3-3546.
SERVICE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES.
The boarding of a passenger who appears to be intoxicated is a violation of
Title 14 of the Code of Federal Regulations (14 CFR).
A.
Further, passenger noncompliance with Federal
Aviation Administration (FAA) safety regulations may result in interference
with a crewmember. This is a violation of 14 CFR part 121 and may also be a criminal violation
under Title 49 of the United States Code (U.S.C.) section 46318(a). Air
Carriers should have procedures in their manuals to ensure that crewmembers
know what actions to take if a passenger does not comply with the safety
regulations and/or interferes with a crewmember.
B.
Title 14
CFR part 121 requires air carriers to report passenger disturbances
associated with alcohol within 5 working days. Due to safety implications, 14
CFR part 135 air carriers should also report these disturbances to the FAA
within 5 days. The appropriate air carrier manuals should contain the
crewmember procedures used to report these occurrences. The FAA suggests the
following procedures:
1)
The pilot-in-command (PIC) and/or the flight
attendant in charge of the cabin should fill out a report that, if feasible,
both of them should sign.
2)
The report should include:
·
The name and
address of the individual
·
A physical
description of the individual, individual’s seat number
·
The location
of the individual’s boarding and destination
·
Names, addresses, and phone numbers
of witnesses
·
Names, addresses, and domiciles of the
other crewmembers
·
A brief
narrative of the incident, the airline, flight number, and date
3)
This report should be sent to the designated
personnel, which will be in the air carrier’s and crewmember’s manuals.
C.
Air carriers should have adequate procedures
contained in crewmember manuals and training programs outlining the specific
duties of crewmembers and ground personnel regarding the use and service of
alcohol. For example:
·
Procedures to handle disturbances
that may occur involving the service of alcoholic beverages
·
Procedures regarding the removal of a
passenger who appears to be intoxicated
·
Procedures to handle passengers who
may have brought their own alcoholic beverages onboard
3-3547.
CARRY-ON BAGGAGE. As a result of
the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks, the U.S. Congress passed The Aviation
and Transportation Security Act. Section 122 of the Act, entitled “Sense of
Congress,” clearly states its desire for the FAA to maintain its current
restriction on carry-on baggage of one bag and one personal item. The
Transportation Security Administration (TSA) web site has information as to
items that are permitted and prohibited in carry-on baggage as well as provides
examples of what constitutes a personal item. The TSA web site is www.tsa.gov .
A.
Title 14
CFR part 121 prohibits an air carrier from closing the passenger entry door
in preparation for taxi or pushback, takeoff, or landing an airplane unless
each article of carry-on baggage is stowed in a suitable baggage or storage
compartment under a passenger seat.
B.
An air carrier may not allow the following:
1)
The boarding of carry-on baggage unless each
passenger’s baggage has been scanned to control the size and amount carried on
board in accordance with an approved carry-on baggage program. Additionally, no
passenger may board an airplane if his/her carry-on baggage exceeds the baggage
allowance prescribed in the air carrier’s approved program.
2)
All passenger entry doors of an airplane to be
closed in preparation for taxi or pushback unless at least one crewmember
verifies that each article of carry-on baggage is properly stowed. Baggage is
neither properly stowed nor restrained unless the over-head bin door is closed
and latched. The same requirements apply for stowing carry-on baggage before
takeoff and landing.
3)
Stowage of carry-on baggage or cargo that could
hinder the use of any emergency equipment. Air carriers should provide suitable
storage space for all required emergency equipment.
C.
When air carriers allow the stowage of cargo
and baggage in passenger seats, they should include this information in their
FAA-approved carry-on baggage program. The information about this practice
should include:
·
The types of
cargo that may be restrained in the seat
·
Location of the seat(s) where it may
be stowed
D.
Carry-on baggage may be stowed against a passenger class
divider or bulkhead if both are stressed for inertia loads and the baggage is
restrained from shifting by FAA-approved tiedown
straps or cargo nets. A principal operations inspector (POI) must approve the
stowage of carry-on baggage against the bulkhead or divider. The POI will
coordinate this approval with the Aircraft Evaluation Group (AEG) and other
elements within the FAA, as needed. Carry-on baggage may be stowed in coat
closets or other compartments that the FAA approves.
E.
The operation of an airplane with carry-on
baggage, cargo, or trash stowed in uncertified receptacles, such as lavatories,
is contrary to 14
CFR part 121 and the certification basis of the
aircraft. If a receptacle in the cabin of the airplane, including the lavatory,
is intended for the stowage of carry-on baggage, cargo, or trash, it must be
shown to meet the applicable requirements in the airplane certification basis.
These requirements include:
·
The
structural requirements pertaining to the restraint of the receptacle’s
contents for flight, ground, and emergency landing load conditions
·
Requirements pertaining to fire
containment
NOTE: The certification requirements are contained in 14 CFR part 25 .
F.
Part 121
, section (§) 121.589
stipulates that each air carrier must have a carry-on baggage program approved
by the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). Carry-on baggage programs must
comply with existing regulations.
1)
A description of carry-on baggage articles must be
in the program. This description shall provide information about the types of
articles which could be exempt from the carry-on baggage count. This could
include such things as child restraints, canes, assist devices for people who
are physically challenged, articles of personal clothing, etc. Some air
carriers believe that “exempted articles” do not have to be restrained.
Therefore, information that all articles (including those exempt from the
carry-on baggage count) must be properly restrained shall also be stipulated in
the carry-on baggage program.
2)
Proper stowage of carry-on baggage is a major
safety issue. Advisory Circular (AC)
121-29 , as amended, asks the airlines to include in their carry-on baggage
programs a definition of “properly stowed.” Ensuring that baggage does not
interfere with emergency equipment is an important part of the information
about proper stowage. In addition, nothing can be stowed in the seat pockets
except magazines and passenger information cards. It is not a good safety
practice to stow meals, either brought onto the airplane by passengers or
served by the air carrier, in seat back pockets. The FAA considers meals
carried on by passengers to be carry-on baggage. Even though meals may be
exempt by the air carrier from the number of bags permitted, they still must be
stowed in accordance with the regulations pertaining to carry-on baggage.
Nothing may be stowed in the lavatories, unless lavatories meet all the
requirements for approved cargo stowage areas.
3)
The program should specify the crewmember position
responsible for ensuring that carry-on baggage is properly stowed. While each
crewmember should ensure carry-on baggage procedures are followed, it is
important that a specific crewmember be identified to be responsible for
insuring carry-on baggage is properly stowed for each cabin or each cabin area.
Specific and clear crew assignments are an important part of safety.
4)
The air carriers shall provide information to
passengers about their carry-on baggage programs. This information should
include advice about the types of articles that should not be carry-on baggage.
Many air carriers do this as part of their telephone announcements when
reservations are made. In addition, some air carriers provide this information
through public address announcements and signs at the airport. A variety of
methods used by the air carrier are acceptable, but the public should be able
to readily obtain the information.
5)
Carry-on baggage programs should:
·
Comply
with existing regulations and applicable programs such as the FAA approved
weight and balance program
·
Provide
information about preventing baggage, which cannot be stowed as carry-on
baggage, from reaching the aircraft as carry-on baggage
·
Ensure
that carry-on baggage which is brought to the airplane, but not carried in the
cabin, is assigned the same weight as other baggage carried in the cargo
compartment
·
Define
carry-on baggage, including those items that might be exempt
·
Provide
information about size and number accepted
·
Define
properly stowed, to include overhead bin stowage and under seat stowage. For
proper under seat stowage of carry-on baggage, there must be forward and side
restraints to prevent bags from sliding into the aisle.
·
Ensure
that carry-on baggage does not interfere with emergency equipment, and that
nothing is placed in front of or directly on tip of emergency equipment
·
Address
stowage of unusual articles such as musical instruments
·
Prohibit
the stowage of carry-on baggage and other items in the lavatories and seat back
pockets (the only items allowed in seat back pockets should be magazines and
passenger information cards)
·
Provide
specific crewmember assignments for the verification that carry-on baggage is
properly stowed
·
Address
procedures in appropriate manuals
·
Provide
crewmember training on carry-on baggage, and
·
Ensure
that information is available to the public about the air carrier’s carry-on
baggage program
6)
Air carriers should use approved procedures to
ensure compliance with their carry-on baggage program. These procedures should
include the following items:
·
Preboarding scanning to ensure that size and amount of
passenger carry-on baggage is in accordance with the allowances prescribed in
the approved carry-on baggage program
·
Closing
and latching each overhead bin before all passenger doors are closed in
preparation for taxi or pushback and before takeoff and landing
·
Closing,
latching, or installing each restraint device for each cargo compartment
located in the passenger cabin before all passenger doors are closed and before
takeoff and landing
·
Stowing each piece of “under seat” carry-on baggage
·
Removing all carry-on baggage that cannot be stowed properly
in the passenger cabin, before closing all passenger entry doors in preparation
for taxi or pushback, and reloading it as checked luggage in a cargo
compartment
7)
Each air carrier may decide if they will allow
passengers to travel with their pets in the passenger cabin. If an airline does
allow cabin pets, then the pet container is considered to be carry-on baggage
and must conform to all carry-on baggage regulations.
·
The pet container must be small enough to fit underneath the
seat without blocking any person’s path to the main aisle of the airplane
·
The pet container must be stowed properly before the last
passenger entry door to the airplane is closed in order for the airplane to
leave the gate
·
The pet container must remain properly stowed the entire
time the airplane is moving on the airport surface, and for take off and
landing
·
Passengers
must follow flight attendant instructions regarding the proper stowage of the
pet container
·
Additional
information on traveling with pets in the passenger cabin can be found on the
FAA Cabin Safety web site (www.faa.gov/safety/programs_initiatives/aircraft_aviation/cabin_safety/
)
3-3548.
STOWAGE OF NON-COLLAPSIBLE FLEXIBLE TRAVEL
CANES. The Department of Transportation (DOT) issued an Order of
Dismissal to certain complainants against a U.S. air carrier dismissing the
complainant’s allegation that the air carrier violated 14 CFR part 382, which prohibits discrimination against qualified
handicapped persons. The complainants, who are legally blind, alleged that the
carrier’s failure to allow them to stow their long white flexible canes at
their seat constituted unlawful discrimination under DOT rules.
A.
The current rules require air carriers to allow
stowage of flexible canes near passengers in a manner consistent with FAA
safety regulations.
B.
Part 121
requires all carry-on items, other than articles of loose clothing, to be
stowed in a suitable closet, baggage or cargo stowage compartment, including an
overhead rack having doors or restraints, or under a passenger seat that is
fitted with a means to prevent stowed articles from sliding forward in the
passenger compartment or sideward into the aisle. In addition, part 121
allows flexible travel canes to be stowed:
1)
Laterally under two or
more connected passenger seats in the same row, if the cane does not protrude
into an aisle and is flat on the floor.
2)
Longitudinally between a non-emergency exit window
seat and the fuselage, if the cane is flat on the floor.
3)
Longitudinally beneath any two non-emergency exit
row window seats, if the cane is flat on the floor.
4)
In accordance with any other method the
Administrator approves.
C.
The thrust of part 121
is to ensure that all carry-on items are properly restrained in the event of an
emergency. The FAA requires that passenger seats, under which baggage is
allowed to be stowed, must be equipped with under-seat restraints sufficient to
prevent articles of baggage, including flexible travel canes and other thin
profile items of baggage, from sliding forward. Also, aisle seats, under which
the FAA allows baggage to be stowed, must be equipped with under-seat
restraints to prevent baggage from sliding forward. POIs
and/or CSIs (as applicable) shall contact their
assigned air carriers to:
·
Inform them of these thin profile
baggage restraint problems
·
Require them to take action to ensure
that the FAA-approved carry-on baggage program of each air carrier operating
under part 121
has policies that ensure proper restraint of all carry-on baggage, including
non-collapsible flexible travel canes
3-3549.
STOWAGE OF GALLEY SERVICE ITEMS.
Part 121
section (§) 121.577
, prohibits an air carrier from moving on the surface, taking off, or landing
an airplane when any food, beverage, or tableware, furnished by the air
carrier, is located at any passenger seat. In an emergency situation requiring
evacuation, litter from food service of any kind (including coffee and rolls)
can be hazardous due to poor footing. Accordingly, part 121
prohibits serving any food or beverage, regardless of the type of containers
used, during movement on the surface, takeoff, and landing. In addition, any
food item or container that the passenger carries on board the aircraft would
be considered carry-on baggage and must be properly stowed, in accordance with
part 121
, for movement on the surface, takeoff, and landing.
A.
Part 121
also states that, during movement on the surface, takeoff, and landing, the
following items must be secured in their stored positions (i.e., correctly
positioned and fastened in their storage compartment and restraint means, if
any):
·
Passenger food and beverage trays
·
Serving
carts
·
Each movie screen
that extends into an aisle
NOTE: If there is a question regarding the stowage of a
particular item, and it must be stowed for takeoff and landing, then that item
must also be stowed for movement on the surface.
B.
Air carriers may arrange to provide limited
beverage and food service to their passengers when the aircraft is no longer
moving on the surface (e.g., while the aircraft is stationary on a taxiway in a
long queue awaiting takeoff.) In such cases, the air carrier should have
specific procedures for flight crewmembers and flight attendants to follow,
including coordination and communication between the flight deck and the
passenger cabin(s), to ensure that these requirements are met before aircraft
movement on the surface resumes.
C.
In addition, the FAA considers that galley
supplies stowed outside the galley are cargo. These supplies must be stowed in
accordance with part 121
. If galley supplies or other cargo, weighing over 20 pounds, are placed under
a seat, the FAA must approve the container or restraint usually, through a
supplemental type certificate.
3-3550.
RETENTION OF ITEMS OF MASS. Part 121
refers to galley equipment, serving carts, and crew baggage. However, the FAA
did not intend to list all items of mass. Crewmembers must restrain any item
that can become a hazard by shifting under the load factors of an emergency
landing.
