Various SDTS Raster Transfers Provided by ERDAS Incorporated Released: 6 June 1996 (README updated 26 October 1998) The following images are provided by ERDAS, incorporated, to exercise some of the capabilities of SDTS Raster Profile, including: Multi-spectral Data (GI and GL Encoding) Integer and Floating Point Data Pseudocolor (Thematic) Data Georeferenced Data, including some level 2 projections These images are fairly small as the focus is on the structure, rather than the contents, of SDTS Raster Profile transfers. These transfers were produced using a development version of the SDTS Raster Profile encoder that is now available with Imagine 8.3 and later. The content and form of these transfers should be considered preliminary and subject to change. Some verification of the contents has been done by manual examination and by running the development version of the decoder. Comments about the structure or contents of these transfers are welcome and would be appreciated, given the limited means of verification currently available. Please direct technical comments or inquiries to Miles Duke (duke@erdas.com). For information regarding availability and features of ERDAS software, please contact Ian Anderson (ianderson@erdas.com). The phone number is (404) 248-9000. LakeLanierGA/HNGL*.DDF - Upper Lanier 16-bit (see Note 1) unsigned integer, athematic from Landsat TM Image Size: 135 x 186, 7 bands, Layer Interleaved by Pixel (GL) Data Range: Min(56), Mean(67.1), Max(151) Map Boundaries (Edge): UL (283820, 3800215), LR (237870, 3805795) Pixel Size: 30 meters Projection: Level 1, UTM Datum: NAD 27 GainesvilleGA/BEDR*.DDF - Lower Lanier (Gainesville) 16-bit (see Note 1) unsigned integer, athematic from Landsat TM Image Size: 181 x 185, 7 bands, Layer Sequential (GI) Data Range: Min(53), Mean(76.7), Max(255) Map Boundaries (Edge): UL (237270, 3794665), LR (242700, 3800215) Pixel Size: 30 meters Projection: Level 1, UTM Datum: NAD 27 LanierGA-Soils/INSL*.DDF - Lanier Soils Survey 16-bit (see Note 1) unsigned integer, thematic classification Image Size: 296 x 371, 1 band Data Range: Min(2), Mean(25.8), Max(35) Map Boundaries (Edge): UL (233820, 3794665), LR (242700, 3805795) Pixel Size: 30 meters Projection: Level 1, UTM Datum: NAD 27 RadarSite/OUTH*.DDF - Radar 32 bit floating point, athematic from a radar image Image Size: 150 x 150, 1 grayscale band Data Range: Min (36.429), Mean (1944.262), Max (20648) -- (See Note 4) Map Boundaries (contrived): UL (226000m, 430000m), LR (229000m, 433000m) Pixel Size: 20 meters Projection: Level 2, Lambert Conformal Conic (see Note 2) Datum: WGS 72 Latitude of 1st standard parallel: 45 degrees north Latitude of 2nd standard parallel: 35 degrees north Longitude of central meridian: 60 degrees east Latitude of origin: 0 degrees False Easting: 50,000 km False Northing: 50,000 km 2 of the 3 Lanier images are subsets of a Landsat TM image of the Gainesville, Georgia area including Lake Lanier. The third is a thematic classification of the soils in the area. The Lanier images are registered to the Earth's surface using the Universal Transverse Mercator projection and the NAD 27 Datum. The right-most 20 pixels on the bottom edge of the Lake Lanier dataset abut the left-most 20 pixels of the top edge of the Gainesville dataset. In other words, if you view both images in the same map coordinate system, the image edges will be in contact for a distance including 20 pixels, with no overlap and no gap between the placement of the two images. The soil survey is the smallest rectangle containing both of the TM datasets. Technical Notes (1) These 8-bit images have been padded to 16 bits, due to a problem with the 1.0.3 version of the FIPS library supplied by the USGS. The 1.0.4 version of the FIPS library addresses these problems, so padding is no longer necessary. (2) The radar image is encoded with a level 2 projection, with the parameters encoded according to a private agreement based upon GCTP. For details on that private agreement, see the "GCTP" file in the RadarSite directory. (3) The map boundaries in these images are specified in the Spatial Domain (SPDM) module, rather than the Internal Spatial Reference (IREF) module. Later experience has shown that the IREF module is the location intended by the USGS for this information. (4) The SDTS Dump utility (and other tools) may interpret these floating-point numbers as long integers, which yields numbers in the billions. Oddly enough, such numbers do form a visible image, but they do not reflect the original image quantities. (5) All of these transfers were built following an older draft of the SDTS Raster Profile.