Reprinted from the Archives of internal Medicine June 1988, Volume 748 Copyright 1988, American Medical Association Original Investigations Thiazide Therapy Is Not a Cause of Arrhythmia in Patients With Systemic Hypertension Vasilios Papademetriou, MD; James F. Burris, MD; Aldo Notargiacomo; Ross D. Fletcher, MD; Edward D. F&s, MD o Forty-four patients with uncomplicated systemic hyper- tension underwent 48-hour electrocardiographic monitoring before and after four weeks of treatment with hydrochlorothi- azide, 100 mg daily. Plasma potassium concentration de- creased from 4.07-cO.26 mmollL (4.07kO.26 mEq/L) to 3.36 2 0.44 mmol/L (3.36 + 0.44 mEq/L). The average number of premature ventricular contractions, couplets, or ventricular tachycardia episodes did not change significantly. Twenty patients had more than mintmat ventricular ectopy (class 2 to 5) before and 17 after diuretic therapy. Further analysis revealed that following diuretic therapy, neither patients with plasma potassium levels of 3.4 mmol/L or less (53.4 mEq/L) nor patients with left ventricular hypertrophy had increased ectopy as compared with baseline. At baseline, patients wlth left ventricular hypertrophy had more arrhythmias than pa- tients without. We conclude that the results of this study provide no evidence that diuretic therapy or diuretic-Induced hypokalemia results in increased ventricular ectopy, and that patients with left ventricular hypertrophy may have more ventricular ectopy than patients wlthout, but these arrhyth- mias are not adversely effected by diuretic therapy. (Arch Intern Med 1988;148:1272-1276) D iuretics have been widely used in the management of systemic hypertension for more than 20 years. In general, they have been considered to be safe and effective with rather a low side effect profile. They have been used in most studies that showed beneficial effects from the For editorial comment see p 1265. treatment of hypertension,112 and diuretics have been rou- tinely recommended as initial therapy in the stepped-care approach.3 In recent years, however, the safety of diuretics in the management of hypertension has been questioned. While biochemical consequences such as hyperuricemia, hyperglycemia, or increase in cholesterol levels cause some Accepted for publication NW 22, 1987. From the Georgetown University and Veterans Administration (VA) Medical Centers, Washington, DC. Reprint requests to Hypertension Research, VA Medical Center, 50 Irving St NW Washington, DC 20422 (Dr Papademetriou). 1272 Arch Intern Med-Vol 148, June 1988 concern, hypokalemia became a major issue. Fears that mild-to-moderate hypokalemia may aggravate cardiac ar- rhythmias have resulted in the extensive administration of potassium supplements and potassium-sparing diuretica and more recently, these fears have initiated a trend away from the use of diuretics in the treatment of hypertension. This trend gained popularity even though an association between hypokalemia and cardiac arrhythmias not only remains unproved but also has been challenged.4m6 Although some studies suggested an increased risk of cardiac ar- rhythmias in patients with diuretic-induced hypokale- rnia,?ra others failed to confirm iW0 and the subject remains controversial. The original publication of the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial11 has been interpreted as indicat- ing an increased risk of sudden death in hypertensive patients with resting electrocardiographic (ECG) abnor- malities when treated aggressively with diuretics. Al- though this interpretation has been criticized,5 this study greatly influenced the medical community. The present study was designed to investigate the effect of diuretic therapy and diuretic-induced hypokalemia on cardiac arrhythmias by direct recording methods in pa- tients with uncomplicated essential hypertension. Some data from the first 31 patients have been previously published.`* This article presents complete analysis of the expanded series of 44 patients; particular emphasis has been placed on the influence of diuretic-induced hypoka- lemia on cardiac arrhythmias. PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty-seven patients with essential hypertension entered the study. All patients were black males. Patients with a history of myocardial infarction, angina pectoris, congestive heart failure, renal insufficiency (creatinine level ~176.8 kmol/L r~2.0 mg/dL]), inability to give informed consent, or patients who required digitalis therapy were excluded from the study. Three patients were terminated from the trial because of noncompliance and failure to attend clinic visits. Screening Phase Following the history and physical examination, a chest roent- genogram, M-mode echocardiogram, ECG, complete blood cell count, and blood chemistry studies were obtained from all patients. Patients with evidence of heart disease other than left ventricular hypertrophy were excluded from the study. The presence or Thiazide Therapy-Papademetriou et al absence of left ventricular hypertrophy was determined from the echocardiogram by measuring the left ventricular posterior wall thickness prior to the mechanical contraction of the left atrium.13 Left ventricular hypertrophy was considered present if the pos- terior wall thickness was equal or more than 12 mm. Echocardio- grams with evidence of asymmetric hypertrophy or dilated car- diomyopathy were not acceptable. The presence or absence of left ventricular hypertrophy was also determined by ECG criteria using Estes' scoring system.14 Study Protocol Phase 1: Baseline.-After eligibility for the study was deter- mined, all drug therapy was discontinued and potassium chloride, 40 mEq, was given to all patients for ten days. Three weeks later patients were seen for baseline studies. Sitting blood pressure, heart rate, body weight, and plasma creatinine, sodium, potas- sium, and chloride levels were determined. Blood samples, which were collected in sterilized lo-mL tubes that contained 143 U of lithium heparin, were analyzed within 30 minutes. Shortly after blood samples were obtained, a 48-hour ambulatory ECG monitor- ing was initiated. Immediately after the completion of the 48-hour recording, a second blood sample for electrolyte determination was obtained. The average plasma potassium level of these two measurements constituted the plasma potassium value of this phase. Phase 2: Hydrochlorothiazide Therapy.-Following the com- pletion of phase 1, all patients were started on a regimen of hydrochlorothiazide. 50 mp twice dailv, that continued for four weeks. At the end bf this-period and while hydrochlorothiazide therapy continued, all studies described in phase 1, including 48- hour ECG monitoring, were repeated. Ambulatory ECG Monitoring.-Ambulatory ECG monitoring was carried out for 48 hours during each phase using a double- channel recorder (model 445B; Del Mar Avionics. Irvine, Calif) and analysis was performed on a two-channel cardioxanner'(mode1 MK3 Cardiodata Corn. Malboro. Mass). Analvsis of all taues was carried out by an exp&ienced technician. For quality contiol, 10% of the tapes were analyzed by a second technician. Less than 10% interobserver variability was found in premature beats and no difference was found in couplets or ventricular tachycardia epi- sodes. In addition, samples from each hour recording, including the important arrhythmias, were printed on hard copy in real time and were reviewed by one of us. Ventricular arrhythmias were tabulated in two ways. The first way is modification of Lown's classification as used by Singh et a1,15 which is as follows: 0 indicates no arrhythmias; 1, premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) of 1 to 29/h; 2, PVCs of 30 or more/h; 3, multifocal PVCs; 4, couplets; and 5, ventricular tachycardia. From this grading system an average grade per hour was calculated. The second way is the average number of premature ventricular contractions per hour, total number of couplets, and total number of ventricular tachycardia episodes. BW kg 92.22175 90.1?17.6+ 61.1+14.4 79.8214.lt PK, mmol/L (mWL) 4.00k0.22 3.08?0.24t 4.2OkO.26 3.81 k0.28t PVC/h 16.6?50.7 9.1 k22.9 2.6 + 5.9 5.1 k9.2 Total couplets 124 12 5 6 Total VT episodes 2 2 5 1 AGR/h 0.72kO.76 0.59r0.64 0.46kO.54 0.57r0.76 J *BW indicates body weight; PK, plasma potassium; PVC, premature ventricular contractions; VT, ventricular tachycardia; and AGR, average grade. tPc.001; statistics compare values before and after diuretic therapy rothiazide (P = not significant). A total of 129 couplets and seven brief episodes (three to five beats) of ventricular tachycardia was noted before and 18 couplets and three runs of ventricular tachycardia were noted after diuretic therapy. The average grade per hour was similar between the two phases. Statistical analysis of the results was performed where appro- priate using the Student t test for paired observations, or the x2 test. The study was approved by the Research and Development Committee at the Veterans Administration Medical Center, Wash- ington, DC. Assessment of the Effect of Hypokalemia on Ventricular Arrhythmias To further evaluate the role of low potassium levels on RESULTS At baseline, all patients studied had mild-to-moderate hypertension, normal plasma potassium levels, and normal renal function. Twenty-eight of these patients had evidence of left ventricular hypertrophy by echocardiography and 20 by ECG criteria. The remaining 16 patients had normal left ventricular wall thickness by echocardiography and only one met the ECG criteria for left ventricular hyper- trophy. In the group as a whole, body weight and blood pressure decreased significantly as expected with diuretic therapy (Table 1). The plasma potassium level also de- creased from 4.07kO.26 mmol/L (4.07 +0.26 mEq/L) at baseline to 3.36+ 0.44 mmol/L (3.36? 0.44) (P<.OOl) with hydrochlorothiazide. Premature ventricular contractions averaged 11.3 * 40.2 before and 7.5 2 18.8 after hydrochlo- ventricular ectopy patients have been grouped into those who developed hypokalemia while receiving diuretic ther- apy and those who maintained plasma potassium levels within the normal range (Table 2). Of the 44 patients, 27 had potassium levels of 3.4 mmol/L or less (~3.4 mEq/L) following thiazide therapy, The decrease in body weight and plasma potassium level was highly significant in both groups (Pc.001). Ventricular ectopy, and the average grade per hour decreased substantially in the hypokalemic group, although the changes did not reach statistical significance. The distribution of patients into the Lown classes did not change with thiazide therapy (Table 3). In the hypokalemic group, 12 patients had more than minimal ectopy (class 2 to 5) before thiazide therapy and 11 patients had more than minimal ectopy after thiazide therapy. Similarly, in the normokalemic group, eight patients had class 2 to 5 ectopy before thiazide therapy and six patients had it after. Arch Intern Med-Vol148, June 1988 Thiazide Therapy-Papademetriou et al 1273 Table I.-Ventricular Ectopy Before and After Muretk Therapy: All Patients (n = 44) Variable* Baseline Diuretic SBP, mm Hg 154?16 136+12t DBP, mm Hg 96k6 69+6t W kg 67.6? 16.9 85.9e 16.9t PK, mmol/L (mEq/L) 4.07~0.26 3.36 f 0.44t PVC/h 11.3-c40.2 7.5218.0 Total couplets 129 16 Total VT episodes 7 3 AGRlh 0.63 to.70 0.58 k 0.67 *SBP indicates systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; BW. bodv weioht: PK. olasma ootassium: PVC. oremature ventricular co~tractirks; VT vkntrkuiar tachykardia; and AGR,' average grade. tP<.ool. Table 2.-Ventricular Ectopy in Patients With or WEthou? Hypokalemia Receiving Diuretic Therapy Variable* Hypokalemla (n=27) Baseline Diuretic No Hypokalemla (n = 17) Baseline Diuretic Table 3.-Patient Distribution: Modified Lown Classifica%3ri* Hypokaiemlc Group Normokalemic Group _. I Class Baseline Diuretic Baseline Diuretic 1 0 3 4 0 0 1 12 12 9 11 2 1 1 0 0 3 5 3 3 2 4 4 6 1 3 5 2 1 4 1 1 *Difference within or between groups not statistically significant. Modifi- cation of classification as used by Smgh et al.13 Table 4.