A.
Particular attention should be given to
compliance with part 121
regarding restraints for any baggage carried on the flightdeck.
Flightcrew flight-kits are not items of crew baggage.
This policy also applies to aviation safety inspectors (ASI) and additional
flight crewmembers. While it is logical that flight kits be placed so that
movement is restricted, the FAA does not intend that they be restrained in a
manner that would interfere with the needs and functions of the flightcrew.
NOTE: This is only applicable to flight kits.
B.
It is recommended that air carriers include
instructions to flight attendants that all serving carts, in addition to being
stowed for takeoff and landing and when it is not in use, be properly
restrained when in use but not being moved from one location to another. Air
carriers should expand this policy to require restraint of all galley equipment
(including supplies) that are not being used, so they
will not become hazards during periods of inflight
turbulence.
3-3551.
POTENTIAL PROBLEMS ASSOCIATED WITH FOOD AND BEVERAGE
SERVICE.
A.
Reports are received regarding passengers and
flight attendants burned by the spillage of hot liquids. Air carriers should
have procedures discontinuing service of hot liquids when turbulent air is
encountered that is not severe enough for the flight attendants to discontinue all
service. In addition, containers for hot liquids should have lids that can be
securely closed. Additional service items and areas of concern that could cause
injuries are:
·
Carts with sharp corners or
projections that may cause injury
·
Brakes on the carts that are hard to
operate, inadequate, or nonexistent
B.
When flight attendants carry food and beverage
containers (bottles, glasses, trays, hot water and coffee containers, etc.)
loosely on the cart and in turbulence, they may become dislodged and strike or
scald passengers and crewmembers
C.
Flight attendants should not leave carts
unattended. Air carriers should have procedures which ensure that flight
attendants are no more than 10 feet (3 rows) away from the carts left in the
aisles. Flight attendants should not park carts out of their normal galley take
off/landing positions unless they can be properly restrained. Some aircraft are
equipped with restraint devices such as mushrooms, which will properly hold
carts in other areas. When this is the case, flight attendants may leave them
unattended. However, most items should be cleared from the top of the carts.
During a sudden directional change of the aircraft, items left unrestrained on
the top of the carts can become dislodged and cause injuries.
D.
Air carriers should have procedures for reporting cart and
cart restraint deficiencies. Flight attendant manuals should contain
information about the procedure for cart stowage and restraint.
3-3552.
PROBLEMS WITH LOWER LOBE GALLEYS.
A.
The FAA requires air carriers to provide
instruction to flight attendants on electrical equipment and related circuit
breakers located in the cabin area of aircraft, which includes all galleys,
service centers, and lifts. A good understanding of the function of these
circuit breakers could eliminate a problem before it becomes a safety hazard.
Air carriers should assure that this subject is adequately covered in flight
attendant training for all aircraft so equipped.
B.
The FAA received information concerning
passengers having access to the lower lobe galleys. They either let themselves
down in the lifts or the flight attendant took them down. There is no
justifiable reason for passengers to be in the galley where they would
interfere with the flight attendant duties. In addition, there is no provision
for oxygen masks and safety belts for extra persons. Air carriers should
incorporate into their manuals and training programs prohibition against
passengers being allowed in the lower lobe. Hence, they should placard each
lift.
C.
Some air carriers have conducted training
and/or instructions in the lower lobe during flight with five or six flight
attendant trainees. They have also allowed deadheading crewmembers to occupy or
visit the lower lobe during flight. Due to the number of oxygen masks and
seatbelts, only two flight attendants should be allowed in the lower lobe at
any time during flight. One additional person may be allowed for instruction,
evaluation, or inspection duties.
D.
It is very difficult to hear the public address (PA) system
announcements in the lower galley because of aerodynamic noise and other noise
emitting from nearby systems. The flight attendant working in the galley cannot
hear the captain’s warning of clear air turbulence or 10-minute warning of
descent. In addition, there have been reports of numerous failures of the
intercom systems. Sometimes, flight attendants in the galleys rely on the other
flight attendants to pass the warning. Air carriers should incorporate flight
attendant procedures to assure that all warnings are passed to and acknowledged
by persons in lower galleys.
E.
En route inspections have revealed a nonconformity throughout the aviation industry in training
and procedures for flight attendants who have to work in lower lobe galleys.
Air carriers’ emergency procedures pertaining to the lower lobe should include
procedures and training on the location and use of emergency equipment. The
emergency procedures should also include the removal of an injured flight
attendant in the lower section.
F.
Minimum Equipment Lists (MEL)
between different aircraft (DC-10, L-1011, and B-747) are not always
compatible. In one instance, if the personnel lift is inoperable, the flight
attendant will not perform food servicing during flight. In another instance,
if the personnel lift is inoperable, the flight attendant may go down to the
lower galley, but the service is limited to a number of carts that can be
delivered and stowed in the passenger cabin. In addition, flight attendants
have sustained serious injuries caused by certain lift malfunctions that occurred
during flight. Air carriers should include procedures in their flight attendant
manuals and training programs to assure that there are adequate instructions
throughout their system on dispatching aircraft with inoperable personnel or
cart lifts. Additionally, they should have procedures in the event these lifts
become inoperable during flight. Further, assurance should be sought to
determine that each air carrier is keeping flight attendants informed on
conditions and procedures, which are set forth in the MELs
that affect them.
G.
Some airlines do not have a sufficient number of mushrooms in
the cabin in order for crewmembers to “tie down” each serving cart in the event
of turbulence. These carts can weigh up to 250 pounds and should be anchored
when not being transferred to or from the cart lifts. Air carriers’ procedures
and training should include instructions to the flight attendants that all
carts must be properly stowed for:
·
Movement on the surface
·
Takeoff
·
Landing
·
Whenever
they are not being moved from one location to another
H.
The FAA has found some retractable mushrooms in lower galleys
inoperable. They are either jammed in the down position or, when lifted to the
up position, will fall back down when the cart is placed over it. The automatic
brakes are insufficient to keep the carts from moving about during takeoff and
landing. Air carriers should conduct inspections periodically in the lower lobe
to see that the mushrooms are operable and that crewmembers adhere to
procedures requiring each cart to be tied down or stowed. Air carrier maintenance
programs should ensure that mushroom restraints and other types of floor tie
downs are not worn down. The thickness and circular diameter must be maintained
in order for the mushroom-type of restraints to properly secure the cart.
3-3553.
PREDEPARTURE CABIN EQUIPMENT CHECKS BY
FLIGHT ATTENDANTS. Some air carriers assign flight attendant tasks
for making a predeparture check of the normal and
emergency equipment in the passenger cabin.
A.
In reviewing this situation, we found that in
most cases the flight attendants on the wide-body aircraft have predeparture equipment check assignments. On other
aircraft, the flight crewmembers and flight attendants sometimes share the predeparture check of passenger cabin normal and emergency
equipment. In each case, the POI and/or CSI (as applicable) indicated that the
flight attendants received training on the equipment and the operations manual
contained appropriate procedures.
B.
When an air carrier elects to have the flight
attendants accomplish a predeparture check of normal
and emergency equipment in the cabin, the POI and/or CSI (as applicable) should
be fully aware of the specific tasks assigned to the flight attendants. These
tasks should be reviewed to ensure that they are not in the areas which require
an airman certificate. Generally, the predeparture
assignments of the flight attendants should be relative to the type of
equipment used in connection with their regular and emergency duties.
Appropriate initial and recurrent training is required to ensure the flight
attendants are properly qualified. Air carriers must also include adequate
procedures and instructions in their manuals so that the applicable personnel
will be able to properly perform their assigned tasks.
C.
The assignment of the flight attendants by an
air carrier to conduct a predeparture check of the
cabin does not relieve the air carrier from training flight crewmembers on
normal and emergency equipment in the passenger cabin.
3-3554.
PASSENGER BRIEFING ON FLOOR PROXIMITY
LIGHTING. Briefing airline passengers regarding the presence of
floor proximity lighting is a good safety practice and should be encouraged.
Part 121
requires the installation of floor proximity emergency escape path marking. The
purpose of this lighting is to provide emergency evacuation guidance for
passengers when all sources of illumination, more than four feet above the
cabin aisle floor, are totally obscured.
A.
Many airline passengers are not aware of this
lighting. Therefore, many air carriers include a statement about the lighting
in the passenger briefing required by part 121
and depict it on the passenger information cards.
B.
Information that should be included in the
passenger briefing includes the actual location of the lights, such as floor
level or seat level. In addition, the briefing should include the change in
pattern, such as color and/or design of the lights that indicate the location
of emergency exits.
3-3555.
CABIN DOOR OPERATING MECHANISMS.
A.
At times, passengers have consciously or
inadvertently moved door operating mechanisms, even when the mechanisms are
located under protective plastic covers. In at least one case, a passenger
removed a plastic cover before the door operating handle was moved. A handle
that is moved during flight could accidentally cause an aircraft door to open
during landing. In one situation, when a door opened, the slide was deployed.
This was unsafe and caused considerable expense to the air carrier.
B.
POIs and/or CSIs (as applicable) should ensure that their assigned air
carriers:
1)
Inform crewmembers of the potential problem of and
the need to be alert to the possibility of passengers moving an exit mechanism.
2)
Have procedures for crew members to check the
position of the door handles periodically during flight.
3-3556.
FOKKER 28-4000 PASSENGER SAFETY INFORMATION
CARDS.
A.
The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB)
believes that there may be a problem with the door operation depiction on some Fokker 28-4000 passenger information cards. The NTSB
requested that the FAA review the Fokker 28-4000
passenger information cards to ensure the following:
·
That the
cards accurately show the procedure for operation of the two forward doors
·
That the
cards show the procedure for the removal of the overwing
emergency exit handle cover
·
That the
cards contain a warning to passengers that the plastic cover should only be removed
in emergency situations
B.
Even though the passenger information cards are
supplementary to the oral briefings required by part 121
, POIs and/or CSIs (as
applicable) assigned to air carriers operating the Fokker
28-4000 should review pertinent passenger safety information cards to ensure
that they show the correct information. In the event that the cards are
deficient, the proper information should be displayed when the cards are
replaced.
3-3557.
MISCELLANEOUS OPERATIONAL AMENDMENTS, AIR CARRIER CABIN
SAFETY OPERATIONS PROVISIONS. In this rule, there are several amendments to
parts 121
and 135
that affect the following areas of air carrier cabin safety operations:
·
Safety belt security during movement
on the surface
·
Stowage of service items during
movement on the surface
·
Passenger information and passenger
briefing provisions
·
Passenger compliance with signs,
placards, and crewmember instruction
·
Emergency evacuation assisting means
readiness
A.
Passenger Information.
1)
Parts 121
and 135
require passenger information signs to be illuminated during any movement on
the surface. In addition, these regulations require passengers to obey the
instructions of signs and placards and the instructions of crewmembers
regarding these signs and placards.
2)
Regulations require that:
·
Passengers be briefed on prohibitions
against smoking and
·
A statement
be added to the pretakeoff announcements stating that
passengers must comply with the instructions conveyed by lighted passenger information
signs and placards and of crewmembers regarding the signs and placards
B.
Arming Doors. Part 121
requires that any time there are passengers on board,
one door must be ready for evacuation. If the jetway or stairs are pulled back, then at least one
door must be armed (for example, for certain door slide/raft installations, the
girt bar must be in place).
C.
Movement on the Surface.
1)
Parts 121
and 135
require that all service items (including food, beverage, tableware, beverage
trays, serving carts and movie screens) are in their stowed position for
movement on the surface. If there is a question regarding the stowage of a
particular item, and it must be stowed for takeoff and landing, then it must
also be stowed for movement on the surface. It should be noted that air
carriers may arrange to provide limited beverage and food service to its
passengers when the aircraft is no longer moving on the surface (e.g., when the
aircraft is stationary on a taxiway in a long queue awaiting takeoff or in the
airport penalty box). In such cases, the air carrier should have specific
procedures for flight crewmembers and flight attendants to follow, including
coordination and communication between the flight deck and the passenger cabin.
This will ensure that these new requirements are met before aircraft movement
on the surface resumes.
NOTE: the Air Transportation Division, AFS-200, is reviewing the
implications for operations of the requirement that air carriers delay taxiing
on a flight to prevent aircraft movement while food and beverages are being
stowed. AFS-200 is considering changes to this requirement. POIs
and/or CSIs (if applicable) should inform their
assigned air carriers that picking up food and beverages before movement on the
surface will not be part of the compliance schedule at this time.
2)
Parts 121
and 135
now require all occupants of an aircraft to be seated with their safety belts
fastened during movement on the surface.
3-3558.
USE OF CHILD/INFANT RESTRAINT SYSTEMS IN AIRCRAFT.
This paragraph provides additional information on the use of child/infant
restraint systems in aircraft. The FAA and the National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration (NHTSA) have agreed upon a single government performance
standard that will satisfy both aviation and highway safety requirements for
child/infant restraint systems. Information regarding most CRS manufacturers is
maintained at the NHTSA web site (http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/CPS/CSSRating/Index.cfm).
A.
Part 121
requires that “during takeoff, landing, and movement on the surface of an airplane,
each person on board shall occupy an approved seat or berth with a separate
safety belt properly secured about him/her. However, a person who has not
reached his/her second birthday may be held by an adult who is occupying a seat
or berth.”
B.
A person under the age of two may be held in an
adult’s lap or placed in a regular passenger seat for takeoff and landing.
However, because of the safety benefits, the FAA encourages the use of approved
child/infant restraints aboard aircraft (for more information, see:
www.faa.gov/index.cfm/apa/1268).
C.
Air carriers are encouraged to allow the use of
empty seats to accommodate CRSs. However, air
carriers are under no obligation to allow unticketed
children to occupy empty passenger seats, regardless of whether the child is to
be placed in a CRS.
D.
