Copyright © American Society for Investigative Pathology Bone Morphogenetic Protein-4 Inhibitor Gremlin Is Overexpressed in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Accepted April 3, 2006. This article has been cited by other articles in PMC. | ||||
Abstract Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), ie, usual interstitial pneumonia in histopathology, is a disease characterized by tissue destruction and active areas of fibroproliferation in the lung. Gremlin (Drm), a member of the cysteine knot family of bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) inhibitors, functions to antagonize BMP-4-mediated signals during lung development. We describe here consistent overexpression of gremlin in the lung interstitium of IPF patients. Quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction analyses revealed considerably higher levels of gremlin mRNA in lung biopsies from IPF patients, the highest level being 35-fold higher compared to controls. Lung fibroblasts isolated from IPF patients also expressed elevated levels of gremlin, which was associated with impaired responsiveness to endogenous and exogenous BMP-4. Transforming growth factor-β-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition of A549 lung epithelial cells in culture was also associated with induction of gremlin mRNA expression. In addition, A549 cells transfected to overexpress gremlin were more susceptible to transforming growth factor-β-induced epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Gremlin-mediated inhibition of BMP-4 signaling pathways is likely to enhance the fibrotic response and reduce epithelial regeneration in the lung. The overexpression of this developmental gene in IPF may be a key event in the persistence of myofibroblasts in the lung interstitium and provides a potential target for therapeutic intervention. | ||||
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a progressive, fatal disease characterized by fibroproliferation and destruction of the lung parenchyme.1,2 IPF represents the clinical manifestation of usual interstitial pneumonia histopathology in the lung.3 The etiology of the disease is primarily unknown, and the current treatment options are by far limited to corticosteroids and cytotoxic drugs without significant effect on patient survival. The development of novel treatment strategies targeting the inhibition of fibrosis, epithelial apoptosis, fibroblast proliferation, or the induction of alveolar repair is actively ongoing.4,5 Characterization of the molecular mechanisms in the development of IPF is of crucial importance for the development of new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies. IPF is characterized by patchy fibroblast expansion, tissue remodeling, and excessive accumulation of the extracellular matrix (ECM). The areas of immature fibrosis are characterized by actively proliferating myofibroblasts and fibroblasts (fibroblastic foci). It has been suggested that IPF could result from epithelial injury, after which the normal architecture of the lung is not properly restored.2 The overexpression of profibrotic activities leads to myofibroblast accumulation, with little involvement of inflammation. Injured epithelial and mesenchymal cells secrete many profibrotic molecules including transforming growth factor (TGF)-β, platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), and connective tissue growth factor (CTGF).6 TGF-β is thought to play a central role in the progression of IPF because it induces the recruitment and differentiation of myofibroblasts as well as ECM accumulation.7,8 TGF-β can cause persistent induction of fibronectin and collagen expression by mRNA stabilization.9 In addition, TGF-β regulates growth factor pathways and proteolytic systems.10 Recent observations suggest that the inhibition of the profibrotic activities of TGF-β in parallel with the inhibition of PDGF signaling significantly decreases fibrosis in mouse models.4 TGF-βs are secreted as inactive, latent complexes that are targeted to the ECM for storage and/or for activation.11 Physiologically relevant activation mechanisms include integrin- and proteolysis-mediated mechanisms as well as activation by the matricellular protein thrombospondin-1. Regulation of the activation process plays an important role in the biological functions of the three mammalian TGF-β isoforms. Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP)-4, a member of the TGF-β superfamily, is one of the key morphogens during embryonic lung development.12 The balance between TGF-β and BMP signaling activities in the lung are of crucial importance during developmental and regenerative processes. BMP-4 inhibits the proliferation of human pulmonary fibroblasts and during embryogenesis induces the proliferation and dedifferentiation of pulmonary epithelial cells.13 Gremlin/Drm is a member of the CAN family of binding proteins that antagonize the functions of BMPs.14 Gremlin can associate with BMP-2, -4, and -7 and inhibit their binding to cell surface receptors.14 Gremlin plays an important role in regulating proximal-distal patterning of the lung by inhibiting BMP-4 signaling.15 In addition, BMP-independent functions for gremlin have been described.16 The role of BMP-4 signaling in IPF has not been clarified so far. Using established cell lines isolated from patients with IPF, we find here consistent overexpression of gremlin mRNA. This resulted in impaired responsiveness of the IPF fibroblasts to endogenous and exogenous BMP-4. Clinical relevance of these results was supported by data from freshly isolated IPF fibroblasts derived from an IPF pulmonary transplant recipient. Immunohistochemical comparison of healthy and IPF patient lungs showed increased expression of gremlin protein in the mesenchymal cells of the IPF lung. Quantitative real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analyses further verified the enhanced expression of the gremlin gene in IPF patients. To explore the possible significance of gremlin induction for epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) we analyzed gremlin levels of cultured lung epithelial cells after exposure to TGF-β1. Gremlin mRNA levels were found to be induced in association with EMT. Lung epithelial cells expressing recombinant gremlin were found to be more susceptible to TGF-β1-induced EMT. Our results suggest that overexpression of the BMP inhibitor gremlin plays a role in the pathogenesis of IPF and may function to enhance the fibrotic response by modulating BMP-4 signaling in the lung. | ||||
Materials and Methods Antibodies and Growth Factors α-SMA antibody (CBL171, mouse monoclonal) was from Chemicon (Temecula, CA), Smad1 antibody (sc-7965, mouse monoclonal) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology (Santa Cruz, CA), gremlin antibody (sc-28873, rabbit polyclonal) from Santa Cruz Biotechnology, and E-cadherin antibody (HECD-1, mouse monoclonal) from Zymed (San Francisco, CA). Rabbit polyclonal P-Smad1 antibody17 was a kind gift from Dr. Peter ten Dijke (The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands). Recombinant BMP-4 was from R&D Systems (Minneapolis, MN), and TGF-β1 was a kind gift from Dr. P. Puolakkainen (Oncogen).Tissues and Cells This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Helsinki University Hospital (permit numbers 23/E5/04, 281/E6/03, and 3296/32/300/05), Helsinki, Finland, and is registered at www.hus.fi/clinicaltrials. All patients involved gave informed consent. They had biopsy-proven usual interstitial pneumonia. Biopsies for histology, immunohistochemistry, and RNA isolation were obtained either during pulmonary transplantation from the explanted lung (five patients) or from diagnostic biopsies taken using thoracoscopy (two patients). The control biopsies were obtained from healthy lung tissue from transplantation donors if only one lung transplantation was performed, or from patients that underwent lobectomy because of benign pulmonary tumors.Primary cells from a patient with IPF (female, 42 years old) were isolated from the explanted right lung during lung transplantation. The pulmonary tissue was dispersed mechanically and suspended in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium containing 15% fetal calf serum. The cells were allowed to attach overnight, and the adherent cells were washed and grown to confluency. These IPF fibroblasts were coded as IPF-U.N. The immunophenotype of the IPF-U.N. cells was characterized after two passages using immunohistochemistry. The cells expressed the myofibroblast marker α-SMA and were negative for CD45 common leukocyte antigen. Only sporadic cells stained positive with muscle cell marker desmin and epithelial cell marker cytokeratin. Antibodies were from NeoMarkers, Inc. (Fremont, CA). Normal adult human lung fibroblasts (CCL-190) and fibroblasts isolated from the lungs of IPF patients (CCL-191 and CCL-134) were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (Rockville, MD). Lung fibroblasts were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium supplemented with 15% fetal calf serum (Life Technologies, Gaithersburg, MD) and cells up to passage 10 were used for the current experiments. Locally established normal human dermal fibroblasts (4′-strain) and dermal fibroblasts from a patient with localized scleroderma (morphea) were provided by Dr. Olli Saksela (Department of Dermatology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland). Human dermal fibroblasts from a systemic sclerosis patient (CRL-1108) were from the American Type Culture Collection. Dermal fibroblasts and A549 lung epithelial adenocarcinoma cells (American Type Culture Collection) were