-Ventricular Ectopy in Patients With or Without LVH Before and After Hydroohlorothiazide* LVH (n = 28) No LVH (n=16) Variable Baseline Diuretic Baseline Diuretic LVPWT 1.39+0.14 1.03-to.07 W kg 86.3k14.7 85.4-cl4.7t 90.0?20.8 88.1 -c20.6+ PK, mmoi/L (mEW 4.06~0.23 3.39-cO.45t 4.1OkO.32 3.33-cO.43t PVC/h 16.6k49.8 10.1 +22.9 2.1 k5.0 3.0 + 5.9 Total couplets 123 15 6 3 Total VT episodes 5 3 2 0 AGRlh 0.79iO.78 0.88-tO.74 0.34+0.40t 0.41 eO.54 L *LVH indicates left ventricular hypertrophy; LVPWT, left ventricular pos- terior wail thickness; BW, body weight; PK, plasma potassium; PVC, premature ventricular contractions; VT, ventricular tachycardia; and AGR, average grade. tP<.OOl, compare values before and after diuretic; Pc.05, compare values between groups at baseline. Effect of Diuretic Therapy in Patients With or Without Left Ventricular Hypertrophy Since some studies suggested a higher incidence of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy, patients were also grouped into those with and those without left ventricular hypertrophy as assessed by echocardiography (Table 4). Twenty-eight patients met the echocardiographic criteria for left ventricular hyper- trophy. Of these patients, 20 also had ECG evidence of left ventricular hypertrophy. In the remaining 16 patients, left ventricular wall thickness was normal, but one patient met ECG criteria for left ventricular hypertrophy. Comparing the ventricular ectopy between the two groups, patients with left ventricular hypertrophy determined by echocar- diography had more PVCs per hour and more repetitive beats than patients without left ventricular hypertrophy, but the differences did not reach statistical significance. The difference in the average grade per hour, however, which is an alternative way of quantitating the severity of arrhythmias, was statistically significant. The average grade per hour at baseline was 0.7920.78 for the first group and 0.3420.40 for the second (Pc.05). There were no statistically significant differences in arrhythmias be- tween patients with or without left ventricular hypertro- phy determined by ECG. Diuretic therapy resulted in a significant decrease in body weight and the plasma potassium level in both groups. &rrhythmias, however, did not change significantly. Table b I&XYS the patient distribution into arrhythmia classes b 155 18 3 a 8 1 b 3 4 a 33 b 90 4 5 a 6 2 b 2 6 a 8 1 b 2 *PVC indicates premature ventricular contractions; VT, ventricular tachy- carala. ta indicates first Hoiter monitoring; b, second Holter monitoring. before and after diuretic therapy in the two groups. Overall, in the left ventricular hypertrophy group, there were 15 patients with more than minimal ventricular ectopy (class 2 to 5) at baseline and 12 after diuretic therapy. In the second group, there were five patients with more than minimal ectopic activity at baseline and five after diuretic therapy. These differences were not statistically significant either within groups or between groups. Data of this study demonstrated no correlation between plasma potassium level and any type of arrhythmias or arrhythmia grade. Even the eight patients with overt hypokalemia (plasma potassium level 2.5 to 2.9 mmol/L [2.5 to 2.9 mEq/L]) had no worsening of their arrhythmias with diuretic therapy. Arrhythmias worsened in some patients following diuretic therapy but improved in many others. In some patients, there was considerable variability between Holter recordings obtained during the same phase. As shown in Table 6, the number of PVCs per hour varied up to fourfold between consecutive recordings whereas couplets or ventricular tachycardia runs could be present on one but not the other recording. (Individual results for each of the 44 patients are available on request.) k$@T4 Arch Intern Med-Vol 148, June 1988 Thiazide Therapy-Papademetriou et al Table 5.-Pat&tit Distdbutkm: Modified town ~ . . Class Baseline Diuretic Baseline Diuretic 0 2 2 1 2 1 11 14 IO 9 2 1 0 0 1 3 6 3 2 2 4 4 7 1 2 5 4 2 2 0 I *Difference between groups or within groups did not reach statistical significance by x2 test. Modification of classification as used by Singh et al.`5 tLVH indicates left ventricular hypertrophy Tab@ ea.