Title: Rastic Samela
Author: Azur Moulaert
Last saved by: Bill Pease
Company: Home PC

510-550-6740
Rastic Samela
19933 Middletown Rd. , Freeland, MD 21053 

November 3, 2008   5:57 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Rastic Samela
19933 Middletown Rd.
Freeland, MD 21053

510-550-6740
Stephen Mollins
300 North Main Street , North Brookfield, MA 01535 

November 3, 2008   5:57 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Stephen Mollins
300 North Main Street
North Brookfield, MA 01535

510-550-6740
francesca johnston
5598 tyson drive , Acworth, GA 30102 

November 3, 2008   5:57 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
francesca johnston
5598 tyson drive
Acworth, GA 30102

510-550-6740
Janis Houston
1490 Russell Way , Thornton, CO 80229 

November 3, 2008   5:57 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Janis Houston
1490 Russell Way
Thornton, CO 80229

510-550-6740
Cleon D. Dilks
230 Pleasant St. , Anoka, MN 55303 

November 3, 2008   5:57 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Cleon D. Dilks
230 Pleasant St.
Anoka, MN 55303

510-550-6740
K Krupinski
4664 Rosewood Ave , LA, CA 90004 

November 3, 2008   5:57 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
K Krupinski
4664 Rosewood Ave
LA, CA 90004

510-550-6740
Krishna Venkatraman
1485 11th Avenue , San Francisco, CA 94122 

November 3, 2008   5:57 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Krishna Venkatraman
1485 11th Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94122

510-550-6740
Kevin Bickers
501 Nautical Blvd. N. , Atlantic Beach, FL 32233 

November 3, 2008   5:57 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kevin Bickers
501 Nautical Blvd. N.
Atlantic Beach, FL 32233

510-550-6740
marilyn harlin
255 SE 33rd Ave , portland, OR 97214 

November 3, 2008   5:57 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
marilyn harlin
255 SE 33rd Ave
portland, OR 97214

510-550-6740
Samuel Ferugia III
27 Grove St , Geneva, NY 14456 

November 3, 2008   5:57 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Samuel Ferugia III
27 Grove St
Geneva, NY 14456

510-550-6740
Robert Wagner
3100 Sweetwater Rd Apt. 3112, Lawrenceville, GA 30044 

November 3, 2008   5:57 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Robert Wagner
3100 Sweetwater Rd
Apt. 3112
Lawrenceville, GA 30044

510-550-6740
melodie martin
2339 11th ave east , seattle, WA 98102 

November 3, 2008   5:57 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
melodie martin
2339 11th ave east
seattle, WA 98102

510-550-6740
Tom Sanchez
2250 Dorris Place , Los Angeles, CA 90031 

November 3, 2008   5:57 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Tom Sanchez
2250 Dorris Place
Los Angeles, CA 90031

510-550-6740
James Spagnolo
26 Edna Drive , Syosset, NY 117913716 

November 3, 2008   5:57 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
James Spagnolo
26 Edna Drive
Syosset, NY 11791-3716

510-550-6740
Donald H. & Alberta S. Gunther
4760 W. Red Wolf Dr. , Tucson, AZ 857428967 

November 3, 2008   5:57 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  WE HAVE TWO DAUGHTERS WHO HAVE HAD THYROID PROBLEMS AND IT MUST BE STOPPED

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Donald H. %pa_first_name% Alberta S. Gunther
4760 W. Red Wolf Dr.
Tucson, AZ 85742-8967

510-550-6740
Polly D. Pitsker
170 Summit Ridge Way , Gardnerville, NV 89460 

November 3, 2008   5:57 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

Don't play guessing games with our health.  I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Polly D. Pitsker
170 Summit Ridge Way
Gardnerville, NV 89460

510-550-6740
Dange Kersulyte
6234 Washington Ave , Saint Louis, MO 63130 

November 3, 2008   5:57 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Dange Kersulyte
6234 Washington Ave
Saint Louis, MO 63130

510-550-6740
Sandra Wagner
126 Avenue B , Bryan, OH 43506 

November 3, 2008   5:57 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Sandra Wagner
126 Avenue B
Bryan, OH 43506

510-550-6740
DANIEL NASH
25 Van Horn Circle , Beacon, NY 12508 

November 3, 2008   5:53 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.
  Please factor in the human qoutient, and give us as much relief as you give the polluters,and prtect the electorate.

Sincerely,
DANIEL NASH
25 Van Horn Circle
Beacon, NY 12508

510-550-6740
Barbara Howard
25220 NE 139th Street , Salt Springs, FL 32134 

November 3, 2008   5:53 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Barbara Howard
25220 NE 139th Street
Salt Springs, FL 32134

510-550-6740
Rita Meuer
153 Dunning Street , Madison, WI 53704 

November 3, 2008   5:53 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Rita Meuer
153 Dunning Street
Madison, WI 53704

510-550-6740
Catherine Patterson
1015 S. 48th Street , Lincoln, NE 68510 

November 3, 2008   5:53 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Catherine Patterson
1015 S. 48th Street
Lincoln, NE 68510

510-550-6740
Jessea Greenman
62nd St. , Oakland, CA 946091245 

November 3, 2008   5:53 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jessea Greenman
62nd St.
Oakland, CA 94609-1245

510-550-6740
Nancy Latimer
3440 E Rosemeade PKWY 8106 , Carrollton, TX 75007 

November 3, 2008   5:53 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Nancy Latimer
3440 E Rosemeade PKWY 8106
Carrollton, TX 75007

510-550-6740
Sheila Lobel
8105 NW 61 Street , TAMARAC, FL 33321 

November 3, 2008   5:53 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Sheila Lobel
8105 NW 61 Street
TAMARAC, FL 33321

510-550-6740
Linda Noriega
30042 Sugarpi8ne St , Lake Elsinore, CA 92531 

November 3, 2008   5:53 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Linda Noriega
30042 Sugarpi8ne St
Lake Elsinore, CA 92531

510-550-6740
Alisa Porter
2623 Commonwealth St. , Houston, TX 77006 

November 3, 2008   5:53 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Alisa Porter
2623 Commonwealth St.
Houston, TX 77006

510-550-6740
Susan Miller
3801 N Swan , Tucson, AZ 85718 

November 3, 2008   5:53 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Susan Miller
3801 N Swan
Tucson, AZ 85718

510-550-6740
G Jayhan
4205 Wildwood Drive , Crystal Lake, IL 60014 

November 3, 2008   5:53 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
G Jayhan
4205 Wildwood Drive
Crystal Lake, IL 60014

510-550-6740
Glenn Himebaugh
3314 Yorkshire Ct. , Murfreesboro, TN 37130 

November 3, 2008   5:53 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Glenn Himebaugh
3314 Yorkshire Ct.
Murfreesboro, TN 37130

510-550-6740
Pamela DeSanto-Tsunis
PO Box 12002 , La Jolla, CA 92039 

November 3, 2008   5:53 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Pamela DeSanto-Tsunis
PO Box 12002
La Jolla, CA 92039

510-550-6740
Kathi Kibbel
522 S Clinton Ave , Dallas, TX 75209 

November 3, 2008   5:53 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kathi Kibbel
522 S Clinton Ave
Dallas, TX 75209

510-550-6740
Barb Staudenmaier
4213 Thunderbird , Sioux Falls, SD 57103 

November 3, 2008   5:53 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Barb Staudenmaier
4213 Thunderbird
Sioux Falls, SD 57103

510-550-6740
Keary Missler
6348 Amston Dr , Dublin, OH 43017 

November 3, 2008   5:53 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Keary Missler
6348 Amston Dr
Dublin, OH 43017

510-550-6740
SONJA franz
9 CASEY COURT , baltimore, MD 21228 

November 3, 2008   5:53 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
SONJA franz
9 CASEY COURT
baltimore, MD 21228

510-550-6740
Lee Basnar
1900 Kachina Trail , Sierra Vista, AZ 85650 

November 3, 2008   5:53 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Lee Basnar
1900 Kachina Trail
Sierra Vista, AZ 85650

510-550-6740
Janice Glasser
2293 Laurel Glen Rd , Soquel, CA 95073 

November 3, 2008   5:53 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Janice Glasser
2293 Laurel Glen Rd
Soquel, CA 95073

510-550-6740
Mr & Mrs Nathan Coggins
255 Taylor Bridge Rd , Jonesborough, TN 37659 

November 3, 2008   5:53 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Mr %pa_first_name% Mrs Nathan Coggins
255 Taylor Bridge Rd
Jonesborough, TN 37659

510-550-6740
Lee Mishkin
790 Checker Dr , Buffalo Grove, IL 60089 

November 3, 2008   5:53 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Lee Mishkin
790 Checker Dr
Buffalo Grove, IL 60089

510-550-6740
Jeannine Zarazowski
14 Willowbrook Road , Broomall, PA 19008 

November 3, 2008   5:53 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jeannine Zarazowski
14 Willowbrook Road
Broomall, PA 19008

510-550-6740
Ronald Bogin
2605 Edwards Ave , El  Cerrito, CA 94530 

November 3, 2008   5:53 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Ronald Bogin
2605 Edwards Ave
El  Cerrito, CA 94530

510-550-6740
Lisa Zielbauer
31705 Kline Circle , Warrenville, IL 60555 

November 3, 2008   5:53 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Lisa Zielbauer
31705 Kline Circle
Warrenville, IL 60555

510-550-6740
thomas stark
40 Main Beach Road , Ringwood, NJ 07456 

November 3, 2008   5:53 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
thomas stark
40 Main Beach Road
Ringwood, NJ 07456

510-550-6740
Daniel Morphis
3150 University St , eugene, OR 97405 

November 3, 2008   5:51 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

MIND IF I POISON YOUR CHILDREN?
THAT'S EXACTLY WHAT YOU ARE ALLOWING!

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Daniel Morphis
3150 University St
eugene, OR 97405

510-550-6740
Ethan Norris
3311 NW 72nd St , Seattle, WA 98117 

November 3, 2008   5:51 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Ethan Norris
3311 NW 72nd St
Seattle, WA 98117

510-550-6740
Andrea Greenwold
5803 Cameron Rd , Freeland, WA 98249 

November 3, 2008   5:51 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Andrea Greenwold
5803 Cameron Rd
Freeland, WA 98249

510-550-6740
Barbara Weteska
5012 W Wolfram Street , Chicago, IL 60641 

November 3, 2008   5:51 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Barbara Weteska
5012 W Wolfram Street
Chicago, IL 60641

510-550-6740
Tim Deller
341 Alcatraz Ave. #1 , Oakland, CA 94618 

November 3, 2008   5:51 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Tim Deller
341 Alcatraz Ave. #1
Oakland, CA 94618

510-550-6740
Garald Lawrence
253 Twin View Dr , Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 

November 3, 2008   5:51 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Garald Lawrence
253 Twin View Dr
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523

510-550-6740
Mercedes Lackey
16525 E 470 Rd , Claremore, OK 74017 

November 3, 2008   5:51 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I love how Bush America has declared war on pregnant women and children.  OUR OWN pregnant women and children.  But,. of course, these are pregnant women and children who are all too poor to afford house filtration systems to make their water safe, and food certified to be free of toxins.  They're only the poor.  Who needs them, right?

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Mercedes Lackey
16525 E 470 Rd
Claremore, OK 74017

510-550-6740
Noel Newnam
1945 Centennial Dr. , Louisville, CO 80027 

November 3, 2008   5:51 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Noel Newnam
1945 Centennial Dr.
Louisville, CO 80027

510-550-6740
Amber Tidwell
2420 1/2 N. Beachwood Dr , Los Angeles, CA 90068 

November 3, 2008   5:51 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Amber Tidwell
2420 1/2 N. Beachwood Dr
Los Angeles, CA 90068

510-550-6740
Charles Gillespie
4935 Sacramento Av , Homewood, CA 96141 

November 3, 2008   5:51 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Charles Gillespie
4935 Sacramento Av
Homewood, CA 96141

510-550-6740
AnnMarie Wilson
420 Santa Rosa dr , Garland, TX 75043 

November 3, 2008   5:51 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
AnnMarie Wilson
420 Santa Rosa dr
Garland, TX 75043

510-550-6740
Lorraine Maloof
3333 Sun Valley Drive , Eagle River, AK 99577 

November 3, 2008   5:51 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Lorraine Maloof
3333 Sun Valley Drive
Eagle River, AK 99577

510-550-6740
Jody Fritzke
1465 267Th.  Ave.  Ne , Isanti, MN 55040 

November 3, 2008   5:51 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jody Fritzke
1465 267Th.  Ave.  Ne
Isanti, MN 55040

510-550-6740
Mary Jo Hostnik
5333 Beechwood Ave , Maple Heights, OH 44137 

November 3, 2008   5:51 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Mary Jo Hostnik
5333 Beechwood Ave
Maple Heights, OH 44137

510-550-6740
Jean Wright
500 W Broadway , Silver City, NM 88061 

November 3, 2008   5:51 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jean Wright
500 W Broadway
Silver City, NM 88061

510-550-6740
Linda Flannery
21340 Dickinson Rd , New Boston, MI 48164 

November 3, 2008   5:51 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Linda Flannery
21340 Dickinson Rd
New Boston, MI 48164

510-550-6740
stacie murray
2638 4th street , Santa Monica, CA 90405 

November 3, 2008   5:51 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
stacie murray
2638 4th street
Santa Monica, CA 90405

510-550-6740
Pat Miller
8705 E Upriver Dr , Spokane, WA 99212 

November 3, 2008   5:49 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

WITHOUT WATER ALL LIFE WILL CEASE TO EXIST.WHAT DO WE HAVE TO DO TO MAKE SURE WE KEEP OUR WATER PURE. WHY DON'T YOU PEOPLE SEEM TO CARE. IT EFFECTS YOU ALSO. IT'S TIME YOU FORGOT THE BUSH DOCTRINE OF DESTROY THE ENVIRONMENT FOR PROFIT OF THE BIG COMPANIES AND THOUGH ABOUT WHAT IS RIGHT FOR THE EARTH AND ALL THE LIFE FORMS THAT LIVE ON IT. 

