USGS Home
SOFIA Home

Effects of water hardness on slough-wet prairie plant communities of the A. R. M. Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge

Metadata also available as - [Outline] - [Parseable text] - [XML]

Frequently-anticipated questions:


What does this data set describe?

Title:
Effects of water hardness on slough-wet prairie plant communities of the A. R. M. Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge
Abstract:
Alterations to ground-water and surface-water hydrology and water chemistry in South Florida have contributed to increased flows of mineral-rich (hard water) canal water into historically rain-fall driven (soft water) areas of the Everglades. The interior of the A. R. M. Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge largely has retained its historic low conductivity or soft water condition due to its relative isolation from canal flows. However, recent sampling by USGS and the Refuge has shown that canal influences on water quality extend several kilometers into the Refuge in some areas, and Refuge managers and scientists are concerned that these influences may increase depending on future changes in water management operations.

A survey across existing mineral gradients will be performed to document patterns of vegetation change and their relationship to changes in water hardness and other environmental factors. Laboratory and field experiments will test these correlative relationships to determine the relative importance of increasing water hardness as a cause of observed vegetation changes across canal gradients.

  1. How should this data set be cited?

    William, Paul McCormick Orem, Unpublished Material, Effects of water hardness on slough-wet prairie plant communities of the A. R. M. Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge.

    Online Links:

  2. What geographic area does the data set cover?

    West_Bounding_Coordinate: -80.5
    East_Bounding_Coordinate: -80.25
    North_Bounding_Coordinate: 26.7
    South_Bounding_Coordinate: 26.3
    Description_of_Geographic_Extent: A.R.M. Loxahatchee National Wildlife Refuge

  3. What does it look like?

  4. Does the data set describe conditions during a particular time period?

    Beginning_Date: 2006
    Ending_Date: Unknown
    Currentness_Reference: ground condition

  5. What is the general form of this data set?

  6. How does the data set represent geographic features?

    1. How are geographic features stored in the data set?

    2. What coordinate system is used to represent geographic features?

  7. How does the data set describe geographic features?

  8. What biological taxa does this data set concern?

    Taxonomy:
    Keywords/Taxon:
    Taxonomic_Keyword_Thesaurus: none
    Taxonomic_Keywords: plants
    Taxonomic_System:
    Classification_System/Authority:
    Classification_System_Citation:
    Citation_Information:
    Originator:
    U.S. Department of Agriculture - Agricultural Research Service (ARS)

    U.S. Department of Agriculture - Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) Department of the Interior - U.S. Geological Survey Department of Commerce - National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Smithsonian Institution - National Museum of Natural History (NMNH)

    Publication_Date: 2000
    Title: Integrated Taxonomic Information System (ITIS)
    Geospatial_Data_Presentation_Form: Database
    Other_Citation_Details:
    Retrieved from the Integrated Taxonomic Information System on-line database, <http://www.itis.gov>.
    Online_Linkage: <http://www.itis.gov>
    Taxonomic_Procedures:
    plants will be identified in the field or specifically collected for the laboratory experiments
    Taxonomic_Completeness: unknown
    General_Taxonomic_Coverage: plants are identified to the species level
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Kingdom
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Plantae
    Applicable_Common_Name: plants
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Division
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Magnoliophyta
    Applicable_Common_Name: angiosperms
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Liliopsida
    Applicable_Common_Name: monocotyledons
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Sub Class
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Commelinidae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Eriocaulales
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Eriocaulaceae
    Applicable_Common_Name: pipeworts
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Eriocaulon
    Applicable_Common_Name: pipewort
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Eriocaulon compressum
    Applicable_Common_Name: flattened pipewort
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Cyperales
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Cyperaceae
    Applicable_Common_Name: Sedge family
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Eleocharis
    Applicable_Common_Name: spikerush
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Eleocharis cellulosa
    Applicable_Common_Name: Gulf Coast spikerush
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Commelinales
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Xyridaceae
    Applicable_Common_Name: yellow-eyed grass
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Xyris
    Applicable_Common_Name: xyris
    Applicable_Common_Name: yelloweyed grass
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Xyris smalliana
    Applicable_Common_Name: Small's yelloweyed grass
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Class
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Magnoliopsida
    Applicable_Common_Name: dicots
    Applicable_Common_Name: docotyledons
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Subclass
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Asteridae
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Order
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Solanales
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Family
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Menyanthaceae
    Applicable_Common_Name: bog beans
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Genus
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Nymphoides
    Applicable_Common_Name: floatingheart
    Applicable_Common_Name: nymphoides
    Taxonomic_Classification:
    Taxon_Rank_Name: Species
    Taxon_Rank_Value: Nymphoides aquatica
    Applicable_Common_Name: big floatingheart


Who produced the data set?

  1. Who are the originators of the data set? (may include formal authors, digital compilers, and editors)

  2. Who also contributed to the data set?

    Project personnel include Rebekah Gibble (USFWS) and Eric Crawford (USGS).

  3. To whom should users address questions about the data?

    Paul McCormick
    Lake Okeechobee Division, South Florida Water Management District
    3301 Gun Club Road
    West Palm Beach, FL 33406
    USA

    561 682-2866 (voice)
    561 640-6815 (FAX)
    pmccormi@sfwmd.gov


Why was the data set created?

Intrusion of canal waters into the Refuge increases the availability of Phosphorus (P), the primary limiting plant nutrient in the Everglades, as well as concentrations of major mineral ions such as Ca 2+, Mg 2+ and SO4 2-. While the ecological effects of P enrichment on the Everglades is fairly well understood, potential impacts caused by increased mineral concentrations in this soft-water wetland are largely unknown. Understanding the types and magnitude of these impacts is particularly important given that the area of the Refuge exposed to mineral enrichment is much greater than that exposed to P enrichment.

The objective of this project is to determine the effects of increased flows of mineral-rich water on the aquatic plant community of the Refuge interior. Slough-wet prairie (SWP) habitats area a major landscape feature in the Refuge and several SWP plant species may be adapted to the soft-water conditions in the Refuge interior. Increased mineral loads to the Refuge may result in a shift towards a more species-poor and spatially homogeneous community, In addition, there is a small amount of evidence to suggest that mineral enrichment may favor the growth and expansion of sawgrass and a consequent decline in the coverage of the SWP habitats.


How was the data set created?

  1. From what previous works were the data drawn?

  2. How were the data generated, processed, and modified?

    Date: Oct-2006 (process 1 of 6)
    Field survey (gradient study)

    The Refuge will be surveyed during fall of FY06 to determine the distribution of common SWP plant species and the extent of SWP habitat with respect to water and soil chemistry. Thirty locations will be selected that encompass a range of hydrology and water chemistry. Severely overdrained areas at the north end of the Refuge, deepwater areas at the south end, and highly enriched cattail area near canals will be excluded as vegetation in these areas is clearly driven by hydrology and/or P.

    The frequency of occurrence of common SWP species will be determined in 24 1-m2 quadrats placed at roughly 2-m intervals along a transect across the center of this habitat. An additional 5 minutes will be spent surveying the site to detect species present in lower abundance. Voucher specimens will be collected and repeat visits will be made later in the year to assure accurate taxonomic identifications. Aerial photography of the Refuge obtained by Palm Beach County in 2004 will be used to determine the percent coverage of SWP (as opposed to sawgrass, tree island, and brush) habitat at each site. Water depths and soil and water chemistry (pH, surface-water conductivity, soil Ca and total and extractable P and N concentrations) also will be measured at each site. Additional water chemistry data will be obtained from monthly water-quality monitoring trips conducted at each site by the Refuge and SFWMD.