Air carrier personnel, specifically flight attendants, should
be aware of the following items pertaining to CRSs:
·
The CRS should have a solid back and seat
·
The CRS should have internal
restraint straps installed to securely hold the child to the CRS
·
The CRS should be labeled stating
that it has been approved for aviation use, and
·
The CRS should have instructions on
the label which must be followed; (labels for approval from other countries are
allowed and therefore may vary)
E.
Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS)
213 defines booster seats as seats not having backs. Based on this
definition, the use of such automotive booster seats is not authorized in air
carrier operation. Unfortunately, some manufacturers market and label their
approved aviation child restraint seats as “booster seats,” even though these
seats have backs. Thus, aviation “booster seats” with backs and labeled
“approved for aviation use” can be used for all phases of flight provided the
label instructions are followed.
NOTE: Children who fit in an automotive booster seat usually can
be properly restrained in an airline passenger seat without a CRS.
F.
Belly belts and vest type devices
are not approved for use during takeoff, landing, and movement on the surface.
These devices usually attach the child to the accompanying adult and could
contribute to injuries when the adult rotates over his/her seat belt during
deceleration. Other such devices tie the child to the passenger seat and since
a solid back is not provided, the child may be injured when the back of the
aircraft seat back rotates forward. Although some foreign airlines have
approved the use of “belly belts” and other devices that do not have solid
backs and solid seats, they are not approved for takeoff, landing, or movement
on the surface.
G.
Child restraint systems must be installed in forward facing
aircraft seats, and in accordance with instructions on the label. This includes
placing the child restraint in either a forward or aft facing direction in the
passenger seat. The CRS should not be installed in the same row of an emergency
exit or in the row forward or aft of an emergency exit. A window seat is the
preferred location; however, other locations may be acceptable, provided the
CRS does not block any passenger’s (including the parent or guardian of the
child) egress to the aisle used to evacuate the aircraft. A responsible adult
should occupy a seat next to the child.
H.
Parts 121
and 135
require air carriers to accept approved CRSs when the
parent/guardian/attendant has purchased a ticket for their use.
1)
These regulations require air carriers to ensure
that the child is properly secured in the CRS, the CRS is properly secured in a
forward facing seat, the child does not exceed the weight limits of the CRS,
and the CRS is approved and has the proper labels.
2)
These regulations do not permit the use of safety
belt extensions (commonly referred to as belly belts), the use of vest and
harness type devices that attach to the parent or to the parent’s restraint
system or the use of booster-type child restraint systems (even though certain
of these type devices bear appropriate labels showing that they meet applicable
United Nations standards or are approved by a foreign government).
3)
If the approved CRS is supplied by the parent or
guardian, they are primarily responsible for ensuring that the CRS is approved,
the child is the right size and weight for the CRS,
and the CRS is properly installed in a forward facing passenger seat. In this
case, flight attendant responsibility is limited to checking with the child’s
parent or guardian to ensure that the above conditions have been met, that the
child appears to be properly restrained in the CRS, and that the CRS appears to
be properly installed in the passenger seat. Finally, it is the responsibility
of the parent or guardian to ensure that the CRS is free of any obvious defects
and that it functions properly.
4)
In cases where the approved CRS is supplied by the
air carrier, properly trained personnel should ensure that the CRS is free of
any obvious defects and functions properly. The trained personnel should also
ensure that the child does not exceed the weight limits of the CRS, is properly
restrained in the CRS, and the CRS is properly installed in a forward facing
passenger seat.
I.
To improve
emergency evacuation capabilities, the FAA recommends the following
precautions:
·
The air
carrier’s training program should cover the use of child restraint systems
·
The CRS should be secured to a
regular passenger seat at all times or, if not in use, stowed as carry-on
baggage
·
The CRS should not be located in an
aisle seat or in a row of seats immediately forward of, aft of, or in the same
row as an emergency exit
·
During an
emergency evacuation the CRS should remain attached to the passenger seat, and
only the child should be removed from the aircraft
·
No other passenger may occupy the
same passenger seat with the CRS
·
CRSs are
not approved for use in sideward facing passenger seats
·
The child
should always be properly secured in the CRS whenever other passengers are
required to have their safety belts fastened
J.
In the event that a
parent/guardian is traveling with more than one child in a CRS or is traveling
with several small children, only one of whom is occupying a CRS, good judgment
should be used regarding placement of the CRS. At a minimum:
·
The CRS should be placed so that it
does not block any passenger’s (including the parent/guardian’s) egress to the
aisle used to evacuate the airplane
·
The CRS should be placed so that the
parent/guardian can reach the child in the CRS to release and evacuate with the
child, should an emergency evacuation be necessary
NOTE: As long as the above conditions are met, this may result in
the CRS being placed between a passenger (including the parent/guardian) and
the aisle and/or the CRS being placed in a seat other than a window seat.
K.
The majority of individuals who use CRSs
on commercial aircraft are young children who typically weigh 40 pounds or
less. However, there are some individuals who, because of physical challenges,
need the support and security that a restraint system provides in order to travel
safely on aircraft. The scope of the CRS regulations that are contained in 14
CFR parts 91
, 121
, 125
, and 135
apply to any individual who is a child (i.e., under age 18)) who does not
exceed the specified weight limit for the CRS, is properly secured in the CRS,
and is in a CRS that bears the proper labels. Air carriers should ensure that
flight attendants are aware that larger children (who have not reached their
eighteenth birthday) may use a properly approved CRS that is appropriate for
that child’s size and weight. In this case the air carrier may not prohibit the
use of the CRS. There are several companies that manufacture CRSs approved for use on aircraft that are specifically
designed for larger children who are physically challenged. Information
regarding some of those manufacturers is posted on a list maintained by NHTSA
http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/CPS/CSSRating/Index.cfm
NOTE: No air carrier may prohibit the use of a CRS by any child
under the age of 18 as long as the CRS is properly labeled, the child does not
exceed the specified weight limit of the CRS, and the child is properly secured
in the CRS.
L.
In the case of an adult (i.e., 18 years old or
older) who because of physical challenges needs the support and security that a
restraint system provides in order to travel safely on aircraft, the individual
or the air carrier (on the individual’s behalf) may request an exemption to § 121.311(b)
. There are several companies that manufacture restraint systems that may be
used by adults.
2)
Exemption information is available for your review on
the FAA’s Automated Exemption System web site. To review a previously granted
exemption regarding this issue, go to http://aes.faa.gov
and type
M. On July 16, 2002, the
FAA published Technical Standard Order (TSO) C100b, Child Restraint Systems,
which contains minimum performance standards that a child restraint system must
meet in order to obtain approval and be identified with the applicable TSO
marking. The TSO was published for review and comment prior to its adoption.
This TSO can be accessed at http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgTSO.nsf/MainFrame?OpenFrameSet
.
N.
Current operating rules in parts 91
, 121
, 125
, and 135
require that child restraint systems used on aircraft bear two labels: “This
child restraint system conforms to all applicable Federal motor vehicle safety
standards” and “THIS RESTRAINT IS CERTIFIED FOR USE IN MOTOR VEHICLES AND
AIRCRAFT,” in red lettering, or must bear either a label showing approval of a
foreign government or a label showing that the seat was manufactured under the
standards of the United Nations. However, under current operating rules, a CRS
that is specifically designed for use on aircraft under the performance
standards of TSO-C100b, as amended, and is not certified under the standards of
FMVSS 213, will not have the labeling required by current regulations to be
used on aircraft.
O.
In order to use a CRS that has been marked in compliance with
TSO-C100b, as amended, on any aircraft, the CRS must also bear the labeling
required by current regulations. In order to use the CRS without the proper
labeling, an exemption from the regulations would be required. The exemption process in discussed in subparagraph K above.
3-3559.
USE OF NON-APPROVED CHILD/INFANT RESTRAINT
SYSTEMS IN AIRCRAFT. The regulations that are contained in § 121.311
prohibit the use of certain types of child restraint systems during ground
movement, takeoff, and landing.
A.
During the cruise portion of the flight,
however, there is no regulatory prohibition regarding the use of any type of
child restraint, including those that are prohibited from use during ground
movement, takeoff, and landing.
B.
There is also no regulatory requirement that an
air carrier permit the use of “non-approved” CRS during the cruise portion of
flight. If an air carrier decides to implement an operational policy that is
not inconsistent with the regulations, they have the operational flexibility to
do so.
3-3560.
DOOR/SLIDE ARMING. Crewmembers
should be able to evacuate passengers from an aircraft whether it is moving on
the surface or parked at the gate.
A.
In accordance with existing regulations, air
carriers must have procedures to ensure that immediately after the stairs or jetway are pulled back from the
airplane, at least one floor level exit is armed. At least one air carrier has
expressed concern that this practice could result in an evacuation where the
slide would inflate and perhaps hit someone on the ground. If this concern is
of primary importance to an air carrier, then the air carrier should have a
policy that ensures that all ground vehicles are out of the possible “slide
strike” area before the jetway
or stairs are pulled back.
B.
In the past, the requirement stipulated that
the crewmembers must arm doors before the pilot taxied the aircraft. However,
the present requirements mandate that crewmembers arm each floor level exit be
armed before movement on the surface. The ideal time to arm the doors is
immediately before the aircraft begins to move. Procedures to arm doors
simultaneously with the start of pushback are also acceptable.
3-3561.
PASSENGER SEATBELT DISCIPLINE. Passengers unfastening their seatbelts when the seatbelt sign is
illuminated concerns the FAA. The Regulations require air carriers to
illuminate the seatbelt sign:
·
Before
movement on the surface
·
During
takeoff and landing
·
At any other
time when considered necessary by the pilot in command
A.
Regulations also require all passengers to
occupy their seat with their seatbelt fastened when the seatbelt sign is
illuminated and to comply with crewmember instructions regarding the “Fasten
Seat Belt” sign.
B.
When the seatbelt sign is turned on,
crewmembers should make an announcement. The announcement should emphasize that
when the seatbelt sign is illuminated, regulations require passengers to fasten
their seatbelts. In addition, as long as the sign is illuminated, crewmembers
should periodically remind passengers that the seatbelt sign is lighted.
Crewmembers should make additional and forceful announcements if passengers
stand and the seatbelt sign is illuminated, especially during turbulent air
operations.
C.
Many passengers regard the illumination of the
seatbelt sign prior to landing as a signal to prepare for landing by going to
the lavatory, standing, or stowing baggage. This is not a safe practice. Some
crewmembers have adopted the desirable practice of making an announcement
before turning on the seatbelt sign for landing. They announce that:
·
The flight
will be landing shortly; now is the time to go to the lavatory or move about
the cabin
·
Once the
seatbelt sign is illuminated, passengers should be in their seats with their
belts fastened
D.
Historically, most airlines ensured passengers were seated
during movement on the surface. However, during the 1980s, at least one airline
allowed its aircraft to be taxied with passengers standing. The FAA
Administrator defined this practice as a careless and reckless operation. The
FAA filed violations and the courts upheld them. Therefore, the FAA
incorporated into 14 CFR the requirement that the seatbelt sign must be turned
on prior to movement on the surface. This does not mean that pilots must stop
an aircraft when a passenger stands. Pilots must weigh the safety alternatives
before determining if it is appropriate to stop an airplane because a passenger
stands up during taxi. Pilots may elect to stop the aircraft when it is pulling
up to a gate and several passengers stand. However, there may be other times
when stopping the aircraft could cause a more serious safety problem.
E.
The regulations do not require all passengers
to be seated before the passenger loading door is closed. Requiring passengers
to be seated before the passenger loading door is closed is one way air
carriers have chosen to obtain passenger compliance with the lighted seatbelt
sign. This is a good practice, but not one that the FAA requires.
F.
Crewmembers must give an
announcement when the seatbelt sign is turned off in flight that passengers
should keep their seatbelts fastened when seated. The POI and/or CSI (as applicable)
should emphasize the requirement for this announcement. In addition, POIs and/or CSIs (as applicable)
should encourage air carriers to establish additional procedures to emphasize
the importance of passengers wearing their seatbelts at all times when seated.
These procedures could include:
·
Additional announcements
·
Video presentations
·
Articles in air carrier publications
or pamphlets in seat pockets
G.
POIs and/or CSIs
(as applicable) should encourage air carriers to use announcement techniques
that serve to forewarn passengers of pending situations that will require them
to comply with the seatbelt sign when it is illuminated. Examples of these
situations include expected turbulence and approaching destination. These
techniques should be designed to preclude any passenger movement once the
seatbelt sign is illuminated.
H.
Standup bars on wide-bodied air carrier aircraft have caused
considerable concern for the safety of passengers when turbulence is
encountered. On occasion, both passengers and flight attendants have
disregarded the seatbelt sign when it was turned on and continued to congregate
near the bar. This results in a potentially hazardous situation, not only for
those passengers standing, but also for others seated in the area adjacent to
the bar. From a safety viewpoint, whenever the seatbelt signs are on, all
passengers, including those in the vicinity of the standup bar,
should be secured in their seats. Air carriers having standup bars installed in
their aircraft should issue suitable instructions for the flight attendants
regarding seatbelt discipline procedures.
3-3562.
FLIGHT AND CABIN CREWMEMBER COORDINATION,
COMMUNICATION, AND SAFETY DURING POTENTIALLY HAZARDOUS CONDITIONS OF FLIGHT.
A review of aircraft accidents/incidents and cabin en route inspections reports
indicates that there is a need for better communication between flight and
cabin crewmembers. Also, there is a need for better seatbelt discipline by
passengers and flight attendants.
A.
Due to the nature of their cabin duties, flight
attendants are susceptible to turbulence-related injuries. Close coordination
between cabin and flight crewmembers can facilitate the timely completion of
cabin services and preclude the exposure of flight attendants to potential
injury during known or anticipated encounters with turbulence.
B.
During flight, the PIC is responsible for the
safety of passengers and crewmembers. Therefore, the PIC should ensure that:
·
The cabin
crewmembers complete their safety duties as appropriate for each phase of
flight.
