Nonfreezing
Cold Injury
E.
Howard N. Oakley, B.A., M.B., B.Ch., M.Sc. |
Head
of Survival & Thermal Medicine |
Institute
of Naval Medicine |
Alverstoke,
Gosport, Hants PO12 2DL, UK |
+44
1705 768043 |
fax
+44 1705 504823 |
howard@quercus.demon.co.uk |
Summary
Nonfreezing
cold injury may occur when peripheral tissues, almost always the
feet, are exposed to cold and/or wet conditions but tissue fluids
do not freeze. Very common among infantry soldiers, it typically
produces only mild symptoms during exposure, but profuse and chronic
problems for many years afterwards. Sequelae are protean, including
cold sensitization, pain, and hyperhidrosis. Little treatment
is effective, and sympathectomy is discouraged.
Introduction
Whilst
cold injury in general has a long military medical history, it
was not until the First World War that nonfreezing forms were
distinguished from those in which freezing of tissues had occurred.
Even as recently as the Second World War and the Korean War, terminology
and field diagnosis were confusing, for instance lumping most
cases of nonfreezing cold injury (NFCI) with some of freezing
cold injury (FCI) under the term ‘cold injuries, ground type.’
What is clear is that NFCI has accounted for very large numbers
of casualties in most infantry wars fought in cold-wet climates,
including the First World War, the European and other Theaters
towards the end of the Second World War, and most recently the
Falklands Conflict. Conditions usually taken to imply NFCI include
‘trench foot’ and ‘immersion foot,’ although in strict historical
usage the former should be applied to very severe mixed injuries
resulting in massive tissue destruction.
Clinical
and laboratory studies of NFCI have increasingly shown its overlap
with similar conditions. These include ‘paddy foot,’ described
in soldiers whose feet have been immersed in warm water for long
periods, and ‘shelter limb,’ which occurred in Londoners taking
refuge in the Underground system during the Blitz, whose feet
were neither wet nor cold, but remained dependent and immobile
for long periods. There are also remarkable similarities with
conditions including ‘deprivation hands and feet,’ which appears
to be NFCI in infants, and ‘reflex sympathetic dystrophy,’ a relatively
recently described group of disorders involving chronic pain and
vascular instability following diffuse trauma. In view of this,
it is perhaps best to consider NFCI as part of a spectrum of diseases
which are marked by ischaemia at the time of the primary injury,
hyperaemia on cessation of that insult, and chronic neurological
and vascular consequences – ‘ischaemia, hyperaemia, neuro-vascular’
or IHNV syndromes.
In
distinction to FCI, and in common with other IHNV disorders, the
early evolution of cases of NFCI is usually unimpressive, and
often even sub-clinical; this contrasts with the long-term consequences,
which are frequently sustained and more severe. Even when victims
have been provided with a high standard of accessible medical
care at the time of the primary injury, it is usual for them to
present many weeks, months or even years afterwards, complaining
of sequelae. The clinician may then be posed the problem of trying
to reconstruct dimly-remembered events from the distant past in
an effort to establish whether current signs and symptoms result
from NFCI, or whether they reflect a more conventional Raynaud’s
disorder.
Definition
Nonfreezing
cold injury is defined as being an injury of peripheral tissues
resulting from exposure to cold and/or wet conditions, such that
the tissue fluids do not freeze at any time.
In
cases where an adequate history can be obtained, the key diagnostic
criterion is of a sensory neurological disturbance during the
period of exposure. This usually amounts to local anaesthesia,
and is distinct from sensations of prolonged or extreme cold.
Occurrence
NFCI
is most commonly reported in military personnel who are exposed
to suitably cold-wet environments for sufficiently long periods,
typically infantry soldiers in static positions, such as in defensive
trenches. Surveys undertaken of personnel involved in the Falklands
Conflict showed that front-line personnel almost invariably sustained
NFCI, whilst it was much less common in headquarters, logistic
support, and similar staff; however rear echelon personnel working
in water and mud for prolonged periods were more liable, and anyone
who becomes soaked during an amphibious operation is clearly at
risk. Certain ethnic groups, particularly Afro-Caribbeans, show
increased incidences, as do tobacco smokers. There is insufficient
information to comment on gender differences, although the low-grade
peripheral vascular problems common in women suggest that they
should be more prone.