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Pat Miller
8705 E Upriver Dr
Spokane, WA 99212

510-550-6740
Tara Wahl
200 Limekiln Road , Reading, PA 19606 

November 3, 2008   5:49 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Tara Wahl
200 Limekiln Road
Reading, PA 19606

510-550-6740
Frederick Reif
1000 Elmhurst Rd , Pittsburgh, PA 15215 

November 3, 2008   5:49 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Frederick Reif
1000 Elmhurst Rd
Pittsburgh, PA 15215

510-550-6740
Bruce Morgan
8485 Crystal Ave , Riverside, CA 92504 

November 3, 2008   5:49 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Bruce Morgan
8485 Crystal Ave
Riverside, CA 92504

510-550-6740
Julia Starr
420 E De La Guerra Apt 108, Santa Barbara, CA 93101 

November 3, 2008   5:49 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Julia Starr
420 E De La Guerra
Apt 108
Santa Barbara, CA 93101

510-550-6740
Helen Anda
13281 Deron Avenue , San Diego, CA 92129 

November 3, 2008   5:49 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Helen Anda
13281 Deron Avenue
San Diego, CA 92129

510-550-6740
Dennis McGarvey
4020 Nichols Rd. , Medina, OH 44256 

November 3, 2008   5:49 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Dennis McGarvey
4020 Nichols Rd.
Medina, OH 44256

510-550-6740
Nelson Cone
PO Box #64 , Sequim, WA 983820064 

November 3, 2008   5:48 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Nelson Cone
PO Box #64
Sequim, WA 98382-0064

510-550-6740
Mary Morano
353 Rainbow Dr Unit B , Branson, MO 65616 

November 3, 2008   5:48 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Mary Morano
353 Rainbow Dr Unit B
Branson, MO 65616

510-550-6740
Carol Meehan
10 Top O'Hill Road , Wappingers Falls, NY 125902217 

November 3, 2008   5:48 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Carol Meehan
10 Top O'Hill Road
Wappingers Falls, NY 12590-2217

510-550-6740
sylvia idelson
17 taunya lane , travelers rest, SC 29690 

November 3, 2008   5:48 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
sylvia idelson
17 taunya lane
travelers rest, SC 29690

510-550-6740
Donald Lloyd
208 deems street , burkeville, VA 23922 

November 3, 2008   5:48 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Donald Lloyd
208 deems street
burkeville, VA 23922

510-550-6740
pete alex
160 buckingham rd , w.hempstead, NY 11552 

November 3, 2008   5:48 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
pete alex
160 buckingham rd
w.hempstead, NY 11552

510-550-6740
Bernard Bredig
503 N Main , Pueblo, CO 81003 

November 3, 2008   5:48 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Bernard Bredig
503 N Main
Pueblo, CO 81003

510-550-6740
Robert Orlando
4705 State Hwy 28 , Cooperstown, NY 13326 

November 3, 2008   5:48 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Robert Orlando
4705 State Hwy 28
Cooperstown, NY 13326

510-550-6740
Jo Nowakowski
9535 Dayton Ave N , Seattle, WA 98103 

November 3, 2008   5:48 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jo Nowakowski
9535 Dayton Ave N
Seattle, WA 98103

510-550-6740
Chris Joslyn
110 Alexander Road , New Britain, CT 06053 

November 3, 2008   5:47 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Chris Joslyn
110 Alexander Road
New Britain, CT 06053

510-550-6740
Paul Hufker
"158 e. 102nd st, Apt 3C" , New York, NY 10029 

November 3, 2008   5:47 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Paul Hufker
"158 e. 102nd st, Apt 3C"
New York, NY 10029

510-550-6740
Marge Carnahan
564 Laughbaum Drive , Galion, OH 448331028 

November 3, 2008   5:47 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Marge Carnahan
564 Laughbaum Drive
Galion, OH 44833-1028

510-550-6740
karla walters
213 n. taylor st. , El Dorado, KS 67042 

November 3, 2008   5:47 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
karla walters
213 n. taylor st.
El Dorado, KS 67042

510-550-6740
Laura Saxe
5300 V Street , Sacramento, CA 95817 

November 3, 2008   5:47 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Laura Saxe
5300 V Street
Sacramento, CA 95817

510-550-6740
Randy Monroe
1819A Wildbrook Court , Concord, CA 94521 

November 3, 2008   5:47 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Randy Monroe
1819A Wildbrook Court
Concord, CA 94521

510-550-6740
Skylar Arend
16300 Sandpiper Dr. , Anchorage, AK 99516 

November 3, 2008   5:47 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Skylar Arend
16300 Sandpiper Dr.
Anchorage, AK 99516

510-550-6740
Vaughn Currier
1537 Cameron Crescent Dr., Apt. 22B , Reston, VA 20190 

November 3, 2008   5:47 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Vaughn Currier
1537 Cameron Crescent Dr., Apt. 22B
Reston, VA 20190

510-550-6740
Eric Cadora
6316 Cavalleri Rd , Malibu, CA 90265 

November 3, 2008   5:47 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Eric Cadora
6316 Cavalleri Rd
Malibu, CA 90265

510-550-6740
Paul Stein
532 laGuardia pl , NY, NY 10012 

November 3, 2008   5:47 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Paul Stein
532 laGuardia pl
NY, NY 10012

510-550-6740
Linda Arywitz
2079 Trinidad Dr. , Bullhead City, AZ 86442 

November 3, 2008   5:47 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Linda Arywitz
2079 Trinidad Dr.
Bullhead City, AZ 86442

510-550-6740
Susan Schluederberg
1100 Sunset Drive , Bel Air, MD 21014 

November 3, 2008   5:47 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Susan Schluederberg
1100 Sunset Drive
Bel Air, MD 21014

510-550-6740
Dale Le Fevre
P.O. Box 1641 , Mendocino, CA 95460 

November 3, 2008   5:46 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Dale Le Fevre
P.O. Box 1641
Mendocino, CA 95460

510-550-6740
maria desmond
244 sandridge ct. , collinsville, IL 62234 

November 3, 2008   5:46 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
maria desmond
244 sandridge ct.
collinsville, IL 62234

510-550-6740
Michele DeBacker
468 Harrison Avenue , Astoria, OR 97103 

November 3, 2008   5:46 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Michele DeBacker
468 Harrison Avenue
Astoria, OR 97103

510-550-6740
Jeffrey Deal
247 Old Bristol Rd , Boone, NC 28607 

November 3, 2008   5:46 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jeffrey Deal
247 Old Bristol Rd
Boone, NC 28607

510-550-6740
wanda pope
155 15 th ave , Longview, WA 98632 

November 3, 2008   5:46 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
wanda pope
155 15 th ave
Longview, WA 98632

510-550-6740
Becky Daiss
1276 N Wayne St #1128 , Arlington, VA 22201 

November 3, 2008   5:46 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Becky Daiss
1276 N Wayne St #1128
Arlington, VA 22201

510-550-6740
Jennifer O'Donnell
4281 W. 76th Street , Chicago, IL 60652 

November 3, 2008   5:46 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jennifer O'Donnell
4281 W. 76th Street
Chicago, IL 60652

510-550-6740
Lynn Guss
3757 Lyla Lane , Carson City, NV 89705 

November 3, 2008   5:46 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Lynn Guss
3757 Lyla Lane
Carson City, NV 89705

510-550-6740
peter pfeiffer
389 W. Mendocino St. , Altadena, CA 91001 

November 3, 2008   5:46 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
peter pfeiffer
389 W. Mendocino St.
Altadena, CA 91001

510-550-6740
Robert Stang
3834 Franklin Ave. , Astoria, OR 97103 

November 3, 2008   5:46 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Robert Stang
3834 Franklin Ave.
Astoria, OR 97103

510-550-6740
probyn gregory
1766 Las Palmas , LA, CA 90028 

November 3, 2008   5:45 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
probyn gregory
1766 Las Palmas
LA, CA 90028

510-550-6740
Arisia Magnusson
3303 hamilton way , los angeles, CA 90026 

November 3, 2008   5:45 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Arisia Magnusson
3303 hamilton way
los angeles, CA 90026

510-550-6740
Kathy Wereski
218 Maple Street , Robbinsville, NJ 08691 

November 3, 2008   5:45 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kathy Wereski
218 Maple Street
Robbinsville, NJ 08691

510-550-6740
Sally Siegel
2592 Briers North Drive , Atlanta, GA 30360 

November 3, 2008   5:45 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Sally Siegel
2592 Briers North Drive
Atlanta, GA 30360

510-550-6740
Thomas Meiring
3858 N. Beverly Hills Drive , Toledo, OH 43614 

November 3, 2008   5:45 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Thomas Meiring
3858 N. Beverly Hills Drive
Toledo, OH 43614

510-550-6740
Paula Stober
3607 Timberoak Drive , Greensboro, NC 27410 

November 3, 2008   5:45 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Paula Stober
3607 Timberoak Drive
Greensboro, NC 27410

510-550-6740
William F. X. Flynn Jr.
11 North Street , Huntington, CT 06484 

November 3, 2008   5:45 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
William F. X. Flynn Jr.
11 North Street
Huntington, CT 06484

510-550-6740
ivan Rarick
1818 suffolk way , Carmichael, CA 95608 

November 3, 2008   5:45 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
ivan Rarick
1818 suffolk way
Carmichael, CA 95608

510-550-6740
Randal Dawkins
728 Lorimer , Brooklyn, NY 11211 

November 3, 2008   5:45 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Randal Dawkins
728 Lorimer
Brooklyn, NY 11211

510-550-6740
Annmarja Lamborn-Balan
1323 Shallcross Ave. , Wilm., DE 19806 

November 3, 2008   5:44 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Annmarja Lamborn-Balan
1323 Shallcross Ave.
Wilm., DE 19806

510-550-6740
Tania Becerra
418 Broadway Street , Cashton, WI 54619 

November 3, 2008   5:44 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Tania Becerra
418 Broadway Street
Cashton, WI 54619

510-550-6740
marvin brickner
2  B  truro drive , monroe twp, NJ 08831 

November 3, 2008   5:44 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
marvin brickner
2  B  truro drive
monroe twp, NJ 08831

510-550-6740
enjoli hollis
79 Lawrence St. , New Brunswick, NJ 08901 

November 3, 2008   5:44 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
enjoli hollis
79 Lawrence St.
New Brunswick, NJ 08901

510-550-6740
Maura Ellyn
52 Canal Rd. , High Falls, NY 12440 

November 3, 2008   5:44 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Maura Ellyn
52 Canal Rd.
High Falls, NY 12440

510-550-6740
Lois Stenzel
162-31 9th Avenue , Whitestone, NY 11357 

November 3, 2008   5:44 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Lois Stenzel
162-31 9th Avenue
Whitestone, NY 11357

510-550-6740
Karyn Goff
18244 Middlebelt Rd. Apt 203 , Livonia, MI 48152 

November 3, 2008   5:44 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Karyn Goff
18244 Middlebelt Rd. Apt 203
Livonia, MI 48152

510-550-6740
Valerie Vallentyne
410 North 3rd Street , Livingston, MT 59047 

November 3, 2008   5:44 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Valerie Vallentyne
410 North 3rd Street
Livingston, MT 59047

510-550-6740
Leland Long
736 East 10th Avenue #2 , Denver, CO 80203 

November 3, 2008   5:44 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Leland Long
736 East 10th Avenue #2
Denver, CO 80203

510-550-6740
Jim Lockhart
5630 se 65th , Portland, OR 97206 

November 3, 2008   5:44 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jim Lockhart
5630 se 65th
Portland, OR 97206

510-550-6740
Mileen Kirkpatrick
309 Ibis Lane , Satellite Beach, FL 32937 

November 3, 2008   5:44 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Mileen Kirkpatrick
309 Ibis Lane
Satellite Beach, FL 32937

510-550-6740
Paul Impola
99 South Pearl Street , Albany, NY 12207 

November 3, 2008   5:44 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Paul Impola
99 South Pearl Street
Albany, NY 12207

510-550-6740
Karen Policy
1010 Meredith St , Kent, OH 44240 

November 3, 2008   5:43 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Karen Policy
1010 Meredith St
Kent, OH 44240

510-550-6740
Tina Brown
19400 Beardsley Way , Juneau, AK 99801 

November 3, 2008   5:43 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Tina Brown
19400 Beardsley Way
Juneau, AK 99801

510-550-6740
J. Alexander
2 Tudor City Place , New York, NY 10017 

November 3, 2008   5:43 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
J. Alexander
2 Tudor City Place
New York, NY 10017

510-550-6740
Carl Gaede
2701 pointe Tremble Rd. , Algonac, MI 48001 

November 3, 2008   5:43 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Carl Gaede
2701 pointe Tremble Rd.
Algonac, MI 48001

510-550-6740
Sandra Workman
1083 Lydia Drive , Franklin Square, NY 11010 

November 3, 2008   5:43 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Sandra Workman
1083 Lydia Drive
Franklin Square, NY 11010

510-550-6740
Fern Leischow
4726 36th Lane , Avondale, CO 81022 

November 3, 2008   5:43 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Fern Leischow
4726 36th Lane
Avondale, CO 81022

510-550-6740
Eileen McNamara
515 Garden Street , Hoboken, NJ 07030 

November 3, 2008   5:43 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Eileen McNamara
515 Garden Street
Hoboken, NJ 07030

510-550-6740
Pat Cuviello
Box 2834 , RWC, CA 94064 

November 3, 2008   5:43 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Pat Cuviello
Box 2834
RWC, CA 94064

510-550-6740
Stacey Lane
13 W Main St Apt 1 , Mechanicsburg, PA 17055 

November 3, 2008   5:43 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Stacey Lane
13 W Main St Apt 1
Mechanicsburg, PA 17055

510-550-6740
Robin Husslage
446 Central Road , Rye, NH 03870 

November 3, 2008   5:43 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Robin Husslage
446 Central Road
Rye, NH 03870

510-550-6740
Gregory Spatz
2020 South Post , Spokane, WA 99203 

November 3, 2008   5:43 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Gregory Spatz
2020 South Post
Spokane, WA 99203

510-550-6740
Morgan Houser
315 N. Pinckney St. #2 , Madison, WI 53703 

November 3, 2008   5:43 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Morgan Houser
315 N. Pinckney St. #2
Madison, WI 53703

510-550-6740
Joan Sims
"1 Jefferson Parkway, #82" , Lake Oswego, OR 97035 

November 3, 2008   5:42 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Joan Sims
"1 Jefferson Parkway, #82"
Lake Oswego, OR 97035

510-550-6740
lisa siconolfi
11676 decatur , westminster, CO 80234 

November 3, 2008   5:42 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
lisa siconolfi
11676 decatur
westminster, CO 80234

510-550-6740
Christine Evans
4350 Agate Road , Boulder, CO 80304 

November 3, 2008   5:42 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Christine Evans
4350 Agate Road
Boulder, CO 80304

510-550-6740
Scott Ruston
915 S 900 E #2 , salt lake city, UT 84105 

November 3, 2008   5:42 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Scott Ruston
915 S 900 E #2
salt lake city, UT 84105

510-550-6740
jo gabriel
3130 James Street #1 , madison, WI 53714 

November 3, 2008   5:42 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
jo gabriel
3130 James Street #1
madison, WI 53714

510-550-6740
kathleen reifke
589 pigeon creek rd , pottstown, PA 19465 

November 3, 2008   5:42 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
kathleen reifke
589 pigeon creek rd
pottstown, PA 19465

510-550-6740
patsy duffin
315 garcia ave , san leandro, CA 94577 

November 3, 2008   5:42 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
patsy duffin
315 garcia ave
san leandro, CA 94577

510-550-6740
Donna Cann
25 Harrison Rd     W , West Chester, PA 193806761 

November 3, 2008   5:40 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Donna Cann
25 Harrison Rd     W
West Chester, PA 19380-6761

510-550-6740
Nathan Fisher
P.O. Box 8026 , Rochester, MN 55904 

November 3, 2008   5:40 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Nathan Fisher
P.O. Box 8026
Rochester, MN 55904

510-550-6740
Dawn Dunsmore
3660 Princeton Ave , San Diego, CA 92117 

November 3, 2008   5:40 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Dawn Dunsmore
3660 Princeton Ave
San Diego, CA 92117

510-550-6740
Jonathan Peebles
23 N. Washington Street apt  4 , Delaware, OH 43015 

November 3, 2008   5:40 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jonathan Peebles
23 N. Washington Street apt  4
Delaware, OH 43015

510-550-6740
Suzan Clausen
3155 Second Ave. , San Diego, CA 92103 

November 3, 2008   5:40 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Suzan Clausen
3155 Second Ave.
San Diego, CA 92103

510-550-6740
the wojciechowski's
3713 mead , ft collins, CO 80526 

November 3, 2008   5:40 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
the wojciechowski's
3713 mead
ft collins, CO 80526

510-550-6740
Diane Waller
P.O. Box 581503 , Minneapolis, MN 55458 

November 3, 2008   5:39 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

Pure, uncontaminated drinking water (and clean water everywhere) is one of our most vital and essential natural resources. As a "civilization" we owe it to our citizens to do all we can to keep drinking water clean, safe and free of pollutants.

 I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Diane Waller
P.O. Box 581503
Minneapolis, MN 55458

510-550-6740
Elizabeth Adan
4419 Rollingrock Way , Carmichael, CA 95608 

November 3, 2008   5:39 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Elizabeth Adan
4419 Rollingrock Way
Carmichael, CA 95608

510-550-6740
shea holliman
404 s 4th st , murrray, KY 42071 

November 3, 2008   5:39 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
shea holliman
404 s 4th st
murrray, KY 42071

510-550-6740
David Melvin
21 Cromwell Drive , Chester,, NJ 079302153 

November 3, 2008   5:39 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
David Melvin
21 Cromwell Drive
Chester,, NJ 07930-2153

510-550-6740
Theresa Skager
5322 B. North Highland , Ruston, WA 98407 

November 3, 2008   5:39 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Theresa Skager
5322 B. North Highland
Ruston, WA 98407

510-550-6740
Carol Brown
1966 Newbold Ave , New York City, NY 10472 

November 3, 2008   5:39 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Carol Brown
1966 Newbold Ave
New York City, NY 10472

510-550-6740
Tim Duda
340 Queen Anne Court , San Antonio, TX 78209 

November 3, 2008   5:39 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Tim Duda
340 Queen Anne Court
San Antonio, TX 78209

510-550-6740
Elizabeth Julia Stoumen
240 East 82 Street #14A, New York, NY 10028 

November 3, 2008   5:39 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Elizabeth Julia Stoumen
240 East 82 Street
#14A
New York, NY 10028

510-550-6740
Mark Wrobel
8063 S. Tennessee Ave. , Willowbrook, IL 60527 

November 3, 2008   5:39 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Mark Wrobel
8063 S. Tennessee Ave.
Willowbrook, IL 60527

510-550-6740
Christine Berger
669 Alma Avenue Apt #103, Oakland, CA 94610 

November 3, 2008   5:38 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Please do not allow the US citizens to be poisoned because of faulty analysis.

Sincerely,
Christine Berger
669 Alma Avenue
Apt #103
Oakland, CA 94610

510-550-6740
Stewart Wilber
Box 280 , The Rock, GA 30285 

November 3, 2008   5:38 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Sincerely,
Stewart Wilber
Box 280
The Rock, GA 30285

510-550-6740
Jonathon Lerner
708 Drillane Rd , Hopkins, MN 55305 

November 3, 2008   5:38 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Please Take Action on Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

I was very disappointed to hear that the EPA might take no action on this industrial chemical polluting our water. Many state agencies have already acted on this problem... why not the Federal Government?

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jonathon Lerner
708 Drillane Rd
Hopkins, MN 55305

510-550-6740
Tammy Boynton
4475 Dupree Road , Olive Branch, MS 38654 

November 3, 2008   5:38 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Tammy Boynton
4475 Dupree Road
Olive Branch, MS 38654

510-550-6740
Leonard B Chandler
732 Jasper St , San Jose, CA 95116 

November 3, 2008   5:38 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Leonard B Chandler
732 Jasper St
San Jose, CA 95116

510-550-6740
Mikelis Beitiks
85 Hazelwood Ave , San Francisco, CA 941121310 

November 3, 2008   5:38 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Mikelis Beitiks
85 Hazelwood Ave
San Francisco, CA 94112-1310

510-550-6740
Joel Ainger
2313 25Th Ave , Sacramento, CA 95822 

November 3, 2008   5:38 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Joel Ainger
2313 25Th Ave
Sacramento, CA 95822

510-550-6740
Richard Biegun
56 Cherry Ave. , W Sayville, NY 11796 

November 3, 2008   5:38 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Richard Biegun
56 Cherry Ave.
W Sayville, NY 11796

510-550-6740
Claribel Marin
7314 Stone Pine Ln , Houston, TX 77041 

November 3, 2008   5:38 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Claribel Marin
7314 Stone Pine Ln
Houston, TX 77041

510-550-6740
Patricia Marchesi
591 Wild Ridge Ln. , Lafayette, CO 80026 

November 3, 2008   5:38 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Patricia Marchesi
591 Wild Ridge Ln.
Lafayette, CO 80026

510-550-6740
Anna Lupus
Wolf Street , General Electric, NY 12345 

November 3, 2008   5:38 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Anna Lupus
Wolf Street
General Electric, NY 12345

510-550-6740
Joe Vissichelli
117 Delmonico Place , Valley Stream, NY 115811423 

November 3, 2008   5:37 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Joe Vissichelli
117 Delmonico Place
Valley Stream, NY 11581-1423

510-550-6740
Dee Anderson
1023-25th Street Apt. 1 , Moline, IL 61265 

November 3, 2008   5:37 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

We need to do everything we can to ensure that everyone in the U. S. has clean, safe water to drink! This is a basic need that we should not tamper with.

Sincerely,
Dee Anderson
1023-25th Street Apt. 1
Moline, IL 61265

510-550-6740
Joseph Glaston
16400 Bubbling Wells Road #404 , Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 

November 3, 2008   5:37 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Joseph Glaston
16400 Bubbling Wells Road #404
Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240

510-550-6740
Todd Sargent
4035 SE Reedway , Portland, OR 97202 

November 3, 2008   5:37 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Todd Sargent
4035 SE Reedway
Portland, OR 97202

510-550-6740
Paul Strauss
336 Wellington   Unit 2005 , Chicago, IL 60657 

November 3, 2008   5:37 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Paul Strauss
336 Wellington   Unit 2005
Chicago, IL 60657

510-550-6740
Jill Davine
4047 La Salle Avenue , Culver City, CA 90232 

November 3, 2008   5:37 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jill Davine
4047 La Salle Avenue
Culver City, CA 90232

510-550-6740
Cynthia Buness
3504 E. Claremont Ave. , Paradise Valley, AZ 85253 

November 3, 2008   5:37 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Cynthia Buness
3504 E. Claremont Ave.
Paradise Valley, AZ 85253

510-550-6740
Imogen Taylor
422 South 7th Street , Ann Arbor, MI 48103 

November 3, 2008   5:37 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Imogen Taylor
422 South 7th Street
Ann Arbor, MI 48103

510-550-6740
Jessica Malott
328 South Artizan St , Williamsport, MD 21795 

November 3, 2008   5:37 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jessica Malott
328 South Artizan St
Williamsport, MD 21795

510-550-6740
Joan Schinkel
1525 Baywood Drive , Petaluma, CA 94954 

November 3, 2008   5:36 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Joan Schinkel
1525 Baywood Drive
Petaluma, CA 94954

510-550-6740
Heidi Rybak
165 East 32nd Street Apt 6H, new york, NY 10016 

November 3, 2008   5:36 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Heidi Rybak
165 East 32nd Street
Apt 6H
new york, NY 10016

510-550-6740
Stephen Matera
943 NW 63rd St. , Seattle, WA 98107 

November 3, 2008   5:36 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Stephen Matera
943 NW 63rd St.
Seattle, WA 98107

510-550-6740
Kevin Stephens
21357 N 79th Dr , Peoria, AZ 85382 

November 3, 2008   5:36 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kevin Stephens
21357 N 79th Dr
Peoria, AZ 85382

510-550-6740
Helen Baumgartner
PO Box 8565 , Surprise, AZ 85374 

November 3, 2008   5:36 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Helen Baumgartner
PO Box 8565
Surprise, AZ 85374

510-550-6740
y rf
borinquen , cabo rojo, PR 00623 

November 3, 2008   5:36 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
y rf
borinquen
cabo rojo, PR 00623

510-550-6740
George Patterson
367 N. Sycamore Ave , Los Angeles, CA 90036 

November 3, 2008   5:36 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
George Patterson
367 N. Sycamore Ave
Los Angeles, CA 90036

510-550-6740
Mark Elman
45 4th Street , Park Ridge, NJ 07656 

November 3, 2008   5:36 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Mark Elman
45 4th Street
Park Ridge, NJ 07656

510-550-6740
John Kramer
22 rayfield Road , Marshfield, MA 02050 

November 3, 2008   5:36 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
John Kramer
22 rayfield Road
Marshfield, MA 02050

510-550-6740
Jack Stotler
17340 Devonshire St. , Northridge, CA 91325 

November 3, 2008   5:36 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jack Stotler
17340 Devonshire St.
Northridge, CA 91325

510-550-6740
Irma Agramova
7925 Romaine St. , Los Angeles, CA 90046 

November 3, 2008   5:36 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Irma Agramova
7925 Romaine St.
Los Angeles, CA 90046

510-550-6740
Brent Carter
4263 SE Belmont St #305 , Portland, OR 97215 

November 3, 2008   5:36 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Brent Carter
4263 SE Belmont St #305
Portland, OR 97215

510-550-6740
David Williams
prospect mt. rd. , Alton, NH 03809 

November 3, 2008   5:36 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
David Williams
prospect mt. rd.
Alton, NH 03809

510-550-6740
Lawrence Carlson
13239 N 56th Ave , Glendale, AZ 85304 

November 3, 2008   5:36 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Lawrence Carlson
13239 N 56th Ave
Glendale, AZ 85304

510-550-6740
Tina Dobsevage
600 West 111th St , New York, NY 100251813 

November 3, 2008   5:36 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Tina Dobsevage
600 West 111th St
New York, NY 10025-1813

510-550-6740
Melody Ortega
1540 Jorgensen St , Atwater, CA 95301 

November 3, 2008   5:36 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Melody Ortega
1540 Jorgensen St
Atwater, CA 95301

510-550-6740
Barbara Haskell
23 Bryer Ave , Jamestown, RI 02835 

November 3, 2008   5:36 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Barbara Haskell
23 Bryer Ave
Jamestown, RI 02835

510-550-6740
billy rainbow
1653 El Dorado Av , Santa Cruz, CA 95062 

November 3, 2008   5:36 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
billy rainbow
1653 El Dorado Av
Santa Cruz, CA 95062

510-550-6740
Marguerite Shuster
675 Mt. Wilson Trail , Sierra Madre, CA 91024 

November 3, 2008   5:36 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Marguerite Shuster
675 Mt. Wilson Trail
Sierra Madre, CA 91024

510-550-6740
Charles Roth
5 Durbyan Place , Port Washington, NY 11050 

November 3, 2008   5:35 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Charles Roth
5 Durbyan Place
Port Washington, NY 11050

510-550-6740
bennett hoffman
po box 6155 , tallahassee, FL 32314 

November 3, 2008   5:35 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
bennett hoffman
po box 6155
tallahassee, FL 32314

510-550-6740
bob whatmough
41 rockingham st , concord, NH 03301 

November 3, 2008   5:35 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
bob whatmough
41 rockingham st
concord, NH 03301

510-550-6740
Martha Carrington
2620 Hickory Street , Oakland, CA 94602 

November 3, 2008   5:35 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Martha Carrington
2620 Hickory Street
Oakland, CA 94602

510-550-6740
Catherine Betz
105 Adderly Lane , Millstadt, IL 62260 

November 3, 2008   5:35 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Catherine Betz
105 Adderly Lane
Millstadt, IL 62260

510-550-6740
Lisa Langcake
7268 Coddin Lane , Fort Mill, SC 29715 

November 3, 2008   5:35 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Lisa Langcake
7268 Coddin Lane
Fort Mill, SC 29715

510-550-6740
Hardee Klitzman
3015 Wade Road , Durham, NC 27705 

November 3, 2008   5:35 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Hardee Klitzman
3015 Wade Road
Durham, NC 27705

510-550-6740
George Ebanks
8001 N Lynn Ave , Tampa, FL 33604 

November 3, 2008   5:35 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
George Ebanks
8001 N Lynn Ave
Tampa, FL 33604

510-550-6740
Betty Bernard
740 South Orange Grove Blvd Apt 6, Pasadena, CA 911051774 

November 3, 2008   5:35 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Betty Bernard
740 South Orange Grove Blvd
Apt 6
Pasadena, CA 91105-1774

510-550-6740
Sampson Bowers
912 College Avenue , St. Helena, CA 94574 

November 3, 2008   5:35 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Sampson Bowers
912 College Avenue
St. Helena, CA 94574

510-550-6740
Deb Fritzler
1489 Lowesville Road , Amherst, VA 24521 

November 3, 2008   5:35 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Deb Fritzler
1489 Lowesville Road
Amherst, VA 24521

510-550-6740
Barbara Capron
114 Tidewater Farm Road , Stratham, NH 03885 

November 3, 2008   5:35 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Barbara Capron
114 Tidewater Farm Road
Stratham, NH 03885

510-550-6740
Martin LeMaire
31676 Mill Creek Court , Lewes, DE 19958 

November 3, 2008   5:35 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Martin LeMaire
31676 Mill Creek Court
Lewes, DE 19958

510-550-6740
sherri silverman
P O Box 2461 , Santa Fe, NM 875042461 

November 3, 2008   5:35 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
sherri silverman
P O Box 2461
Santa Fe, NM 87504-2461

510-550-6740
marcia smith
1437 W. Elmdale , chicago, IL 60660 

November 3, 2008   5:35 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
marcia smith
1437 W. Elmdale
chicago, IL 60660

510-550-6740
Elizabeth Johnson
833 Jackson Street , Albany, CA 94706 

November 3, 2008   5:35 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Elizabeth Johnson
833 Jackson Street
Albany, CA 94706

510-550-6740
Kurt Olson
31 Franklin Rd. , Salisbury, NH 03268 

November 3, 2008   5:35 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kurt Olson
31 Franklin Rd.
Salisbury, NH 03268

510-550-6740
Claire Flewitt
975 Soto Drive , San Lorenzo, CA 945801554 

November 3, 2008   5:33 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Keep Perchlorate Out of  Our Drinking Water

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Claire Flewitt
975 Soto Drive
San Lorenzo, CA 94580-1554

510-550-6740
susan folsom
PO Box 1147 , lawndale, CA 902606047 

November 3, 2008   5:33 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards that will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

I am concerned for my son and his family consisting of 3 young children and the many young families across our nation. Therefore, your attention to and consideration of this matter is greatly appreciated! 

Sincerely,
susan folsom
PO Box 1147
lawndale, CA 90260-6047

510-550-6740
Ricki Newman
617 Prince Dr. , Newburgh, IN 47630 

November 3, 2008   5:33 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Ricki Newman
617 Prince Dr.
Newburgh, IN 47630

510-550-6740
Meyer Jordan
403 W. Michigan Ave. , Pensacola, FL 32505 

November 3, 2008   5:33 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Meyer Jordan
403 W. Michigan Ave.
Pensacola, FL 32505

510-550-6740
Kathleen Peterson
3606 Radcliffe Dr , Northbrook, IL 60062 

November 3, 2008   5:33 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kathleen Peterson
3606 Radcliffe Dr
Northbrook, IL 60062

510-550-6740
Steven Grainger
655 Stokeswood Ave. , Atlanta, GA 30316 

November 3, 2008   5:33 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Steven Grainger
655 Stokeswood Ave.
Atlanta, GA 30316

510-550-6740
Caterina Morin
6477 SW 13 St. , Miami, FL 33144 

November 3, 2008   5:33 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Caterina Morin
6477 SW 13 St.
Miami, FL 33144

510-550-6740
Gerry Veeder
1721 Wisteria St , Denton, TX 76205 

November 3, 2008   5:33 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Gerry Veeder
1721 Wisteria St
Denton, TX 76205

510-550-6740
Lisa Sharken
420 East 72nd Street , New York, NY 10021 

November 3, 2008   5:33 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Lisa Sharken
420 East 72nd Street
New York, NY 10021

510-550-6740
Will Snell
13858 Stonehenge CR ID 05045197, Pickerington, OH 43147 

November 3, 2008   5:33 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Will Snell
13858 Stonehenge CR
ID 05045197
Pickerington, OH 43147

510-550-6740
Tammi Stolpe
2443 Hampshire Sq. , Ft. Collins, CO 80526 

November 3, 2008   5:33 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Tammi Stolpe
2443 Hampshire Sq.
Ft. Collins, CO 80526

510-550-6740
Stefan Kozinski
1880 Superfine Lane, Apt. 6 , Wilmington, DE 19802 

November 3, 2008   5:33 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Stefan Kozinski
1880 Superfine Lane, Apt. 6
Wilmington, DE 19802

510-550-6740
Steven Hellerman
104 So. Center St. , Redlands, CA 92373 

November 3, 2008   5:33 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Steven Hellerman
104 So. Center St.
Redlands, CA 92373

510-550-6740
Barbara Scott
1400 S. Valley View #2048, Las Vegas, NV 89102 

November 3, 2008   5:33 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Barbara Scott
1400 S. Valley View
#2048
Las Vegas, NV 89102

510-550-6740
Amy Grondin
1450 30th Street , Port Townsend, WA 98368 

November 3, 2008   5:33 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Amy Grondin
1450 30th Street
Port Townsend, WA 98368

510-550-6740
Melissa Tomaszewski
159 Waterford Lane , Reading, PA 19606 

November 3, 2008   5:33 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Melissa Tomaszewski
159 Waterford Lane
Reading, PA 19606

510-550-6740
Michael Galuska
19505 Morden Blush Dr , Lutz, FL 33558 

November 3, 2008   5:33 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Michael Galuska
19505 Morden Blush Dr
Lutz, FL 33558

510-550-6740
Patricia Perry
165 Morningside Drive , San Anselmo, CA 94960 

November 3, 2008   5:33 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Patricia Perry
165 Morningside Drive
San Anselmo, CA 94960

510-550-6740
Bette Simons
4020 Stone CanyonAVe , Sherman Oaks, CA 91403 

November 3, 2008   5:31 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

Dear Mr. Johnson, even if you were a political appointee, I'm sure you are an aware person who sees what is needed to make our people and the earth as sage as can be.
PLEASE reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Thank you in advance for doing the right thing.

Sincerely,
Bette Simons
4020 Stone CanyonAVe
Sherman Oaks, CA 91403

510-550-6740
Katharina Nordmann
237 Glen Cove Avenue , Carle Place, NY 11514 

November 3, 2008   5:31 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Katharina Nordmann
237 Glen Cove Avenue
Carle Place, NY 11514

510-550-6740
Mary Ilona Mensik
14 Chestnut Street , SouthNorwalk, CT 06854 

November 3, 2008   5:31 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Mary Ilona Mensik
14 Chestnut Street
SouthNorwalk, CT 06854

510-550-6740
Patricia Ferrari
175 Miramonte Drive , Moraga, CA 94556 

November 3, 2008   5:31 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Patricia Ferrari
175 Miramonte Drive
Moraga, CA 94556

510-550-6740
Tim Corcoran
315 SW 169th Ct , Beaverton, OR 97006 

November 3, 2008   5:31 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Tim Corcoran
315 SW 169th Ct
Beaverton, OR 97006

510-550-6740
Margaret Tollner
4138 Marwick Ave , Lakewood, CA 90713 

November 3, 2008   5:31 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Margaret Tollner
4138 Marwick Ave
Lakewood, CA 90713

510-550-6740
Eric Hoyer
704 NW Eagle Ridge , Lees Summit, MO 64081 

November 3, 2008   5:31 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Eric Hoyer
704 NW Eagle Ridge
Lees Summit, MO 64081

510-550-6740
Judy Commons
2703 Corabel Lane #215 , Sacramento, CA 95821 

November 3, 2008   5:30 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Judy Commons
2703 Corabel Lane #215
Sacramento, CA 95821

510-550-6740
Mariano Parks
7 Collins Circle , Avon, MA 02322 

November 3, 2008   5:30 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Mariano Parks
7 Collins Circle
Avon, MA 02322

510-550-6740
Connie Anne Francisco
13 Lizbeth Lane , Berwyn, PA 19312 

November 3, 2008   5:30 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Connie Anne Francisco
13 Lizbeth Lane
Berwyn, PA 19312

510-550-6740
john lawson
207 Fairview Rd. , Narberth, PA 19072 

November 3, 2008   5:30 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
john lawson
207 Fairview Rd.
Narberth, PA 19072

510-550-6740
Benjamin Zank
131 Carolina Avenue , Boston, MA 02130 

November 3, 2008   5:30 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Benjamin Zank
131 Carolina Avenue
Boston, MA 02130

510-550-6740
Martha Hubert
370 29th Street , San Francisco, CA 94131 

November 3, 2008   5:30 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Martha Hubert
370 29th Street
San Francisco, CA 94131

510-550-6740
Elizabeth Spanbauer
1411A South Main St , Oshkosh, WI 54902 

November 3, 2008   5:30 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Elizabeth Spanbauer
1411A South Main St
Oshkosh, WI 54902

510-550-6740
sandra davis
6 gatewood cove , little rock, AR 72206 

November 3, 2008   5:30 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
sandra davis
6 gatewood cove
little rock, AR 72206

510-550-6740
Jennifer Heggie
532 Flood Avenue , San Francisco, CA 94112 

November 3, 2008   5:28 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jennifer Heggie
532 Flood Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94112

510-550-6740
Aida Berenson
5845 N Virginia , Chicago, IL 60659 

November 3, 2008   5:28 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Aida Berenson
5845 N Virginia
Chicago, IL 60659

510-550-6740
Sidney J.P. Hollister
465 Chestnut St. , San Francisco, CA 94133 

November 3, 2008   5:28 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I urge you to reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind recent state regulatory actions. 

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Sincerely,
Sidney J.P. Hollister
465 Chestnut St.
San Francisco, CA 94133

510-550-6740
Betty Combs
609 Skaggs Rd , Londonderry, OH 45647 

November 3, 2008   5:28 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Betty Combs
609 Skaggs Rd
Londonderry, OH 45647

510-550-6740
Rose Scheda
41 Percy , Oxnard, CA 93033 

November 3, 2008   5:28 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Rose Scheda
41 Percy
Oxnard, CA 93033

510-550-6740
Ann Sandritter
3B Ashwood Mall , Old Bridge, NJ 08857 

November 3, 2008   5:28 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Ann Sandritter
3B Ashwood Mall
Old Bridge, NJ 08857

510-550-6740
Robert Rand
14000 NW 20th Street , Pembroke Pines, FL 33028 

November 3, 2008   5:28 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Robert Rand
14000 NW 20th Street
Pembroke Pines, FL 33028

510-550-6740
Ian Conners
5 Dionne Circle , Brunswick, ME 04011 

November 3, 2008   5:28 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Ian Conners
5 Dionne Circle
Brunswick, ME 04011

510-550-6740
Peter Mathews
3530 henry hudson parkway  apt 9n , bronx, NY 10463-1311 

November 3, 2008   5:28 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Peter Mathews
3530 henry hudson parkway  apt 9n
bronx, NY 10463-1311

510-550-6740
Ginnie Taylor
31 pond view dr , Canton, CT 06019 

November 3, 2008   5:28 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Ginnie Taylor
31 pond view dr
Canton, CT 06019

510-550-6740
jennifer wyatt
620 5th ave south apt c , edmonds, WA 98020 

November 3, 2008   5:28 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
jennifer wyatt
620 5th ave south apt c
edmonds, WA 98020

510-550-6740
Janice Herendeen
918 E Judd St , Greenville, MI 48838 

November 3, 2008   5:28 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Janice Herendeen
918 E Judd St
Greenville, MI 48838

510-550-6740
Phaedra Kossow-Quinn
233 Thompson Ave  #C , Glendale, CA 91201 

November 3, 2008   5:28 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Phaedra Kossow-Quinn
233 Thompson Ave  #C
Glendale, CA 91201

510-550-6740
Roberta McCanse
904 E. 28th St. , Kansas City, MO 64109 

November 3, 2008   5:26 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

As a doctorally prepared nurse I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.  Continued inaction endangers us all.

