pmc logo imageJournal ListSearchpmc logo image
Logo of jphysiolThe Journal of Physiology SiteMembershipSubmissionJ Physiol
J Physiol. 1976 September; 260(3): 497–514.
PMCID: PMC1309107
Increment sensitivity in humans with abnormal visual experience.
B L Beyerstein and R D Freeman
Abstract
1. Visual acuity is lower for gratings oriented diagonally than for those of horizontal and vertical orientations. In addition to this oblique effect, some subjects show substantial deficits in acuity for horizontal or vertical targets (meridional amblyopia). These subjects are invariably astigmatic, but the condition has a neuronal basis and is thought to arise from faulty post-natal neural development. 2. Foveal increment sensitivites have been determined for normal subjects and meridional amblyopes using bar-shaped targets of various lengths, widths and orientations.3. Normal subjects do not exhibit differences in sensitivity as a function of orientation. No oblique effect is found for 1-5' wide bars ranging in length from 10 to 60'. On the other hand, meridional amblyopes have substantial differences in increment sensitivity which depend on test target orientation. Invariably, when there is a deficit in acuity for a particular grating orientation, there is also a reduction in increment sensitivity for a bar of the same orientation. This effect is diminshed or eliminated when the background illuminance is lowered from 70 to 7td. 4. The orientational differences in increment sensitivity found in meridional amblyopes do not increases for bars longer than about 10'. As the bar is shortened, the differences are reduced, and they are absent when the test bar is 6' or less. 5. In normal subjects, for a 1 degree long bar, increment sensitivity increases with width up to about 4' where the width-sensitivity curve levels off. No orientation differences are exhibited. Prominent orientation differences are found with meridional amblyopes when the bar target width is altered. The normal meridian is similar to those of the control subjects but the deficity meridian has very low sensitivity and summation is present for widths up to about 11'.
Full text
Full text is available as a scanned copy of the original print version. Get a printable copy (PDF file) of the complete article (1.5M), or click on a page image below to browse page by page. Links to PubMed are also available for Selected References.
Selected References
These references are in PubMed. This may not be the complete list of references from this article.
  • Andrews, DP. Perception of contour orientation in the central fovea. II. Spatial integration. Vision Res. 1967 Nov;7(11):999–1013. [PubMed]
  • BARLOW, HB. Increment thresholds at low intensities considered as signal/noise discriminations. J Physiol. 1957 May 23;136(3):469–488. [PubMed]
  • BARLOW, HB; FITZHUGH, R; KUFFLER, SW. Change of organization in the receptive fields of the cat's retina during dark adaptation. J Physiol. 1957 Aug 6;137(3):338–354. [PubMed]
  • Barlow, HB; Levick, WR. Changes in the maintained discharge with adaptation level in the cat retina. J Physiol. 1969 Jun;202(3):699–718. [PubMed]
  • BOUMAN, MA. Visual thresholds for line-shaped targets. J Opt Soc Am. 1953 Mar;43(3):209–211. [PubMed]
  • CORNSWEET, TN. The staircrase-method in psychophysics. Am J Psychol. 1962 Sep;75:485–491. [PubMed]
  • Flynn, JT. Spatial summation in amblyopia. Arch Ophthalmol. 1967 Oct;78(4):470–474. [PubMed]
  • Freeman, RD. Contrast sensitivity in meridional amblyopia. Invest Ophthalmol. 1975 Jan;14(1):78–81. [PubMed]
  • Freeman, RD. Asymmetries in human accomodation and visual experience. Vision Res. 1975 Apr;15(4):483–492. [PubMed]
  • Freeman, RD; Mitchell, DE; Millodot, M. A neural effect of partial visual deprivation in humans. Science. 1972 Mar 24;175(28):1384–1386. [PubMed]
  • Freeman, RD; Thibos, LN. Electrophysiological evidence that abnormal early visual experience can modify the human brain. Science. 1973 May 25;180(88):876–878. [PubMed]
  • Freedman, RD; Thibos, LN. Contrast sensitivity in humans with abnormal visual experience. J Physiol. 1975 Jun;247(3):687–710. [PubMed]
  • Freeman, RD; Thibos, LN. Visual evoked responses in humans with abnormal visual experience. J Physiol. 1975 Jun;247(3):711–724. [PubMed]
  • LEIBOWITZ, H. Some observations and theory on the variation of visual acuity with the orientation of the test object. J Opt Soc Am. 1953 Oct;43(10):902–905. [PubMed]
  • MILLER, EF. The nature and cause of impaired vision in the amblyopic eye of a squinter. Am J Optom Arch Am Acad Optom. 1954 Dec;31(12):615–623. [PubMed]
  • Mitchell, DE; Freeman, RD; Millodot, M; Haegerstrom, G. Meridional amblyopia: evidence for modification of the human visual system by early visual experience. Vision Res. 1973 Mar;13(3):535–558. [PubMed]
  • Mithcell, DE; Wilkinson, F. The effect of early astigmatism on the visual resolution of gratings. J Physiol. 1974 Dec;243(3):739–756. [PubMed]
  • Rentschler, I; Fiorentini, A. Meridional anisotrophy of psychophysical spatial interactions. Vision Res. 1974 Dec;14(12):1467–1475. [PubMed]
  • RUSHTON, WA. The difference spectrum and the photosensitivity of rhodopsin in the living human eye. J Physiol. 1956 Oct 29;134(1):11–29. [PubMed]
  • Wiesel, TN; Hubel, DH. Spatial and chromatic interactions in the lateral geniculate body of the rhesus monkey. J Neurophysiol. 1966 Nov;29(6):1115–1156. [PubMed]