cultured in minimal essential medium supplemented with 10% fetal calf serum. All media contained 100 IU/ml of penicillin and 50 μg/ml of streptomycin. Transfection of Cells Cells to be transiently transfected were plated in six-well plates. The next day the cells were co-transfected with a total of 2 μg of (BRE)2-luciferase promoter construct18 together with pRL-TK (Renilla luciferase control; Promega, Madison, WI) plasmid using FuGENE 6 transfection reagent (Roche, Basel, Switzerland). Subsequently, 48 hours after transfection, the cells were lysed and subjected to luciferase activity measurements by a dual luciferase Kit (Promega) and Digene DCR-1 luminometer (MGM Instruments, Hamden, CT).For stable transfection, the A549 cells were cultured in P60 culture dishes overnight. The transfection was performed the next day using 3 μg of gremlin/pEF-IRES construct19 and 9 μl of FuGENE 6 transfection reagent (Roche) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. After transfection the cells were washed and incubated in serum-containing growth medium overnight. The antibiotic selection was started a day after transfection with 1 μg/ml of puromycin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO). The puromycin concentration was gradually increased up to 10 μg/ml. Immunofluorescence Microscopy Equal number of cells were grown on glass coverslips and treated as indicated in Results. Coverslips were then washed three times with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and the cells fixed in methanol at −20°C. After washing three times with PBS, the cells were incubated in Dulbecco’s PBS containing 3% bovine serum albumin to prevent nonspecific binding of the antibodies. The cells were then incubated with the primary antibody in Dulbecco’s PBS containing 0.5% bovine serum albumin for 1 hour. The bound antibodies were detected using Alexa Fluor-594 secondary antibodies (Molecular Probes). The coverslips were finally washed in water, mounted on glass slides using Vectashield anti-fading reagent with 4,6-diamidino-2-phenylindole (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA), and examined under the Axioplan 2 imaging microscope (Zeiss, Gottingen, Germany) using ×20 to ×40 objectives. Images were acquired with AxioCamHRc camera (Zeiss) and AxioVision3.1 software (Zeiss).TGF-β Activity Assay Conditioned medium was collected and cleared by centrifugation. Medium from the same number of cells was analyzed for TGF-β activity directly (active TGF-β) or after heat treatment (total TGF-β). Heat-treatment activates latent forms of TGF-β.20 Mink lung epithelial cells stably transfected with a fragment of PAI-1 promoter fused to luciferase gene (TMLC) were a kind gift from Dr. Daniel B. Rifkin (New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY). These cells produce luciferase activity in response to TGF-β. TGF-β standards and medium samples were analyzed as described.21 All assays were performed three to five times with comparable results. The results have been presented as relative values of TGF-β activity. The specificity was confirmed by neutralizing pan-specific TGF-β antibodies (AB-100-NA, R&D Systems).RNA Isolation and Northern Blotting Total cellular RNA was isolated using the RNeasy mini kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany), and the RNA concentrations and purities were determined spectrophotometrically (BioPhotometer 6131; Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). Ten μg of total cellular RNA was fractionated on 1.2% agarose gels containing formaldehyde and transferred to Hybond-N nylon membranes (Amersham, Uppsala, Sweden) by capillary transfer. Prehybridization and hybridization were performed at 68°C in ExpressHyb hybridization solution (Clontech, Mountain View, CA). cDNA probes for genes of interest and the control gene glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH) were labeled with [32P]-dCTP (>3000 Ci/mmol, Amersham) using a Ready-To-Go DNA labeling kit (Amersham). High stringency washing was followed by detection by fluorography.Real-Time RT-PCR Total RNA was extracted from snap-frozen lung biopsies by mechanical homogenization and the Phase Lock Gel Heavy kit according to the manufacturer’s (Eppendorf) instructions. Reverse transcription was performed with random hexamer primers (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA) and Superscript II reverse transcriptase (Life Technologies) using 1.0 μg of total RNA according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The cDNAs were amplified using TaqMan Assays-on-Demand gene expression products (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) and GeneAmp 5700 sequence detector thermal cycler (Applied Biosystems). Control amplifications directly from RNA were performed to rule out DNA contamination. Levels of gene expression were determined using the Ct method, and the results have been expressed as mRNA expression levels normalized to the levels of a gene with a constant expression (actin).Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate-Polyacrylamide Gel Electrophoresis and Immunoblotting Concentrated (10×) cell-conditioned medium (Microcon 10 concentrators; Millipore, Bedford, MA) or cell lysates were analyzed by 4 to 20% gradient sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (Cambrex). Electrophoretically separated proteins were transferred to nitrocellulose membranes using a semidry blotting system (Bio-Rad, Hercules, CA). Immunodetection was performed as described previously.22 Densitometric analyses were performed using Scion Image β 4.03 program (Scion Corporation, Frederick, MD).Immunohistochemistry Paraffin-embedded tissue sections from normal/healthy and IPF lung biopsies were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated in graded alcohol. Antigens were retrieved by heating the sections in citrate buffer (pH 6.0). Endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with 0.3% hydrogen peroxidase. For immunostaining, either the Zymed ABC Histostain-Plus kit (Zymed) or the Vectastain Elite ABC kit (Vector Laboratories) were used according to the manufacturer’s protocol. The primary antibodies were mouse monoclonal anti-human BMP-4 (mAb 1049, Chemicon) and goat polyclonal anti-human gremlin (sc-18274, Santa Cruz). Detection was performed with biotinylated anti-mouse or anti-goat secondary antibody, horseradish peroxidase complex, and AEC chromogen (Zymed). The sections were counterstained with Mayer’s hematoxylin and mounted on glass slides. Control sections were treated with mouse isotype control (Zymed) or goat IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, West Grove, PA) to determine the specificity of the staining. | ||||
Results Increased Secretion of Active TGF-β in Lung Fibroblasts from IPF Patients TGF-β1 plays a major role in the induction of the lung myofibroblast phenotype and extracellular matrix deposition, and its overexpression has been well documented in IPF.23 However, TGF-βs are secreted from cells as large latent complexes which need to be activated for TGF-β to be biologically functional. The proportions of active versus latent TGF-β forms in fibroblastic cells are, in general, not well known. We analyzed therefore the secretion of active and latent TGF-β forms by lung fibroblasts isolated from IPF patients. Two fibroblast lines from IPF patients (CCL-191 and CCL-134) were compared with fibroblasts isolated from control human adult lung (CCL-190). The IPF fibroblasts expressed higher levels of α-SMA, which is produced by the increased myofibroblast population characteristic of IPF (Figure 1A).24 TGF-β activity was quantified from cell-conditioned medium using TGF-β-responsive reporter cells.21 The amount of TGF-β in fibroblast-conditioned medium, harvested at 24 hours, was analyzed directly (active TGF-β) or after activation of the latent TGF-β forms by heat treatment (active plus latent TGF-β).20 The specificity of the assay was confirmed using neutralizing antibodies against TGF-β (see Materials and Methods). In control fibroblasts the proportion of active TGF-β was ~5% of total TGF-β (data not shown). The IPF fibroblasts were found to secrete approximately threefold higher levels of active TGF-β, whereas the total TGF-β levels increased only ~1.5-fold (Figure 1B). This implies that IPF fibroblasts, in addition to producing more TGF-β, are able to activate a larger proportion of the latent TGF-β forms. Analyses of the mRNA expression levels of TGF-β isoforms by Northern hybridization indicated that lung fibroblasts produce mainly TGF-β1 (Figure 1C). The mRNA expression levels of the different latent TGF-β-binding proteins (LTBPs) were not altered in IPF fibroblasts (data not shown). The expression of CTGF, which is a TGF-β1 target gene, was enhanced twofold to threefold in IPF fibroblasts, further suggestive of increased TGF-β1 signaling (Figure 1C).IPF Fibroblasts Overexpress Gremlin mRNA We have recently observed that the disruption of TGF-β1 activation in mouse lung fibroblasts results in alterations in the BMP-4 signaling pathway. In the absence of LTBP-4, the secretion of active TGF-β was reduced, which led to increased BMP-4 expression in parallel with the loss of expression of the BMP inhibitor gremlin.19 Previously, TGF-β1 has been suggested to regulate gremlin expression in kidney mesangial cells.25 The expression of BMP-4 and gremlin mRNA in IPF fibroblasts was therefore analyzed by Northern hybridization. We found that BMP-4 mRNA levels were not notably altered, whereas gremlin mRNA levels were increased fourfold to fivefold (Figure 2A). Quantitative real-time RT-PCR analyses of gremlin mRNA levels confirmed the increase to be approximately