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. For instance, EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Roberta McCanse
904 E. 28th St.
Kansas City, MO 64109

510-550-6740
FULVIO FIORENTINI
V. BONANNI 7 , CIVITA C. (VT),  01033 Italy

November 3, 2008   5:26 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
FULVIO FIORENTINI
V. BONANNI 7
CIVITA C. (VT) 01033

510-550-6740
Dorothy Olinger
170 Good Counsel DR , Mankato, MN 56001 

November 3, 2008   5:26 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Dorothy Olinger
170 Good Counsel DR
Mankato, MN 56001

510-550-6740
Richard Fowlkes
66 Sand Dunes Road , Santa Rosa Beach, FL 32459-5118 

November 3, 2008   5:26 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Richard Fowlkes
66 Sand Dunes Road
Santa Rosa Beach, FL 32459-5118

510-550-6740
Claudia Srok
39321 upper camp creek rd. , Springfield, OR 97478 

November 3, 2008   5:26 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Claudia Srok
39321 upper camp creek rd.
Springfield, OR 97478

510-550-6740
Kimberly Mitchell
2001 Monterey Street , Santa Barbara, CA 93101 

November 3, 2008   5:26 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kimberly Mitchell
2001 Monterey Street
Santa Barbara, CA 93101

510-550-6740
Thomas Sloan
4410 W. Ironwood Hill Dr. , Tucson, AZ 85745 

November 3, 2008   5:26 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Thomas Sloan
4410 W. Ironwood Hill Dr.
Tucson, AZ 85745

510-550-6740
Joe Leone
120 Clarkewoods Toad , Athens, GA 30607 

November 3, 2008   5:26 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Joe Leone
120 Clarkewoods Toad
Athens, GA 30607

510-550-6740
Robi Anderson
34 Brookhollow Dr , Wimberley, TX 78676 

November 3, 2008   5:26 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Robi Anderson
34 Brookhollow Dr
Wimberley, TX 78676

510-550-6740
Mary McBride
2537 Otis Rd Se , Cedar Rapids, IA 52403 

November 3, 2008   5:26 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Mary McBride
2537 Otis Rd Se
Cedar Rapids, IA 52403

510-550-6740
james letz
2289 Chimney Swift Circle , Marietta, GA 30062 

November 3, 2008   5:26 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
james letz
2289 Chimney Swift Circle
Marietta, GA 30062

510-550-6740
Connie Lippert
216 Redbud St. , Seneca, SC 29672 

November 3, 2008   5:26 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Connie Lippert
216 Redbud St.
Seneca, SC 29672

510-550-6740
Michael Monsor
17625 11th Ave N , Plymouth, MN 55447 

November 3, 2008   5:26 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Michael Monsor
17625 11th Ave N
Plymouth, MN 55447

510-550-6740
Catherine Johnson
1215 Caravan Trail , Duncanville, TX 75116 

November 3, 2008   5:26 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Catherine Johnson
1215 Caravan Trail
Duncanville, TX 75116

510-550-6740
Robin Kessler
5316 Brabant Road , Baltimore, MD 21229 

November 3, 2008   5:26 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Robin Kessler
5316 Brabant Road
Baltimore, MD 21229

510-550-6740
Gail Skinner-Brassard
667 Marsh Hill Road , Dracut, MA 01826 

November 3, 2008   5:24 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Gail Skinner-Brassard
667 Marsh Hill Road
Dracut, MA 01826

510-550-6740
Wendy Tripp
1850 Lincoln Ave. , San Jose, CA 95125 

November 3, 2008   5:24 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Wendy Tripp
1850 Lincoln Ave.
San Jose, CA 95125

510-550-6740
Barry Cutler
40797 Schafer Place , Palm Desert, CA 92211 

November 3, 2008   5:24 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Barry Cutler
40797 Schafer Place
Palm Desert, CA 92211

510-550-6740
Richard T Hill Jr
1111 Clairmont Ave E-2 , Decatur, GA 30030 

November 3, 2008   5:24 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Richard T Hill Jr
1111 Clairmont Ave E-2
Decatur, GA 30030

510-550-6740
Persephone Maywald
120 Village Square #121 , Orinda, CA 94563 

November 3, 2008   5:24 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Persephone Maywald
120 Village Square #121
Orinda, CA 94563

510-550-6740
Joseph Sebastian
4110 Edison Ave , Sacto, CA 95821 

November 3, 2008   5:24 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Joseph Sebastian
4110 Edison Ave
Sacto, CA 95821

510-550-6740
Mary Elizabeth Petersen
193 Clark's Cove Road , Walpole, ME 045733307 

November 3, 2008   5:22 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination. It is easier, safer, and less expensive to set stricter limits than to repair the damage from too much perchlorate.+

Sincerely,
Mary Elizabeth Petersen
193 Clark's Cove Road
Walpole, ME 04573-3307

510-550-6740
Wayne Langford
539 Rue Montaigne , Stone Mountain, GA 30083 

November 3, 2008   5:22 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Wayne Langford
539 Rue Montaigne
Stone Mountain, GA 30083

510-550-6740
Virginia Anderson
310 Sunshine Dr. , Coconut Creek, FL 33066 

November 3, 2008   5:22 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Virginia Anderson
310 Sunshine Dr.
Coconut Creek, FL 33066

510-550-6740
Shawn Lonsfjord
190 Avenue B, 3-A , New York, NY 10009 

November 3, 2008   5:22 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Shawn Lonsfjord
190 Avenue B, 3-A
New York, NY 10009

510-550-6740
Eva "Urbaniak, ND"
4262 Whitman Ave N , Seattle, WA 98103 

November 3, 2008   5:22 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Eva "Urbaniak, ND"
4262 Whitman Ave N
Seattle, WA 98103

510-550-6740
Jolynn Ging
608 Harbour Ridge Lane , Downingtown, PA 193354534 

November 3, 2008   5:22 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jolynn Ging
608 Harbour Ridge Lane
Downingtown, PA 19335-4534

510-550-6740
Kimberly Reinhart-Mora
731 Choctaw , Flagstaff, AZ 86001 

November 3, 2008   5:22 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kimberly Reinhart-Mora
731 Choctaw
Flagstaff, AZ 86001

510-550-6740
Stephen Gliva
713 Mulford St Unit 1A, Evanston, IL 60202 

November 3, 2008   5:22 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Stephen Gliva
713 Mulford St
Unit 1A
Evanston, IL 60202

510-550-6740
David Wilcox
1 S. Park Ave. , Lombard, IL 60148 

November 3, 2008   5:22 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
David Wilcox
1 S. Park Ave.
Lombard, IL 60148

510-550-6740
Sheree Beans
111 Noble St , Kutztown, PA 19530 

November 3, 2008   5:21 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Sheree Beans
111 Noble St
Kutztown, PA 19530

510-550-6740
caryl pearson
p.o. box 7074 , cotati, CA 94931 

November 3, 2008   5:21 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
caryl pearson
p.o. box 7074
cotati, CA 94931

510-550-6740
Robert Fricke
3913 w 124 pl #1e , Alsip, IL 60803 

November 3, 2008   5:21 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Robert Fricke
3913 w 124 pl #1e
Alsip, IL 60803

510-550-6740
John Curotto
621 Quinebaug Road , Quinebaug, CT 06262 

November 3, 2008   5:21 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
John Curotto
621 Quinebaug Road
Quinebaug, CT 06262

510-550-6740
Amanda Cutler
6577 turkey hollow trl , Browns Valley, CA 96080 

November 3, 2008   5:21 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Amanda Cutler
6577 turkey hollow trl
Browns Valley, CA 96080

510-550-6740
Julie Bannister
4408 S Terrace Road , Tempe, AZ 85282 

November 3, 2008   5:20 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Please Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Julie Bannister
4408 S Terrace Road
Tempe, AZ 85282

510-550-6740
Annie Petersen
2121 Gila River Road NE , Rio Rancho, NM 87144 

November 3, 2008   5:20 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Annie Petersen
2121 Gila River Road NE
Rio Rancho, NM 87144

510-550-6740
Paul D. Martin
76 Fordham Drive , Buffalo, NY 142163112 

November 3, 2008   5:20 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Paul D. Martin
76 Fordham Drive
Buffalo, NY 14216-3112

510-550-6740
Margaret Stewart
2110 lauderdale , Louisville, KY 40205 

November 3, 2008   5:20 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Margaret Stewart
2110 lauderdale
Louisville, KY 40205

510-550-6740
Melanie Jones
583 Webster St. , Marshfield, MA 02050 

November 3, 2008   5:20 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Melanie Jones
583 Webster St.
Marshfield, MA 02050

510-550-6740
Marcia McDuffie
5691 1/2 San Pablo Dam Road , El Sobrante, CA 948033414 

November 3, 2008   5:20 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Marcia McDuffie
5691 1/2 San Pablo Dam Road
El Sobrante, CA 94803-3414

510-550-6740
Deborah St Julien
4570 Kingspark Dr , San Jose, CA 951362323 

November 3, 2008   5:20 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Deborah St Julien
4570 Kingspark Dr
San Jose, CA 95136-2323

510-550-6740
David & Leneda Ditterick
P.O. Box 1108 , Hillsboro, OR 971231108 

November 3, 2008   5:20 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

We are writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
David %pa_first_name% Leneda Ditterick
P.O. Box 1108
Hillsboro, OR 97123-1108

510-550-6740
t logan
611 s congress , austin, TX 78704 

November 3, 2008   5:19 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
t logan
611 s congress
austin, TX 78704

510-550-6740
Bronwynne Brent
252 Fernwood Drive , Pass Christian, MS 39571 

November 3, 2008   5:19 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Bronwynne Brent
252 Fernwood Drive
Pass Christian, MS 39571

510-550-6740
Carolyn Blaso
50 Riceville Rd C405, Asheville, NC 28805 

November 3, 2008   5:19 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Carolyn Blaso
50 Riceville Rd
C405
Asheville, NC 28805

510-550-6740
David Rousseau
"2027, 13th St." , Clarkston, WA 994033101 

November 3, 2008   5:19 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
David Rousseau
"2027, 13th St."
Clarkston, WA 99403-3101

510-550-6740
Jim Sylva
P.O. Box 115 , Hansen, ID 83334 

November 3, 2008   5:19 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jim Sylva
P.O. Box 115
Hansen, ID 83334

510-550-6740
Vincent A. Ruiz
893 Empire Ave. #204 , Ventura,, CA 93003-4901 

November 3, 2008   5:18 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am a citizen who is very concerned about water pollution. So I am writing you to urge reversal of the EPA's preliminary regulatory determination regarding perchlorate and set a protective drinking water standard for it as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

The EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Vincent A. Ruiz
893 Empire Ave. #204
Ventura,, CA 93003-4901

510-550-6740
Dale Overman
3027 Roxborough Park St , West Valley City, UT 841195983 

November 3, 2008   5:18 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Dale Overman
3027 Roxborough Park St
West Valley City, UT 84119-5983

510-550-6740
Carla Shuford
116 Pitch Pine Lane , Chapel Hill, NC 27514 

November 3, 2008   5:18 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Carla Shuford
116 Pitch Pine Lane
Chapel Hill, NC 27514

510-550-6740
Charles Hill
8541 Calmada Ave , Whittier, CA 90605 

November 3, 2008   5:18 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Charles Hill
8541 Calmada Ave
Whittier, CA 90605

510-550-6740
Jennifer Meyer
1539 Lathrop Ave , Racine, WI 53405 

November 3, 2008   5:17 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jennifer Meyer
1539 Lathrop Ave
Racine, WI 53405

510-550-6740
Kevin Kreiss
1602 WHITE PINE DRIVE , DURHAM, NC 27705 

November 3, 2008   5:17 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kevin Kreiss
1602 WHITE PINE DRIVE
DURHAM, NC 27705

510-550-6740
Sandra Severson
1704 Woodgate Lane , Eagan, MN 55122 

November 3, 2008   5:17 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Sandra Severson
1704 Woodgate Lane
Eagan, MN 55122

510-550-6740
Renee Kirkpatrick
12113 Metric Blvd , Austin, TX 78758 

November 3, 2008   5:16 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Renee Kirkpatrick
12113 Metric Blvd
Austin, TX 78758

510-550-6740
William Gignilliat
4228 1/2 River Rd , Washington, DC 20016 

November 3, 2008   5:16 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
William Gignilliat
4228 1/2 River Rd
Washington, DC 20016

510-550-6740
Maria Zamudio
232 Washburn Ave. , Santa Cruz, CA 95060 

November 3, 2008   5:16 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Maria Zamudio
232 Washburn Ave.
Santa Cruz, CA 95060

510-550-6740
Karen Clarke
4554 S. Rhett , North Charleston, SC 29405 

November 3, 2008   5:16 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Karen Clarke
4554 S. Rhett
North Charleston, SC 29405

510-550-6740
Matthew St.Clair
1161 W. Fifth St. , Ontario, CA 94703 

November 3, 2008   5:15 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Matthew St.Clair
1161 W. Fifth St.
Ontario, CA 94703

510-550-6740
Idabelle Fosse
1139 55th Street , Oakland, CA 94608 

November 3, 2008   5:15 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Idabelle Fosse
1139 55th Street
Oakland, CA 94608

510-550-6740
Catherine Gauthier
5329 Caminito Mindy , San Diego, CA 92105 

November 3, 2008   5:15 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Catherine Gauthier
5329 Caminito Mindy
San Diego, CA 92105

510-550-6740
Emil Reisman
33811 Violet Lantern , Dana Point, CA 92629 

November 3, 2008   5:15 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Emil Reisman
33811 Violet Lantern
Dana Point, CA 92629

510-550-6740
Judith Embry
51 Blackstone Road , Florida, MA 01247 

November 3, 2008   5:15 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Judith Embry
51 Blackstone Road
Florida, MA 01247

510-550-6740
Arlene Braswell
8 Imperial Ave. , Palmetto, FL 34221 

November 3, 2008   5:15 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Arlene Braswell
8 Imperial Ave.
Palmetto, FL 34221

510-550-6740
Katherine Holland
8710 N. Colton St , Spokane, WA 99218 

November 3, 2008   5:15 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Katherine Holland
8710 N. Colton St
Spokane, WA 99218

510-550-6740
Beverly Hector-Smith
1 Oxbow Rd , Natick, MA 01760 

November 3, 2008   5:14 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.    