Civilian
personnel do suffer from NFCI, but seldom present; when they do,
the absence of overt primary injury and the nature of sequelae
often cause confusion. In the extreme, such patients may have
had long careers following a relentless progression from vascular
surgeon to neurologist, ending with psychiatrist. Establishing
a physical diagnosis may then result in immense relief to the
patient, and restoration of self-esteem, even though they have
been warned that little treatment is available for the condition.
NFCI may be not uncommon in mountaineers, participants in water-sports,
divers, and year-round outdoor workers.
The
feet are almost universally the affected periphery, although occasionally
the hands may be involved. Anecdotal reports of NFCI to the male
genitalia appear not to have been investigated. Whilst exceptional
injuries may occur to any area of skin, nonfreezing injuries of
the face or ears seem very rare indeed, in contrast to FCI.
Clinical
Course
Although
the grading of cold injuries by severity is becoming increasingly
deprecated, the progression in time of NFCI is usefully divided
into stages. Most generally accepted are those originally employed
by Ungley, in his classic description of immersion foot during
the Second World War. It is strongly recommended that this staging
is adopted for all descriptions of NFCI.
Stage
One: Ischaemia
Prior
to the start of the first stage, the periphery feels cold, but
sensation and function remain essentially intact. This stage is
marked by loss of sensation in the affected part, to a varying
degree. The majority of patients admit to complete loss of feeling
in the most distal extremity (toes), although some employ more
colorful and distinctive descriptions, including the feeling that
their feet were made of cotton wool, or that they were ‘wearing
someone else’s feet.’ The latter phrase is almost characteristic,
and neatly summarizes the consequences of loss of proprioception
as well. If the affected part is examined at this time, it is
very cold indeed, but unfrozen (e.g. there is no ice in the socks),
white, and apparently ischemic. This stage ends once rewarming
commences; such rewarming may be as little as that occurring during
massage and routine foot care, in which case the feet may cycle
between stages one and two several times before final rewarming.
Stage Two:
Early
reperfusion Once rewarming has started, the periphery undergoes
transition from ischaemia to hyperaemia, exhibiting a fleeting
intermediate which, although rarely observed, is distinctive.
The return of color starts with a blue-mottled appearance, with
swelling beginning but rarely prominent. Tissue temperatures start
to rise, and that rewarming is accompanied by pain in the face
of the numbness remaining from stage one. In some more severe
cases, the skin remains wet, as if from profuse sweating. This
stage ends once hyperaemia commences, which is normally within
a few minutes or hours of starting rewarming.
Stage
Three:Hyperaemia
The
most overt signs of NFCI are paradoxically the hyperaemia, swelling,
and pain which ensue soon after the extremity is rewarmed. As
tissue temperatures continue to rise during rewarming, the skin
flushes and remains pinker than usual for the remainder of this
stage. Pulses become full and bounding, and slowed capillary refill
can be demonstrated (rest a fingertip on the skin to blanch it
- on removal, the blanching is slow to disappear). Early swelling
which may have appeared during stage two continues to grow, to
the point where the patient may be unable to wear conventional
footwear. Pitting oedema is not normally present, although the
most severe cases may develop blistering not unlike that of FCI.
Early
loss of sensation usually remains, to be accompanied by pain which
may be exquisite and severe. In milder cases, the pain is mainly
nocturnal and confined to the region of the metatarsal heads,
under the sole of the foot, and may mimic metatarsalgia. This
commonly prevents or disrupts sleep, and is exacerbated by contact
with bedclothes and footwear. More severe pain is uncommon, but
when it does occur it may be unremitting and resistant to all
conventional analgesics (including narcotics, which simply remove
the distress which the pain was causing), although it can be abolished
by regional analgesia such as spinal or epidural administration
of local anesthetics. At its worst, such pain can be relentless,
and last for several weeks.
Other
sensory abnormalities are less common, but distinctive when they
do occur. Some complain of formication, or other similar dysthesiae.
Painful paraethesiae are more common but usually transient. Conventional
assessment of gross motor function and reflexes are normal.
The
hyperemic stage usually lasts several days or weeks, and gradually
gives way to the final stage.
Stage
Four: Sequelae
For
an apparently minor initial injury, NFCI is notorious for its
severe and long-lasting consequences. Long-term follow-up of small
numbers of patients from the Second World War and many more from
recent conflicts suggests that some suffer from lifelong sequelae,
whilst others recover spontaneously from three months to 12 years
after the injury. Resolution is unpredictable, although serial
thermography can provide tentative prognosis.
The
most common and significant consequence is the symptom of cold
sensitivity, which is an indicator of the presence of cold sensitization.
Patients complain of an increased sensitivity to cold exposure
in the cold-injured extremity, in particular that once it has
become cold, it is very slow to rewarm. It is not uncommon for
a mild cold stress (such as immersion in 15º C. for two minutes)
to require more than six hours of exposure to warm air before
the patient feels that the toes have fully rewarmed. Objective
evidence of such protracted vasoconstriction has been provided
by both infra-red thermography (see below) and laser Doppler blood
flow measurement. As a consequence, those who are cold sensitized
may be unwilling to go outdoors during the winter, may require
to heat their homes excessively, and sometimes even during the
summer, and undergo social and occupational restrictions. Although
sometimes described as a secondary Raynaud’s condition, it is
sufficiently distinctive to accord it the name of ‘cold sensitization.’
A typical and almost diagnostic remark is that a sensitized male’s
female partner complains of his cold feet in bed, rather than
him complaining about hers.
Pain
and other disturbances of sensation (ranging from numbness to
hyperaesthesia) are also common, and may be associated with cold
sensitization and episodes of cooling. Patterns are very variable,
and range from random shooting pains higher in the foot or ankle,
to dull aches on exposure to the cold. They may mimic causalgia,
and some patients appear to be suffering from allodynia. Partial
or complete loss of sensation usually resolves slowly, but certain
modalities may never recover. Two characteristic instances are
a rare permanent loss of proprioception, which in turn alters
gait and may severely limit walking, and almost complete loss
of warm thermal sensation. The latter can be confirmed by the
measurement of thermal sensory thresholds.
Many
who have suffered from NFCI complain of excessive local sweating,
or hyperhidrosis. The high evaporative heat loss from affected
feet, coupled with profound resting vasoconstriction, can lower
skin temperatures well below ambient, down to as low as 22º C.
when conditioned to 30º C. air. Sustained sweating leads to the
accumulation of sweat within footwear: this causes social problems
because of odor, can rot leather footwear (some sufferers have
to throw their shoes away every three months), and may lead to
further NFCI. In contrast, the skin may become dry and cracked,
particularly along skinfolds, with fissures opening and weeping
periodically. Stubborn, deep-seated and recurrent fungal infection
may take hold, aided by the moist environment resulting from hyperhidrosis.
This can affect the nails too, leading to thickening and in the
worst cases onychogryposis. Other patients complain that they
shed and regrow toe nails two or three times a year.
Other
sequelae are more unusual, and may include joint involvement similar
to ‘frostbite arthritis,’ although this does not appear to have
been studied in those who have had NFCI alone. The most severely
injured may undergo amputation and suffer problems common to those
with the worst freezing injuries.
Special
Investigations
Taking
a careful history and performing a thorough medical examination
should enable the non-specialist physician to arrive at the correct
diagnosis in the great majority of cases. Equivocal findings,
disputes, and when there is a need to assess change (perhaps in
response to treatment, or to offer a prognosis) merit the greater
rigor of investigation. Although there is as yet no single measure
which can act as a diagnostic criterion, two techniques have shown
themselves to be of value in assessing cold sensitization and
thermal sensory impairment.
Assessing
cold sensitization
Many
different techniques have been employed to try to demonstrate
the prolonged vasoconstriction which results from exposure to
a cold stress. For a method to be successful, the stress must
be sufficiently mild as to avoid causing too many false positives,
the method of assessing change must be reproducible, and the whole
test conducted in an environment warm enough to support resting
vasodilatation in normal subjects.