·
During
takeoff and landing, the flight attendants are seated at their duty station
with safety belts and shoulder harnesses fastened.
·
During
movement on the surface, unless performing safety-related duties, flight
attendants must sit with safety belts and shoulder harnesses fastened.
C.
During emergency conditions, the flightcrew is primarily responsible for maintaining control
of the airplane. However, as conditions permit, the flightcrew
should brief the flight attendants on the nature of the emergency, the
approximate amount of time for cabin preparation, and the contemplated course
of action. This will enable the flight attendants to more effectively carry out
their duties.
D.
Air carriers should be reminded that it is advisable to make
a public address announcement to remind passengers that Federal regulations
require them to fasten their seatbelts when the seatbelt sign is turned on.
Additionally, part 121
, sections (§§) 121.415
and 121.417
specify that training programs must ensure that each crewmember remains
adequately trained. The training program should include:
·
Instruction on coordination among
crewmembers in abnormal/emergency situations
·
Review and discuss previous aircraft
accidents and incidents pertaining to actual emergency situations
E.
Coordination and communication between the
flight and cabin crewmembers during all phases of flight concerns the FAA. The
FAA requests that POIs review their assigned air
carrier’s training program and operational manuals to ensure that the air
carrier establishes a safe and effective means of coordination and
communication between the flight and cabin crewmembers. POIs
should address the operation, coordination, and communication procedures.
·
Guidance to flight crewmembers on the
importance of a predeparture briefing of the senior
flight attendant, which includes forecast turbulence related weather
conditions, scheduling of cabin services, clean up, securing of galley and
cabin, carry-on baggage, and passengers
·
Use of the public address system to
alert flight attendants and passengers of anticipated inflight
turbulence
·
Guidance for notifying flight
attendants when they are to cease inflight services,
secure the galley, sit with their restraints fastened, and/or resume duties
·
Standardization notification to the flightcrew from the cabin crew when the cabin crew
completes all pretakeoff and prelanding
duties and the cabin has been secured
·
Standardized pretakeoff
and prelanding signals from the flightcrew,
which the flightcrew uses to allow sufficient time
for flight attendants to be seated
3-3563.
BRACE FOR IMPACT POSITIONS.
A.
The Aeromedical Research
Branch of the Civil Aerospace Medical Institute (CAMI), Protection and Survival
Laboratory, has conducted research and tests with respect to establishing
“brace for impact” positions for passengers and flight attendants.
B.
In order to establish a best brace for impact
position for each person, it would be necessary to know the size and physical
limitations of the individual, the seating configuration, the type of
emergency, and many other factors.
C.
There are two primary reasons for bracing for
impact.
1)
To reduce flailing. Having the occupant flex, bend,
or lean forward over their legs can reduce flailing.
2)
To reduce secondary impact. Repositioning the body
(particularly the head) against the surface it would strike during impact can
reduce secondary impact.
D.
Today’s aircraft may have seating arrangements that result in
very small seat pitches (the space between seats) or a combination of small and
large seat pitch spacing (i.e., an aircraft with a first class/coach seating
arrangement). Also, amendments to part 121
have upgraded the airworthiness standards for flight attendant seats, including
the requirement for shoulder harnesses. In view of this information, this
provides the best possible information for most emergency situations.
E.
Passengers should take a brace position in one
of several ways. In all cases, the seatbelt should be worn, as tight and as low
on the torso as possible.
1)
In aircraft with low-density seating or seats
spaced relatively far apart, passengers should, as depicted in Illustration A or
B of figure 3-125, rest their head and chests against their legs. Passengers
can reduce flailing by grasping their ankles or legs, as depicted in
Illustration A, or if they are unable to do that, wrapping their arms under
their legs, as depicted in Illustration B. Their heads should be face down in
their laps, and not turned to one side.
Figure 3 – 125, Brace Position in Aircraft With
Low-Density Seating or Seats Spaced Relatively Far Apart
2)
In aircraft with high-density seating or in cases
where passengers are physically limited and are unable to place their heads in
their laps, they should position their heads and arms against the seat (or
bulkhead) in front of them, as depicted in figure 3-126.
Figure 3 – 126, Brace Position in Aircraft With
High-Density Seating or Where Passengers Are Physically Limited
3)
Passengers in aft
facing seats should rest their heads on the seat back (or bulkhead) behind them
as depicted in figure 3-127. The passengers should not place their hands in
back of their heads, as has been recommended in the past. Rather, passengers
should either place their hands in their laps or grasp the side of their seats.
Figure 3 – 127, Brace Position for Passengers in Aft Facing
Seats
4)
The passengers should place
their feet flat on the floor and slightly in front of the edge of the seat.
5)
Passengers should not use pillows or blankets
between their bodies and the object they are bracing against (either a seat
back or their own body). Pillows and blankets provide little, if any, energy
absorption and increase the possibility of secondary impact injury. Also,
pillows and blankets could create additional clutter in the aisles which could
be a detriment in an emergency evacuation.
6)
Children that occupy approved child restraint
devices should be braced in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.
Children in passenger seats should utilize the same brace position as adults.
Adults holding infants should provide uniform support to the infant’s head,
neck, and body and lean over the infant to minimize the possibility of injury
due to flailing.
7)
Pregnant or handicapped passengers may or may not
need the assistance of another person in taking a brace position, but should,
in general, attempt to take the same brace position as the other passengers. If
aft facing passenger seats are available, these passengers may benefit from
being located to those seats.
F.
The brace positions for flight
attendants will depend on the direction their seats face and type of restraint
system those seats are equipped with.
1)
In forward facing seats equipped with an inertial
reel shoulder harness, the flight attendants should sit back in the seat, as
depicted in figure 3-127, and rest their chin on their sternum, as depicted in
figure 3-128. If the seats are equipped with noninertial
reel-type shoulder harnesses, the flight attendants should fasten their
shoulder harnesses as tight as possible, lean against them, and rest their
chins on their sternums as depicted in figure 3-128. The flight attendants
should position their arms and hands in their laps or hold on to the side of
their seats, but should not be holding onto their restraint systems.
Figure 3 – 128, Brace Position With
Chin on Sternum
2)
In rear facing flight attendant seats, the flight
attendants should sit back in their seats, rest their heads against their seat
backs or headrests, and have the restraint systems, inertial or noninertial type, as tight as possible, as depicted in
figure 3-127. They should not clasp their hands behind their heads, but
position them as in a forward facing seat.
G.
Helicopter “brace for impact” positions are the same as those
for airplanes. Flight attendants, if present, should utilize either the brace
position for passengers or flight attendants depending on their seats and restraint
systems.
H.
In the case of an anticipated emergency landing, the
passengers should be briefed on the above information. In the case of an
unanticipated emergency, the flight attendants may only have enough time to
give a short command, such as “lean over” or “grab your ankles.” Experience has
shown that in an attempt to take a brace position of some sort, the passengers
will end up in a position that could result in less injury than if they make no
attempt at all.
I.
The air carrier’s
crewmember emergency training program should contain bracing information
appropriate to the aircraft and seat spacing used by that air carrier.
3-3564.
EMPHASIS ON TIME MANAGEMENT AND CREW COORDINATION
IN PREPARATION OF CABIN FOR IMPENDING EMERGENCY LANDING.
A.
On July 19, 1989, a DC-10-10 experienced a
catastrophic failure of the number 2 tail-mounted engine during cruise flight.
The separation, fragmentation, and forceful discharge of stage one fan rotor
assembly parts from the number two engine led to the loss of the three
hydraulic systems that powered the airplane’s flight controls. The flightcrew experienced severe difficulties controlling the
airplane, which subsequently crashed during an attempted landing at Sioux Gateway Airport, Iowa. There were 285 passengers and 11
crewmembers onboard. One flight attendant and 110 passengers were killed.
B.
The NTSB investigation resulted in
recommendations to the FAA. They included recommendation A-90-172: Issue an Air
Carrier Operations Bulletin for all air carrier flightcrew
training departments to review this accident scenario and reiterate the
importance of time management in the preparation of the cabin for an impending
emergency landing.
C.
POIs and/or CSIs (if applicable) should ensure that their assigned air
carrier’s training department reviews the accident scenario of United Airlines,
Inc., Flight 232. Emphasis should be on time management and crew coordination
and/or communication in emergency cabin preparation. “Lessons learned” in this
accident may be very useful for developing air carrier’s training curriculums.
In any case, each emergency training program should provide flight attendants,
who may be required to act in rapidly changing emergency conditions, with
knowledge of the air carrier’s policies and procedures. CRM training, with
practice and feedback sessions, is recommended for building communication,
situational awareness, problem solving, and stress management skills.
3-3565.
FLIGHT ATTENDANT RESTRAINT DURING A CRASH
AND EMERGENCY EVACUATION SECOND CHOICE EXIT DETERMINATION.
A.
On February 1, 1991, a B-737-300 collided with
a Fairchild Metroliner while the B-737 was landing.
The Metroliner was positioned on the same runway
awaiting clearance for takeoff. As a result of the collision, both airplanes
were destroyed. All 10 passengers and 2 crewmembers aboard the Metroliner and 20 passengers and 2 crewmembers aboard the
B-737 were killed.
B.
The NTSB investigation resulted in
recommendations to the FAA. They included recommendation A-91-117: Direct the
emergency evacuation subcommittee of the Aviation Rulemaking Advisory Committee
to examine flight attendant emergency procedures regarding the “2nd choice”
exit assignments to ensure that such assignments provide for use of the nearest
appropriate exit point. They also included recommendation A-91-118: Issue an
Air Carrier Operations Bulletin directing principal operations inspectors to
emphasize that during a crash sequence, flight attendants must remain properly
restrained and seated in their crew seats until the airplane has come to a
complete stop.
C.
The NTSB believes that POIs
and/or CSIs (as applicable) should ensure that air
carriers emphasize the following:
1)
During flight attendant training, the air carriers
that have a second choice exit assignment for flight attendants (e.g., overwing Type III exits) should emphasize the need to
evaluate personal risk in a decision to use a closer escape path rather than
using the assigned second choice exit. For example, another door or any opening
in the fuselage may be more acceptable and more appropriate.
2)
That during a crash sequence, flight attendants
must remain properly restrained and seated in their crew seats until the
airplane has come to a complete stop.
D.
Procedures in flight attendant manuals and training programs
that provide for “second choice” exit assignments for aircraft emergency
evacuation should be reviewed. This review should ensure that such assignments
also provide for the use of the nearest available exit or fuselage opening when
appropriate.
E.
Air carrier training programs often emphasize
the need for rapid evacuation following takeoff and landing accidents. On the
other hand, it is often difficult for flight attendants involved in such
accidents to determine when an aircraft comes to a complete stop. This lack of
a combination of cues (motion, deceleration, etc.) can result in flight
attendants releasing their seatbelts prematurely. If the aircraft experiences a
sudden deceleration while a crewmember is unsecured, the result may be
incapacitation to that crewmember and an increase of passenger evacuation time.
Therefore, crewmember training should emphasize the importance of crewmembers
remaining seated and properly restrained until the aircraft comes to a complete
stop. It should also identify techniques to aid crewmembers in making that
determination.
F.
During training in a crash
scenario, air carriers should emphasize the following to their flight
attendants:
·
The need for
them to evaluate personal risk in a decision to go to a second choice exit
·
The need for
them to remain seated and properly secured until the aircraft comes to a
complete stop
3-3566.
ACCIDENT
NOTIFICATION AND MANIFEST ACCOUNTING PROCEDURES.
A.
On September 20, 1989, a B-737-400 was an
“extra section” passenger flight to replace the regularly scheduled but
cancelled flight from New York City’s LaGuardia Airport. As the first officer began the
takeoff on runway 31, he felt the airplane drift left. The captain noticed the
left drift also and used the nosewheel tiller to help
steer. As the takeoff run progressed, the aircrew heard a “bang” and a
continual rumbling noise. The captain then took over and rejected the takeoff
but did not stop the airplane before running off the end of the runway into Bowery Bay.
The accident occurred in darkness. Both pilots and the four cabin crewmembers
had minor injuries. Two of the 57 passengers were killed and 15 had minor or serious
injuries.
B.
The NTSB investigation resulted in
recommendations to the FAA. They included recommendation A-90-105: Require
airlines to provide airport crash/fire rescue personnel accurate and timely numbers
of all persons aboard an accident/incident aircraft, and to provide assistance
in determining the disposition of persons who have been recovered from the
scene of an accident.
C.
The problems associated with the recovery
efforts involving an air carrier accident, in which a night take off was
aborted and the airplane ended up running off the end of the runway and into a
body of water, were compounded because rescue personnel did not know exactly
how many persons were onboard the airplane. This situation was detrimental to
the rescue effort because it created an uncertainty as to how many persons the
rescuers had to account for during the rescue operation. The NTSB recommended
that the FAA require air carriers:
·
Provide airport rescue personnel
accurate and timely numbers of all persons aboard an aircraft involved in an
accident or incident
·
Assist in determining the whereabouts
of persons who have been recovered from the scene of an accident
D.
The FAA agrees with the NTSB that air carriers should be able
to provide accurate and timely information to an appropriate and/or Government
authority with respect to the total number of persons on an aircraft and that
air carriers should assist the appropriate authorities in determining the
whereabouts of persons who have been recovered from the scene of an accident.
The sum of the persons on board an aircraft includes:
·
Crewmembers
·
Revenue passengers
·
Non-revenue passengers
·
Children being held in the lap of an
adult
·
Persons occupying cabin or flightdeck jump seats
E.
Part 121
requires that all air carriers prepare a load manifest that includes, at the
time of takeoff, the names of passengers (unless the passenger names are
maintained by some other means). Part 135
requires, for multiengine aircraft, a load manifest that includes, at the time
of takeoff, the number of passengers. On December 30, 1988, the FAA issued
Action Notice 8430.29, the primary purpose of which was to provide guidance
concerning a recent legal interpretation of part 121
regarding the manifest accounting for all non-crewmembers and the recording of
passenger names.
1)
Part 121
requires that air carriers include, as part of the load manifest, the names of
passengers unless such information is maintained by other means by the air
carrier. Other means could be ticket stubs or a computer source. The principal
reason for this regulation is to facilitate the rapid and accurate
determination of how many passengers are on board an aircraft and who they are
in the event of an emergency situation, such as an accident or hijacking. Not
having an accurate record of all passengers could, for example, hamper the
efforts of rescue workers during a post-accident rescue operation.
2)
The word “passenger”, as used throughout the
Regulations, means any passenger regardless of age. That interpretation also
states that the word passenger, as used in part 121
, is not qualified and means “any passenger.” A crewmember, as defined in 14
CFR part 1
, means “a person assigned to perform duty in an aircraft during flight time.”
3)
Any person provided transportation on an air
carrier aircraft, who is not a crewmember assigned by the air carrier to perform
duties during flight time, must be recorded as a passenger and listed.
a)
Crewmembers include:
·
The
pilot-in-command
·
The second
in-command (SIC)
·
Other required
flight crewmembers (such as flight engineers, navigators, relief pilots,
required and non-required flight attendants (who are assigned duties by the air
carrier))
·
Any other persons
(pursers, customer service agents, etc.) assigned duties during flight time
b)
All other persons are passengers. The following are
examples.
·
Non-revenue passengers
·
Children (regardless of their age and
whether they occupy a seat)
·
Deadheading crewmembers or other
company employees not assigned duties during flight time
·
FAA or NTSB safety inspectors
·
Law enforcement officials
F.
In addition to the load manifest
required by these regulations, the air carrier should also have a procedure
that ensures that the total number of persons on board any aircraft, including
the total number of crewmembers, is available at the time of takeoff. The
procedures should, as a part of the manual requirements of parts 121
and 135
(accident notification procedures) contain guidance, instructions, and
procedures regarding the local authorities (e.g., airport police, management,
and/or fire department), who the air carrier’s personnel should contact in the
event of an accident or incident. The procedures should also include what
information to give in the notification, including the total number of persons
on board the aircraft. The air carrier should also have a procedure that
provides assistance to those authorities in determining the whereabouts of
persons that the air carrier knows have been recovered from the scene of an accident.
G.
If an airport is certificated in accordance with 14 CFR part 139 , it must have an airport emergency
plan. Air carriers and commercial air carriers should review the plans of those
certificate airports to which they operate to ensure that the procedures they
develop, in accordance with the Regulations, are consistent with the airport
emergency plan that the airport air carriers developed. FAA ACs in the 150 series (e.g., 150/5210-14
, Airport Emergency Plans) contain additional information concerning airport
emergency plans.
3-3567.
POLICY FOR PASSENGER AND FLIGHT ATTENDANT
USE OF SEATBELTS DURING TURBULENCE. This paragraph provides guidance
about passenger and crewmember use of seat belts during turbulence.
Additionally, air carriers should include procedures regarding communication
and coordination in all crewmember manuals and training programs.
A.
Regulations require the air carrier to ensure
the following:
·
That each passenger has an approved
safety belt properly fastened around him/her during movement on the surface,
takeoff, and landing
·
Passengers have their seatbelt
fastened any time the seatbelt sign is illuminated
·
Signs are installed so they are
visible (usually on the back of passenger seat), advising each passengers to
keep their seatbelts fastened when seated
B.
In 1993, the FAA issued an air carrier
operations bulletin emphasizing the importance of passenger seatbelt discipline
and asking air carriers to establish special emphasis programs to highlight the
importance of this issue. Many airlines cooperated by making innovative changes
to announcements and placing articles in publications informing passengers of
the dangers associated with sitting in a seat without their seatbelts fastened.
In spite of all these efforts, passengers and flight attendants continue to
sustain injuries in flight during turbulence, evasive maneuvers, or other inflight disturbances. Many of these injuries are serious
and result in broken bones (especially ankle bones) and head injuries.
C.
Part 121
requires that a crewmember give an announcement after each takeoff, immediately
before or immediately after turning the seatbelt sign off, that passengers
should keep their seatbelts fastened, while seated, even when the seatbelt sign
is off. POIs and/or CSIs
(as applicable) should emphasize the requirement for this announcement. POIs and/or CSIs (as applicable)
should also remind air carriers that making a public address announcement to
remind passengers that Federal regulations require them to fasten their
seatbelts when the seatbelt sign is turned on is advisable. POIs
and/or CSIs (as applicable) should encourage their
assigned air carriers to establish additional procedures to emphasize the importance
of passengers wearing their seatbelts at all times while seated. These
procedures could include additional announcements, video presentations, and
articles in air carrier publications or pamphlets in seat pockets.
D.
Coordination and communication between the flight crewmembers
and the flight attendants during all phases of flight concerns the FAA. POIs should ensure that their assigned air carrier’s
training programs and operational manuals contain the safe and effective
procedures for coordination and communication between all crewmembers. These
procedures should address:
1)
Guidance to flight crewmembers on the importance of
a predeparture briefing of the flight attendants,
which includes:
·
Forecast turbulence related weather
conditions
·
Securing the galley and cabin
·
Carry-on baggage
·
Passengers
·
Scheduling
of cabin service and pick up
2)
Use of the public address system or other signal to
alert flight attendants and passengers of anticipated inflight
turbulence.
3)
Guidance and specific signals to notify flight
attendants when they are to cease inflight services,
secure galley, sit with their restraints fastened, and/or resume duties.
4)
Guidance for flight attendants regarding flight
attendant determination that turbulence is too severe for the continuing of
service and taking their seats with their restraints fastened and that they are
to notify the flight crewmembers regarding this action.
5)
Standardized notification to the flightcrew from the flight attendants when they complete
all pretakeoff and prelanding
duties and have secured the cabin.
6)
Standardized signals from the flightdeck
crew before takeoff and before landing, which they use to allow sufficient time
for the flight attendants to be seated.
3-3568.
GALLEY SECURITY. Reported
incidents of galley carts not properly secured or galley service items not
properly managed have caused concern that there is a need to have additional
guidance regarding galley carts and galley supplies. Notwithstanding the “Miscellaneous
Operational Amendments” final rule, effective on October 15, 1992, the
compliance schedule for enforcing § 121.577
regarding the pick up of paper cups and plastic glasses prior to movement of
the aircraft, has not been established at this time. Inspectors have reported
finding that proper restraints were no longer available for galley equipment
and that galley components could not be restrained by the existing latches.
Inspectors have also reported finding latching devices that did not work
properly for stowage compartments or drawers. The only latches available or the
latches that were identified as the primary latches were not long enough to
keep the doors properly closed. Certificated air carriers should have
procedures to address the following areas:
A.
Responsibility for Galley Restraint. A
specified crewmember should be responsible for each galley. However, all
crewmembers are responsible for ensuring galley security. Crewmembers have been
known to enter a secured galley and open a compartment and inadvertently forget
to resecure the galley. Therefore, crewmembers
should:
1)
Ensure that the galley and restraints are available
and function properly.
2)
Report malfunctioning galley equipment and
restraints by following the specific procedures; and
3)
Check the proper stowage of “items of mass,” as
referenced in § 121.576
, and equipment in the galley.
B.
Availability of Proper Restraint.
1)
The primary restraint should be identified.
2)
The primary restraint should be in good working
order and available for use during each takeoff and landing.
3)
Air carriers should have procedures to ensure that
the primary restraint performs the function for which it was intended.
NOTE: Not all latches required to be in the locked position
provide the primary restraint.
C.
Malfunction in Galley Equipment. The air
carrier should have specific procedures for reporting galley equipment and
restraints that have malfunctions. These procedures should include a method
identifying the person (or position) who will receive the report. The
procedures should be a part of the required flight attendant manual.
D.
Checking Galley Restraints. The responsible flight attendant
should check the galley and galley components to ensure proper restraints,
including:
·
Actions such as pulling vigorously on
carts, oven doors, drawers, and other components. This is a good method
of ensuring that they are secured.
·
Ensuring the
safe and correct parking of carts on mushrooms.
·
Ensuring
that brakes are operational on carts that use brakes.
·
If keys are applicable
to the container, then ensuring that the key is in the locked position should
be part of the actual checking procedures;
·
Galley curtains are secured open for
takeoff and landing; and
·
Visual
checking of galley, galley components, and galley cart security when possible.
E.
Phases of Flight. The procedures should
include, at least, the following information for each phase of flight.
1)
Prior to movement on the
surface. Prior to movement on the surface the responsible flight attendant
should ensure that all primary galley restraints are available and are in
working order.
2)
Movement on the surface.
a)
All galley items with the exception of paper cups
and plastic glasses should be picked up and properly stowed prior to movement
on the surface. Extension of the compliance schedule for the pick up of paper
cups and plastic glasses should not result in the safety problem of having galley
components unrestrained. When an air carrier wishes to serve food or beverages
while the airplane is stationary, the air carrier should ensure that this
service will not affect galley security.
b)
The air carrier should either serve beverages in
containers which can be thrown in a garbage receptacle or ensure that all items
which are not disposable are picked up prior to movement on the surface. Pick
up of service items is considered safety related and therefore all flight
attendants assigned duties on that flight may pick up galley service items
during movement on the surface.
3)
Prior to Takeoff. Flight attendants should ensure
that the galley and galley components are properly stowed and restrained.
4)
Procedures for Galley Security Inflight.
Procedures for galley security inflight include the
following:
a)
Carts are not to be left unattended.
b)
Air carriers should have procedures which ensure
that flight attendants are no more than 10 feet away (approximately three rows)
from the carts left in the aisles.
c)
Flight attendants should not park carts out of
their normal galley takeoff/landing positions unless they can be properly
restrained. Some aircraft are equipped with restraint devices such as mushrooms
which will properly hold carts in other areas. When this is the case, they may
be left unattended; however, most items should be cleared from the top of the
carts. If left unrestrained, items on the top of the carts can become dislodged
and cause injuries should there be a sudden
directional change of the aircraft. It is recommended that all cart restocking
should be done in the galley as this is a good safety practice.
d)
During service, other than when the cart is being
moved, the brake (if applicable) must be engaged. If the cart is parked out of
the galley during the flight, then it should be on the mushroom.
e)
Galley carts and the galley itself should be
maintained in an orderly fashion because of the possibility of turbulence or
evasive actions. This means that as many supplies as possible should be stowed
or left in their containers. It is recommended that the top of the carts be
kept as clear as possible. During light turbulence, when service can continue,
it is still advisable to discontinue the service of hot liquids and these
liquids should be removed from the tip of the cart.
5)
Prelanding. Flight
attendants should ensure that all galleys are properly restrained and that
galley components are properly stowed and secured.
6)
Postlanding. Flight
attendants should ensure that all reports of malfunctioning galley restraints,
galley components, and galley carts are properly recorded and/or reported.
3-3569.
ENSURING THAT CHILDREN WHO HAVE REACHED
THEIR SECOND BIRTHDAY ARE PROPERLY RESTRAINED.
A.
On June 8, 1995, a DC-9-32 was operated as a
scheduled, domestic passenger flight under the provisions of part 121
. The flight was cleared for takeoff on runway 27R. Five crewmembers and 57
passengers were on board.
B.
As the airplane began its takeoff roll, the
airplane occupants and air traffic control heard a “loud bang.” The right
engine fire warning light illuminated, the flightcrew
of the following airplane reported to the crew that the right engine was on
fire, and the takeoff was rejected. Shrapnel from the right engine penetrated
the fuselage and the right engine main fuel line, and a cabin fire erupted. The
airplane was stopped on the runway, and the captain ordered the evacuation of
the airplane.
C.
The flight attendant seated in the aft flight
attendant jump seat received puncture wounds from shrapnel and thermal
injuries. Another flight attendant and five passengers received minor injuries.
The pilots, the third flight attendant, and 52 passengers were not injured. The
airplane’s fuselage was destroyed.
D.
The NTSB investigation of this accident resulted in
recommendations to the FAA. These recommendations included A-96-84: Provide
guidance on how to implement the requirement that occupants who are more than
24 months old are restrained during takeoffs, landings, and during turbulence.
E.
During this NTSB investigation, it was
determined that one child who had reached its second birthday was listed as a
lap child, despite regulations that require all passengers who have reached
their second birthday to be restrained during takeoffs and landings. The Safety
Board has long been concerned about the inadequacy and enforcement of this
regulation, and in the last several years, has identified at least six
accidents and one enforcement action, in which children who had reached their
second birthday, were unrestrained because they were held in someone’s lap. The
ages of these children ranged from 26 months to 5 years.
F.
Present regulations allow
parents/guardians of children who have not reached their second birthday the
option of holding these children in their laps. Children who have reached their
second birthday must be restrained in an approved restraint system. As pointed
out in the background to the NTSB recommendation, the problem appears to be
that some parents/guardians want to hold children who have reached their
second birthday in their lap. This is not an acceptable procedure.
G.
In order to preclude this occurrence, many air carriers ask
the age of the lap-held child when the child is presented to be placed on the
load manifest. In addition, many air carriers instruct crewmembers to ask
parents the age of lap-held children. These procedures complement each other
and are recommended.
3-3570.
FLIGHT ATTENDANT APPAREL WHILE PERFORMING DUTIES
ASSOCIATED WITH FLIGHT.
A.
On June 8, 1995, a DC-9-32 was operated as a
scheduled, domestic passenger flight under the provisions of part 121
. The flight was cleared for takeoff on runway 27R. Five crewmembers and 57
passengers were on board.
B.
As the airplane began its takeoff roll, the
airplane occupants and air traffic control heard a “loud bang.” The right
engine fire warning light illuminated, the flightcrew
of the following airplane reported to the crew that the right engine was on
fire, and the takeoff was rejected. Shrapnel from the right engine penetrated
the fuselage and the right engine main fuel line, and a cabin fire erupted. The
airplane was stopped on the runway, and the captain ordered the evacuation of
the airplane.