fivefold (data not shown). Accordingly, immunoblotting analyses suggested that increased levels of gremlin were secreted by the IPF fibroblasts, while BMP-4 levels did not differ significantly (Figure 2B). To explore further the altered expression pattern of gremlin we established fresh fibroblast cultures from a patient with IPF (IPF-U.N., see Materials and Methods). Overexpression of the myofibroblast marker α-SMA (Figure 2C) was noted in parallel with very high levels of gremlin mRNA expression (Figure 2D). To assess the question whether gremlin overexpression is a general feature of fibrotic diseases involving increased myofibroblast population, we analyzed gremlin mRNA expression in dermal fibroblasts from patients with systemic (CRL-1108) or localized (morphea) scleroderma. As in IPF, the pathology of these diseases includes excessive ECM accumulation and the persistence of fibroblasts.26 α-SMA was found to be overexpressed in scleroderma fibroblasts (Figure 2C), but gremlin mRNA levels were comparable to control dermal fibroblast (Figure 2D), suggesting that gremlin overexpression may not be associated with fibrotic diseases in general.BMP-4 Signaling Is Severely Impaired in IPF Fibroblasts Because overexpression of gremlin is likely to suppress BMP signaling pathways, we used a BMP-responsive promoter construct [(BRE)2-luciferase, see Materials and Methods] to measure BMP signaling activity in IPF fibroblasts. Cells were transiently transfected with the promoter construct, and the luciferase indicator gene activity was measured after 2 days. The promoter was considerably less active in IPF fibroblasts, suggesting that gremlin overexpression may lead to decreased levels of endogenous BMP signaling (Figure 3A). To test whether the responsiveness to exogenously added BMP-4 would be altered, the cells were treated with increasing concentrations of BMP-4 for 16 hours followed by indicator gene analyses. The responsiveness of the IPF fibroblasts to BMP-4 was significantly reduced (Figure 3B). Smad1 is a downstream signaling molecule of BMPs that is phosphorylated and transported into the nucleus rapidly after ligand stimulation.27 Fibroblasts were treated with BMP-4 for 1 hour, after which the phosphorylation level of Smad1 was analyzed by immunoblotting. In normal lung fibroblasts BMP-4 (5 ng/ml) caused a significant induction of Smad1 phosphorylation, while the total Smad1 protein levels remained unaltered (Figure 3C). Higher concentrations of BMP-4 further enhanced Smad1 phosphorylation to some extent. In IPF fibroblasts the BMP-4 responsiveness was noticeably reduced, and the total levels of Smad1 phosphorylation were decreased, even with relatively high BMP-4 concentrations. These experiments suggest that the responsiveness to endogenous and exogenous BMP-4 is severely impaired in IPF fibroblasts.IPF Lungs Show Increased Gremlin Immunoreactivity in Mesenchymal Cells Immunohistochemical staining was performed to visualize BMP-4 and gremlin expression and localization in normal and IPF lungs. BMP-4 immunoreactivity was found in the IPF lung in occasional epithelial cells and did not differ from the localization in normal lung (Figure 4). Gremlin immunoreactivity was observed in the normal lung tissue at the alveolar epithelial lining and alveolar macrophages, but not in the lung interstitium (Figure 4). In contrast, in lung biopsies from patients with IPF, the gremlin immunoreactivity was strong and was observed at areas of relatively well preserved lung tissue in early fibrotic lesions, but also in advanced fibrotic lesions.Increased Expression of Gremlin mRNA in the Lungs of IPF Patients To confirm gremlin overexpression in IPF patients, real-time RT-PCR was performed. mRNA was isolated from the lung biopsies of six IPF patients and six control subjects (see Materials and Methods) followed by quantitative gremlin mRNA analyses. Gremlin mRNA levels were low in all control samples, whereas in five of six IPF patient samples the gremlin mRNA levels were clearly elevated (Figure 5A). Data analyses using the unpaired t-test confirmed that the inductions were statistically significant (P < 0.05). The highest level noted was ~35-fold overexpression. BMP-2, -4, and -7 mRNA expression levels were analyzed next from the same set of samples. More variation was observed between the expression levels of BMPs in the biopsy samples (Figure 5B). BMP-4 and -7 expression levels did not seem to be altered in IPF, while BMP-2 levels were reduced (average level of BMP-2 mRNA in IPF samples was ~40% of control level).TGF-β Induces Gremlin Expression in Association with EMT in Lung Epithelial Cells Lung epithelial cells can undergo EMT in response to TGF-β stimulation.28 We analyzed here whether the TGF-β-induced differentiation processes would be associated with altered gremlin mRNA expression