OMB Guidance to Agencies on Definition of Earmarks
OMB defines earmarks as funds provided by the Congress for projects or programs where the
congressional direction (in bill or report language) circumvents Executive Branch merit-based
or competitive allocation processes, or specifies the location or recipient, or otherwise
curtails the ability of the Executive Branch to manage critical aspects of the funds
allocation process.
-
Earmarks vs. Unrequested Funding. At the broadest level, unrequested funding is any
additional funding provided by the Congress -- in either bill or report language --
for activities/projects/programs not requested by the Administration. Earmarks are a
subset of unrequested funding. The distinction between earmarks and unrequested funding
is programmatic control or lack thereof of in the allocation process.
-
Earmarks and Programmatic "Control." If the congressional direction accompanying a
project/program/funding in an appropriations bill or report or other communication
purports to affect the ability of the Administration to control critical aspects of
the awards process for the project/program/funding, this IS an earmark.
Note: The definition of "control critical aspects" includes specification of the
location or recipient or otherwise circumventing the merit-based or competitive
allocation process and may be program specific. However, if the Congress adds
funding and the Administration retains control over the awards process for the
project/program/funding, it is NOT an earmark; it is unrequested funding.
-
Earmarks Include:
-
Add-ons. If the Administration asks for $100 million for formula grants, for
example, and Congress provides $110 million and places restrictions (such as
site-specific locations) on the additional $10 million, the additional $10
million is counted as an earmark.
-
Carve-outs. If the Administration asks for $100 million and Congress provides
$100 million but places restrictions on some portion of the funding, the
restricted portion is counted as an earmark.
-
Funding provisions that do not name a recipient, but are so specific that only one
recipient can qualify for funding.
OMB has used this definition to gather data on earmarks internally. This definition is
similar to the definition that the Congress recently developed for disclosing earmarks
in spending legislation (H. Res. 6 and the Senate-passed version of S. 1).
Other documents on collection of information about earmarks: