skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 215163  
Title: How Does the Juvenile Justice System Measure Up? Applying Performance Measures in Five Jurisdictions
Author(s): Doug Thomas
Sponsoring Agency: US Dept of Justice
Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention
United States
Sale: National Ctr for Juvenile Justice
3700 South Water Street, Suite 200
Pittsburgh, PA 15203-2363
United States
Document Url: PDF 
Publication Date: 05/2006
Pages: 24
Type: Issue overviews
Origin: United States
Language: English
Grant No.: 2005-JL-FX-K184
Note: This report is part of the Technical Assistance to the Juvenile Court Bulletin series. Downloaded on August 9, 2006.
Annotation: This report describes a performance measures system which reports to the public on how well a juvenile justice system is performing and operating and whether it is achieving its goals.
Abstract: The Pennsylvania Juvenile Court Judges’ Commission proposed a new statewide juvenile justice system outcome measures based on the data being collected. The initiative included the system outcome measures, means of data collection, and outcome report formats. South Carolina developed its statewide juvenile justice report card which demonstrates a “new way of doing business” predicated on the principles of balanced and restorative justice and agency accountability. The Deschutes County Department of Juvenile Community Justice presented an outcome-based report card to its community. An update on selected benchmarks is published and disseminated in the Bend Bulletin every 3 months. The Alleghany County (Pennsylvania) Juvenile Probation Department has used outcome-based performance measures for years. In addition, it produced its first system-wide report card in 2003. Like most juvenile court service agencies, Marquette County’s (Michigan) Juvenile Division had no previous outcome-based performance measures. However, in 2005 the division developed and implemented a strategy for measuring outcomes and produced a performance-based report card, and in 2006 published its first report card. In this report, the case is made for measuring and reporting juvenile justice system performance measures. The performance measures in this report are predicated on the goals and objectives inherent in the balanced and restorative justice mission. The projects described were designed to develop, implement, test, and demonstrate a viable performance measures strategy for the juvenile justice system.
Main Term(s): Juvenile justice system
Index Term(s): Testing and measurement ; Evaluation measures ; Effectiveness ; Local juvenile justice systems ; State juvenile justice systems ; Juvenile justice research
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=236743

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder