Skip navigation
NOAA's National Centers for Coastal Ocean Science
Science Serving Coastal Communities
Home
About Us
Mission & Strategy
NCCOS Centers
Organization
Staff Locator
News & Features
Feature Stories
Press Releases
Q&As
Research
Search by Location
Search by Stressor
Search by Ecosystem
Advanced Search
Publications & Products
Recent Publications
Entire Collection
Peer-Reviewed
Non Peer-Reviewed
Data
Stressors
Climate Change
Extreme Natural Events
Invasive Species
Land & Resource Use
Pollution
Ecosystems
Coastal Oceans
Coral Reefs
Estuaries
Marine Sanctuaries
Opportunities
For Students
Postgrads & Job Seekers
Volunteers
Funding
Publications & Products
Search Publications/Products Database
Popular Requests
Entire Collection
Peer-Reviewed
Non Peer-Reviewed
General Information
Contact Us
Site Map
Search
You are here:
Home
›
Publications & Products
› Search
Publications & Products
Top Ten Publications
View Entire Collection
NOAA Central Library
Author Analytic:
Uhrin, A. V. ,J. G. Holmquist
Title Analytic:
Effects of Propeller Scarring on Macrofaunal Use of the Seagrass Thalassia testudinum
Journal Title:
Marine Ecology Progress Series
Date of Publication:
2003
Volume ID:
250
Location In Work:
61-70
Keywords:
Propeller scarring, edge, Thalassia testudinum, Decapoda, Shrimp, Fish, Mollusc, Land and Resource Use
Stressor:
Resource and land use
Availability:
Contact author
Type:
Journal Article
Abstract:
Damage to seagrasses by propeller scarring is common in coastal waters. Scarring has the potential to fragment seagrass beds resulting in habitat loss, decreased productivity, and the possibility for further erosion and degradation. A study was conducted in Thalassia testudinum beds in Puerto Rico to determine how seagrass plants, associated fauna, and physical processes are affected by this disturbance. Four treatments (propeller scar, seagrass/scar interface, and seagrass located 5 and 10 m from scars) were compared among 10 replicate seagrass beds. Scarring modified the faunal assemblage at the scale of the propeller-created gap; there was significantly lower total faunal abundance and fewer faunal species in scars. When individual taxa were considered, shrimp and mollusc abundances were significantly lower in scars. Resident fish abundance was not significantly different among treatments. Dominant shrimp species in scars differed from seagrass treatments. Crabs and molluscs responded negatively to scarring as indicated by significantly lower densities of these two taxa up to 5 m from scars. The extent to which these results scale up remains unknown and future studies should focus on larger, more intensely scarred areas.
New Search