 |  |
| ||||
Copyright © 2000, American Society of Plant Physiologists Accumulation of ENOD2-Like Transcripts in Non-Nodulating Woody Papilionoid Legumes1 *Corresponding author; e-mail cmfoster/at/iastate.edu; fax 515–294–0730. Received May 25, 2000; Accepted July 10, 2000. | |||||||||||||||||
Abstract Japanese pagodatree (Styphnolobium japonicum [L.] Schott) and American yellowwood (Cladrastis kentukea Dum.-Cours.) Rudd are the first woody, non-nodulating papilionoid legumes shown to possess putative early nodulin 2 (ENOD2) genes. ENOD2 cDNAs from Japanese pagodatree (807 bp) and American yellowwood (735 bp) have 75% to 79% sequence identity to ENOD2 sequences and encode deduced proteins that possess conserved ENOD2 pentapeptides (PPHEK and PPEYQ). Lower percentages of glucose and higher percentages of histidine and valine suggest that SjENOD2 and CkENOD2 are different from other ENOD2s. Hybridization analyses indicate the clones represent ENOD2 gene families of two to four genes in Japanese pagodatree and American yellowwood genomes, and ENOD2-like transcripts were detected in stems and flowers, as well as roots. Only roots of control species that nodulate, Maackia amurensis Rupr. & Maxim. and alfalfa (Medicago sativa), produced pseudonodules after treatment with zeatin or 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid, an auxin transport inhibitor. Accumulation of MaENOD2 transcripts was enhanced during the first 10 d of treatment, but 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid and zeatin enhanced transcript accumulation after 30 d in roots of Japanese pagodatree and American yellowwood. Characteristics that distinguish ENOD2 gene families in basal, non-nodulating woody legumes from other ENOD2 genes may provide new information about the function of these genes during symbiotic and non-symbiotic organ development. | |||||||||||||||||
The mutualistic relationship between many legumes (Fabaceae) and bacteria that fix dinitrogen (N2), such as Rhizobium sp., Bradyrhizobium sp., Sinorhizobium sp., and Azorhizobium sp., results in a unique organ, the nodule (Dénarié and Roche, 1992). Nodulation, once considered inherent in legumes, does not occur in all taxa. In subfamilies Caesalpinioideae, Mimosoideae, and Papilionoideae, 71%, 10%, and 3% of the studied species, respectively, do not form root nodules (Bryan et al., 1996). Although most species in the Papilionoideae nodulate, little is known about the molecular biology of nodulation and N2 fixation in temperate, woody members of this subfamily. Genes involved in nodule formation and function have been classified into two groups, early (ENODs) and late (NODs) nodulins, based on time of their expression during nodule development. Many ENODshave been identified (Gyorgyey et al., 2000; Jimenez-Zurdo et al., 2000), but few genomes of woody papilionoid species, members of the Caesalpinioideae and Mimosoideae subfamilies, or nodulating non-legumes have been examined (Foster et al., 1998a; Graves et al., 1999; Okubara et al., 2000). Study of ENODs in woody species may provide new information about the function of these genes during nodulation and facilitate an understanding of the evolution of nodulation in legumes (Doyle, 1994; Soltis et al., 1995). As a conserved early nodulation gene, ENOD2 has been used as a molecular marker for the early stages of nodule organogenesis. The ENOD2 sequence predicts that it may encode a Pro-rich protein with a structure similar to hydroxy-Pro-rich cell wall glycoproteins (Franssen et al., 1987). In situ hybridization showed that accumulation of ENOD2 transcripts occurs in the nodule parenchyma (van de Wiel et al., 1990a; Allen et al., 1991), but transcripts also have been detected in uninoculated, mycorrhizal, and cytokinin-treated roots of herbaceous legumes known to nodulate (Szczyglowski et al., 1997; van Rhijn et al., 1997; Goormachtig et al., 1998). ENOD2 mRNA has not been detected in stems or flower organs as has mRNA of ENOD12 (Scheres et al., 1990) and ENOD40 (Yang et al., 1993). Expression of ENOD2 and other early nodulins can occur during nodule morphogenesis without the presence of rhizobia (Govers et al., 1990; van de Wiel et al., 1990a). Purified nod factors, auxin transport inhibitors (ATIs) (naphthylphthalamic acid and 2,3,5-triiodobenzoic acid [TIBA]), auxins, and cytokinins induced formation of uninfected nodule-like structures (pseudonodules) on the roots of legumes and non-legumes (Arora et al., 1959; Hirsch et al., 1989; Ridge et al., 1992, 1993). Pseudonodules on roots of Melilotus alba Desr., alfalfa (Medicago sativa), and pea contained transcripts of ENOD2, ENOD8, ENOD12, and/or ENOD40 (Hirsch et al., 1989; Scheres et al., 1992; Dickstein et al., 1993; Wu et al., 1996; Fang and Hirsch, 1998). New information about the nature of hormone-sensitive ENOD genes can be obtained by modifying the endogenous hormone balance of roots of nodulating and non-nodulating legumes. Japanese pagodatree (Styphnolobium japonicum Schott) and American yellowwood (Cladrastis kentukea Dum.-Cours.) Rudd are commercially important, temperate, woody members of the Papilionoideae that do not nodulate (Wilson, 1939; Batzli, 1991; Graves and van de Poll, 1992; Foster et al., 1998b). Phylogenetic analyses of rbcL sequences indicated the genera Cladrastis and Styphnolobium are sister taxa that represent a basal (primitive) group within the subfamily where nodulation is not common (Doyle et al., 1997). As a first step in determining whether molecular events typical of nodulation of herbaceous legumes occur in these non-nodulating tree species we tested for the presence of ENOD2 in Japanese pagodatree and American yellowwood and studied spatial and temporal production of transcripts. In the absence of compatible rhizobia to stimulate gene function in Japanese pagodatree and America yellowwood, TIBA and zeatin were used to induce the formation of pseudonodules and production of ENOD2 transcripts in roots of both species. | |||||||||||||||||
RESULTS Isolation of PCR-Generated Sequences Conserved ENOD2 sequences encoding 5′- and 3′-translated regions and Pro-rich pentapeptide repeats were used to design degenerate primers for PCR. DNA fragments from Japanese pagodatree (555 and 807 bp) and American yellowwood (387 and 735 bp) were amplified by using the primers and genomic DNA or first-strand cDNA generated from total RNA from roots. Fasta analysis of the 807-bp cDNA sequence from Japanese pagodatree (SjENOD2; accession no. AF289097) showed greatest identity (64%, 792-bp overlap) to MaENOD2 (Foster et al., 1998a). The 735-bp cDNA sequence from American yellowwood (CkENOD2; accession no. AF289098) showed greatest identity (67%, 755-bp overlap) to GmENOD2B (Franssen et al., 1989). Deduced ENOD2 amino acid sequences from SjENOD2 and CkENOD2 are shown in Figure 1. These results indicated that the PCR-generated fragments were partial ENOD2 sequences.
Sequences of SjENOD2 and CkENOD2 Are Similar to Other ENOD2 Sequences Nucleotide and predicted amino acid sequences of SjENOD2 and CkENOD2 were compared with sequences from GenBank by using GCG Gap program (Genetics Computer Group, Madison, WI; Table I). Three ENOD2s, a Pro-rich protein, MtPRP4 (Wilson et al., 1994), and an extensin, HRGPnt3 (Keller and Lamb, 1989) were selected for comparison based on best sequence match to SjENOD2 and CkENOD2 with GCG Fasta program. Values for percentage similarity for SjENOD2 and CkENOD2 were highest with other ENOD2s (75% to 83%) and lowest with MtPRP4 and HRGPnt3 (50% to 70%). Nucleotide (76%) and amino acid (79%) sequence similarities between SjENOD2 and CkENOD2 were consistent with the values determined for other ENOD2 sequences.
In Table II, amino acid compositions of SjENOD2 and CkENOD2 are compared with ENOD2s, MtPRP4, and HRGPnt3. Six amino acids (Pro, Glu, Tyr, Lys, His, and Val) made up more than 97% and 92% of the SjENOD2 and CkENOD2 polypeptides, respectively. Although Pro, Lys, and Tyr levels in SjENOD2 and CkENOD2 are consistent with those of other ENOD2 proteins, Glu content is markedly lower, and Val content in CkENOD2 and His content in SjENOD2 are higher. In general, the amino acid compositions of SjENOD2 and CkENOD2 are more similar to ENOD2s than to MtPRP4 and HRGPnt3.
Deduced ENOD2 proteins consist of two domains, a signal peptide and a sequence of Pro-rich pentapeptide repeats (Govers et al., 1990). The deduced SjENOD2 and CkENOD2 proteins (Fig. 1) consist primarily of five pentapeptide motifs, PPHEK, PPEYQ, PPVYQ, PPHVK, and PPVYP. PPHEK and PPEYQ are conserved and highly repeated in ENOD2 proteins (Wycoff et al., 1992; Table III). The other motifs are found in ENOD2 proteins as well, especially in the deduced MaENOD2 protein from another temperate woody species, Maackia amurensis (Foster et al., 1998a). Pentapeptide repeats conserved in PRPs (PPVEK and PPVYK; Wycoff et al., 1992) also were found in CkENOD2, MaENOD2, and SrENOD2, but to a much lesser extent. These sequence analyses (percentage similarity, amino acid composition, and conserved motifs) indicate that SjENOD2 and CkENOD2 belong to the ENOD2 gene family.
SjENOD2 and CkENOD2 Are Encoded by Small Gene Families To evaluate the number of ENOD2 genes in Japanese pagodatree and American yellowwood, high stringency Southern hybridizations of genomic DNA were performed with SjENOD2, CkENOD2, and GmENOD2 cDNAs. No EcoRI, BamHI, or XhoI restriction sites were found in SjENOD2 and CkENOD2 cDNA sequences. Two hybridizing fragments were detected in each lane of the blot for Japanese pagodatree (Fig. 2), and three or four fragments were detected for American yellowwood. SjENOD2 and CkENOD2 probes hybridized to a 4.5-kb EcoRI fragment from soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merrill subsp. Marcus BC). At lower stringency (40% formamide), a 10.5-kb EcoRI fragment was detected (data not shown). These are the same EcoRI fragment sizes to which the GmENOD2 cDNA hybridized (data not shown; Franssen et al., 1989). No DNA fragments from maize (Zea mays subsp. mays B73; 1 PI 550473) were detected with SjENOD2 or CkENOD2. These results suggest that the cloned SjENOD2 and CkENOD2 PCR products may be members of ENOD2 gene families consisting of two and four genes, respectively.
Accumulation of SjENOD2 and CkENOD2 Transcripts Is Organ-Dependent To determine whether SjENOD2 and CkENOD2 were organ-dependent, poly(A)+ RNA from leaves, stems, and roots from 12-d-old seedlings and flowers from trees was subjected to RNA-blot analysis. Transcripts were detected in stems, roots, and flowers, but were undetectable in leaves (Fig. 3). Transcripts observed in roots and stems were approximately 1.1 kb, whereas flower transcripts were approximately 1.1 kb in Japanese pagodatree, and 1.2 and 0.9 kb in America yellowwood. Size of transcripts was estimated according to Lambda/HindIII and ØX174/HaeIII DNA markers.
ENOD2 Transcript Production Responds to TIBA and Zeatin Exogenously supplied ATIs and cytokinins induce the formation of pseudonodules that may contain ENOD2 transcripts (Hirsch et al., 1989). Roots of Japanese pagodatree, American yellowwood, alfalfa, and M. amurensis were treated with TIBA and zeatin to determine whether morphogenesis of pseudonodules and production of ENOD2 transcripts could be induced. Although TIBA and zeatin inhibited lateral roots in all species (data not shown), presumed pseudonodules developed only on TIBA-treated roots of the positive controls, M. amurensis (Fig. 4A) and alfalfa (Fig. 4B). Zeatin induced similar pseudonodules in alfalfa (data not shown). Root tips of Japanese pagodatree (Fig. 4C) and American yellowwood (Fig. 4D) swelled when exposed to TIBA and zeatin, but did not produce pseudonodules.
Total RNA from these experiments was extracted from roots after 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40 d of treatment and subjected to RNA-blot analysis (Fig. 5). TIBA inhibited accumulation of SjENOD2 transcripts on d 10 and 20 in Japanese pagodatree, but transcripts increased on d 30 and 40. Zeatin did not affect transcript accumulation in Japanese pagodatree until d 40 when accumulation was enhanced. Accumulation of CkENOD2 transcripts in the roots of American yellowwood was enhanced by TIBA on d 30 and 40. Zeatin inhibited accumulation of transcripts in American yellowwood on d 30, but transcripts increased on d 40. Transcript accumulation in M. amurensis was enhanced on d 10 by TIBA and zeatin. Equal loading of samples was monitored by rehydridizing membranes with an 18S rDNA probe. These results suggest that ENOD2 transcript accumulation in Japanese pagodatree, American yellowwood, and M. amurensis varies with concentrations of plant growth regulators.
| |||||||||||||||||
DISCUSSION To determine whether molecular events characterized during nodulation of herbaceous legumes occur in non-nodulating leguminous trees, we have identified putative ENOD2 genes in Japanese pagodatree and American yellowwood. SjENOD2 and CkENOD2 are the first ENOD2 homologs isolated from non-nodulating, temperate species from basal taxa of the Papilionoideae. Members of small gene families, SjENOD2 and CkENOD2 share sequence similarity and repetitive motifs with other ENOD2 proteins and respond to fluctuations in concentrations of plant growth regulators. However, differences in spatial and temporal production of transcripts distinguish SjENOD2 and CkENOD2 from ENOD2 genes in previously studied legumes. Partial ENOD2-like clones were generated with reverse transcriptase (RT)-PCR from total RNA from zeatin- and TIBA-treated roots of Japanese pagodatree (SjENOD2) and American yellowwood (CkENOD2). Similarity of the coding region of SjENOD2 and CkENOD2 at the nucleotide and deduced amino acid levels were as high as 83% with ENOD2 genes from other taxa (Table I). Pentapeptide repeats found most often in the deduced SjENOD2 and CkENOD2 proteins (Table III) and their tandem arrangement (forms of PPHEK and PPHVK followed by variants of PPEYQ, PPVYQ, and PPVYP; Fig. 1) were characteristic of ENOD2 proteins (van de Wiel et al., 1990b). Based on our sequence analyses we conclude SjENOD2 and CkENOD2 are distinct from other Pro-rich proteins and extensins. However, compared with previously described ENOD2 proteins (Nap and Bisseling, 1990; Wycoff et al., 1992), lower percentages of Glu and higher percentages of His and Val in deduced proteins of SjENOD2 and CkENOD2 (Table II) suggested that these cDNAs are different forms of ENOD2. Disparity in ENOD2 sequences may be used to infer genetic distance between Japanese pagodatree and American yellowwood and higher taxa in the Papilionoideae (Soltis et al., 1995) and may reflect the different cell wall properties of the tissue in which they are expressed (Franssen et al., 1988). Transcripts of the ENOD2-like genes in Japanese pagodatree and American yellowwood were identified in roots, and for the first time, in stems and flowers of both species (Fig. 3), which suggests that these genes might have roles in the development of different organs. However, functions of Pro-rich proteins involved in nodule formation and normal plant development have not been identified (Showalter, 1993). As a putative cell wall protein, ENOD2 may play a role in cell wall remodeling during organ development. Although ENOD2 expression had been detected only in nodules (van de Wiel et al., 1990b), ENOD2 transcripts have been detected in total RNA from uninoculated roots of Lotus japonicus (Regel) K. Larsen (Szczyglowski et al., 1997), in root primordia on stems of S. rostrata Brem. & Oberm. (Goormachtig et al., 1998), and in mycorrhizal roots of alfalfa (van Rhijn et al., 1997). ENOD2 mRNA had not been detected previously in stems or flower organs as has mRNA of other ENODs (Scheres et al., 1990; Yang et al., 1993). Synthesis of nodulins in parts of the plant other than nodules does not preclude the utility of nodulins in characterizing events during symbiosis (Sánchez et al., 1991). Application of purified nod factors, ATIs, auxins, and cytokinins that change the concentrations of endogenous hormones can stimulate some early stages of nodule development (Arora et al., 1959; Ridge et al., 1992, 1993; Hirsch et al., 1997) and ENOD gene expression (Govers et al., 1990; van de Wiel et al., 1990a). Similarities between pseudonodules and nodules induced by rhizobial infection at the molecular level have been evaluated by examining expression of ENOD genes (Bauer et al., 1996). In this study we sought to elicit formation of pseudonodules on Japanese pagodatree and American yellowwood by treating roots with TIBA and zeatin. Pseudonodules did not develop. Instead, tips of the primary roots swelled (Fig. 4), which has occurred in other species in response to auxins and ATIs (Allen et al., 1953; Hirsch et al., 1989, 1993; Scheres et al., 1992). Temporal changes in ENOD2 transcript levels during development of pseudonodules are similar to transcript accumulation during symbiotic nodule development. After inoculation with rhizobia or treatment with ATIs or cytokinins, nodules and pseudonodules become visible on roots in 7 to 14 d, and ENOD2 transcripts can be detected in 4 to 10 d (Hirsch et al., 1989, 1993, 1997; Govers et al., 1990; Dehio and de Bruijn, 1992; Scheres et al., 1992; Cooper and Long, 1994; Wu et al., 1996). In our experiment pseudonodules developed on the TIBA-treated roots of the nodulating controls, alfalfa and M. amurensis, and zeatin induced pseudonodules in alfalfa (Fig. 4). Accumulation of MaENOD2 transcripts was enhanced during the first 10 d of treatment with TIBA and zeatin (Fig. 5), which is consistent with the response of other ENOD2 genes to ATIs and cytokinins. However, SrENOD2 RNA is present in roots of S. rostrata 2 to 48 h after exposure to benzylaminopurine even though no pseudonodules develop (Dehio and de Bruijn, 1992). Despite the lack of pseudonodule development on uninoculated roots of Japanese pagodatree and American yellowwood, ENOD2 transcript levels were affected by exogenously supplied ATIs and cytokinins. But in contrast to the response of ENOD2 genes in nodulating legumes, enhanced ENOD2 transcript accumulation was delayed considerably in roots of Japanese pagodatree and American yellowwood when phytohormone balance was changed. Accumulation of SjENOD2 and CkENOD2 transcripts in roots was inhibited initially by TIBA, but by d 30, expression was enhanced (Fig. 5) concomitant with swelling of the root tip (Fig. 4). Although zeatin did not affect SjENOD2 transcript accumulation until d 40, CkENOD2 gene expression was delayed and then later enhanced by zeatin (Fig. 5). SrENOD2 genes in S. rostrata are similar to SjENOD2 in that they have a specific response to one treatment, cytokinin (Dehio and de Bruijn, 1992), whereas, SjENOD2 responds to TIBA. Sprent (1994) and others have questioned whether legumes considered non-nodulators lost the capacity to nodulate over time or never acquired it. In some non-nodulating, herbaceous legumes, perception of nod factors seems uncoupled from expression of ENOD genes (Cooper and Long, 1994; Hirsch et al., 1997). It is tempting to speculate that Japanese pagodatree and American yellowwood lack a component of the signal transduction pathway leading to localized cortical cell division and nodule organogenesis. But other factors, such as autoregulation by a local signal (ethylene) or a global signal (shoot-derived inhibitor; Schultze and Kondorosi, 1998) may influence nodule initiation in Japanese pagodatree and American yellowwood. We now know that Japanese pagodatree and American yellowwood possess ENOD2-like genes, and their transcripts have been detected, but whether these genes can function in roles ascribed to the ENOD2 genes of other legumes remains