---Spontaneous Vadabifity Bsiweatn 24~How Ho&w Re&ording Obtained Ourif@ the same twee of the s?udp Patientf PVC/h Total Couplets Total VT Episodes 1 a 55 10 1 b 99 2 a 359 63 COMMENT In a previously published study,0 we found no change in ventricular arrhythmias when overt diuretic-induced hy- pokalemia was corrected in patients with systemic hyper- tension. In that study, approximately one third of the patients with overt hypokalemia (average plasma potas- sium level, 2.8eO.3 mmol/L 12.8~0.3 mEq/LI) had more than minimal ventricular ectopy that remained unaffected by correction of plasma potassium levels. We hypothesized then that those arrhythmias were not related to the low plasma potassium level. The present study was designed to determine whether diuretic therapy, per se, without hypokalemia or diuretic therapy with hypokalemia has adverse effects on the cardiac rhythm. F'or the purpose of the study, patients with systemic hypertension and no other major disease were selected. Although ambulatory ECG monitoring rep- resents the best method for detection of spontaneous cardiac arrhythmias, the technique is still limited by considerable day-to-day va~abilit~`~I' Therefore, to in- crease its sensitivity, two consecutive 24-hour monitorings were performed during each phase of the study. The close temporal relationship between the plasma potassium mea- surement and recording of arrhythmias was assured by obtaining blood samples for plasma potassium levels at the beginning and at the end of each 48hour ECG monitoring. Furthermore, interference with arrhythmias by any other pharmacologic agents was excluded by discontinuing treat- ment with all medications prior to including patients in the study so that only hydrochlorothiazide was administered during the experimental phase. Data in this study were examined for the group as a whole and in subgroups; that is, patients were separated into hypokalemic and nonhypokalemic groups and into patients with or without left ventricular hypertrophy Although we realize the limitations of subgroup analysis, these separations were helpful in differentiating the effects of hypokalemia from any other independent effects of diuretic therapy on the cardiac rhythm and any adverse effects of diuretics in patients with left ventricular hyper- trophy. Results in this study provide no evidence that diuretic therapy or diuretic-induced hypokalemia results in in- creased ventricular eetopy Neither the group as a whole nor the subgroups exhibited increased arrhythmias with hydroehlo~thiazide therapy. In fact, the hypokalemic group manifested a trend toward decreased arrhythmias with hydrochlorothiazide. More patients had complex ar- rhythmias at baseline than during hypokalemia. Even the eight patients who exhibited plasma potassium levels of 2.5 to 2.9 mmol/L (2.5 to 2.9 mEq/L) with hydrochlorothi- azide therapy did not have any change in the frequency of ventricular ectopy. Two patients with considerable ventric- ular ectopy at baseline, if anything, improved with diuretic therapy, which also resulted in marked hypokalemia. Pa- tients with left ventricular hypertrophy had considerably more ventricular ectopy at baseline than patients without left ventricular hypertrophp Although the differences did not reach statistical significance for any individual category of arrhythmias, the average grade per hour was signifi- cantly higher in the first group of patients. These findings are in accord with the data published by Messerli et al,`8 who found more severe and complex arrhythmias in hyper- tensive patients with left ventricular hypertrophy, It is important to emphasize, however, that even patients with left ventricular hypertrophy did not demonstrate increased ventricular ectopy following thiazide therapy. Arch Intern Med-Vol 148, June 1988 Data in Table 2 indicate an impressive difference in premature beats at baseline between hypokalemic and normokalemic patients. This difference was not statistically significant due to the large SD. Careful examination of the individual data demonstrated no correlation between base- line arrhythmias and subsequent development of hypoka- lemia. In fact, the difference at baseline was due to the high premature beat count demonstrated by three patients (257, 76, and 40 PVCs per hour). In the remaining 24 patients constituting the hypokalemic group, baseline PVCs averaged 3,3/h. Considerable day-to-day variability has been noted in consecutive Holten recordings.`%" The sensitivity of the technique increases with the number of monitorings per- formed. Although a large number of recordings in each phase would be desirable, this is difficult for technical reasons. Most of the previously published studies utilized only one Holter monitoring in each phase, whereas in the present study two recordings were obtained in each phase. With respect to the variability in arrhythmias noted in this study, the following are noteworthy. The large SD noted in the group as a whole and in the hypokalemic group at baseline has been greatly effected by one patient who demonstrated a very high PVC count at baseline (257/h). This admittedly decreases the statistical power of the study to detect changes. However, if this patient was not to be included, the mean ( 2 SD) of the difference would be 1.2k11.6 for the 43 patients. This would give an 80% statistical power to detect a change of 4.9 premature beats per hour. Although small changes would not have been detected, the clinical significance of such changes is ques- tionable. Furthermore, a trend toward less rather than more arrhythmias was noted after diuretic therapy. Results in this trial are supported by other similarly designed studies. Lief et al9 performed 48-hour ECG monitoring in 13 patients with uncomplicated systemic hypertension before and after treatment with hydrochlo- rothiazide. Plasma potassium levels decreased from 4.0 r 0.1 to 3.0 2 0.1 mmol/L (4.0 2 0.1 to 3.0 rf: 0.1 mEq/L), but no change in ventricular ectopy was noted. Madias et allo performed 24-hour ECG monitoring in 20 patients with hypertension who were receiving placebo, and at two and four weeks of hydrochlorothiazide therapy. Plasma potas- sium level was 4.4 ~fr 0.1 mmol/L (4.4+- 0.1 mEq/L) with placebo, 3.4 r 0.1 mmol/L (3.4 t 0.1 mEq/L) at two weeks, and 3.0?0.1 mmol/L (3.01tO.l mEq/L) at four weeks of hydrochlorothiazide therapy Ventricular ectopic activity did not change significantly with hydrochlorothiazide ther- apy Caralis et alIs studied 16 hypertensive patients before and after thiazide therapy. Eight patients with no clinical evidence of organic heart disease had no change in ventric- ular eetopy following diuretic therapy, The remaining eight patients had findings consistent with organic heart disease and they demonstrated increased ventricular ectopy with diuretics. In a 1983 publication, the Medical Research Council of Britain- reported on two studies with rather contradictory results. In the first study, patients with uncomplicated hypertension were subjected to 24-hour ECG monitoring before and after eight to ten weeks of therapy with bendroflumethiazide. This study showed no evidence of increased ventricular ectopy with diuretic treatment. The second study compared results of 24-hour ECG monitoring of patients receiving long-term treatment with thiazides with a group of placebo-treated patients. The investigators noted an overall increased incidence of ventricular ectopy in the diuretic-treated patients. How- ever, this increase in ventricular ectopy could not be att~buted to hypokalemia since there was no correlation Thiazide Therapy-Papademetriou et al 7275 with plasma potassium in this particular subgroup and these patients had no baseline pretreatment ECG record- ings. The study most frequently quoted as providing evidence linking diuretic-induced hypokalemia to cardiac arrhyth- mias is that by Holland et a1.8 That investigation, using 24- hour ECG monitoring, showed increased ventricular ectopy in thiazide-treated, hypokalemic patients, as compared with their control pretreatment recordings. Holland's study, however, failed to take into account the considerable day-to-day