C.
The flight attendant seated in the aft flight
attendant jump seat received puncture wounds from shrapnel and thermal
injuries. Another flight attendant and five passengers received minor injuries.
The pilots, the third flight attendant, and 52 passengers were not injured. The
airplane’s fuselage was destroyed.
D.
The NTSB investigation of this accident resulted in recommendations
to the FAA. These recommendations included A-96-88: Issue an operations
bulletin recommending that POIs advise their air
carriers to disseminate FAA safety guidance on airline passenger attire to
their flight attendants.
E.
The NTSB investigation of this accident
disclosed that the flight attendant who received the most serious injuries was
wearing shorts and a short-sleeved shirt. Safety experts agree that in order to
decrease the chance of sustaining burns, it is better to wear long sleeves and
pants than it is to wear short sleeves and short pants. In addition, fabrics
such as wool and cotton are better than synthetic fabrics. Also, it is better
to have low heeled shoes which are enclosed. Straps or laces are encouraged
while sandals are discouraged.
F.
Air carriers should ensure that
those charged with developing the criteria for the attire crewmembers wear
while performing duties associated with flight are aware of these safety
considerations.
G.
Air carriers should ensure that crewmembers are aware of the
information regarding the safety considerations for the apparel they wear
during flights.
3-3571.
ADOPTION OF FLIGHT CREWMEMBER FLIGHT TIME
LIMITATION RULES TO ESTABLISH FLIGHT ATTENDANT DUTY, FLIGHT TIME LIMITATIONS,
AND REST RESTRICTIONS. The flight attendant duty period limitations
and rest requirements final rule allows air carriers to adopt the flight
crewmember rules for their flight attendants. This rule provides additional
scheduling flexibility and eliminates the need for an air carrier to have two
sets of scheduling requirements for its flight crewmembers and flight
attendants. This provision also will permit flight attendants on such
operations to be scheduled with the same limitations as the flight crewmembers.
This option appears in 14 CFR §§ 121.467(c)
and 135.273(c)
of the final rule.
A.
In order to adopt the flight crewmember’s
flight, duty, and rest requirements for its flight attendants, the air carrier
must establish written procedures which are approved by the Administrator and
referenced in the air carrier’s operations specifications. The procedure as
written must comply with the following guidelines and contain at least the
following information:
1)
Air carriers wishing to apply the flight crewmember
flight, duty, and rest requirements to flight attendants may obtain approval by
submitting their procedures for preliminary review and approval to the
principal operations inspectors assigned to them at the FAA FSDO that is
charged with the overall inspection of their operations. The approval process
is similar to those used for exit seating and passenger carry-on baggage
required to ensure that flight crewmember rules are adequately applied to flight
attendants.
2)
The written procedures must apply to all flight
attendants used in the air carrier’s operation.
3)
The written procedures must be applied to the air
carrier’s entire operations.
4)
The written procedures must show that the flight
crewmember rules are adequately applied to the flight attendants. They must
clearly show that when the flight crewmembers are following the rules for an
operation, for example, domestic, the flight attendants will also be following
those rules. Another example would be if the flight crewmembers are using the
Flag rules, then the flight attendants must also be following these rules and
the written procedures would clearly show this is the case.
5)
The written procedures for establishing duty period
limitations and rest requirements for air carriers certificated under part 135
must include the limitations contained in subpart F except for provisions for
on-board rest facilities, as appropriate to the operation being conducted.
6)
The written procedures must provide information
about augmenting the flight attendant crew complement. Part 121
and 135
air carriers are required to provide flight attendants on aircraft with certain
passenger seating configurations in accordance with §§ 121.391
, 135.107
, or the air carrier’s operations specifications, as appropriate. The number of
flight attendants required on an aircraft to meet the provisions of §§ 121.391
, 135.107
, or the air carrier’s operations specifications, whichever is greater, is
referred to as the minimum flight attendant crew complement.
NOTE: Any air carrier that elects the options to apply flight
crewmember flight, duty, and rest requirements of flight attendants and has
established written procedures for augmenting the minimum flight crewmember
complement must establish procedures for augmenting the minimum flight
attendant complement. The augmenting procedures must be based on the number of
flight crewmembers assigned to the flight that is in addition to the minimum
flight crewmember complement as specified in the aircraft type certificate data
sheet. For example, if the minimum flight crewmember complement on a Boeing
747-200 is three, as specified in the aircraft type certificate data sheet, an
air carrier that schedules four flight crewmembers for an extended long-range
flight will be required to schedule one flight attendant in addition to the
minimum flight attendant crew complement that is required by §§ 121.391
, 135.107
, or the air carrier’s operations specifications. For example, if the
operations specifications for a certain airplane requires
eight flight attendants, and if the air carrier adds one flight crewmember,
that air carrier would be required to add one additional flight attendant, for
a total of nine flight attendants.
7)
In addition, in the written procedures each air
carrier must show how they will ensure that the definition of “rest period” in
the final rule is applied to flight attendants. (See the detailed discussion on
“Rest Period Requirements” and “Reserve Status, Stand-by Status, or Similar
Assignments” in the final rule.)
8)
Under the provisions for applying flight crewmember
flight, duty, and rest requirements to flight attendants, if the Administrator
finds that revisions to the written procedures are necessary for the continued
adequacy of the procedures for applying flight crewmember flight, duty, and
rest requirements to flight attendants, the Administrator will require the air
carrier to make necessary changes within 30 days after being notified by the
Administrator. In addition, an air carrier may petition the Administrator to
reconsider the notice to change the procedures.
NOTE: This procedure for requiring changes is consistent with the
current regulatory language for aircraft inspection programs and pilot training
programs contained in §§ 91.415
and 121.405
, respectively, as well as a number of other regulations.
9)
Any air carrier that establishes written procedures
to apply the flight crewmember flight, duty, and rest requirements to flight
attendants and that subsequently wishes to revise this practice and schedule
flight attendants according to the duty period limitations and rest
requirements in § 121.467
or 135.273
must amend their operations specifications in accordance with §§ 121.79(c) and
135.17(b). These sections require an air carrier to file an application for an
amendment of operations specifications at least 15 days before the effective
date proposed by the applicant for the amendment, unless a shorter filing
period is approved by the FSDO charged with the overall inspection of the air
carrier. See chapter 18, section 3 of this volume, for information regarding
the issuance of OpSpec A032, Adoption of flight
crewmember flight time limitation rules to establish flight attendant duty and
flight time limitations and rest restrictions.
3-3572.
EXIT SEATING PROGRAM. The
applicable air carriers must comply with the appropriate parts of 14 CFR
pertaining to exit seating: §§ 121.585
and/or 135.129
. The following information provides guidance and clarification on the
development of the exit seating program and defines the applicability.
A.
Applicability.
1)
Exit row regulations apply to the following air
carriers:
a)
Part 121
certificated air carriers. This includes air carriers who carry passengers
pursuant to § 121.583
, because § 121.585
is not on the list of part 121
regulations from which those air carriers are exempt.
b)
Part 135
on-demand air carriers with aircraft having more than 19 passenger seats.
2)
The exclusion of part 135
on-demand aircraft having 19 or fewer passengers seats and part 135
commuter aircraft having 9 or fewer seats was based on typical passenger
seating configurations and exit availability of these aircraft.
B.
Exit Seat. An exit seat is defined as each seat
in a row of seats through which passengers would have to pass to gain access to
an exit from the first seat inboard of the exit to the first aisle inboard of
the exit. A passenger seat having direct access means a seat from which a
passenger can proceed directly to the exit without having to enter an aisle or pass
around an obstruction (such as a bulkhead, lavatory, closet, galley, etc.).
1)
The air carrier’s manual procedures must contain a
listing of designated exit seats for each type of passenger seating
configuration in its fleet.
2)
“Exit seat” is a more accurate term than “exit
row.” In some configurations involving a row of two seats at an exit, only one
seat is behind a partition. (For example, the forward most row on the left side
of the Dash-8.) The window seat, obstructed by the partition, is not considered
an exit seat because the passenger does not have direct access to the forward
left exit. However, the passenger seated next to that seat on the aisle has
direct access because that passenger does not have to pass around the bulkhead
to reach the exit. This is one of the rare exceptions whereby the entire row is
not an exit row.
C.
Selection Criteria.
1)
As applicable to the exit seating rule, the
required selection criteria for an occupant of an exit seat are listed in §§ 121.585(b)
and 135.129(b)
. The selection criteria is a listing of capabilities
and conditions to be applied to determine the suitability of persons to occupy
an exit seat.
2)
The selection criteria should be contained in its entirety
in the air carrier’s manuals, including the flight attendant manual, and the
exit seating passenger information card. The selection criteria must also be
available for inspection by the public at all passenger loading gates. Air
carriers should avoid paraphrasing the selection criteria, as it may change the
meaning of the neutral selection criteria and result in unwarranted
discrimination. An example of such paraphrasing whereby the meaning of the
criteria is changed would be if an air carrier misrepresented § 121.585(b)(4) as follows:
a)
“The person lacks sufficient visual capacity to
perform one or more of the applicable functions.”
b)
The omission of “without the assistance of visual
aids beyond contact lenses or eyeglasses” (as stated in the regulation)
significantly changes the meaning of the criteria and could result in
unwarranted removal of passengers with eyeglasses seated at exit seats.
However, in some instances the regulatory language could be changed for
simplification purposes without changing the meaning of the criteria. For
example, “to exit expeditiously” could be restated as “to exit quickly.”
3)
The airline employee, designated to determine who
may be assigned to an exit seat, must make this assessment in a
nondiscriminatory manner by consistent application of the neutral criteria.
a)
If, for example, a passenger is being evaluated for
assignment to an exit seat, age (with the exception of those younger than 15
years of age) or the size of a person alone should not be the determining
factors. The airline employee must evaluate the individual’s physical and
mental capabilities, and other conditions, as clearly outlined in the selection
criteria. If that individual meets all the selection criteria, then age or size
alone should not be a disqualifying factor.
b)
However, if that individual has difficulty walking
and lifting his/her own carry-on luggage, then the application of the neutral
criteria would exclude this individual from being assigned an exit seat because
it would appear by observation that the individual would not be able to move expeditiously
and perform the tasks involved in the emergency evacuation.
D.
Functions. As applicable to the exit seating rule, §§ 121.585(d)
and 135.129(d)
list the functions which a passenger, seated at an exit seat, must be willing
and able to perform in the event of an emergency. The functions must appear on
the exit seating passenger information card, but can be in written form or
graphically displayed. The functions must also be contained in the written
airport information available at the passenger loading gates and in the air
carrier’s manual procedures.
E.
Seat Selection/Assessment/Verification Process.
Each air carrier, using the selection criteria, is required to determine the
suitability of each person who occupies an exit seat. Regulations require that
persons responsible for making this determination be identified in the air
carrier’s manual. The air carrier is further responsible for developing
procedures concerning this passenger selection process. The procedures should
address:
·
Who is
responsible for making these determinations (prior to boarding and the final
verification on board the aircraft)
·
How they
will make this determination
·
When the
process will be performed
·
Where the
process will be performed
·
Identification of each designated
exit seat (for each passenger seating configuration in its fleet)
1)
Advanced Seating.
a)
To the maximum extent feasible, exit seats should
be assigned prior to boarding the aircraft. This would reduce the confusion or requests for reseating and possible delays after the aircraft is
boarded. This does not preclude an air carrier from having an open seating
policy, advance seat selection, self check-in kiosks, or other type of
computer/ internet technologies which allows advance seating selection and
check-in at airports where passengers may be permitted to select and be
assigned an exit seat at check-in without screening by air carrier personnel.
However, when these types of check-ins are in place, additional procedures
should be developed and implemented for screening, verifying, and reseating
passengers onboard the aircraft to ensure compliance with exit seat assignment
requirements.
b)
For example, menu prompts which appear at the point
of exit seat selection could assist in preliminary verification of passenger
eligibility. When a passenger has chosen an exit seat by means of a self check-in
kiosk, the ground agent at the ticket lift point could make determinations and
assessments at the time of the required verification of positive ID to meet TSA
security requirements. In order to safeguard the screening process, other
carriers may select a “see agent” prompt at the point of passenger selection of
exit seating via self check-in. POIs and/or CSIs (if applicable) should ensure that when air carriers
offer these methods of advanced seat selection, check-in, and open seating that
approved exit seating programs provide ample information detailing the methods
of screening and procedural safeguards in place to ensure compliance with exit
seat assignment requirements.
2)
The air carrier is responsible for identifying
those persons who will make the determination as to the suitability of the
person assigned to an exit seat. The responsibility can be assigned to a
customer service agent, a crewmember, or other persons specified by the air
carrier in its company’s manual procedures.
3)
Should air carriers choose to use electronic media
that allows passengers to select exit seats and print out a boarding pass
without going through an employee of the company, they must have procedures in
place for screening those passengers. The individuals and the procedures used
to accomplish this should be identified in the appropriate air carrier manuals.
4)
While the regulation specifically defines the
criteria for persons occupying an exit seat, the method by which the airline
employee assesses the person assigned to an exit seat should be defined by the
air carrier in its company’s manual. This process generally requires a physical
observation of the person and should require additional processes such as conversation
with the person, to determine if he or she meets the selection criteria
(ability to hear, understand, impart information, not distracted by other
responsibilities such as caring for small children or other traveling
companions, etc.).
5)
Sections 121.585(g)
and 135.129(g)
state that the air carrier may not taxi or pushback unless at least one
required crewmember has verified that no exit seat is occupied by a person the
crewmember determines is likely to be unable to perform the emergency
functions. The required crewmember and the method used to make this
determination must be specified in the company’s manual.
F.
Individual Exit Seat Briefings.
