_________________ February 11, 1997 _________________ GSBCA 13936-RELO In the Matter of MICHAEL L. ROMAN Michael L. Roman, Chesapeake, VA, Claimant. J.A. Hughes, Chief, Travel Policy Branch, Defense Finance and Accounting Service, Columbus, OH, appearing for the Department of Defense. VERGILIO, Board Judge. The claimant, Mr. Michael L. Roman, a Department of Defense civilian employee, seeks to recover real estate expenses associated with the purchase of a residence at a new duty station. Applicable regulation permits recovery of appropriate purchase expenses only after the signing of a "transportation agreement." He incurred the expenses prior to his signing the agreement. The claimant lacks a basis to recover his expenses. Mr. Roman had a permanent duty station at Mare Island Naval Shipyard, California. This shipyard was to be closed under Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC). In September 1994, Mr. Roman began temporary duty status elsewhere. In November 1995, Mr. Roman learned that the agency was in the process of creating a permanent position at Norfolk, Virginia, a position for which the agency would encourage him to apply as a priority placement program (PPP) enrollee from the closing shipyard. In February 1996, prior to the creation of a permanent position, Mr. Roman purchased a residence nearby to Norfolk, thereby incurring the costs for which he seeks reimbursement. On March 21, 1996, Mr. Roman was notified of his impending transfer and the permanent change of station to Norfolk. On March 22, 1996, Mr. Roman signed his transportation agreement. On April 1, 1996, his permanent change of station became effective and his temporary duty status ceased. With this claim, Mr. Roman seeks reimbursement of $3,758.70, which he characterizes as "real estate expenses" and "expenses incurred upon purchase of residence," and for which he provides further detail. Mr. Roman contends that Government personnel assured him that he would be reimbursed these expenses, before he incurred them, even though the purchase was made prior to his permanent change of station. In setting forth the conditions for reimbursement, the Joint Travel Regulations (JTR) specify that an employee is entitled to reimbursement for expenses required to be paid by him in connection with the purchase of a residence at the employee's new duty station after he has signed the required transportation agreement and provided, among other conditions, that a permanent change of station is authorized or approved. JTR C14000.A. The regulations expressly address the situation of the sale of a residence in anticipation of transfer, and permit reimbursement in certain circumstances. JTR C14000.D. The regulations contain no provision for a purchase in anticipation of a permanent change of station. Given the explicit conditions for recovery and the lack of any "in anticipation" rule, the inescapable interpretation is that the reimbursement of costs associated with a purchase prior to the signing of the transportation agreement for a permanent change of station is not allowed. Mr. Roman may not recover the amount claimed. ____________________________ JOSEPH A. VERGILIO Board Judge