variability in arrhythmic activity.16 Patients with more than six premature ventricular beats per hour at baseline, prior to diuretic therapy, were excluded from the study. Bias, therefore, was introduced by selecting baseline recording with low levels of ventricular ectopy. Because of possible day-to-day variability,16 the likelihood of finding increased arrhythmias on the second recording would be increased simply due to regression toward the mean rather than to hypokalemia per se. In our study, patients with more than minimal baseline ventricular ectopy were not excluded. It is noteworthy that up to a fourfold difference in the frequency of PVCs was noted in the same patient during the same phase on consecutive 24- hour recordings. More importantly, couplets or runs of ventricular tachycardia were noted on one but not the other 24-hour monitoring during the same phase. Much of the controversy surrounding diuretic therapy with or without hypokalemia and increased risk of sudden death has been derived from the results of the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial" that was published in 1982. That study has been interpreted as having shown increased mortality in a subgroup of patients with ECG abnormalities at rest when aggressively treated with diuretics. Although the author@' of that study cautioned that their findings were inconclusive and further investigation was needed, these data have frequently been used as establishing an association between thiazide therapy and increased risk of sudden death in patients with baseline ECG abnormali- ties.21 This finding, however, has not been substantiated by other studies. In fact, the recent retrospective analysis of the Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program2* failed to confirm the findings of the Multiple Risk Factor Inter- vention Trial. Furthermore, the final report of the Medical Research CounciP reporting on the results of treatment of mild hypertension could not demonstrate any adverse effects of diuretic therapy on patient mortality. Although the electrophysiologic changes associated with diuretic therapy are of uncertain significance, theoretically at least, it is possible that mild-to-moderate, diuretic- induced hypokalemia in patients with uncomplicated sys- temic hypertension could be associated with more electrical stability and less cardiac arrhythmias. It has been shown by many investigators that diuretic therapy is mainly associated with a decrease of extracellular potassium but only minimal change in intracellular potassium concentra- tion.24.2' The changes result in hyperpolarization of the cell membrane,28~29 which could lead to an increased threshold of excitation, increased rate of rise of phase 0, and improve- ment in conduction, which could eliminate reentrant cir- cuits and thus improve electrical stability. In conclusion, the results of this study provide no evidence that diuretic therapy, per se, or mild-to-moderate, diuretic-induced hypokalemia are associated with in- creased ventricular ectopy. Furthermore, diuretic therapy did not result in increased ventricular ectopy in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy, although these patients appear to have more arrhythmias at baseline as compared with patients with normal left ventricular wall thickness. 1. Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group on Antihyperten- sive Agents: Effects of treatment on morbidity in hypertension: Results in patients with diastolic blood pressures averaging 115 through 129 mm Hg. jAMA 1967;202:1028-1034. - - - 2. Veterans Administration Cooperative Study Group: Effects of treat- ment on morbiditv in hvnertension: III. Influence of ace. diastolic nressure and prior cardio&c&; disease. Circulation 1972;45;941-1004. L 3. The 1984 report of the Joint National Committee on Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Arch Intern Med 1984;144:1045-1057. 4. Harrington JT, Isner JM, Kassirer JP: Our national obsession with potassium. Am J Med 1982;`73:155-159. 