levels. A549 lung epithelial cells are sensitive to TGF-β-induced EMT, which is characterized by the loss of cell surface expression of E-cadherin.29 A549 cells were treated with TGF-β1 (1 ng/ml) for 48 hours, and E-cadherin levels were analyzed by immunofluorescence analyses. As reported earlier the morphology of the cells changed to that of spindle-like fibroblasts29 (data not shown), and E-cadherin disappeared from the cell surfaces (Figure 6A). The basal expression levels of gremlin were low in A549 cells, whereas TGF-β1 induced prominent expression of gremlin mRNA (Figure 6B). The induction was detectable within 48 hours and persisted at the same level during the 72 hours of incubation.To analyze whether gremlin expression alone could change the cellular phenotype, we produced a stable A549 cell pool (A549/gremlin) that overexpressed gremlin (see Materials and Methods). The growth rate of the A549/gremlin cells was comparable to A549 cells (data not shown), and gremlin mRNA analyses indicated that the transgene was expressed as expected (Figure 7A). BMP signaling activity was measured using the BMP responsive promoter construct and found to be reduced to ~20% of control level (Figure 7B) suggesting that gremlin overexpression reduced BMP signaling. Interestingly, the cell surface expression of E-cadherin was somewhat reduced in A549/gremlin cells (Figure 6D), suggesting that gremlin can interfere with cellular pathways regulating the early signs of EMT. When low concentrations of TGF-β1 (0.05 to 0.5 ng/ml) were used to induce EMT, the A549/gremlin cells were found to be more sensitive to the loss of cell surface E-cadherin (Figure 6D). These results further suggest that enhanced expression of gremlin is associated with EMT of A549 lung epithelial cells. | ||||
Discussion IPF is a devastating disease with treatment options limited to corticosteroids in combination with cytotoxic drugs and in rare cases lung transplantation. Development of new diagnostic and therapeutic strategies requires better knowledge of the molecular mechanisms of the disease. Recent studies have suggested that IPF may result from abnormal reparative processes after injury in the lung.2 The cross-talk between epithelial and mesenchymal cells of the lung is crucial for the normal regenerative processes. Many growth factor pathways involved in this cross-talk are altered in IPF. The production of profibrotic molecules including TGF-β, PDGF, and CTGF is frequently increased.6 Inducers of epithelial cell proliferation such as HGF, which have a protective effect against fibrosis, are down-regulated in IPF fibroblasts.30 Imbalance of proteolytic systems including plasminogen activators and matrix metalloproteinases and their specific inhibitors can favor the accumulation of ECM.10,31,32 The best known mediator of fibrotic activities in the IPF lung is TGF-β, which, in addition to increasing ECM synthesis, can also regulate the proteolytic activities in the lung.6,33 We find here that lung fibroblasts isolated from IPF patients secrete increased amounts of TGF-β and also activate a larger proportion of the latent TGF-β forms. mRNA analyses of the TGF-β isoform expression indicated that lung fibroblasts produce mainly TGF-β1. The expression of TGF-β2 and -β3 may be suppressed by TGF-β1 as has been observed in mouse fibroblasts.34 The profibrotic TGF-β1 target gene, CTGF, was induced in IPF fibroblasts, confirming increased TGF-β signaling.35,36 Possible mediators of TGF-β activation in the IPF lung include thrombospondin-7,37,38 integrin αvβ6,39 as well as the increased matrix metalloproteinase activities associated with IPF.40,41 Our previous studies suggested that decreased TGF-β activation in mouse lung fibroblasts leads to the loss of expression of gremlin and the increase in BMP-4 signaling.19 This prompted us to analyze the expression levels of gremlin and BMP-4 in IPF fibroblasts, which were now found to secrete more active TGF-β. Although there may be heterogeneity among fibroblasts and a relatively few different IPF fibroblast cell lines were analyzed, a consistent up-regulation of gremlin mRNA levels was observed in each of these IPF fibroblast lines. The mechanism of this up-regulation, however, remained unclear. Overexpression of gremlin probably resulted in decreased responsiveness of the IPF fibroblasts to endogenous and exogenous BMP-4. Although we cannot exclude the possible nonspecific activation of the BMP responsive reporter promoter in control fibroblasts, the data on gremlin expression in fibroblasts and epithelial cells suggests the involvement of autocrine BMP signaling. To assess the correlation between the in vitro results using cultured IPF fibroblasts with the IPF disease in patients, immunohistochemical stainings of lung sections were performed. Although BMP-4 immunoreactivity was moderate and