The
current method used at INM has been developed from the original
work of Golden, Gallimore and Francis in 1982. Testing is conducted
in an environmental chamber providing still air at a dry-bulb
temperature of 30º C., in which patients are rested recumbent
for at least 30 minutes before starting. A control infrared thermogram
is then taken, of the sole of an affected foot (or palm of hand).
The extremity is put into a plastic bag (which keeps it dry during
immersion) and plunged into a waterbath maintained at 15º C. for
two minutes. On removal, the plastic bag is discarded, and a second
thermogram taken. Five minutes after removal from the water, the
third and final thermogram is taken.
Normal
and mildly cold-sensitized subjects show warm (surface temperatures
above 32º C.) extremities in the first infrared image, whilst
those with moderate and severe degrees of sensitization have digits
at around 30º C. and below. The third image is the most discriminatory:
in normal subjects, skin temperatures have returned to normal,
warm pre-immersion values. The mildly cold-sensitized will only
have achieved 29º–30º C., moderate cases around 27º C., and severe
cases 25º C. and below. The distribution of temperatures usually
gives insight into the digits which are worst affected, and may
sometimes show demarcated deficits, although these are more usual
in FCI, vibration injuries, etc.
The
requirement to use a tightly-controlled environmental chamber
limits the use of this technique to specialist centers. Variant
methods have been used by some workers in their attempts to perform
assessments elsewhere: some have focussed on trying to follow
cold-induced vasodilatation during longer cold exposures, whilst
others have tried short periods of alcohol spraying. Although
these may be of value in experienced hands, they can also produce
very high false positive rates, and are not as easy to interpret
as results from the INM protocol. Other methods of assessing blood
flow have been used: Francis tried photoplethysmography, whilst
Oakley has more recently performed many studies using laser Doppler
systems, but they are more demanding and only of value as research
tools.
Assessing
sensory impairment
Anecdotal
reports of impaired warm sensation (see above) were married in
1986 with Fowler’s development of simple apparatus to measure
thermal sensory thresholds in those with diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
Oakley demonstrated that those with NFCI of the feet commonly
had unrecordably high (> 6º C.) warm sensory thresholds in the
toes, whilst cool thresholds were little altered (< 3º C.) from
normal. Since then Fowler’s Middlesex Hospital Thermal Testing
System has been used to assess those presenting with NFCI. Although
it is not a direct measure of cold sensitization, this differential
pattern of damage remains a common objective finding in stage
four. Because the measurement of thermal sensory thresholds is
much less demanding of facilities, and several commercial systems
are available and in use in neurological departments worldwide,
it is a more accessible means of investigation than infrared thermography.
Treatment
The
very limited understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms
responsible for NFCI and its sequelae have severely limited its
treatment. Current understanding focuses on three main causes
of tissue damage: exposure to cold, prolonged ischaemia accompanying
that exposure, and the action of free radicals during reperfusion.
There are as yet no proven treatment regimes for any of these
modes of injury.
Acute
management
The
critical difference in management between FCI and NFCI is that
nonfreezing injuries should only ever be rewarmed slowly. Laboratory
and clinical evidence has shown that the rapid rewarming preferred
for freezing injuries will at the very least result in more severe
symptoms and signs during stage three, if applied to nonfreezing
injuries. Beyond that, management is conservative, with topical
anti-bacterials, avoidance of further trauma including any further
cold exposure, and early mobilization.
Pain
relief is usually the greatest problem during stage three. Mild
analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are usually
completely ineffective; as remarked above, even narcotic analgesics
do not alleviate the pain, but just affect the reaction to pain.
Oakley found that nocturnal doses of quinine salts (e.g. quinine
sulphate 200 mg rising to 400 mg hs) were effective, but subsequent
experience has been unfavorable. More recent approaches have been
based on amitriptyline (50 to 150 mg Hs) which does afford most
patients some degree of relief without significant side-effects.
It can also be used in those suffering residual pain in stage
four.
Amelioration
of sequelae
Once
the hyperaemia of stage three changes into the vasoconstriction
of stage four, the administration of vasodilators may have a sounder
rationale. Unfortunately, experience has shown that results are
disappointing. The only approach which has so far shown any promise
is the long-term use of sustained-release preparations of nifedipine.
