Administrative Release Securities Act of 1933 Release No. 7581 /September 22, 1998 Securities Exchange Act of 1934 Release No. 40453 /September 22, 1998 Administrative Proceeding File No. 3-9711 ADMINISTRATIVE AND CEASE AND DESIST PROCEEDINGS INSTITUTED AGAINST MEDA BELLE MCKINNEY The Securities and Exchange Commission ("Commission") announced that it issued an Order Instituting Public Proceedings Pursuant to Section 8A of the Securities Act of 1933 ("Securities Act") and Sections 15(b), 19(h) and 21C of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") against Meda Belle McKinney ("McKinney"), alleging violations of the registration and antifraud provisions of the securities laws: Section 5(a), 5(c) and 17(a) of the Securities Act, and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act and Rule 10b-5 thereunder. McKinney is a registered representative at Innovative Consulting Services, Inc. ("ICS"), a registered broker-dealer located in Sligo, Pennsylvania. The Commission's Order alleges that, from 1993 through 1996, ICS, through certain individuals, including McKinney and ICS' owner, raised more than $16 million from hundreds of investors by fraudulently offering to the public and selling approximately 43 limited partnerships. As part of this fraudulent scheme, ICS agreed to pay investors 13% annually on their investments. None of the limited partnerships had registration statements on file or in effect with the Commission. The Order further alleges that McKinney made misrepresentations and omissions to investors in connection with the offer and sale of the limited partnerships. She failed to disclose to investors the risks of the investment and the use of offering proceeds. For example, McKinney failed to tell investors that the source of their interest payments would be funds raised from new investors. She also told investors that the limited partnerships were as safe as bank certificates of deposit, even though they were highly risky. The Order also alleges that McKinney profited personally from the fraudulent scheme. A hearing will be scheduled to determine whether the allegations contained in the Order are true, and if so, to determine what sanctions, if any, are appropriate and in the public interest.