skip navigation
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Login | Subscribe/Register | Manage Account | Shopping Cartshopping cart icon | Help | Contact Us | Home     
National Criminal Justice Reference Service
  Advanced Search
Search Help
     
| | | | |
place holder
Administered by the Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service National Criminal Justice Reference Service Office of Justice Programs Seal National Criminal Justice Reference Service
Topics
A-Z Topics
Corrections
Courts
Crime
Crime Prevention
Drugs
Justice System
Juvenile Justice
Law Enforcement
Victims
Left Nav Bottom Line
Home / NCJRS Abstract

Publications
 

NCJRS Abstract


The document referenced below is part of the NCJRS Library collection.
To conduct further searches of the collection, visit the NCJRS Abstracts Database.

How to Obtain Documents
 
NCJ Number: NCJ 121212  
Title: Liquid Gloves and Latent Fingerprint Detection
Journal: Journal of Forensic Identification  Volume:40  Issue:1  Dated:(January/February 1990)  Pages:23-27
Author(s): G Grimoldi ; C J Lennard ; P A Margot
Publication Date: 1990
Pages: 5
Type: Technical reports
Origin: United States
Language: English
Annotation: Two commercial "liquid glove" products, Marlyskin and Metaflux-Manuprotect, were tested to determine the effect of hand treatment on latent fingerprint detection.
Abstract: Marlyskin, developed by Swedish chemists, consists of a stearate-propylene-glycerol-sorbitol polymer which reinforces the corneous layer of the epiderm. No information could be obtained on the composition of Metaflux-Manuprotect, produced by a Swiss company. Latent fingerprints were deposited on paper, plastic, and glass surfaces by a donor 30 minutes after the hands had been washed with soap and water, rinsed, and dried. The hands were again washed and dried and then treated with the "liquid glove" formulation. Half an hour after treatment, a second set of latent fingerprints was deposited on the same surfaces. Two days after being deposited, the latent prints were developed using conventional fingerprint detection techniques for print visualization. Prints deposited after treatment with "liquid gloves" were developed in a manner similar to normal latent prints deposited before the hand treatment. No significant differences in the sensitivity or quality of fingerprint detail were observed. The two "liquid glove" formulations both behaved in a similar manner, and did not appear to affect the quality and nature of fingerprint deposits. 5 figures.
Main Term(s): Latent fingerprints
Index Term(s): Suspect identification ; Investigative techniques ; Fingerprint image quality
 
To cite this abstract, use the following link:
http://www.ncjrs.gov/App/Publications/abstract.aspx?ID=121212

* A link to the full-text document is provided whenever possible. For documents not available online, a link to the publisher's web site is provided.


Contact Us | Feedback | Site Map
Freedom of Information Act | Privacy Statement | Legal Policies and Disclaimers | USA.gov

U.S. Department of Justice | Office of Justice Programs | Office of National Drug Control Policy

place holder