These need to be given for several weeks or months before there
is demonstrable benefit, but side-effects are sufficiently common
and significant that this is of no use in those remaining in the
military, or otherwise leading an active life. Thymoxamine has
not been of any value.
There
is much controversy surrounding the use of sympathectomy. Whilst
it can undoubtedly lead to short-term improvements, after six
months most patients have worse symptoms than before. It also
lacks any sound pathophysiological basis. Surgical sympathectomy
therefore should never be considered, and chemical techniques
should be avoided.
Keeping
the feet warm and dry, through the use of suitable footwear, remains
the mainstay of long-term treatment. Military and other personnel
who want to return to cold and wet environments should be strongly
discouraged from doing so until symptomatic cold sensitization
has resolved. Serial thermographic assessment can be particularly
valuable in deciding when it is safe to allow re-exposure, although
the severity of symptoms does not always accord with the assessed
severity of sensitization. Recurrent minor injury is common, and
may result in the most severe degrees of cold sensitization; FCI
may also occur in those who are cold-sensitized, readily causing
massive tissue loss and high levels of amputation.
Prevention
Although
NFCI can be postponed by good foot care and hygiene, and careful
choice of footwear, fieldcraft and equipment appear unable to
overcome fundamental physiological limitations to cold/wet exposure.
Much of the success achieved in prevention has resulted from measures
such as troop rotation, which were first applied during the First
World War.
Training
injuries are a particularly intransigent problem. The arguments
for training realism might need to be tempered with increased
risk of NFCI. On the other hand, the value of a very high standard
of fieldcraft, as can only be achieved by long and demanding training,
is also apparent. Provided that the objective is always training
and not selection by natural wastage, better training could still
result in less severe and obtrusive NFCI.
Future
Developments
Efforts
continue to try to unravel the complex pathophysiology of this
protean group of conditions. Recent hypotheses that cold sensitization
results from sympathetic denervation supersensitivity have not
been borne out by the latest research. Instead, attention is being
focussed on changes in the vascular endothelium, and in trained
reductions in peripheral perfusion capacity. Experimental models
have shown that small local blood vessels are quite severely damaged
following NFCI, and groups are now examining neuro-endothelial
function. It is also possible that cold sensitization is the reverse
of the neovascularisation seen as a result of physical training
in the heat, leading to a loss of peripheral vessels. If this
is the case, sending patients to the tropics during stage three
may prevent the appearance of cold sensitization.
Bibliography
|
Akers,
WA (1974) |
|
Paddy
foot: a warm water immersion foot syndrome variant. Part I.
The natural disease, epidemiology. Military Medicine 139:605-612. |
|
Akers,
WA (1974) |
|
Paddy
foot: a warm water immersion foot syndrome variant. Part II.
Field experiments, correlation. Military Medicine 139:613-621.
|
|
Catterall,
MD (1975) |
|
Warm
water immersion injuries of the feet - a review. J Royal Naval
Medical Service 61:22-26. |
|
Francis,
TJR (1984) |
|
Non freezing cold injury: a historical review. J Royal Naval
Medical Service 70:134-139. |
|
Francis,
TJR & Golden, FStC (1985) |
|
Non
freezing cold injury: the pathogenesis. J Royal Naval Medical
Service 71:3-8. |
|
Francis,
TJR & Oakley, EHN (1996) |
|
Cold
injury. Chapter 23 in Tooke, JE & Lowe, GDO, A Textbook of
Vascular Medicine, pp. 353-370, Arnold, London. |
|
Tek,
D & Mackey, S (1993) |
|
Non-freezing
cold injury in a Marine infantry battalion. J Wilderness Medicine
4:353-357. |
|
Thomas,
JR & Oakley, EHN (in the press) |
|
Non-freezing
cold injuries. Chapter in Textbook of Military Medicine, Medical
Aspects of Deployment to Harsh Climates, Borden Institute,
WRAMC. |
|
Ungley,
CC, Channell, GD & Richards, RL (1945) |
|
The
immersion foot syndrome. British J Surgery 33:17-31. |
|
Whayne,
TF & DeBakey ME (1958) |
|
Cold
Injury, Ground Type. Office of the Surgeon General, Department
of the Army, Washington DC |
|