pmc logo imageJournal ListSearchpmc logo image
Logo of oenvmedJournal URL: redirect3.cgi?&&auth=0N34ufoEdE5Ccyr5JlwvSV8uiQfrN6Zfu4OwYZAy8&reftype=publisher&artid=1740569&article-id=1740569&iid=139869&issue-id=139869&jid=172&journal-id=172&FROM=Article|Banner&TO=Publisher|Other|N%2FA&rendering-type=normal&&http://oem.bmj.com/
Occup Environ Med. 2003 July; 60(7): 521–527.
doi: 10.1136/oem.60.7.521.
PMCID: PMC1740569
Cancer risk around the nuclear power plants of Trillo and Zorita (Spain)
A Silva-Mato, D Viana, M Fernandez-SanMart..., J Cobos, and M Viana
Department of Sanitary and Socio-Medical Sciences, Area of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Biostatistics and Epidemiology Units, University of Alcalá, Madrid, Spain. Email: agustin.silva/at/uah.es
Abstract
Aim: To investigate the association between cancer risk and proximity of place of residence to the Guadalajara nuclear power plants: Trillo and Zorita.

Methods: Case-control study. Cases were patients admitted with cancer and controls were non-tumorous patients, both admitted to Guadalajara Hospital (period 1988–99). Exposure factor: place of residence (areas within 10, 20, and 30 km of each plant). Odds ratios (ORs) of those areas closest to the plants were calculated with respect to those furthest away; a linear trend analysis was also performed.

Results: In the extreme areas in the vicinity of Trillo, an OR of 1.71 was obtained (95% CI 1.15 to 2.53), increasing in magnitude in the subgroup of more radioinducible tumours and in the period considered as post-latency (1997–99). Risk increased linearly with proximity to the two plants, significantly in Trillo (p < 0.01) but not in Zorita (p = 0.19).

Conclusions: There is an association between proximity of residence to Trillo and cancer risk, although the limitations of the study should be kept in mind when interpreting the possible causal relation.

Full Text
The Full Text of this article is available as a PDF (188K).
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Hoel, DG; Li, P. Threshold models in radiation carcinogenesis. Health Phys. 1998 Sep;75(3):241–250. [PubMed]
  • Mossman, KL. The linear no-threshold debate: where do we go from here? Med Phys. 1998 Mar;25(3):279–300. [PubMed]
  • Little, MP; Muirhead, CR. Curvature in the cancer mortality dose response in Japanese atomic bomb survivors: absence of evidence of threshold. Int J Radiat Biol. 1998 Oct;74(4):471–480. [PubMed]
  • Schmitz-Feuerhake, I; Dannheim, B; Heimers, A; Oberheitmann, B; Schröder, H; Ziggel, H. Leukemia in the proximity of a German boiling-water nuclear reactor: evidence of population exposure by chromosome studies and environmental radioactivity. Environ Health Perspect. 1997 Dec;105 Suppl 6:1499–1504. [PubMed]
  • Cook-Mozaffari, PJ; Darby, SC; Doll, R; Forman, D; Hermon, C; Pike, MC; Vincent, T. Geographical variation in mortality from leukaemia and other cancers in England and Wales in relation to proximity to nuclear installations, 1969-78. Br J Cancer. 1989 Mar;59(3):476–485. [PubMed]
  • Bithell, JF; Dutton, SJ; Draper, GJ; Neary, NM. Distribution of childhood leukaemias and non-Hodgkin's lymphomas near nuclear installations in England and Wales. BMJ. 309(6953):501–505. [PubMed]
  • Black, RJ; Sharp, L; Harkness, EF; McKinney, PA. Leukaemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: incidence in children and young adults resident in the Dounreay area of Caithness, Scotland in 1968-91. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1994 Jun;48(3):232–236. [PubMed]
  • Pobel, D; Viel, JF. Case-control study of leukaemia among young people near La Hague nuclear reprocessing plant: the environmental hypothesis revisited. BMJ. 1997 Jan 11;314(7074):101–106. [PubMed]
  • Morris, MS; Knorr, RS. Adult leukemia and proximity-based surrogates for exposure to Pilgrim plant's nuclear emissions. Arch Environ Health. 1996 51(4):266–274.Jul–Aug; [PubMed]
  • Sharp, L; McKinney, PA; Black, RJ. Incidence of childhood brain and other non-haematopoietic neoplasms near nuclear sites in Scotland, 1975-94. Occup Environ Med. 1999 May;56(5):308–314. [PubMed]
  • Gulis, G; Fitz, O. Cancer incidence around the Nuclear Power Plant Jaslovské Bohunice. Cent Eur J Public Health. 1998 Aug;6(3):183–187. [PubMed]
  • Draper, GJ; Stiller, CA; Cartwright, RA; Craft, AW; Vincent, TJ. Cancer in Cumbria and in the vicinity of the Sellafield nuclear installation, 1963-90. BMJ. 1993 Jan 9;306(6870):89–94. [PubMed]
  • Mangano, JJ. Cancer mortality near Oak Ridge, Tennessee. Int J Health Serv. 1994;24(3):521–533. [PubMed]
  • Sharp, L; Black, RJ; Harkness, EF; McKinney, PA. Incidence of childhood leukaemia and non-Hodgkin's lymphoma in the vicinity of nuclear sites in Scotland, 1968-93. Occup Environ Med. 1996 Dec;53(12):823–831. [PubMed]
  • Hattchouel, JM; Laplanche, A; Hill, C. Cancer mortality around French nuclear sites. Ann Epidemiol. 1996 Mar;6(2):126–129. [PubMed]
  • Kaatsch, P; Kaletsch, U; Meinert, R; Michaelis, J. An extended study on childhood malignancies in the vicinity of German nuclear power plants. Cancer Causes Control. 1998 Oct;9(5):529–533. [PubMed]
  • López-Abente, G; Aragonés, N; Pollán, M; Ruiz, M; Gandarillas, A. Leukemia, lymphomas, and myeloma mortality in the vicinity of nuclear power plants and nuclear fuel facilities in Spain. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 1999 Oct;8(10):925–934. [PubMed]
  • Pierce, DA; Shimizu, Y; Preston, DL; Vaeth, M; Mabuchi, K. Studies of the mortality of atomic bomb survivors. Report 12, Part I. Cancer: 1950-1990. Radiat Res. 1996 Jul;146(1):1–27. [PubMed]
  • Ivanov, VK; Rastopchin, EM; Gorsky, AI; Ryvkin, VB. Cancer incidence among liquidators of the Chernobyl accident: solid tumors, 1986-1995. Health Phys. 1998 Mar;74(3):309–315. [PubMed]
  • Kusiak, RA; Ritchie, AC; Muller, J; Springer, J. Mortality from lung cancer in Ontario uranium miners. Br J Ind Med. 1993 Oct;50(10):920–928. [PubMed]
  • Shleien, B; Ruttenber, AJ; Sage, M. Epidemiologic studies of cancer in populations near nuclear facilities. Health Phys. 1991 Dec;61(6):699–713. [PubMed]