLUG region), and muon coverage only down to (20 degrees).
WHAT WE RECORD --Out of the millions of collision per second, only a few
gives out energetic particles at large angles--into our detector. All our
detectors --tracking chambers, calorimeters, etc. --are instrumented to
record electronic information--we have more than (?500,000) such channels
of information !!! A small selected sample of these channels provide
very fast (within microseconds) preliminary information on what happen in
the collision and allow us to determine whether the particular collision
is of sufficient interest (the "Trigger") so that we should record all the
information from these "accepted" event (we only record about 50 events per
second out of the millions of collisions)
RECONSTRUCTION --In order to determine what the event is, we need to
"reconstruct" the event--that is, measure all the particles that we observe,
determine their characteristics, and then decide what type of event this is.
For example, if we see an event with a well-measured 40 GeV electron candidate
on one side, along MET on the other side--plus other soft particles, this would
be a candidate for a W decaying into an electron + neutrino.
PHYSICS ANALYSIS --Once we have collected a sample of a particular type
of events (say, W-->e + nu candidates), we need to answer several questions--
(I give below a very brief overview--the whole items, even for one particular
process, is extremely complicated and usually occupy one or more graduate
student or post-doctoral fellow many months or even years of burning the
midnight oil --many of the work from morning to midnight for 6-7 days per week
!!!)
Now, for some comments on these issues--for a particular process we are
studying
for an introduction to the CDF experiment
for an introduction to the
Physic processes being studied by the CDF experiment
for an introduction to the CDF Detector along
with short descriptions of the particles we measure
for an introduction to the CDF Event Displays
for additional comments on the CDF experiment
PARTICLES THAT WE DO OBSERVE
Conservation
of Momentum says that if we have a 40 GeV transverse momentum particle that
goes to the left at 90 degrees, there must be a total of 40 GeV transverse
momentum particle(s) going off to the right. If we do not see any energetic
particles to the right, (and we have no hole in our coverage), then whatever
that carries 40 GeV transverse momentum off to the right must
be one or more particles that we do not detect !!! such as a
neutrino. In fact, if the 40 GeV particle to our left is an electron, or a
muon, this is a perfect candidate for a W boson, an 80 GeV object that would
decay (roughly 11 % of the time each) into a e + nu or mu + nu.
So, here's a bunch of particle types that we measure and
some of their characteristics--
The statistical error comes from the fact that we have a
finite number of observed events. For example, if you flip a coin
(not a loaded on, please) 100 times, you may find that there are
48 heads and 52 tails--that's because 100 times give you a statistical
error of 1/2 divided by square root of 100--so 5% statistical error--
so, the result which is 2% away from the correct one is entirely
reasonable (you may also been hearing about statistical uncertaintly
in recent political polling results--same idea).
HOW WE MEASURE THESE PARTICLES
All the event information from the (?500,000) channels are digitized--
and those that have null information (such as a scintillator that do
not have a signal) are discarded. So, roughly 100,000 pieces of information
are recorded for every selected event (give a take a factor of 2--depending
on what's happening in the event--some events have 10-20 particles in our
detector, others have 50 or even 100 or more particles).
Events could be lost due to inefficiency in our trigger, reconstruction,
selection criteria, or confusion.
The trigger, which enable us to
record only 50 or so events out of the millions of collision per second,
could lose a small fraction of events, as well as having biases which
will make us lose some events--especially with some special properties.
Some events may not be reconstructed properly.
In order to best study a process, we make selection criteria (cuts)
so that only the "best" (i.e., the sample having the most advantageous
signal to background) events are used for final analysis.
Confusion --Also, some signal events would be lost due to tracks
overlapping with other tracks in the event--and thus might be lost.
We need to determine these and efficiencies and biases in order to
obtain any physics results--this involves many studies using
background and other samples. Monte carlo simulation (what-if
scenarions in which we generate supposed signal and study them through
a computer-simulated detector--to see what would have shown up), etc.
For each process we are studying, there are other process which could
either give us events close to or even identical with the events from
the desired process.
Some of these could be "artifacts"--events which
we mis-measure some of the reconstructed particles due to electronics
or other noises
Others are correctly reconstructed events which come from other
processes which mimic the process we are studying--such as an electron
candidate which come from a overlap of a track with a photon energy
deposit.
Still others are events with the correct signature, but come from other
physics processes
All these must be studied and the quantities determined. If we are looking
for a new physics process, we must show that the number as well as
properties of events observed can not be accounted for by the
"backgrounds" from old physics.
Once we have made a measurement, we need to provide the values of the
measurement, as well as the systematic and statistical uncertainties
of the measurement.