******************************************************** NOTICE ******************************************************** This document was converted from WordPerfect or Word to ASCII Text format. Content from the original version of the document such as headers, footers, footnotes, endnotes, graphics, and page numbers will not show up in this text version. All text attributes such as bold, italic, underlining, etc. from the original document will not show up in this text version. Features of the original document layout such as columns, tables, line and letter spacing, pagination, and margins will not be preserved in the text version. If you need the complete document, download the WordPerfect version or Adobe Acrobat version, if available. ***************************************************************** Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In re Application of ) ) GTE, CORPORATION, ) Transferor, ) ) And ) CC Docket No. 98-184 ) BELL ATLANTIC CORPORATION, ) Transferee ) ) For Consent to Transfer Control of Domestic ) And International Section 214 and 310 ) Authorizations and Applications to Transfer ) Control of a Submarine Cable Landing License ) ORDER Adopted: August 31, 2001 Released: August 31, 2001 By the Chief, Policy and Program Planning Division I. INTRODUCTION 1. On July 10, 2001, Verizon requested the Commission's permission to allow Verizon Pennsylvania Inc. (Verizon) and Verizon Advanced Data Inc. (VADI) to cooperate to provide digital subscriber loop (xDSL) service for resale over resold voice lines in Pennsylvania prior to the scheduled sunset of the advanced services affiliate requirement contained in the Bell Atlantic-GTE Merger Order. For the reasons explained below, we grant Verizon's request to the extent described herein. II. BACKGROUND 2. As an initial matter, we note that as a result of the ASCENT v. FCC ruling, Verizon may elect, at the end of a nine-month period, to reintegrate its separate advanced services affiliate into the Bell Operating Company (BOC). Verizon has submitted a letter requesting permission to reintegrate its advanced services subsidiary prior to the end of the nine-month period. Pending the Commission's action on this request, Verizon seeks Special Temporary Authority (STA) to offer for resale xDSL service over resold lines in Pennsylvania. We granted Verizon a STA to provide its resold xDSL offering in Connecticut. III. DISCUSSION 3. In determining whether to grant Verizon a STA, we look at whether the proposed action will serve the public interest, convenience and necessity. Like in Connecticut, Verizon argues that should it receive a STA, it would broaden its resale xDSL offering in the former Bell Atlantic service areas in Pennsylvania to include a service that will allow a competitor to resell VADI's xDSL service over lines on which the competitor currently resells Verizon's voice service. The new service will be provided pursuant to an amendment to VADI's federal tariff. Verizon states that this is an interim arrangement until a more permanent arrangement can be developed through collaboratives and the change management process. 4. Verizon states that in order to provision a competitor's order to resell VADI's xDSL service over lines on which the competitor currently resells Verizon's voice service, VADI and Verizon will need to access each other's systems and data, and interact in ways that Verizon acknowledges are arguably prohibited by the Bell Atlantic-GTE Merger Order. Verizon, therefore, seeks both a permanent waiver of certain Merger Conditions and a STA so that it may immediately take any and all steps necessary to process orders for and provide this resale xDSL offering. 5. We do not address Verizon's request for a permanent waiver of the Merger Conditions in this Order. However, we do conclude, as we did in the Connecticut STA Order, that granting Verizon's STA request for this limited purpose is in the public interest for several reasons. Granting the STA will enable competitors to provide resold voice and xDSL service to their end-user customers over the same local loop. This should benefit consumers by expanding competition in the provision of advanced services. Moreover, granting the STA will allow Verizon and its competitors an opportunity to gain experience with the ordering and provisioning of resold xDSL service in conjunction with resold voice service, experience that will facilitate the transition to a permanent arrangement for this offering. 6. As is the situation in Connecticut, in granting Verizon's STA request, we emphasize that the authority granted by this action is limited, and effective only to the extent necessary to allow Verizon and VADI to coordinate so that a competitor can resell VADI's xDSL service over lines on which the competitor resells Verizon's voice services in Pennsylvania. This authority governs only until the Commission rules on Verizon's request to waive the nine-month sunset period or otherwise modifies the terms of this STA. Any "cooperative" activities not pertaining to the resale product offering described above are not covered by this STA and will subject Verizon to appropriate enforcement action. IV. ORDERING CLAUSE 7. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that, pursuant to sections 4(i), 214(a) and 303(r) of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C.  154(i), 214(a), 303(r), Verizon IS GRANTED Special Temporary Authority as described above to the extent necessary to permit resale of xDSL service by a competitive carrier on a line on which the competitor resells Verizon's voice service in Verizon's Pennsylvania service area. This authority is given without prejudice to any Commission or Common Carrier Bureau action that may be taken in the future. FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION Michelle M. Carey Chief, Policy and Program Planning Division Common Carrier Bureau