unknown. Although ENOD2 expression is specific to certain cell types in nodules, a direct link cannot be made between the induction of ENOD2 genes by exogenously supplied hormones and the capacity of a plant to form symbiotic nodules. Our results demonstrate that ENOD2 homologs are present in non-nodulating, temperate tree species from basal papilionoid taxa (Doyle et al., 1997) and add to the growing body of evidence that genes involved with nodulation have been recruited from other developmental pathways in the plant (Gualtieri and Bisseling, 2000). Characteristics that distinguish ENOD2 genes in woody legumes from ENOD2 genes in herbaceous legumes may provide insight into their role in symbiotic and non-symbiotic organ development. A broader understanding of the evolution of nodulation in plants may be fostered as well (Soltis et al., 1995). | |||||||||||||||||
MATERIALS AND METHODS Plant Material and Treatment Seeds of Japanese pagodatree (Styphnolobium japonicum [L.] Schott) were obtained from F.W. Schumacher Co. (Plains, MT) and Lawyer Nursery (Sandwich, MA). Half-sib seeds of Maackia amurensis Rupr. & Maxim. (seed source 15–5 by Pai and Graves, 1995) were obtained from the U.S. National Arboretum (Washington, DC). Seeds of American yellowwood (Cladrastis kentukea Dum.-Cours.) Rudd, alfalfa (Medicago sativa), soybean (Glycine max [L.] Merrill subsp. Marcus BC), and maize (Zea mays subsp. mays B73; 1 PI 550473) were obtained at Iowa State University (Ames).Seeds were scarified (Batzli et al., 1992) or surface-sterilized (Ralston and Imsande, 1983) and germinated aseptically for 5 d. Roots of 5-d-old seedlings not provided combined nitrogen were harvested for DNA extraction. Seven-day-old seedlings were irrigated with a sterile nutrient solution (Hoagland and Arnon, 1950; pH 6.8) that contained 10 μm Fe-EDDHA (with 30 μm NO3−) and 0.42 pm CoCl2, or with the same solution containing 50 μm TIBA or 100 nm zeatin (Sigma, St. Louis). Plants were grown in sterile, 1-L mason jars (Ralston and Imsande, 1983). Jars were arranged randomly in a growth chamber at 24.0°C ± 1.0°C under 146.3 ± 23.8 μm m−2 s−1 photosynthetically active radiation in 16-h photoperiods from incandescent and fluorescent lamps. At d 0, 10, 20, 30, and 40, roots were harvested for a temporal study of ENOD2 expression. To study organ-dependent accumulation of ENOD2 transcripts, leaves, stems, and roots from untreated 12-d-old seedlings were harvested. Inflorescences from mature American yellowwood and Japanese pagodatree at Iowa State University were harvested in June and August, respectively, when >50% of the flowers in the panicle were open and before any had senesced. All samples were frozen in liquid N2 immediately after harvest and stored at −80°C. PCR Amplification of DNA Probes Putative ENOD2 DNA fragments were generated with GeneAmp (PCR System 2400, Perkin Elmer, Norwalk, CT) using oligonucleotide primers and genomic DNA of Japanese pagodatree and American yellowwood. Primer sequences were derived from Pro-rich pentapeptide repeats (PHEKP, PPEYQ, and PPYEK) of conserved ENOD2 sequences (Govers et al., 1990) and were synthesized on an ABI 394 DNA synthesizer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Primer pairs used to amplify ENOD2 fragments from Japanese pagodatree and American yellowwood were 5′-CCACCTCATGA(G/-A)AAACCA-3′ and 5′-TTGA-TA(T/C)TCTGGTGGTGG-3′, and 5′-CCACCACC(C/A) GA(G/A)TACCAG-3′ and 5′-TGG(T/C)TT(T/C)TCATGAGG(A/T)GG-3′, respectively. PCR products were cloned into the pCR 2.1 vector from the TA Cloning Kit (Invitrogen, San Diego).DNA Extraction and Southern-Blot Analysis Genomic DNA was extracted from freshly harvested roots of 5-d-old seedlings of Japanese pagodatree, American yellowwood, soybean, and maize using the cetyl-trimethyl-ammonium bromide method (Doyle and Doyle, 1987). Ten micrograms of genomic DNA was digested with restriction enzymes EcoRI, BamHI, and XhoI (Promega, Madison, WI), subjected to electrophoresis in a 0.7% (w/v) agarose gel with Tris [tris(hydroxymethyl)- aminomethane]-acetate-EDTA buffer, and blotted onto a nylon membrane (MSI, Westboro, MA) with 25 mm sodium phosphate buffer. Prehybridization and hybridization were done at 42°C in 50% (w/v) formamide, 6.7× SSC, 3.3× Denhardt's solution, 0.4% (w/v) SDS, 25 mm sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7), and salmon sperm DNA at 0.12 μg μL−1. Gel-purified 0.555-, 0.387-, and 1.1-kb ENOD2 clones from Japanese pagodatree, American yellowwood, and soybean (Franssen et al., 1989) were labeled with [32P]dCTP and [32P]dATP by nick translation (Nick Translation System, Promega) and used as probes. After hybridization, washed membranes were subjected to autoradiography.RNA Extraction and Northern-Blot Analysis Total RNA was extracted from flowers, leaves, stems, and roots (Dix and Rawson, 1983), and poly(A+) RNA was selected using an oligo(dT)-cellulose column (Maniatis et al., 1982). Total and poly(A+) RNA samples of 10 and 2.5 μg, respectively, were denatured for 15 min at 65°C and resolved in 1.0% (w/v) denaturing agarose gels by using 10 mm methyl mercury hydroxide in Tris-borate buffer (Maniatis et al., 1982). Gels were blotted onto nylon membranes with 10× sodium chloride/sodium phosphate/EDTA buffer. Prehybridization and hybridization of the membranes were done as described for Southern-blot analysis. Membranes were hybridized with gel-purified 32P-labeled ENOD2 cDNAs from Japanese pagodatree (555 bp), American yellowwood (387 bp), and M. amurensis (561 bp). The sequence of the 561-bp PCR clone from M. amurensis was identical to nucleotides 235 to 796 of the coding region of MaENOD2 (Foster et al., 1998a). Washes were followed by autoradiography of the membranes. To confirm equal loading of RNA per lane, membranes were stripped of the former probe and rehybridized with a wheat 18S rDNA probe.RT-PCR To amplify more complete putative ENOD2 sequences from Japanese pagodatree and American yellowwood for sequence analysis, RT-PCR was performed with components and protocols from RETROscript Kit (Ambion, Austin, TX). First-strand cDNA was synthesized from 1 μg of total RNA from zeatin- and TIBA-treated roots using M-MLV reverse transcriptase and an 18-mer oligo(dT)-primer. PCR amplification of cDNAs was achieved by using a 5-μL aliquot of the RT-PCR reaction and primers derived from 5′- and 3′-translated regions and Pro-rich pentapeptide repeats of MaENOD2 (Foster et al., 1998a). Primer combinations were 5′-CCAGTGTTGGCAAATTAC-AA-3′and 5′-TTAATTTTTGGAAGGTGGATA-3′ for American yellowwood and 5′-CCACCACCAGA(G/A)TATCAA-3′and 5′-TGGTTT(C/T)TCATGAGGTGG-3′ for Japanese pagodatree. Amplified cDNAs were cloned into the pCRII vector using the TA cloning kit (Invitrogen).DNA Sequencing and Analysis The sequence of both strands was determined by using automated dideoxy sequencing on an ABI 377 sequencer (Applied Biosystems). The Fasta, Gap, Lineup, Pileup, and PeptideSort computer programs (Genetics Computer Group) were used to analyze nucleotide and amino acid sequences by determining percentages of identity and similarity, consensus sequences, and amino acid compositions, respectively. | |||||||||||||||||
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS The authors thank Mary Tymeson, Dr. Jennifer Hart, Faye Rosin, and Dr. David Hannapel for technical assistance and advice. We are grateful to Dr. Ton Bisseling for providing us with pGmENOD2. Thank you to Dr. John Imsande, the Seed Science Center, and the U.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service Corn, Insects, and Crop Genetics Research Unit at Iowa State University for providing seeds of soybean, alfalfa, and maize, respectively. We also thank Dr. Eve Wurtele and Dr. Philip Becraft for reviewing this manuscript. | |||||||||||||||||
Footnotes 1This work was supported by the Hatch Act and State of Iowa funds. This is journal paper number J–18575 of the Iowa Agriculture and Home Economics Experiment Station (Ames; project no. 3229). | |||||||||||||||||
LITERATURE CITED
| |||||||||||||||||