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Beverly Hector-Smith
1 Oxbow Rd
Natick, MA 01760

510-550-6740
Betty Mencucci
1777 Victory Highway , Glendale, RI 02826 

November 3, 2008   5:14 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Betty Mencucci
1777 Victory Highway
Glendale, RI 02826

510-550-6740
Adrienne Cook
6 S Woodhaven Dr , White Haven, PA 18661 

November 3, 2008   5:14 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Adrienne Cook
6 S Woodhaven Dr
White Haven, PA 18661

510-550-6740
Chas Rathburn
14724 SW 83rd Court , Miami, FL 33158 

November 3, 2008   5:14 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Chas Rathburn
14724 SW 83rd Court
Miami, FL 33158

510-550-6740
Sheri Kuticka
820 Weaver Ln. , Concord, CA 94518 

November 3, 2008   5:13 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Sheri Kuticka
820 Weaver Ln.
Concord, CA 94518

510-550-6740
arlene aquino
11298 pat george blvd , conroe, TX 77303 

November 3, 2008   5:13 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
arlene aquino
11298 pat george blvd
conroe, TX 77303

510-550-6740
Rachel s
1 , decatur, GA 30030 

November 3, 2008   5:13 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Rachel s
1
decatur, GA 30030

510-550-6740
John Kerschbaum
Arcola Trail N. , Stillwater, MN 55082 

November 3, 2008   5:12 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
John Kerschbaum
Arcola Trail N.
Stillwater, MN 55082

510-550-6740
Daniel Morris
1493 Dover Center Rd. , Westlake, OH 44145 

November 3, 2008   5:12 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Daniel Morris
1493 Dover Center Rd.
Westlake, OH 44145

510-550-6740
Destry Kitchen
22900 Northline , Taylor, MI 48180 

November 3, 2008   5:11 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.
Please make our water safe, shouldn't that be important too?

Sincerely,
Destry Kitchen
22900 Northline
Taylor, MI 48180

510-550-6740
Pamela Gylling
3242 N. Longfellow Ave. , Tucson, AZ 857121023 

November 3, 2008   5:11 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Pamela Gylling
3242 N. Longfellow Ave.
Tucson, AZ 85712-1023

510-550-6740
Maureen Pisani
4704 Surrey Lane , Richmond, CA 94803 

November 3, 2008   5:11 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Maureen Pisani
4704 Surrey Lane
Richmond, CA 94803

510-550-6740
David Spero
2325 Casitas Way , Palm Springs, CA 922648219 

November 3, 2008   5:11 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
David Spero
2325 Casitas Way
Palm Springs, CA 92264-8219

510-550-6740
Rosamond Mitchell
1562 Crest Dr. , Fortuna, CA 95540 

November 3, 2008   5:11 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Rosamond Mitchell
1562 Crest Dr.
Fortuna, CA 95540

510-550-6740
Hugh O'Haire
570 E43rd Ave , Eugene, OR 97405 

November 3, 2008   5:11 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Hugh O'Haire
570 E43rd Ave
Eugene, OR 97405

510-550-6740
Karen Barnwell
7002 jade field , san antonio, TX 78240 

November 3, 2008   5:11 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Karen Barnwell
7002 jade field
san antonio, TX 78240

510-550-6740
Diane Petrillo
24665 Avenida Principal , Corral de Tierra, CA 939089308 

November 3, 2008   5:11 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Diane Petrillo
24665 Avenida Principal
Corral de Tierra, CA 93908-9308

510-550-6740
sylvia pearl
658 ridgewood rd , maplewood, NJ 07040 

November 3, 2008   5:11 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
sylvia pearl
658 ridgewood rd
maplewood, NJ 07040

510-550-6740
David Chastain
208 Arlo Todd Rd , Toccoa, GA 30577 

November 3, 2008   5:11 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
David Chastain
208 Arlo Todd Rd
Toccoa, GA 30577

510-550-6740
Barbara Elwell
5108 N.E. 37th Street , Kansas City, MO 64117 

November 3, 2008   5:11 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Barbara Elwell
5108 N.E. 37th Street
Kansas City, MO 64117

510-550-6740
Debra Hamilton
3886 Nowlin Rd. , Kennesaw, GA 30144 

November 3, 2008   5:11 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Debra Hamilton
3886 Nowlin Rd.
Kennesaw, GA 30144

510-550-6740
Dominique Arrieta
300 Scott Avenue , Nashville, TN 37206 

November 3, 2008   5:11 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Dominique Arrieta
300 Scott Avenue
Nashville, TN 37206

510-550-6740
Michael Lab
P.O. Box 1432 , Port Townsend, WA 98368 

November 3, 2008   5:11 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Michael Lab
P.O. Box 1432
Port Townsend, WA 98368

510-550-6740
Dan Vachon
76 Indigo Hill Road , Somersworth, NH 038782405 

November 3, 2008   5:11 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Dan Vachon
76 Indigo Hill Road
Somersworth, NH 03878-2405

510-550-6740
Jay Gassman
1919 Middle Country Road , Centereach, NY 11720 

November 3, 2008   5:11 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jay Gassman
1919 Middle Country Road
Centereach, NY 11720

510-550-6740
kate dahmen
26 farrar rd , lincoln, MA 01773 

November 3, 2008   5:11 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
kate dahmen
26 farrar rd
lincoln, MA 01773

510-550-6740
Rainbow Di Benedetto
909 E. Oltorf St. #101 , Austin, TX 78704 

November 3, 2008   5:11 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: It's Your Job to Protect Our Drinking Water

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Rainbow Di Benedetto
909 E. Oltorf St. #101
Austin, TX 78704

510-550-6740
Carolyn Spigel
"700 West End Avenue, #7D" , ny, NY 10025 

November 3, 2008   5:08 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Carolyn Spigel
"700 West End Avenue, #7D"
ny, NY 10025

510-550-6740
Kali Bronson
1814 Anderson Pl SE , Albuquerque, NM 87108 

November 3, 2008   5:08 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kali Bronson
1814 Anderson Pl SE
Albuquerque, NM 87108

510-550-6740
Laura Zeller
415 Westside Blvd. , Catonsville, MD 21228 

November 3, 2008   5:08 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Laura Zeller
415 Westside Blvd.
Catonsville, MD 21228

510-550-6740
Beth Cady
5300 Holmes Run Parkway #710, Alexandria, VA 22304 

November 3, 2008   5:08 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Beth Cady
5300 Holmes Run Parkway
#710
Alexandria, VA 22304

510-550-6740
Edward Carey
150-33 20th Road , Whitestone, NY 113573601 

November 3, 2008   5:08 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Edward Carey
150-33 20th Road
Whitestone, NY 11357-3601

510-550-6740
shaun woodson
625 center st. #202 , herndon, VA 20170 

November 3, 2008   5:08 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
shaun woodson
625 center st. #202
herndon, VA 20170

510-550-6740
Carolyn Davis
111 Lee Road 222  Lot 38 , Smiths, AL 36877 

November 3, 2008   5:08 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Carolyn Davis
111 Lee Road 222  Lot 38
Smiths, AL 36877

510-550-6740
Michelle Soule
910 Santa Fe Dr #202 , Denver, CO 80204 

November 3, 2008   5:08 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Michelle Soule
910 Santa Fe Dr #202
Denver, CO 80204

510-550-6740
Sheena Dean
212 Waverly Rd. , wyncote, PA 19095 

November 3, 2008   5:08 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Sheena Dean
212 Waverly Rd.
wyncote, PA 19095

510-550-6740
Mana Iluna
4415 145th Ave. NE H-2 , Bellevue, WA 98007 

November 3, 2008   5:08 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Mana Iluna
4415 145th Ave. NE H-2
Bellevue, WA 98007

510-550-6740
Louis Dolive
120 Dynamite Road , Staunton, VA 24401 

November 3, 2008   5:08 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Louis Dolive
120 Dynamite Road
Staunton, VA 24401

510-550-6740
Stacey Clayton
66261 Ave Suenos , Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240 

November 3, 2008   5:08 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Stacey Clayton
66261 Ave Suenos
Desert Hot Springs, CA 92240

510-550-6740
Calypso Hole
124 Live Oak Ave. No. 9, Daytona Beach, FL 32114 

November 3, 2008   5:08 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Calypso Hole
124 Live Oak Ave.
No. 9
Daytona Beach, FL 32114

510-550-6740
Diana Vest Goodman
123 Mendosa Avenue , San Francisco, CA 941161944 

November 3, 2008   5:06 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

Reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Many experts disagree with your assessment: 15 parts per billion of perchlorate = safe and acceptable. 

EPA's analysis overlooks the possibilty that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA.
It does not incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. 

Please remedy these flaws for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Diana Vest Goodman
123 Mendosa Avenue
San Francisco, CA 94116-1944

510-550-6740
Yoriko Nishi
1441 Veteran Avenue , Los Angeles, CA 90024 

November 3, 2008   5:06 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Yoriko Nishi
1441 Veteran Avenue
Los Angeles, CA 90024

510-550-6740
Emily Baron
202 San Vicente Blvd. #6 , Santa Monica, CA 90402 

November 3, 2008   5:06 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Emily Baron
202 San Vicente Blvd. #6
Santa Monica, CA 90402

510-550-6740
KImberly Baker
Box 21 , Orleans, CA 95556 

November 3, 2008   5:06 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
KImberly Baker
Box 21
Orleans, CA 95556

510-550-6740
jennifer ayers
2311  Rogge Ln , austin, TX 78723 

November 3, 2008   5:06 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
jennifer ayers
2311  Rogge Ln
austin, TX 78723

510-550-6740
Susannah Robbins
23 Woodbridge Way , Novato, CA 94949 

November 3, 2008   5:06 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Susannah Robbins
23 Woodbridge Way
Novato, CA 94949

510-550-6740
Warren G Jones
911 Maple Ave , Grafton, WV 26354 

November 3, 2008   5:06 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Warren G Jones
911 Maple Ave
Grafton, WV 26354

510-550-6740
Jim and Virginia Wagner
4897 E Walnut St , Westerville, OH 43081 

November 3, 2008   5:05 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

Virginia and I write today to urge you to reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination; and to urge you to set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our nation's food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Please note: Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. 

Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards that will ensure that the most vulnerable populations (pregnant women, infants, and small children) are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

Your, EPA's, analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. 

Nor do you incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. 

These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jim and Virginia Wagner
4897 E Walnut St
Westerville, OH 43081

510-550-6740
Barbara Woods
200 Riverside Drive , New York, NY 10025 

November 3, 2008   5:05 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Barbara Woods
200 Riverside Drive
New York, NY 10025

510-550-6740
Tedd Barnfield
2908 Carter Way , Antioch, CA 94509 

November 3, 2008   5:05 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Tedd Barnfield
2908 Carter Way
Antioch, CA 94509

510-550-6740
PATRICE SENA
1010 east Locust st. , PASADENA, CA 911065344 

November 3, 2008   5:05 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
PATRICE SENA
1010 east Locust st.
PASADENA, CA 91106-5344

510-550-6740
George Kacouris
6807 N. Milwaukee , Niles, IL 60714 

November 3, 2008   5:05 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
George Kacouris
6807 N. Milwaukee
Niles, IL 60714

510-550-6740
Graciela Lubertino
4377 Harvest , Houston, TX 77004 

November 3, 2008   5:05 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Graciela Lubertino
4377 Harvest
Houston, TX 77004

510-550-6740
Nicole Hopper
7421 S. La Rosa Dr. , Tempe, AZ 85283 

November 3, 2008   5:05 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Nicole Hopper
7421 S. La Rosa Dr.
Tempe, AZ 85283

510-550-6740
Johnny Asia
46 Rt. 214 , Phoenicia, NY 12464 

November 3, 2008   5:05 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Johnny Asia
46 Rt. 214
Phoenicia, NY 12464

510-550-6740
Caitlyn Park
1168 Carpenters Run Rd , Waverly, WV 26184 

November 3, 2008   5:05 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Caitlyn Park
1168 Carpenters Run Rd
Waverly, WV 26184

510-550-6740
M Gotovich
15 Cedar Ridge Drive , East Hampton, NY 11937 

November 3, 2008   5:05 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
M Gotovich
15 Cedar Ridge Drive
East Hampton, NY 11937

510-550-6740
Omar Marino
16 Merritt Ave , White Plains, NY 10606 

November 3, 2008   5:05 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Omar Marino
16 Merritt Ave
White Plains, NY 10606

510-550-6740
Benjamin Riley
22232 Wuertley Rd. , Summersville, MO 65571 

November 3, 2008   5:05 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Benjamin Riley
22232 Wuertley Rd.
Summersville, MO 65571

510-550-6740
John Dawes
20295 12th Avenue NE , Poulsbo, WA 98370 

November 3, 2008   5:05 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
John Dawes
20295 12th Avenue NE
Poulsbo, WA 98370

510-550-6740
Karen Green
1413 Oak Avenue , Manhattan Beach, CA 90266 

November 3, 2008   5:05 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Karen Green
1413 Oak Avenue
Manhattan Beach, CA 90266

510-550-6740
Stephanie Wilson
19274 E. 800th Ave , Willow Hill, IL 62480 

November 3, 2008   5:05 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Stephanie Wilson
19274 E. 800th Ave
Willow Hill, IL 62480

510-550-6740
david lafond
70 Brown Avenue , Holyoke, MA 010403502 

November 3, 2008   5:05 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
david lafond
70 Brown Avenue
Holyoke, MA 01040-3502

510-550-6740
Jennifer Boyce
1685 Tutwiler Ave , Memphis, TN 38107 

November 3, 2008   5:02 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jennifer Boyce
1685 Tutwiler Ave
Memphis, TN 38107

510-550-6740
Deborah Sparshott
104 E Hibiscus St , Port Isabel, TX 78597 

November 3, 2008   5:02 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Deborah Sparshott
104 E Hibiscus St
Port Isabel, TX 78597

510-550-6740
James Clemmer
5241 Whitewater Dr , Hickory, NC 28601 

November 3, 2008   5:02 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
James Clemmer
5241 Whitewater Dr
Hickory, NC 28601

510-550-6740
Lisa Brumby
35 Partridge Hill Road , Dudley, MA 01571 

November 3, 2008   5:02 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Lisa Brumby
35 Partridge Hill Road
Dudley, MA 01571

510-550-6740
Clint Landeen
380 S. Holly St. , Canby, OR 97013 

November 3, 2008   5:02 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Clint Landeen
380 S. Holly St.
Canby, OR 97013

510-550-6740
Cleta Ciulla
103 Gedney St. 6E , Nyack, NY 109602228 

November 3, 2008   5:02 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Cleta Ciulla
103 Gedney St. 6E
Nyack, NY 10960-2228

510-550-6740
Jenny Willingter
1107C Marconi Street , Houston, TX 770194207 

November 3, 2008   5:02 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jenny Willingter
1107C Marconi Street
Houston, TX 77019-4207

510-550-6740
Rael Nidess, M.D.
100 StoneCreek Drive Apt. 239, Marshall, TX 75672 

November 3, 2008   5:00 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Rael Nidess, M.D.
100 StoneCreek Drive
Apt. 239
Marshall, TX 75672

510-550-6740
Sara Snyder
364 8th street , Bohemia, NY 11716 

November 3, 2008   5:00 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Sara Snyder
364 8th street
Bohemia, NY 11716

510-550-6740
Judith Abel
Im Zimmerhof 10 , Basel, AE 4054 Switzerland

November 3, 2008   5:00 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Judith Abel
Im Zimmerhof 10
Basel, AE 4054

510-550-6740
Deb Merchant
5415 SW 149th Ave. , Beaverton, OR 97007 

November 3, 2008   5:00 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Deb Merchant
5415 SW 149th Ave.
Beaverton, OR 97007

510-550-6740
Andrea Harrow
732 Amador St. , Los Angeles, CA 90012 

November 3, 2008   4:59 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Andrea Harrow
732 Amador St.
Los Angeles, CA 90012

510-550-6740
William Stone
112 Rock Spring Court , Carrboro, NC 27510 

November 3, 2008   4:59 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
William Stone
112 Rock Spring Court
Carrboro, NC 27510

510-550-6740
Gerri Ricciardi
10 madonna lane , annandale, NJ 08801 

November 3, 2008   4:59 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Gerri Ricciardi
10 madonna lane
annandale, NJ 08801

510-550-6740
Kai Hally-Rosendahl
8450 Whale Watch Way , La Jolla, CA 92037 

November 3, 2008   4:59 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kai Hally-Rosendahl
8450 Whale Watch Way
La Jolla, CA 92037

510-550-6740
Keith Berger
690 Kingsbridge St. #15 , Boca Raton, FL 33487 

November 3, 2008   4:59 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Keith Berger
690 Kingsbridge St. #15
Boca Raton, FL 33487

510-550-6740
Barbaralynn Altorfer
628 Kissam Rd , Peekskill, NY 10566 

November 3, 2008   4:59 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Barbaralynn Altorfer
628 Kissam Rd
Peekskill, NY 10566

510-550-6740
Bradley A Harris
PO Box 11875 , Fort Smith, AR 72917 

November 3, 2008   4:58 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Bradley A Harris
PO Box 11875
Fort Smith, AR 72917

510-550-6740
Diane Hansen
26964 Mickelson Drive , Starbuck, MN 56381 

November 3, 2008   4:58 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Diane Hansen
26964 Mickelson Drive
Starbuck, MN 56381

510-550-6740
Jack Wilson
15470 White Vale Lane , Poway, CA 92064 

November 3, 2008   4:58 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jack Wilson
15470 White Vale Lane
Poway, CA 92064

510-550-6740
Mark Gotvald
528 Monti Circle , Pleasant Hill, CA 94523 

November 3, 2008   4:58 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Mark Gotvald
528 Monti Circle
Pleasant Hill, CA 94523

510-550-6740
marietta thompson
47947 Commercial St. , Oakridge, OR 97463 

November 3, 2008   4:58 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
marietta thompson
47947 Commercial St.
Oakridge, OR 97463

510-550-6740
Gary Myerson
18755 W. Bernardo Dr. #1126 , San Diego, CA 92127 

November 3, 2008   4:58 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Gary Myerson
18755 W. Bernardo Dr. #1126
San Diego, CA 92127

510-550-6740
Lyndsey Alm, P.E.
3439 Pierce Street N.E. , Minneapolis, MN 55418 

November 3, 2008   4:58 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Lyndsey Alm, P.E.
3439 Pierce Street N.E.
Minneapolis, MN 55418

510-550-6740
Rev. L. Barrie
15 Kulanihakoi St. , Kihei, HI 96753 

November 3, 2008   4:58 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Rev. L. Barrie
15 Kulanihakoi St.
Kihei, HI 96753

510-550-6740
Tamara Treuhardt
1405 E. 18th St. , Georgetown, TX 78626 

November 3, 2008   4:56 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Tamara Treuhardt
1405 E. 18th St.
Georgetown, TX 78626

510-550-6740
Kirby Cole
2727 Folsom St Apt 336 , Boulder, CO 80304 

November 3, 2008   4:56 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kirby Cole
2727 Folsom St Apt 336
Boulder, CO 80304

510-550-6740
Martha Milne
1764 Braman Av. , Fort Myers, FL 33901 

November 3, 2008   4:56 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Martha Milne
1764 Braman Av.
Fort Myers, FL 33901

510-550-6740
Hugh Seay
34 N Edgehill Ave , Dover, DE 19901 

November 3, 2008   4:56 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

PLEASE START PROTECTING PEOPLE INSTEAD OF CORPORATIONS!
I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Hugh Seay
34 N Edgehill Ave
Dover, DE 19901

510-550-6740
Carol Atwater
386 James Bowie Ct. , Alamo, CA 94507 

November 3, 2008   4:55 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Carol Atwater
386 James Bowie Ct.
Alamo, CA 94507

510-550-6740
Nancy Thompson
511 E 141st St , Hammond, IN 46327 

November 3, 2008   4:55 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Nancy Thompson
511 E 141st St
Hammond, IN 46327

510-550-6740
Jenny Ross
PO Box 10037 , Truckee, CA 96162 

November 3, 2008   4:55 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jenny Ross
PO Box 10037
Truckee, CA 96162

510-550-6740
Greg Puppione
1839 Poki St. #5 , Honolulu, HI 96822 

November 3, 2008   4:55 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Greg Puppione
1839 Poki St. #5
Honolulu, HI 96822

510-550-6740
chris grundstrom
291 Putnam St Apt L , san francisco, CA 94110 

November 3, 2008   4:55 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
chris grundstrom
291 Putnam St Apt L
san francisco, CA 94110

510-550-6740
Steve Barrett
3927 36th Ave Nw , Olympia, WA 98502 

November 3, 2008   4:55 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Steve Barrett
3927 36th Ave Nw
Olympia, WA 98502

510-550-6740
Karisha Kirk
3231 S Bradshire Court , Bloomington, IN 474018725 

November 3, 2008   4:55 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Please Stop the Perchlorate Contamination of Our WATER!

Dear Administrator Johnson,

This is upsetting and dangerously irresponsible: I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Karisha Kirk
3231 S Bradshire Court
Bloomington, IN 47401-8725

510-550-6740
James de Crescentis
791 Tremont St. Apt. W-402, Boston, MA 02118 

November 3, 2008   4:55 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
James de Crescentis
791 Tremont St.
Apt. W-402
Boston, MA 02118

510-550-6740
Kim Braun
2038 E. 18th Street , Tucson, AZ 85719 

November 3, 2008   4:54 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kim Braun
2038 E. 18th Street
Tucson, AZ 85719

510-550-6740
Vicky Ball
5669 Donna Dr , Ashtabula, OH 44004 

November 3, 2008   4:54 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Vicky Ball
5669 Donna Dr
Ashtabula, OH 44004

510-550-6740
Brad Holmes
6801 Bluffridge Lane , Indianapolis, IN 46278 

November 3, 2008   4:54 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Brad Holmes
6801 Bluffridge Lane
Indianapolis, IN 46278

510-550-6740
Carolynn Griffith
83 Nawiliwili St , Honolulu, HI 96825 

November 3, 2008   4:54 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Carolynn Griffith
83 Nawiliwili St
Honolulu, HI 96825

510-550-6740
KIRSTIN FLYNN
1041 ARLINGTON WAY , MARTINEZ, CA 94553 

November 3, 2008   4:54 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
KIRSTIN FLYNN
1041 ARLINGTON WAY
MARTINEZ, CA 94553

510-550-6740
Jeff Thompson
8905 Apache , Beulah, CO 81023 

November 3, 2008   4:53 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jeff Thompson
8905 Apache
Beulah, CO 81023

510-550-6740
Jessica Lam
1118 S Bedford St Apt 5, Los Angeles, CA 90035 

November 3, 2008   4:53 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jessica Lam
1118 S Bedford St
Apt 5
Los Angeles, CA 90035

510-550-6740
Richard DeNeale
3221 Essex Road PO Box 531, Willsboro, NY 12996 

November 3, 2008   4:53 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Richard DeNeale
3221 Essex Road
PO Box 531
Willsboro, NY 12996

510-550-6740
Theresa Andrews
4341 Edgewood Avenue , Oakland, CA 94602 

November 3, 2008   4:53 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Theresa Andrews
4341 Edgewood Avenue
Oakland, CA 94602

510-550-6740
MelodyEcho Thurlow
337 Shedd Road , Norway, ME 04268 

November 3, 2008   4:53 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
MelodyEcho Thurlow
337 Shedd Road
Norway, ME 04268

510-550-6740
Nancy Piotrowski
3450 Geary Boulevard Suite #107, San Francisco, CA 94118 

November 3, 2008   4:52 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Nancy Piotrowski
3450 Geary Boulevard
Suite #107
San Francisco, CA 94118

510-550-6740
David S. Nichols
5107 NE Couch Street , Portland, OR 97213 

November 3, 2008   4:52 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
David S. Nichols
5107 NE Couch Street
Portland, OR 97213

510-550-6740
Nancy Kassim Farran
262 Franklin Street , Brooklyn, NY 11222 

November 3, 2008   4:52 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination & Other Water Pollutants

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination. The Federal Government must rise to at least the states levels instead of undermining Water Pollution Protection.

Sincerely,
Nancy Kassim Farran
262 Franklin Street
Brooklyn, NY 11222

510-550-6740
Brad Wakeman
39194 State Route 303 , Grafton, OH 44044-9612 

November 3, 2008   4:52 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards that will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Brad Wakeman
39194 State Route 303
Grafton, OH 44044-9612

510-550-6740
A Lindstrom
10 Wells Ave , Amesbury, MA 01913 

November 3, 2008   4:51 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
A Lindstrom
10 Wells Ave
Amesbury, MA 01913

510-550-6740
Lindsay Johnson
421 Eagle Nest Drive , Chesterton, IN 46304 

November 3, 2008   4:51 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Lindsay Johnson
421 Eagle Nest Drive
Chesterton, IN 46304

510-550-6740
Lynda Hendrell
501 N. Evelyn Ave. , Tucson, AZ 857103059 

November 3, 2008   4:51 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

To put future generations at risk like this is insane. The health care system (assuming it can even be fixed) can't afford having larger and larger percentages of people who are chronically sick and disabled, even unable to work! I thought contaminated water was a third-world issue--silly me.