    Data will be analyzed using simple correlations, multiple regressions, and multivariate analysis to identify patterns of species distributions and habitat cover with respect to chemical variables and depth. These analyses will generate testable hypotheses concerning the importance of water hardness vs. other environmental factors in determining the size and vegetation composition of SWP habitats.

    Date: Not complete (process 2 of 6)
    Effects of mineral and P enrichment on sawgrass and SWP communities and cover

    Sets of 4 walled enclosures (2.5 m x 1.25 m) will be established at 3 locations (for a total of 12 enclosures) near an interior monitoring station (LOX8) in the Refuge. Enclosures will be located in the transition zone between sawgrass and SWP habitats such that approximately half of each enclosure is within each habitat. Vegetation composition and tissue chemistry will be measured in each enclosure during February 2007. Once this baseline assessment is completed, enclosures will be enriched with one of the following substances: 1) no enrichment (control); 2) crushed limerock (mineral, pH treatment); 3) slow release P fertilizer (nutrient enrichment); 4) both limerock and P enrichment. Each treatment will be applied to 1 enclosure in each set for a total of 3 replicates per enrichment treatment. Surface soils will be collected from each enclosure 1 month after the first dose is applied and processed to determine pH, mineral content, and available P. Additional doses will be applied quarterly or more frequently as required to maintain elevated levels of these chemical parameters in applicable treatments. Vegetation responses will be measured after 6 months and every 6 months thereafter. Dosing will continue through FY08.

    Date: Not complete (process 3 of 6)
    Laboratory experiment to determine the effects of increased mineral and P loading on sawgrass growth in sloughs

    Sawgrass seeds from a common seed source will be germinated in the laboratory. While still small (~2-3 cm high), seedlings will be transplanted to small pots containing 500 g of soil from an interior slough in the Refuge. Initially, soils will be amended with a mineral solution containing major ions in the same proportions as found in canal water and with P in different combinations. Plants will be grown for 3 months under a temperature and photoperiod indicative of spring-time conditions in south Florida and watered 1-2 times each week with the same solutions used for soil amendment. The growth rate (increase in height) of replicate plants in each treatment will be measured over a 3-month period and final biomass will be determined. Initial and final soil pH and nutrient and mineral chemistry will be measured.

    Date: Not complete (process 4 of 6)
    Response of a submerged aquatic plant, Eriocaulon compressum, to mineral enrichment

    Twenty-four E. compressum plants of similar size will be collected from a peat pop-up at an interior location in the Refuge. Plants will be shipped overnight to the laboratory and weighed to obtain initial wet weights. Twelve plants will be potted in interior slough soil (low mineral content) in deep plastic containers and the remaining 12 will be planted in soils from a canal-influenced slough (higher mineral content). Plants of each soil treatment will be subjected to the following hydrologic treatments (4 replicate plants each): 1) watering to maintain saturated conditions; 2) watering to maintain flooding approximately 1/2 way up the above-ground portion of the plant; 3) flooding to submerge the plant under several cm of water. Plants grown in low mineral soils will be watered weekly with mineral-poor water from the same collection site. Plants grown in higher mineral soils will receive the same water that has been amended with a mineral solution to approximate 50% of the ionic strength of canal water, a mineral content that periodically occurs in sloughs near the Refuge perimeter in response to canal-water intrusion. Plants in flooded treatments will be acclimated gradually by raising water levels a few cm each week. Thus, for example, it will take about 5 weeks to completely flood plants in the submerged treatment.

    Plants will be grown for 3 months under a temperature and photoperiod indicative of spring-time conditions in south Florida. Water pH and conductivity will be monitored weekly in each flooded container and concentrations of major cations and anions (mineral content) will be measured every 2-3 weeks. Care will be taken to avoid excessively high mineral concentrations by adding unamended interior slough water or distilled water as needed to account for evaporation. Plant height and diameter will be monitored for 3 months. The extent of browning of each plant also will be measured as an indicator of stress. At the end of the experiment, plants will be harvested to measure final biomass and tissue chemistry. Final water and soil mineral concentrations and pH will be measured.