1)
The NTSB recently examined 46 passenger aircraft
evacuations that occurred between September 1997 and June 1999. The report,
titled National Transportation Safety Board, Emergency Evacuation of Commercial
Airplanes, Safety Study NTSB/SS-00/01 (Washington,
DC: NTSB, 2000), resulted in
recommendations to the FAA. They include recommendation A-00-77: Require air
carriers to provide all passengers seated in exit rows in which a qualified
crewmember is not seated a preflight personal briefing on what to do in the
event the exit may be needed. To read the entire report, go to: www.ntsb.gov/Recs/letters/letters.htm
.
2)
During the study, the NTSB examined passenger
performance in exit rows for the six cases for which the Board received
information on the overwing exit operation. In
several evacuations, the passengers had trouble using the exits correctly and
the Board determined that one reason for these difficulties was passenger
inattention to the safety materials provided. The Board found that in one case,
exit seats were occupied by two passengers older than age 70, one of whom was
unable to open the exit. In addition, three passengers seated in exit rows did
not speak the language in which briefings and oral commands were given by the
crew.
a)
Of the six study cases, several of the air carriers
had procedures in place to individually brief passengers on exit row tasks.
Passengers who received an individual briefing were more likely to read the
safety card than those who did not receive an individual briefing.
b)
The Board found that 44.5 percent of the passengers
who were individually briefed reported examining their safety cards and 16
percent of the passengers who did not receive an individual briefing reported
examining their safety cards.
c)
In addition, those who received individual
briefings performed better during actual evacuations and were better prepared
to operate the overwing exits.
3)
Many air carriers have procedures which designate
certain crewmembers to conduct additional structured personal conversations or
briefings, beyond the oral briefing required by §§ 121.585(h)
and (i) and 135.129(h)
and (i) , to ensure that the passengers in exit seats can
hear, understand, and speak the language of the air carrier. (However, fluency
in the language of the air carrier is not required as long as the exit seat
passengers can understand crew instructions, commands, the graphic
illustrations related to exit seat functions, and are able to adequately impart
information related to emergency functions.)
4)
Individual briefings that are given to passengers
who occupy exit seats have a positive effect on the outcome of an aircraft
evacuation. Individual briefings also assist flight attendants in assessing the
suitability of passengers who occupy those seats. An individual briefing
reminds passengers of their exit seat responsibilities, gives them the
encouragement to review their safety information card and also gives passengers
the opportunity to ask the flight attendant any questions they may have about
exit operation or procedures. This briefing also presents an opportunity for
the flight attendant to assess the passengers’ ability to understand oral crew
commands.
5)
POIs and/or CSIs (if applicable) should strongly encourage their assigned
air carriers to consider the safety benefits that are accomplished by
individual exit seat briefings and to include such briefings in their predeparture procedures. In the absence of procedures that
require individual briefings, POIs and/or CSIs (if applicable) should ensure that each air carrier
has a method in place to ensure compliance with § 121.585(g)
, which requires verification by a required crewmember that the passengers can
perform all required functions, which includes the ability to follow oral
directions.
G.
Assessment/Verification Prior to Landing. Air carriers should
also have procedures in place to ensure that exit seats are not occupied by
persons who do not meet the exit seat criteria. Crewmembers should continue to
monitor exit seat occupancy during flight, in the course of their normal
duties, to ensure that persons who do not meet the criteria do not move into exit
seats. In addition, crewmembers should recheck the exit seats before landing to
make certain that passengers who met the criteria and occupied exit seats prior
to takeoff still meet the exit seat criteria for landing (e.g., intoxication
during flight, panic attacks, passenger illness or injury).
H.
Exit Seating Passenger Information Card. Sections 121.585(d)
and 135.129(d)
provide the requirement for the contents of the exit seating passenger
information card. This exit seating passenger information card may be in
addition to the standard passenger information card, which is required by §§ 121.571(b)
and 135.117(e)
or it can be incorporated into the standard passenger information card. The
exit seating passenger information card is required to be located at each
designated exit seat. The exit seating passenger information card is to be
presented in the primary language in which briefings and oral commands are
given by the crew. It must contain the following information:
1)
The selection criteria, as found in §§ 121.585(b)
and 135.129(b)
;
NOTE: The selection criteria are mobility, strength and dexterity
standards that do not specify where exits should be deposited. Exits should be
deposited in accordance with the airplane manufacturer’s instructions. Air
carriers must depict on their passenger information card the actual weight of
the exit so that each potential exit seat passenger can make an assessment as
to whether or not they meet the selection criteria. Therefore, air carriers
must include the selection criteria on their passenger information card.
However, there is no need to repeat the information verbatim from the
regulation.
2)
The emergency function, as found in §§ 121.585(d)
and 135.129(d)
;
NOTE: The functions must be listed (as in the rule) and/or
graphically displayed on the passenger information card. Either or both methods
are acceptable. If a function can not be graphically depicted on the card (such
as “Follow oral directions and hand signals given by a crewmember.”), then it
should be written on the exit seating information card.
3)
The contents (to follow) found in §§ 121.585(e)
and 135.129(e)
:
a)
A request that passengers identify themselves for
reseating if they cannot meet the selection criteria; have non discernible
conditions that will prevent them from performing the applicable functions
listed on the card; may suffer bodily harm as a result of performing one or
more of the functions; and do not wish to perform the functions
b)
A request that passengers identify themselves to
allow reseating if they lack the ability to read, speak, or understand the
specified language in which crew commands will be given in an emergency. (This
request is to be written in each language used by the air carrier for the
passenger information card. If the card, for example, contains some safety
instructions in several languages, then this request should be in each of those
languages.)
I.
Oral Briefing.
Sections 121.585(h)
and (i) and 135.129(h)
and (i) provide the specific requirements for the oral
briefing. The content of the required oral briefing must be part of the air
carrier’s manual procedures. As per the rule, the oral briefing shall:
1)
Reference the exit seating passenger information
card, along with the criteria and the functions. (The required oral briefing
only requires a reference, not a reading of the contents of the criteria and
functions.)
2)
In addition, the briefing must have a statement
that requests the passenger to identify himself or
herself for reseating if he or she:
·
cannot meet the selection criteria
·
has a non discernible condition that
will prevent him or her from performing the applicable (emergency) functions
·
may suffer bodily harm as the result
of performing one or more of the functions
·
does not wish to perform the
functions
3)
This briefing should be conducted after all the
passengers have boarded. If the required briefing is conducted several minutes before
the entry door is closed and then several late passengers
board after the briefing is completed, the briefing should be repeated in case
one or more of the late passengers occupies an exit seat.
4)
It is beneficial when the air carrier incorporates
into the required oral briefing the exit seat locations for that aircraft
configuration so the passengers seated at the exit seats clearly understand
that the briefing requirements are directed toward them. Some air carriers
further identify exit seat locations to passengers and crew with placards in
the cabin, or with an indication on the passenger boarding pass.
J.
Reseating/Full Booking.
1)
Sections 121.585(k)
and 135.129(k)
require that in the event that a passenger assigned to an exit seat would be
unable to perform the evacuation functions, or requests a non-exit seat, the
air carrier shall expeditiously relocate the passenger to a non-exit seat. The
air carrier’s manual procedures should clearly outline how the reseating would
be accomplished.
NOTE: The air carrier, by regulation, shall not require the
passenger to disclose his or her reason for needing reseating.
2)
Sections 121.585(l)
and 135.129(l)
require that in the event a passenger assigned to an exit seat wishes to be
relocated to a non-exit seat and all of the non-exit seat are booked full, the
air carrier must move a passenger from a non-exit seat to the exit seat who is
willing and able to assume the evacuation functions. The air carrier’s manual
procedures should clearly outline how the reseating with a full load would be
accomplished.
NOTE: If a passenger is assigned to an exit seat but later has
second thoughts about being seated at an exit seat, the passenger should be
relocated prior to pushback. However, if taxiing has begun or takeoff is
already underway, the rule does not require that the passenger be moved. This
would create dangers as great as or greater than allowing the person to remain
in place until the aircraft is airborne. The cabin crew has been alerted to the
location of a potential problem in the event of an evacuation and can wait
until airborne when it would be safe to relocate the passenger. This is not an
excuse for a crewmember to be complacent in performing the required
verification.
K.
Denial of Transportation.
1)
Sections 121.585(m)
and 135.129(m)
state that an air carrier may deny transportation to any passenger under this
section only because:
·
The
passenger refused to comply with instructions given by a crewmember or other
authorized employee of the air carrier concerning the implementation of the
approved exit seating procedures; and
·
The only
seat that will physically accommodate the person’s disability is an exit seat.
2)
The air carrier’s manual procedures must describe
the reasons for denial of transportation. It should also describe how it will
be handled and who is designated to handle the situation.
L.
Disputes. Sections 121.585(n)
(iv) and 135.129(n)
(iv) require that the air carrier include procedures which address how to
resolve disputes arising from the implementation of this rule, and identify the
employee on the airport to whom complaints would be addressed for resolution.
This person is commonly referred to as the Complaint Resolution Official or
CRO.
M. Airport Information.
Sections 121.585(f)
and 135.129(f)
require that each air carrier shall make available for inspection by the public
at all passenger loading gates and ticket counters at each airport where it
conducts business, written procedures established for making determinations in
regard to exit seating. The method of presentation of the airport information
may vary, such as: a flyer, a card, a ticket jacket, a computer printout, a
posted sign, etc. The air carrier’s exit seating program should state the method
in which this information will be presented to anyone who requests this
information. This written airport information should contain:
·
The
selection criteria, as found in §§ 121.585(b)
and 135.129(b)
;
·
The
emergency functions, as found in §§ 121.585(d)
and 135.129(d)
;
·
The requests
for reseating, as found in §§ 121.585(e)
and 135.129(e)
;
·
The reasons
for denial of transportation, as found in §§ 121.585(m)
and 135.129(m)
;
N.
Program Content for Submission. The air
carrier should submit the following documents to the POI and/or CSI (if
applicable):
1)
Manual Excerpts.
a)
Manual excerpts should be submitted from the
operations, flight attendant, and passenger/customer service portions of the
air carrier’s manuals, with procedures appropriate for the air carrier’s
employees to adequately perform their exit seating duties and responsibilities.
b)
The procedures should contain: the selection
criteria, the emergency functions, location of designated exit seats,
requirements for exit seating passenger information cards, crewmember
verification of appropriate seating in exit seats, passenger oral briefings,
seat assignments, requirements for written airport information, reseating, full
bookings, assignment of exit seats, denial of transportation, resolving
disputes arising from exit seating, and identification of the air carrier
employee on the airport to whom complaints should be addressed for resolution.
2)
Configuration Diagrams. These should be submitted
(for evaluation) and should display each passenger seating configuration in the
air carrier’s fleet. The diagram should highlight all exit seats, all passenger
exits, any obstruction, such as: bulkheads, lavatories, closets, galleys, etc.
3)
Exit Seating Passenger Information Cards. Must be submitted for each type, make/model, and series aircraft.
These cards may be submitted in draft form, pending final approval.
4)
Airport Information. The air carrier should
identify the manner in which the written airport information is presented and
submit a draft copy pending final approval.
O.
Approval Process. The intent of the exit seating review and
approval process is to ensure consistent application of the regulation,
particularly when the rule was new and policy was being developed. (See figure
3-129, Exit Seating Program Job Aid.) During the original approval process, the
exit seating programs were sent for review first to the POI, and then forwarded
for a second review by the Exit Seating Coordinator at the Regional Office who
approved the programs on behalf of the Director, Flight Standards Service
(AFS-1). The POI no longer needs to forward exit seating programs to the Exit
Seating Coordinator at the Regional Office for approval. The POI is now
considered to be the representative of AFS-1 in terms of compliance with §§ 121.585(p)
and 135.129(p)
.
1)
Once the air carrier has completed their exit
seating program package, a copy of the program should be forwarded in draft
format to their POI and/or CSI (if applicable). During the review process, the
POI and/or CSI (if applicable) should use this guidance and complete the Exit
Seating Program Job Aid (checklist), figure 3-129. If the POI and/or CSI (if
applicable) is not satisfied with the package, the
inspector will return it to the air carrier with an explanation of the
changes/additions needed for the program. If the POI and/or CSI (if applicable)
finds the program to be complete and satisfactory, the POI will then give the
final approval to the air carrier and issue operations specification A022.
2)
Any subsequent revisions to the approved exit
seating program, such as a change in procedures, an addition of new aircraft, a
change in the passenger seating configurations, a change to the exit seating
passenger information card, etc., must be sent to the POI and/or CSI (if
applicable). The certificate holding office should maintain a copy of an
up-to-date version of their air carrier’s exit seating program.
P.
Special Approvals. There may be
situations whereby an air carrier may conduct some operations entirely in a
foreign country. Such a situation could occur during a wet lease operation. The
entire airplane may be full of passengers who all speak one foreign language.
The intent of the rule was not to exclude foreign speaking passengers from the
exit seat, provided these passengers understand the commands given by the
crewmembers in the event of an emergency, all the information on the approved
exit seating passenger information card, and the required oral briefings. This
may be accomplished in a number of ways. The crewmembers may be bilingual and
trained in two languages, one of which is the language of the foreign
passengers. The briefings may be conducted in two languages, the language of
the foreign speaking passengers and the primary language of the air carrier.
The exit seating passenger information cards should also be in the two languages.
An amendment to the existing exit seating program would be needed which details
the manner in which the air carrier would address this type of operation.
1)
If the situation is such that the operation is
conducted domestically and a large group of foreign speaking passengers board
the aircraft speaking one particular foreign language, and board in such
numbers that the only seats remaining for them are the exit seats, then the air
carrier would need to develop special procedures for FAA review and approval
which would address this type of operation in order to comply with the rule.