confined to the epithelial layer in both normal and IPF lung, the gremlin immunoreactivity was enhanced in the IPF lung, and the localization switched from the epithelium to the interstitium. In agreement with the immunohistochemical staining, quantitative mRNA analyses of lung tissue samples indicated a high occurrence of overexpression of gremlin in IPF. We also observed lower levels of BMP-2 in the IPF lung, which correlates well with the microarray data obtained from the Gene Expression Omnibus database.42 These changes together probably alter the BMP signaling activities in the IPF lung. Gremlin has an important role in epithelial and mesenchymal signaling cross-talk in branching morphogenesis during lung and kidney development.15,43 Knockout and overexpression studies indicate that gremlin induces epithelial cell growth arrest and differentiation. In addition, gremlin-mediated BMP antagonism promotes the survival of mesenchymal cells. Gremlin expression was detected in the epithelial cells in normal lung, where it may function to maintain epithelial integrity. In IPF lung gremlin was overexpressed specifically in the mesenchymal cells, where it may promote the differentiation and persistence of myofibroblasts (illustrated in Figure 8). Both BMP and gremlin are secreted proteins, and the mesenchymally produced gremlin may decrease BMP-mediated epithelial regeneration after injury. High expression of gremlin may also be associated with accelerated fibrosis because the patients in this study represented advanced stages of pulmonary fibrosis. Recently, gremlin overexpression has been associated with fibrotic kidney diseases,44,45 which share many pathological features with IPF. Dermal fibroblasts from patients with systemic or localized scleroderma, other fibrotic diseases characterized by the accumulation of myofibroblasts, did not show increased expression of gremlin mRNA. Thus fibrotic diseases of the lung (IPF) and kidney, but probably not of skin, seem to be associated with gremlin overexpression, which may suggest the reappearance of a developmental gene in disease. The increased population of fibroblasts and differentiated myofibroblasts in IPF show heterogeneity and may be derived from various sources. These include peribronchial and perivascular adventitial fibroblasts, circulating fibrocytes,46,47 as well as lung epithelial cells that can undergo EMT (illustrated in Figure 8). There is emerging in vivo evidence to suggest an important role for EMT during embryonic development and in malignant diseases.29 Overexpression of matrilysin (MMP-7) has been described in IPF,40 and it may have a role in E-cadherin ectodomain shedding and in mediating the induction of EMT.48 In addition, TGF-β is a potent inducer of EMT in lung epithelial cells.28 We find here that gremlin overexpression is associated with TGF-β1-induced EMT of lung epithelial cells. It appears that gremlin expression can sensitize cells to TGF-β1-induced EMT. The relevance of our results with A549 cells to normal lung epithelial cells in vitro and in vivo remains to be evaluated. BMP-7, on the other hand, can induce mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition in renal fibroblasts and also counteract TGF-β1-induced EMT.5,49 Apparently the balance between TGF-β and BMP signaling pathways plays a major role during these phenotypic transitions. Our results reveal for the first time that enhanced gremlin-mediated BMP antagonism may be associated with IPF. Further studies are needed to evaluate whether gremlin overexpression plays an important role in the pathogenesis of IPF. Gremlin antagonism may prove to be beneficial for IPF patients, as suggested by studies showing that BMP-7 or a BMP signaling enhancer, kielin/chordin-like protein, can inhibit or attenuate renal fibrotic diseases in mouse models.50,51 Future studies will reveal whether gremlin is a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of IPF. | ||||
Acknowledgments We thank Sami Starast, Anne Remes, Tiina Marjomaa, and Marjatta Kivekäs for excellent technical assistance; Ville Pulkkinen (Department of Medical Genetics, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland) for RNA isolation from lung tissue samples; and the patients who consented to participate in our study. | ||||
Footnotes Address reprint requests to Katri Koli, University of Helsinki, Biomedicum/A506, P.O. Box 63, Haartmaninkatu 8, 00014 Helsinki, Finland. E-mail: katri.koli/at/helsinki.fi. Supported by grants from the Academy of Finland, the Finnish Cancer Foundation, the Sigrid Juselius Foundation, Biocentrum Helsinki, the National Technology Agency (TEKES), the Novo Nordisk Foundation, the Biomedicum Helsinki Foundation, the Helsinki University Hospital Fund, the University of Helsinki, and the Finnish Antituberculosis Association Foundation. | ||||
References
| ||||