Sincerely,
Lynda Hendrell
501 N. Evelyn Ave.
Tucson, AZ 85710-3059

510-550-6740
Angelica Corpeno
143 E Grove st #2 , Lombard, IL 60148 

November 3, 2008   4:51 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Angelica Corpeno
143 E Grove st #2
Lombard, IL 60148

510-550-6740
Carol Otterstrom
5712 Southview Ct , Citrus Heights, CA 95610 

November 3, 2008   4:51 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Carol Otterstrom
5712 Southview Ct
Citrus Heights, CA 95610

510-550-6740
Alyce Strong
653 SW Cleveland Avenue , Stuart, FL 34994 

November 3, 2008   4:51 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Alyce Strong
653 SW Cleveland Avenue
Stuart, FL 34994

510-550-6740
Harvey Kaiser
50 Mohonk Rd , High Falls, NY 12440 

November 3, 2008   4:51 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Harvey Kaiser
50 Mohonk Rd
High Falls, NY 12440

510-550-6740
Linsday Marshall
1680 Randolph Ave , Saint Paul, MN 55105 

November 3, 2008   4:51 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Linsday Marshall
1680 Randolph Ave
Saint Paul, MN 55105

510-550-6740
lucas kolasa
270 morris ave , providence, RI 02906 

November 3, 2008   4:51 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
lucas kolasa
270 morris ave
providence, RI 02906

510-550-6740
WAVER BROERS
2810 SPIRAL CT , TAMPA, FL 336101454 

November 3, 2008   4:51 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
WAVER BROERS
2810 SPIRAL CT
TAMPA, FL 33610-1454

510-550-6740
Cynthia Byrd
68 Macondray Lane, #4 , San Francisco, CA 94133 

November 3, 2008   4:51 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Cynthia Byrd
68 Macondray Lane, #4
San Francisco, CA 94133

510-550-6740
Carol McWhirter
480 W Rosedale Rd , Doniphan, NE 68832 

November 3, 2008   4:51 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Carol McWhirter
480 W Rosedale Rd
Doniphan, NE 68832

510-550-6740
Michael Vecchio
7467 Wetherburn Way , Hudson, OH 44236 

November 3, 2008   4:51 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Michael Vecchio
7467 Wetherburn Way
Hudson, OH 44236

510-550-6740
Kathleen Tarlow
915 Sycamore Avenue , Modesto, CA 95350 

November 3, 2008   4:51 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kathleen Tarlow
915 Sycamore Avenue
Modesto, CA 95350

510-550-6740
Donna Laubhan
Box 369 , Booker, TX 79005 

November 3, 2008   4:51 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Donna Laubhan
Box 369
Booker, TX 79005

510-550-6740
Loretta Doona
681 4th Pl S , Garden City, NY 11530 

November 3, 2008   4:51 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Loretta Doona
681 4th Pl S
Garden City, NY 11530

510-550-6740
martha stampfer
7290 sayre drive , oakland, CA 94611 

November 3, 2008   4:51 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
martha stampfer
7290 sayre drive
oakland, CA 94611

510-550-6740
Theodore Scribner
1854 26th st. , Cuyahoga Falls, OH 44223 

November 3, 2008   4:48 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Theodore Scribner
1854 26th st.
Cuyahoga Falls, OH 44223

510-550-6740
liza connelly
60 glen road unit # T8, brookline, MA 02445 

November 3, 2008   4:48 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
liza connelly
60 glen road
unit # T8
brookline, MA 02445

510-550-6740
Marjorie Williams
3440 Vail Ave. Se #B , Albuquerque, NM 87106 

November 3, 2008   4:48 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Marjorie Williams
3440 Vail Ave. Se #B
Albuquerque, NM 87106

510-550-6740
Gerard Rohlf
503 Greendale Avenue , Pittsburgh, PA 15218 

November 3, 2008   4:48 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Gerard Rohlf
503 Greendale Avenue
Pittsburgh, PA 15218

510-550-6740
Adrienne Moumin
2807 Byron St. , Silver Spring, MD 20902 

November 3, 2008   4:48 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Adrienne Moumin
2807 Byron St.
Silver Spring, MD 20902

510-550-6740
HENRY D'SILVA
6 JEFFERSON CT. , NEWTOWN, PA 18940 

November 3, 2008   4:48 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
HENRY D'SILVA
6 JEFFERSON CT.
NEWTOWN, PA 18940

510-550-6740
Scott Fields
5771 Campanella Pl. , Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739 

November 3, 2008   4:48 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Scott Fields
5771 Campanella Pl.
Rancho Cucamonga, CA 91739

510-550-6740
mary quinn
1520 fairmount ave , saint paul, MN 55105 

November 3, 2008   4:48 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
mary quinn
1520 fairmount ave
saint paul, MN 55105

510-550-6740
Marc Garrett
103 Waverly Pl , New York, NY 10011 

November 3, 2008   4:47 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Marc Garrett
103 Waverly Pl
New York, NY 10011

510-550-6740
Blythe Lowry
104 Brookfield Terrace , Ardmore, PA 19003 

November 3, 2008   4:47 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Blythe Lowry
104 Brookfield Terrace
Ardmore, PA 19003

510-550-6740
Dr. Ed Feraco
PO Box 223 , Old Mystic, CT 063720223 

November 3, 2008   4:47 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Dr. Ed Feraco
PO Box 223
Old Mystic, CT 06372-0223

510-550-6740
A. D. Coleman
465 Van Duzer St. , Staten Island, NY 10304 

November 3, 2008   4:47 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
A. D. Coleman
465 Van Duzer St.
Staten Island, NY 10304

510-550-6740
Carrie England
179 Front Drive , Winchester, VA 22602 

November 3, 2008   4:47 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Carrie England
179 Front Drive
Winchester, VA 22602

510-550-6740
Ruth Case
1055 Casitas Pass Rd. #204 , Carpinteria, CA 930132127 

November 3, 2008   4:47 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Ruth Case
1055 Casitas Pass Rd. #204
Carpinteria, CA 93013-2127

510-550-6740
Lisa LaDore
180 Halstead Ave C2 , Harrison, NY 10528 

November 3, 2008   4:47 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Lisa LaDore
180 Halstead Ave C2
Harrison, NY 10528

510-550-6740
Clint Chamberlain
3200 South First St. #922, Austin, TX 78704 

November 3, 2008   4:47 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Clint Chamberlain
3200 South First St.
#922
Austin, TX 78704

510-550-6740
michael maggied
2240 east arbor circle , Mesa, AZ 85204 

November 3, 2008   4:47 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
michael maggied
2240 east arbor circle
Mesa, AZ 85204

510-550-6740
Dirk Meenen
2312 Teviot St , Los Angeles, CA 90039 

November 3, 2008   4:47 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Dirk Meenen
2312 Teviot St
Los Angeles, CA 90039

510-550-6740
Olivia Latiano
414 Fulton Street , Sandusky, OH 44870 

November 3, 2008   4:46 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Olivia Latiano
414 Fulton Street
Sandusky, OH 44870

510-550-6740
Lynne H-Crick
5044 Park Rim Dr. , San Diego, CA 92117 

November 3, 2008   4:46 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Lynne H-Crick
5044 Park Rim Dr.
San Diego, CA 92117

510-550-6740
Lee Ritscher
3080 Crumpton Ln 14 , Marina, CA 93933 

November 3, 2008   4:46 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Lee Ritscher
3080 Crumpton Ln 14
Marina, CA 93933

510-550-6740
Sarah Oswald
321 Wilson St A204, Hollywood, FL 33019 

November 3, 2008   4:46 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Sarah Oswald
321 Wilson St
A204
Hollywood, FL 33019

510-550-6740
Randy Eastman
2205 Bonnie Doon Ave , Yakima, WA 98902 

November 3, 2008   4:46 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Randy Eastman
2205 Bonnie Doon Ave
Yakima, WA 98902

510-550-6740
Jane Myers Drew
6 Swift Court , Newport Beach, CA 92663 

November 3, 2008   4:46 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Jane Myers Drew
6 Swift Court
Newport Beach, CA 92663

510-550-6740
allison Knabb
474 James st , Phillipsburg, NJ 08865 

November 3, 2008   4:46 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
allison Knabb
474 James st
Phillipsburg, NJ 08865

510-550-6740
Ken-Donna Bubb
7710 N. Napa St. , Spokane, WA 99217 

November 3, 2008   4:46 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Ken-Donna Bubb
7710 N. Napa St.
Spokane, WA 99217

510-550-6740
Mary and Tom Reed
3900 Bones Road , Sebastopol, CA 95472 

November 3, 2008   4:46 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Mary and Tom Reed
3900 Bones Road
Sebastopol, CA 95472

510-550-6740
Mary McMahon
1750 Quarry Rd. , Yardley, PA 19067 

November 3, 2008   4:46 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Mary McMahon
1750 Quarry Rd.
Yardley, PA 19067

510-550-6740
Linda Drescher
9 S. Holman Way , Golden, CO 80401 

November 3, 2008   4:46 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Linda Drescher
9 S. Holman Way
Golden, CO 80401

510-550-6740
Martin Mendelsohn
303 Brooke Ave  # 203 , Norfolk, VA 23510 

November 3, 2008   4:44 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Martin Mendelsohn
303 Brooke Ave  # 203
Norfolk, VA 23510

510-550-6740
Rachel Clarke
2939 Wycliff Road , Raleigh, NC 27607 

November 3, 2008   4:44 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Rachel Clarke
2939 Wycliff Road
Raleigh, NC 27607

510-550-6740
Randy Harrison
4051 Wagner Street , Eugene, OR 97402 

November 3, 2008   4:44 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Randy Harrison
4051 Wagner Street
Eugene, OR 97402

510-550-6740
timon thompson
3216 walton , ft.worth, TX 76133 

November 3, 2008   4:44 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
timon thompson
3216 walton
ft.worth, TX 76133

510-550-6740
Rajan Dosaj
6039 Allott Ave. , Van Nuys, CA 91401 

November 3, 2008   4:44 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Rajan Dosaj
6039 Allott Ave.
Van Nuys, CA 91401

510-550-6740
Matthijs Koopmans
525 West 238 Street, Apt. 4A , Bronx, NY 10463 

November 3, 2008   4:44 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Matthijs Koopmans
525 West 238 Street, Apt. 4A
Bronx, NY 10463

510-550-6740
Andrea Groppe
661 Davis Lane , WAYNE, PA 19087 

November 3, 2008   4:44 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Andrea Groppe
661 Davis Lane
WAYNE, PA 19087

510-550-6740
Victoria Hall
254 Meetinghouse Rd. , Gilmanton, NH 03237 

November 3, 2008   4:44 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Victoria Hall
254 Meetinghouse Rd.
Gilmanton, NH 03237

510-550-6740
David Warren
Box 34681 , North Kansas City, MO 64116 

November 3, 2008   4:44 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
David Warren
Box 34681
North Kansas City, MO 64116

510-550-6740
Tammy Bowden
984 West Street , attleboro, MA 02703 

November 3, 2008   4:44 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Tammy Bowden
984 West Street
attleboro, MA 02703

510-550-6740
Alan Furchtenicht
6617 Montclair Lane , Madison, WI 53711 

November 3, 2008   4:44 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Alan Furchtenicht
6617 Montclair Lane
Madison, WI 53711

510-550-6740
Regina Barnes
7810 Trading Post Lane , Millington, TN 38053 

November 3, 2008   4:41 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Regina Barnes
7810 Trading Post Lane
Millington, TN 38053

510-550-6740
Trina McCarty
919 West MacArthur , Bloomington, IL 61701 

November 3, 2008   4:41 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Trina McCarty
919 West MacArthur
Bloomington, IL 61701

510-550-6740
eden jasper
4 manhattan ave 2a, new york, NY 10025 

November 3, 2008   4:41 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
eden jasper
4 manhattan ave
2a
new york, NY 10025

510-550-6740
Fen Taylor
784 Crosswind Lane , Lindenhurst, IL 60046 

November 3, 2008   4:41 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Fen Taylor
784 Crosswind Lane
Lindenhurst, IL 60046

510-550-6740
Karen Marcus
1050 N. taylor street , Arlington, VA 22201 

November 3, 2008   4:41 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Karen Marcus
1050 N. taylor street
Arlington, VA 22201

510-550-6740
Christina Maris
7553 Isleta Boulevard SW #1 , Albuquerque, NM 87105 

November 3, 2008   4:41 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Christina Maris
7553 Isleta Boulevard SW #1
Albuquerque, NM 87105

510-550-6740
Louise Heck
126 Homeland Ave. , Baltimore, MD 21212 

November 3, 2008   4:41 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Louise Heck
126 Homeland Ave.
Baltimore, MD 21212

510-550-6740
Kimberley Harris
5355 Cochran St. #201 , Simi Valley, CA 93063 

November 3, 2008   4:41 PM

Administrator Stephen L. Johnson
1101A EPA Headquarters
1200 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW, Ariel Rios Building
Washington, DC 20460

Subject: Protect Our Drinking Water From Perchlorate Contamination

Dear Administrator Johnson,

I am writing to urge you reverse EPA's preliminary regulatory determination and set a protective drinking water standard for perchlorate as required by the Safe Drinking Water Act.   

Perchlorate contamination in our food and water supplies is too widespread, and its toxic effects too well known, for continued inaction on this problem. 

Many experts disagree with your assessment that drinking water with 15 parts per billion of perchlorate is safe and acceptable. Scientists from the California Environmental Protection Agency and the Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection have set stricter standards to will ensure that the most vulnerable populations -- pregnant women, infants, and small children -- are protected from the adverse impacts of perchlorate.  

EPA's analysis fails to consider that the combination of food and drinking water exposure to perchlorate in the U.S. population exceeds the reference dose set by EPA. Nor does it incorporate the more protective methodology behind the recent state regulatory actions. These flaws must be remedied for the sake of the millions of U.S. families exposed to dangerous levels of perchlorate contamination.

Sincerely,
Kimberley Harris
5355 Cochran St. #201
Simi Valley, CA 93063