2)
If the air carrier cannot find any passengers who
speak the language of the air carrier, then the air carrier should attempt to
find those passengers who have some understanding of the language used by the
air carrier in the domestic operations. In this situation it would appear that
an interpreter would have to be used who is fluent in both the air carrier’s
primary language and the language of the foreign speaking passengers. An exit
seating passenger information card would have to be developed in that foreign
language and the interpreter would have to thoroughly brief the foreign
speaking passengers on the contents of that specially approved exit seating
passenger information card. The interpreter would also have to provide the
required exit seating oral briefing in the foreign language to ensure that the
exit seating passengers are willing and able to perform the emergency
functions. The interpreter would have to review the commands, which would be
given by the crewmember in an emergency evacuation, in both the primary
language of the air carrier and in the foreign language.
3)
A designated crewmember should oversee this special
briefing and make the determination that those passengers understand their
responsibilities, meet the criteria, and are willing and able to perform the
emergency functions, if called upon to do so. This procedure requires more time
to implement prior to departure and the necessary time must be allotted for
this special briefing.
4)
In these and other similar situations, the air
carrier would need to develop, in advance of the operation, and submit for
approval specific procedures, special exit seating passenger information cards
in the foreign language to be used, and crewmember training for that specific
operation. The procedures must detail how the exit seating requirements would
be met and who would be responsible for implementing the procedures and making
the final determination as to the suitability of these passengers. The amended
procedures must be sent to the POI and/or CSI (if applicable) for review. If
the procedures satisfactorily meet the requirements, the exit seating program
amendment for foreign speaking passengers can be approved by the POI.
3-3573.
EMERGENCY EVACUATION WITH INFANTS.
Researchers from the FAA Aerospace Medical Institute (CAMI), AAM-600, have
completed two studies designed to determine the most favorable methods for the
emergency evacuation of infants from aircraft (All CAMI publications may be
accessed at: http://www.faa.gov/library/reports/medical/oamtechreports/index.cfm
The following information is intended for use in developing passenger
information materials and/or briefing.
A.
The purpose of the first study, published in
2001, was to determine the most favorable methods for the evacuation of infants
via an inflatable emergency evacuation slide. The results of this study
strongly suggest that jumping onto the slide should be the favored boarding
manner, as opposed to sitting down and sliding which slows the progress of the
evacuation. The carrying position that provides the most protection for the
child would include cradling the child’s head and neck with the hand (for a
vertical position) or in the arm (for horizontal positions), keeping the
child’s arms, legs, and feet enfolded as much as possible by the adult’s arms.
Both positions emphasize the importance of cradling the infant to protect its
head, arms, and legs.
B.
The purpose of the second study, to be
published in 2004, was to determine the most favorable methods for evacuation
of infants through a Type III overwing exit. The
results of this study suggest that carrying the infant vertically, cradling the
infant to protect its head, arms, and legs, should be the favored egress
maneuver through the Type III exit, as opposed to carrying the child
horizontally or passing the child to another passenger on the outside of the
Type III exit.
3-3574.
USE OF PORTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICES.
POIs and principal avionics inspectors (PAI) should
review the provisions contained in 14
CFR part 91 , § 91.21
, part 121
, § 121.380
, and AC
91.21-1B , Use of Portable Electronic Devices Aboard Aircraft, with their
assigned operators. POIs and PAIs
shall ensure that their operators have adequate procedures in place to
determine whether or not portable electronic devices are acceptable for
passenger use on-board their aircraft. POIs shall
ensure that their operators specify in their operations manuals those portable
electronic devices that may not be operated on-board their aircraft. Although
14 CFR § 121.571
, part 125
, § 125.327
, and § 135.117
do not require the following briefing information to be given, POIs should encourage their assigned operators to include
information regarding the operation of portable electronic devices in their
operators’ pre-takeoff passenger safety briefings. These briefings should
include any specific restrictions that apply to passenger use of portable
electronic devices. An example briefing might be the following: “Some portable
electronic devices may interfere with the aircraft’s communications and
navigation systems. Please refrain from using any electronic device other than
portable voice recorders, hearing aids, and [the operator should add to this
list of portable electronic devices, the generic identification of any device
that it determines will not cause interference.] For your safety and the safety
of others, please stow all carry-on portable electronic devices during taxi,
takeoff, and landing.”
3-3575.
BRIEFINGS ON INDIVIDUAL FLOTATION DEVICES.
Individual flotation devices, for use by passengers, are not always identical
on some aircraft. The differences in the equipment can be insignificant. For
example, flotation cushions may have straps on the sides or straps across the
bottom of the cushion. In either case, the instructions for use would be the
same, “Insert your arms through the straps and hold the cushion to your chest.”
The straps are not in the same place, but the same instructions would work
regardless of the location of the straps. However, there are cases when the
differences in the flotation cushions or the life preservers are significant.
A.
Significant differences in life preservers are:
·
Some are
donned by placing one part over the head,
·
Others are
worn like a coat, and
·
Some have
inflation handles that work differently.
B.
Operators use various methods to inform passengers
of using dissimilar flotation equipment, such as:
·
Briefing passengers on the different
types of flotation devices;
·
Displaying
the differences on passenger cards and alluding to them in the briefing;
·
Using a combination of briefing and
passenger cards; and
·
Briefing passengers (in rare
cases) on only one design.
C.
Policy. When a passenger is informed about more
than one type of flotation cushion or life preserver it can be confusing. One
method for informing passengers is to give each passenger
information about the piece of individual flotation equipment that is
located at that individual passenger’s seat. In some cases, this may mean
different cards at different seats and individual briefings at certain seats.
When two sections on the same aircraft are equipped differently, each section
would need a different passenger briefing. Another method for informing
passengers is to advise them during the oral briefing that there are different
types of flotation cushions on the airplane and therefore, it is important that
they study the card carefully and be aware of the differences in the flotation
equipment. The different methods of donning and/or operating the individual
flotation device should be depicted on the card and given in the oral briefing
or demonstration (if extended over-water flight).
RESERVED. Paragraphs
3-3576 through 3-3590.
Figure 3 – 129, Exit Seating Program
Job Aid
This preapplication phase job
aid provides guidance for determining air carrier compliance with §§ 121.585
and 135.129
, Exit Seating.
|
Certificate Holder Name:
|
Doing Business As (DBA):
|
|
Address:
|
|
|
Certificate Holder Certificate No.:
|
POI Name:
|
Office and Phone Number:
|
Review Completed
|
Signature and Date:
Date Program Approved:
|
|
Date AFS-500 Notified:
|
|
Comments:
|
|
|
|
REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS: Detailed on attached pages -
Complete the lines with Y (for Yes) or N (for No):
|
Exit Seating Procedures
|
Airport Information
|
Passenger Seating Cards
|
Aircraft Floor Plans
|
EXIT SEATING PROCEDURES.
Procedures should be submitted as manual section/training program
sections/bulletins, etc. as appropriate to the individual carrier. Attach all
applicable sections pertinent to exit seating only.
NOTE: The POI should check for applicability and manual format
and ensure that all applicable publications are revised. THE PROCEDURES MUST
ADDRESS THE FOLLOWING REGULATORY REQUIREMENTS, AND MUST ADDRESS WHEN, HOW, AND
BY WHOM THE ITEMS WILL BE ADDRESSED.
SELECTION CRITERIA: Reference §§ 121.585(b)
and 135.129(b)
.
|
|
Do carrier procedures address when, how, and by whom the
screening and/or selection will be accomplished?
|
|
Do carrier procedures address the following selection
criteria?
|
|
1. Does a person lack sufficient strength, dexterity, or
mobility in both arms and hands, and both legs to perform the following
functions?
|
|
a. Reach upward, sideways, and downward to the location of
emergency exit and exit slide operating mechanisms.
|
|
b. Grasp and push, pull, turn, or otherwise manipulate
those mechanisms.
|
|
c. Push, shove, pull, or otherwise open emergency exits.
|
|
d. Lift out, hold, deposit on nearby seats, or maneuver over
the seat backs to the next row objects the size and weight of overwing exit doors.
|
|
e. Remove obstructions similar in size and weight of overwing exit doors.
|
|
f. Reach the emergency exit expeditiously.
|
|
g. Maintain balance while removing obstructions.
|
|
h. Exit expeditiously.
|
|
i. Stabilize an escape slide
after deployment.
|
|
j. Assist others in getting off an escape slide.
|
|
2. Is the person less than 15 years of age or does the
person lack the capacity to perform one or more of the functions listed in §§
121.585(d)
and 135.129(d)
without the assistance of an adult companion, parent, or other relative?
|
|
3. Does the person lack the ability to read and
understand instructions related to emergency evacuation pro vided by the
certificate holder in printed or graphic form or the ability to understand
oral crew commands in the language used by the carrier?
|
|
4. Does the person lack a sufficient visual capacity to
perform one or more of the functions listed in §§ 121.585(d)
and 135.129(d)
without the assistance of visual aids beyond contact lens or eyeglasses?
|
|
5. Does the person lack a sufficient aural capacity to
hear and understand instructions shouted by crew members without assistance
beyond a hearing aid?
|
|
6. Does the person lack the ability to adequately impart
information orally to other passengers?
|
|
7. Does the person have either of the following?
|
|
a. A condition or responsibility, such as caring for
small children, that would prevent the person from performing one or more of
the functions listed in §§ 121.585(d)
and 135.129(d)
.
|
|
b. A condition that might cause the person harm if he or
she performs one or more of the listed functions.
|
|
SEATING ASSIGNMENTS/VERIFICATION PROCEDURES
|
|
Are exit seats identified for seat assignment purposes?
|
|
Reference §§ 121.585(g)
and 135.129(g)
. Does the certificate holder have a procedure that taxi or pushback will not
be allowed until at least one required crewmember has verified that no exit
seat is occupied by a person the crewmember determines is likely to be unable
to perform the functions listed in §§ 121.585(d)
and 135.129(d)
?
|
|
Are verifying crewmembers specifically identified?
|
|
Reference §§ 121.585(j)
(k) and 135.129(j)
(k). Does the certificate holder have procedures to honor a passenger’s
request to be relocated and the procedures for relocation?
|
|
Does the procedure note that a person does not need to
disclose his or her reason for the request?
|
|
Reference §§ 121.585(l)
and 135.129(l)
. Does the certificate holder have procedures to move a passenger to
accommodate a relocated passenger, in the event of full booking of non-exit
seats?
|
|
DENIAL OF TRANSPORTATION/RESOLVING DISPUTES
|
|
Reference §§ 121.585(m)
and 135.129(m)
. Does the certificate holder have procedures to deny transportation because
of either or both of the following?
|
|
1. The passenger refuses to comply with instructions.
|
|
2. The only seat that will physically accommodate the
person’s handicap is an exit seat.
|
|
Reference §§ 121.585(n)
and 135.129(n)
. Does the certificate holder have procedures for resolving disputes,
including identification of the employee at the airport to whom complaints
should be addressed for resolution?
|
|
ORAL BRIEFING PROCEDURES
|
|
Reference §§ 121.585(i) and 135.129(i) . Does the oral briefing reference the following?
|
|
1. Passenger information cards.
|
|
2. The selection criteria in §§ 121.585(b)
or 135.129(b)
.
|
|
3. The functions to be performed under §§ 121.585(d)
or 135.129(d
).
|
|
4. A request for reseating if any of the following
conditions are met:
|
|
a. Cannot meet the selection criteria.
|
|
b. Has a nondiscernible
condition that would prevent him or her from performing the listed functions.
|
|
c. May suffer bodily harm as a result of performing one or
more of those functions.
|
|
d. Does not wish to perform those functions.
|
|
AIRPORT INFORMATION
|
|
Reference §§ 121.585(f)
and 135.129(f)
. Does the certificate holder have written procedures for making
determinations regarding exit seating available for inspection by the public
at all passenger loading gates and ticket counters at each airport where it
conducts passenger operations?
|
|
Is a copy of the information attached?
|
|
Is the content complete and the
method of inspection identified, such as flyers, signs, and so forth?
|
|
PASSENGER INFORMATION CARDS
|
|
Are copies of applicable cards attached?
|
|
Are cards appropriate to carrier’s aircraft and
configurations?
|
|
Do procedures address the use and location of cards?
|
|
Reference §§ 121.585(d)
and 135.129(d)
. Do the briefing cards contain the following functions?
|
|
1. Locate the emergency exit.
|
|
2. Recognize the emergency exit opening mechanism.
|
|
3. Comprehend the instructions for opening the emergency
exit.
|
|
4. Operate the emergency exit.
|
|
5. Assess whether opening the emergency exit will increase
the hazards to passengers being exposed.
|
|
6. Follow oral directions and hand signals given by a
crewmember.
|
|
7. Stow or secure the emergency exit door so that it will not
impede the use of the exit.
|
|
8. Assess the condition of the escape slide, activate the
slide, and stabilize the slide after deployment to assist others in getting
off the slide (where applicable to aircraft type).
|
|
9. Explain how to pass expeditiously through the emergency
exit.
|
|
10. Explain how to assess, select, and follow a safe path
away from the emergency exit.
|
|
Does the briefing card contain the selection criteria
listed in §§ 121.585(b)
and 135.129(b)
?
|
|
Does the briefing card contain a request that a passenger
identify himself or herself to allow reseating if he or she meets one of the
following criteria?
|
|
1. Cannot meet the selection criteria.
|
|
2. Has a nondiscernible
condition that would prevent him or her from performing the listed functions.
|
|
3. May suffer bodily harm as a result of performing one
or more of those functions.
|
|
4. Does not wish to perform those functions.
|
|
5. Lacks the ability to read, speak, or understand the
language, or the graphic form specified by the carrier, or lacks the ability
to understand oral crew commands (in every language used by the certificate
holder for the card).
|
|
AIRCRAFT FLOOR PLANS
|
|
Are the aircraft passenger
seating floor plans submitted for each aircraft make, model, and series, and for
each passenger seating configuration used by the certificate holder?
|
|
Are exits and exit seats identified?
|
|
List aircraft operated:
Aircraft Make/Model/Series
|
Configurations (same or show each configuration)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|