text-based alphabetical index Skip to content
StaffDirectory Search
Home
AboutNAS
ResearchNTechnology
CurrentResearch
PapersNReports
SearchAllReports
browse technical reports
BrowseGrantReports
BrowseConfPapers
Software
SampleDatasets
UserServices
ContactUs
Feedback
Sitemap
Help

technical reports

Dynamical Approach Study of Spurious Steady-State Numerical Solutions of Nonlinear Differential Equations

H.C. Yee and P.K.Sweby

RNR Technical Report
RNR-92-008 February 1992

Abstract

The global asymptotic nonlinear behavior of 11 explicit and implicit time discretizations for four 2 * 2 systems of first-order autonomous nonlinear ordinary differential equations (ODEs) is analyzed. The objectives are to gain a basic understanding of the difference in the dynamics of numerics between the scalars and systems of nonlinear autonomous ODEs and to set a baseline global asymptotic solution behavior of these schemes for practical computations in computational fluid dynamics. We show how ``numerical'' basins of attraction can complement the bifurcation diagrams in gaining more detailed global asymptotic behavior of time discretizations for nonlinear differential equations (DEs). We show how in the presence of spurious asymptotes the basins of the true stable steady states can be segmented by the basins of the spurious stable and unstable asymptotes. One major consequence of this phenomenon which is not commonly known is that this spurious behavior can result in a dramatic distortion and, in most cases, a dramatic shrinkage and segmentation of the basin of attraction of the true solution for finite time steps. Such distortion, shrinkage and segmentation of the numerical basins of attraction will occur regardless of the stability of the spurious asymptotes, and will occur for unconditionally stable implicit linear multistep methods. In other words, for the same (common) steady-state solution the associated basin of attraction of the DE might be very different from the discretized counterparts and the numerical basin of attraction can be very different from numerical method to numerical method. The results can be used as an explanation for possible causes of error, and slow convergence and nonconvergence of steady-state numerical solutions when using the time-dependent approach for nonlinear hyperbolic or parabolic PDEs.

To view the full report:
Postscript Version -254k

PDF Version -221k

To read this file you will need the free Adobe Acrobat Reader.

Graphics from this paper

Curator: Jill Dunbar
Last Update: November 27, 2001
NASA Official: Walt Brooks