    Date: Not complete (process 5 of 6)
    Response of the floating aquatic plant, Nymphoides aquaticum, to mineral enrichment

    Several plants of N. aquaticum will be collected from an interior slough in the Refuge during February 2007. Collection of this species at this time of the year is facilitated by the abundance of small, free-floating specimens produced asexually by fragmentation. Plants will be shipped overnight to the laboratory, weighed to obtain initial wet weights, and measured for leaf number and size. Soils from an interior (low mineral content) and perimeter (high mineral content) slough will be combined in the following wet-weight ratios and used to fill the bottom of replicate containers: 1) 100%L:0%H; 2) 75%L:25%H; 3) 50%L:50%H; 4) 25%L:75%H; 5) 0%L:100%H. Soils in these respective treatments will be flooded with water from an interior location that has been amended with minerals to achieve 0, 25, 50, 75, or 100% of the increased ionic strength of canal water over interior surface water. Additional treatments will combine selected mineral treatments with P enrichment. A seedling will be placed in each container and allowed to grow and root for 3 months under a temperature and photoperiod indicative of spring-time conditions in south Florida. Water specific conductance and pH will be monitored weekly and water mineral and P chemistry will be measured every 2-3 weeks. Leaf number and size will be measured monthly. At the end of the experiment, plants will be harvested to determine final biomass and tissue chemistry. Final soil and water chemistry will be measured.

    Date: Not complete (process 6 of 6)
    Competition Experiment

    This experiment is currently being designed, but anticipated methods are as follows. Large (e.g., 20 L) pots will be filled with soils from either an interior (low minerals and nutrients) or perimeter (high minerals and nutrients) SWP. Pots of each soil type will be planted with dominant interior (Xyris, Eriocaulon, Nymphoides) and perimeter (Eleocharis cellulosa) SWP taxa either separately or in combination. Replicate pots of each soil-plant treatment will be maintained under either slightly flooded (e.g., 10 cm) conditions that are representative of interior SWPs or under deeper and fluctuating water depths (e.g., 10-30+ cm) that are more representative of perimeter SWPs. The experiment will be maintained in large water troughs at Refuge headquarters for a minimum of 12 months, and plant growth and survival will be measured quarterly. Initial and final soil and plant-tissue chemistry will be measured.

    Person who carried out this activity:

    Paul McCormick
    Lake Okeechobee Division, South Florida Water Management District
    3301 Gun Club Road
    West Palm Beach, FL 33406
    USA

    561 682-2866 (voice)
    561 640-6815 (FAX)
    pmccormi@sfwmd.gov

  3. What similar or related data should the user be aware of?


How reliable are the data; what problems remain in the data set?

  1. How well have the observations been checked?

  2. How accurate are the geographic locations?

  3. How accurate are the heights or depths?

  4. Where are the gaps in the data? What is missing?

    not available at present

  5. How consistent are the relationships among the observations, including topology?

    not available at present


How can someone get a copy of the data set?

Are there legal restrictions on access or use of the data?

Access_Constraints: none
Use_Constraints: none


Who wrote the metadata?

Dates:
Last modified: 14-Jan-2008
Metadata author:
Heather Henkel
U.S. Geological Survey
600 Fourth Street South
St. Petersburg, FL 33701
USA

727 803-8747 ext 3028 (voice)
727 803-2030 (FAX)
sofia-metadata@usgs.gov

Metadata standard:
Content Standard for Digital Geospatial Metadata Part 1: Biological Data Profile (FGDC-STD-001.1-1999)


This page is <http://sofia.usgs.gov/metadata/sflwww/hardness_swp_lnwr.faq.html>

U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey
Comments and suggestions? Contact: Heather Henkel - Webmaster
Generated by mp version 2.8.18 on Mon Jan 14 11:16:52 2008