5. Papademetriou V: Diuretics, hypokalemia, and cardiac arrhythmias: A critical analysis. Am Heart J 1986;111:1217-1224. 6. Papademetriou y Fletcher R, Khatri IM, et al: Diuretic-induced hypokalemia in uncomplicated hypertension: Effect of plasma potassium correction on cardiac arrhythmias. Am J CarWol 1983;52:1017-1022. 7. Hollifield JW, Statou PE: Thiazide diuretics, hypokalemia and cardiac arrhythmias. Acta Med Stand 1981$647:67-73. 8. Holland OB, NixonJv Kuhnert I: Diuretic-induced ventricular ectopic activity. Am J Med 1981;70:762-768, 9. Leif PD, Beligon I, Mates J, et al: Diuretic-induced hypokalemia does not cause ventricular ectopy in uncomplicated essential hypertension, abstracted. Kidney Int 1984;25:203. 10. Madias JE, Madias NE, Gavras HP: Nonarrhythmogenicity of diuretic-induced hypokalemia. Arch Intern Med 1984;144:2171-2176. 11. Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial: Risk factor changes and mortality results. JAMA 1982;248:1465-1476. 12. Papademetriou s Price M, Notargiacomo A, et al: Effect of diuretic therapy on ventricular arrhythmias in hypertensive patients with or without left ventricular hypertrophy. Am Heart J 1985;110:595-599. 13. Feigenbaum H: Echocardiography, ed 3. Philadelphia, Lea & Febiger, 1981, pp 129-131. 14. Lipman BS, Massie E, Kleiger RE: Clinical Scalar Electrocardiog- rap& ed 6. Chicago, Year Book Medical Publishers Inc, 1972, pp 103.104. 15. Singh SN, DiBianco R, Davidov ME, et al: Comparison of acebutolol and propranolol for treatment of chronic ventricular arrhythmia: A placebo- controlled, double-blind, randomized crossover study Circulation 1982; 65:1356-1364. 16. Michelson EL, Morganroth J: Spontaneous variability of complex 1276 Arch Intern Med-Vol 148, June 1988 References ventricular arrhythmias detected by long-term electrocardiographic re- cording. Circulation 1980;61:690-695. 17. Morganroth J, Michelson EL, Horowitz LN, et al: Limitations of routine long-term electrocardiographic monitoring to assess ventricular ectopic frequency. Circulation 1978;58:408-414. 18. Messerli FH, Ventura HO, Elizardi DJ, et al: Hypertension and sudden death: Increased ventricular ectopic activity in left ventricular hypertrophy. Am JMed 1984;77:18-22. 19. Caralis VP, Materson BJ, Perez-Stable E: Potassium and diuretic induced ventricular arrhythmias in ambulatory hypertensive patients. Miner Electrolyte Metab 1984;10:148-154. 20. Medical Research Council Working Party on Mild to Moderate Hypertension: Ventricular extra systole during thiazide treatment: Sub- study of MRC mild hypertension trial. Br Med J 1983;28'7:1249-1253. 21. Kaplan NM: Our appropriate concern about hypokalemia. Am J Med 1984;77:1-4. 22. The Hypertension Detection and Follow-up Program Cooperative Research Group: The effect ofantihypertensive drug treatment on mortality in the presence of resting electrocardiographic abnormalities at baseline: The HDFP experience. Circulation 1984;70:996-1003. 23. Medical Research Council Trial of Treatment of Mild Hvoertension: Principle results: Medical Research Council Working Part;`& Med J 19x5:291:97-104. 24. Kassirer PJ, Harrington TJ: Diuretics and potassium metabolism: A reassessment ofneed, effectiveness and safety ofpotassium therapy. Kidney Id 1977;11:505-515. 25. Leemhuis MP. VanDamme KJ. Stravrebere A: Effects of chlorthali- done on serum and'total body pot&si& in hypertensive patients. Acta Med Stand 1976;200:37-45. 26. Hersp R, Wilkinson PR: Potassium supplementation of thiazide therapy. Lancet 1976;2:1144. 27. Dareie HJ, Boddv K. Kennedy AC. et al: Total body potassium in long-termlfurosemide therapy: Is p&ass&m supplementation necessary? Br Med J 1974;4:316-319. 28. Dyckner T, Wester PO: Ventricular extrasystoles and intracellular electrolytes in hypokalemic patients before and after correction of the hypokalemia. Acta Med Sand 1973;204:357-359. 29. Dyckner T, Wester PO: Ventricular extrasystoles and intracellular electrolytes before and after magnesium infusion in patients on diuretic treatment. Am Heart J 1979;97:12-18. Thiazide Therapy-Papademetriou et al Printed and Published in the United States of America